`
`
`
`CALDARELLI HEJMANOWSKI & PAGE LLP
`William J. Caldarelli (SBN #149573)
`12340 El Camino Real, Suite 430
`San Diego, CA 92130
`Tel: (858) 720-8080
`Fax: (858) 720-6680
`wjc@chplawfirm.com
`
`FABIANO LAW FIRM, P.C.
`Michael D. Fabiano (SBN #167058)
`12526 High Bluff Drive, Suite 300
`San Diego, CA 92130
`Telephone: (619) 742-9631
`mdfabiano@fabianolawfirm.com
`
`OSBORNE LAW LLC
`John W. Osborne (Pro Hac Vice App. Pending)
`33 Habitat Lane
`Cortlandt Manor, NY 10567
`Telephone: (914) 714-5936
`josborne@osborneipl.com
`
`WATTS LAW OFFICES
`Ethan M. Watts (SBN #234441)
`12340 El Camino Real, Suite 430
`San Diego, CA 92130
`Telephone: (858) 509-0808
`Facsimile: (619) 878-5784
`emw@ewattslaw.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff Ameranth, Inc.
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`
`AMERANTH, INC.
`
`
`
`
`
`MOBO SYSTEMS, INC.,
`
`
`v.
`
`Case No.
`
`
`COMPLAINT FOR PATENT
`INFRINGEMENT
`
`
`DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`'12
`
`CV1642
`
`BLM
`
`BEN
`
`
`
`Case 3:12-cv-01642-DMS-WVG Document 1 Filed 06/29/12 Page 2 of 15
`
`
`
`COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`
`Plaintiff Ameranth, Inc., for its Complaint against defendant Mobo Systems, Inc., a/k/a
`
`OLO, a/k/a OLO Online Ordering (herein “OLO”), avers as follows:
`
`PARTIES
`
`1. Plaintiff Ameranth, Inc. (“Ameranth”) is a Delaware corporation having a principal
`
`place of business at 5820 Oberlin Drive, Suite 202, San Diego, California 92121. Ameranth
`
`develops, manufactures and sells, inter alia, hospitality industry, entertainment, restaurant and
`
`food service
`
`information
`
`technology solutions under
`
`the
`
`trademarks 21st Century
`
`Communications™, and 21st Century Restaurant™, among others, comprising
`
`the
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`synchronization and integration of hospitality information and hospitality software applications
`
`11
`
`between fixed, wireless and/or internet applications, including but not limited to computer
`
`12
`
`servers, web servers, databases, affinity/social networking systems, desktop computers,
`
`13
`
`laptops, “smart” phones and other wireless handheld computing devices.
`
`14
`
`2. Defendant Mobo Systems, Inc., a/k/a OLO, a/k/a OLO Online Ordering (herein
`
`15
`
`“OLO”) is, on information and belief, a Delaware corporation having a principal place of
`
`16
`
`business and headquarters in New York, New York. On information and belief, OLO makes,
`
`17
`
`uses, sells and/or offers for sale, restaurant, foodservice, point-of-sale and property
`
`18
`
`management and other hospitality information technology products, software, components
`
`19
`
`and/or systems within this Judicial District, including the OLO Ordering System as defined
`
`20
`
`herein.
`
`21
`
`22
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`3. This is an action for patent infringement arising under the Patent Laws of the United
`
`23
`
`States, 35 U.S.C. §§ 271, 281-285.
`
`24
`
`4. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and
`
`25
`
`1338(a).
`
`26
`
`5. On information and belief, Defendant engages in (a) the offer for sale or license and
`
`27
`
`sale or license of hospitality, restaurant, food service, ordering, products and/or components in
`
`28
`
`the United States, including this Judicial District, including services, products, software, and
`1
`COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 3:12-cv-01642-DMS-WVG Document 1 Filed 06/29/12 Page 3 of 15
`
`
`
`components, comprising wireless and internet POS and/or hospitality aspects; (b) the
`
`installation and maintenance of said services, products, software, components and/or systems
`
`in hospitality industry, restaurant, food service, and/or entertainment information technology
`
`systems in the United States, including this Judicial District; and/or (c) the use of hospitality
`
`industry, restaurant, food service, and/or entertainment information technology systems
`
`comprising said services, products, software, components and/or systems in the United States,
`
`including this Judicial District.
`
`6. This Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendant because Defendant commits acts
`
`of patent infringement in this Judicial District including, inter alia, making, using, offering for
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`sale or license, and/or selling or licensing infringing services, products, software, components
`
`11
`
`and/or systems in this Judicial District.
`
`12
`
`7. Venue is proper in this Judicial District pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391(b) and (c) and
`
`13
`
`1400(b).
`
`14
`
`15
`
`8. Ameranth was established in 1996 to develop and provide its 21st Century
`
`BACKGROUND
`
`16
`
`Communications™ innovative information technology solutions for the hospitality industry
`
`17
`
`(inclusive of, e.g., restaurants, hotels, casinos, nightclubs, cruise ships and other entertainment
`
`18
`
`and sports venues). Ameranth has been widely recognized as a technology leader in the
`
`19
`
`provision of wireless and internet-based systems and services to, inter alia, restaurants, hotels,
`
`20
`
`casinos, cruise ships and entertainment and sports venues. Ameranth’s award winning
`
`21
`
`inventions enable, in relevant part, generation and synchronization of menus, including but not
`
`22
`
`limited to restaurant menus, event tickets, and other products across fixed, wireless and/or
`
`23
`
`internet platforms as well as synchronization of hospitality information and hospitality
`
`24
`
`software applications across fixed, wireless and internet platforms, including but not limited to,
`
`25
`
`computer servers, web servers, databases, affinity/social networking systems, desktop
`
`26
`
`computers, laptops, “smart” phones and other wireless handheld computing devices.
`
`27
`
`28
`
`9. Ameranth began development of the inventions leading to the patent-in-suit and the
`
`other patents in this patent family in the late Summer of 1998, at a time when the then-
`2
`COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 3:12-cv-01642-DMS-WVG Document 1 Filed 06/29/12 Page 4 of 15
`
`
`
`available wireless and internet hospitality offerings were extremely limited in functionality,
`
`were not synchronized and did not provide an integrated system-wide solution to the pervasive
`
`ordering, reservations, affinity program and information management needs of the hospitality
`
`industry. Ameranth uniquely recognized the actual problems that needed to be resolved in
`
`order to meet those needs, and thereafter conceived and developed its breakthrough inventions
`
`and products to provide systemic and comprehensive solutions directed to optimally meeting
`
`these industry needs. Ameranth has expended considerable effort and resources in inventing,
`
`developing and marketing its inventions and protecting its rights therein.
`
`10. Ameranth’s pioneering inventions have been widely adopted and are thus now
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`essential to the modern wireless hospitality enterprise of the 21st Century. Ameranth’s
`
`11
`
`solutions have been adopted, licensed and/or deployed by numerous entities across the
`
`12
`
`hospitality industry.
`
`13
`
`11. The adoption of Ameranth’s technology by industry leaders and the wide acclaim
`
`14
`
`received by Ameranth for its technological innovations are just some of the many
`
`15
`
`confirmations of the breakthrough aspects of Ameranth’s inventions. Ameranth has received
`
`16
`
`twelve different technology awards (three with “end customer” partners) and has been widely
`
`17
`
`recognized as a hospitality wireless/internet technology leader by almost all major national and
`
`18
`
`hospitality print publications, e.g., The Wall Street Journal, New York Times, USA Today and
`
`19
`
`many others. Ameranth was personally nominated by Bill Gates, the Founder of Microsoft, for
`
`20
`
`the prestigious Computerworld Honors Award that Ameranth received in 2001 for its
`
`21
`
`breakthrough synchronized reservations/ticketing system with the Improv Comedy Theatres.
`
`22
`
`In his nomination, Mr. Gates described Ameranth as “one of the leading pioneers of
`
`23
`
`information technology for the betterment of mankind.” This prestigious award was based on
`
`24
`
`Ameranth’s innovative synchronization of wireless/web/fixed hospitality software technology.
`
`25
`
`Subsequently, the United States Patent and Trademark Office granted Ameranth a number of
`
`26
`
`currently-issued patents, two of which are the basis for this lawsuit. Ameranth has issued press
`
`27
`
`releases announcing these patent grants on business wires, on its web sites and at numerous
`
`28
`
`trade shows since the first of the presently-asserted patents issued in 2002. A number of
`3
`COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 3:12-cv-01642-DMS-WVG Document 1 Filed 06/29/12 Page 5 of 15
`
`
`
`companies have licensed patents and technology from Ameranth, recognizing and confirming
`
`the value of Ameranth’s innovations.
`
`RELATED CASES PREVIOUSLY FILED
`
`12. The Ameranth patents asserted herein, U.S. Patent No. 6,384,850 (the “’850 patent”),
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,871,325 (the “’325 patent”), and U.S. Patent No. 8,146,077 (the “’077
`
`patent”), are all patents in Ameranth’s “Information Management and Synchronous
`
`Communications” patent family.
`
`13. Ameranth is also currently asserting claims of these same patents in separate
`
`lawsuits, against other defendants, that are already pending in this Court. The first-filed
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`lawsuit asserts claims of the ‘850 and ‘325 patents and is entitled Ameranth v. Pizza Hut, Inc.
`
`11
`
`et al., Case No. 3:11-cv-01810-JLS-NLS. Lawsuits subsequently filed by Ameranth in this
`
`12
`
`Court, asserting claims of the ‘077 patent, include Case Nos. 3:12-cv-00729-JLS-NLS; 3:12-
`
`13
`
`cv-00731-JLS-NLS; 3:12-cv-00732-JLS-NLS; 3:12-cv-00733-JLS-NLS; 3:12-cv-00737-JLS-
`
`14
`
`NLS; 3:12-cv-00738-JLS-NLS; 3:12-cv-00739-JLS-NLS; and 3:12-cv-00742-JLS-NLS.
`
`15
`
`Another lawsuit subsequently filed by Ameranth in this Count, asserting claims of the ‘850,
`
`16
`
`‘325, and ‘077 patents, is Case No. 3:12-cv-00858-JLS-NLS.
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`COUNT I
`
`Patent Infringement (U.S. Pat. No. 6,384,850)
`
`(35 U.S.C. § 271)
`
`14. Plaintiff reiterates and incorporates the allegations set forth in paragraphs 1-13 above
`
`21
`
`as if fully set forth herein.
`
`22
`
`15. On May 7, 2002, United States Patent No. 6,384,850 entitled “Information
`
`23
`
`Management and Synchronous Communications System with Menu Generation” (“the ‘850
`
`24
`
`patent”) (a true and copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A) was duly and legally issued
`
`25
`
`by the United States Patent & Trademark Office.
`
`26
`
`16. Plaintiff Ameranth is the lawful owner by assignment of all right, title and interest in
`
`27
`
`and to the ‘850 patent.
`
`28
`
`4
`COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 3:12-cv-01642-DMS-WVG Document 1 Filed 06/29/12 Page 6 of 15
`
`
`
`17. On information and belief, Defendant directly infringes and continues to directly
`
`infringe one or more valid and enforceable claims of the ‘850 patent, in violation of 35 U.S.C.
`
`§ 271(a) by making, using, offering for sale or license and/or selling or licensing infringing
`
`systems, products, and/or services in the United States without authority or license from
`
`Ameranth, including but not limited to the OLO ordering system/product/service, which
`
`includes, inter alia, wireless and internet POS integration, online and mobile ordering,
`
`integration with e-mail and affinity program and social media applications such as Facebook,
`
`Twitter, Groupon, and YouTube, and/or other third-party web-based applications, and other
`
`hospitality aspects (“OLO Ordering System”).
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`18. On information and belief, the OLO Ordering System, as deployed and/or used at or
`
`11
`
`from one or more locations by OLO, its agents, distributors, partners, affiliates, licensees,
`
`12
`
`and/or their customers, infringes one or more valid and enforceable claims of the ‘850 patent,
`
`13
`
`by, inter alia, doing at least one of the following: (a) Generating and transmitting menus in a
`
`14
`
`system including a central processing unit, a data storage device, a computer operating system
`
`15
`
`containing a graphical user interface, one or more displayable main menus, modifier menus,
`
`16
`
`and sub-modifier menus, and application software for generating a second menu and
`
`17
`
`transmitting it to a wireless handheld computing device or a Web page; and/or (b) Enabling
`
`18
`
`ordering and other hospitality functions via iPhone, Android, and other internet-enabled
`
`19
`
`wireless handheld computing devices as well as via Web pages, storing hospitality information
`
`20
`
`and data on at least one central database, on at least one wireless handheld computing device,
`
`21
`
`and on at least one Web server and Web page, and synchronizing applications and data,
`
`22
`
`including but not limited to applications and data relating to ordering, between at least one
`
`23
`
`central database, wireless handheld computing devices, and at least one Web server and Web
`
`24
`
`page; utilizing an interface that provides a single point of entry that allows the synchronization
`
`25
`
`of at least one wireless handheld computing device and at least one Web page with at least one
`
`26
`
`central database; allowing information to be entered via Web pages, transmitted over the
`
`27
`
`internet, and automatically communicated to at least one central database and to wireless
`
`28
`
`handheld computing devices; allowing information to be entered via wireless handheld
`5
`COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 3:12-cv-01642-DMS-WVG Document 1 Filed 06/29/12 Page 7 of 15
`
`
`
`computing devices, transmitted over the internet, and automatically communicated to at least
`
`one central database and to Web pages.
`
`19. On information and belief, defendant OLO has indirectly infringed and continues to
`
`indirectly infringe one or more valid and enforceable claims of the ‘850 patent, in violation of
`
`35 U.S.C. § 271(b), by actively, knowingly, and intentionally inducing direct infringement by
`
`other persons.
`
`20. On information and belief, customers of OLO, including consumers and restaurant
`
`operators, use the OLO Ordering System. OLO provides instruction and direction regarding
`
`the use of the OLO Ordering System, and advertises, promotes, and encourages the use of the
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`OLO Ordering System.
`
`11
`
`21. On information and belief, the OLO Ordering System infringes one or more valid
`
`12
`
`and enforceable claims of the ‘850 patent for the reasons set forth hereinabove.
`
`13
`
`22. OLO has long had knowledge of the ‘850 patent, and knew or should have known
`
`14
`
`that its continued offering and deployment of the OLO Ordering System, and its continued
`
`15
`
`support of consumers, restaurant operators, and other users of this system/product/service,
`
`16
`
`would induce direct infringement by those users. Additionally, OLO intended that its actions
`
`17
`
`would induce direct infringement by those users.
`
`18
`
`23. On information and belief, Defendant has indirectly infringed and continues to
`
`19
`
`indirectly infringe one or more valid and enforceable claims of the ‘850 patent, in violation of
`
`20
`
`35 U.S.C. § 271(c).
`
`21
`
`24. By distributing, selling, offering, offering to sell or license and/or selling or licensing
`
`22
`
`the OLO Ordering System, OLO provides non-staple articles of commerce to others for use in
`
`23
`
`infringing systems, products, and/or services. Additionally, OLO provides instruction and
`
`24
`
`direction regarding the use of the OLO Ordering System, and advertises, promotes, and
`
`25
`
`encourages the use of the OLO Ordering System. Users of one or more of the OLO Ordering
`
`26
`
`System directly infringe one or more valid and enforceable claims of the ‘850 patent for the
`
`27
`
`reasons set forth hereinabove.
`
`28
`
`6
`COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 3:12-cv-01642-DMS-WVG Document 1 Filed 06/29/12 Page 8 of 15
`
`
`
`25. On information and belief, the OLO Ordering System infringes one or more valid
`
`and enforceable claims of the ‘850 patent, for the reasons set forth hereinabove.
`
`26. On information and belief, OLO has had knowledge of the ‘850 patent, including
`
`knowledge that the OLO Ordering System, which is a non-staple article of commerce, has been
`
`used as a material part of the claimed invention of the ‘850 patent, and that there are no
`
`substantial non-infringing uses for the OLO Ordering System.
`
`27. On information and belief, the aforesaid infringing activities of defendant OLO have
`
`been done with knowledge and willful disregard of Ameranth’s patent rights, making this an
`
`exceptional case within the meaning of 35 U.S.C. § 285.
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`28. The aforesaid infringing activity of defendant OLO has directly and proximately
`
`11
`
`caused damage to plaintiff Ameranth, including loss of profits from sales it would have made
`
`12
`
`but for the infringements. Unless enjoined, the aforesaid infringing activity will continue and
`
`13
`
`cause irreparable injury to Ameranth for which there is no adequate remedy at law.
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`COUNT II
`
`Patent Infringement (U.S. Pat. No. 6,871,325)
`
`(35 U.S.C. § 271)
`
`29. Plaintiff reiterates and reincorporates the allegations set forth in paragraphs 1-28
`
`18
`
`above as if fully set forth herein.
`
`19
`
`30. On March 22, 2005, United States Patent No. 6,871,325 entitled “Information
`
`20
`
`Management and Synchronous Communications System with Menu Generation” (“the ‘325
`
`21
`
`patent”) (a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit B) was duly and legally
`
`22
`
`issued by the United States Patent & Trademark Office.
`
`23
`
`31. Plaintiff Ameranth is the lawful owner by assignment of all right, title and interest in
`
`24
`
`and to the ‘325 patent.
`
`25
`
`32. On information and belief, Defendant directly infringes and continues to directly
`
`26
`
`infringe one or more valid and enforceable claims of the ‘325 patent, in violation of 35 U.S.C.
`
`27
`
`§ 271(a) by making, using, offering for sale or license and/or selling or licensing infringing
`
`28
`
`7
`COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 3:12-cv-01642-DMS-WVG Document 1 Filed 06/29/12 Page 9 of 15
`
`
`
`systems, products, and/or services in the United States without authority or license from
`
`Ameranth, including but not limited to the OLO Ordering System.
`
`33. On information and belief, the OLO Ordering System, as deployed and/or used at or
`
`from one or more locations by OLO, its agents, distributors, partners, affiliates, licensees,
`
`and/or their customers, infringes one or more valid and enforceable claims of the ‘325 patent,
`
`by, inter alia, doing at least one of the following: (a) Generating and transmitting menus in a
`
`system including a central processing unit, a data storage device, a computer operating system
`
`containing a graphical user interface, one or more displayable main menus, modifier menus,
`
`and sub-modifier menus, and application software for generating a second menu and
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`transmitting it to a wireless handheld computing device or a Web page; and/or (b) Enabling
`
`11
`
`ordering and other hospitality functions via iPhone, Android, and other internet-enabled
`
`12
`
`wireless handheld computing devices as well as via Web pages, storing hospitality information
`
`13
`
`and data on at least one central database, on at least one wireless handheld computing device,
`
`14
`
`and on at least one Web server and Web page, and synchronizing applications and data,
`
`15
`
`including but not limited to applications and data relating to orders, between at least one central
`
`16
`
`database, wireless handheld computing devices, and at least one Web server and Web page;
`
`17
`
`and sending alerts, confirmations, and other information regarding orders to various wireless
`
`18
`
`mobile devices.
`
`19
`
`34. On information and belief, Defendant has indirectly infringed and continues to
`
`20
`
`indirectly infringe one or more valid and enforceable claims of the ‘325 patent, in violation of
`
`21
`
`35 U.S.C. § 271(b), by actively, knowingly, and intentionally inducing direct infringement by
`
`22
`
`other persons.
`
`23
`
`35. On information and belief, customers of OLO, including consumers and restaurant
`
`24
`
`operators, use the OLO Ordering System in a manner that infringes upon one or more valid and
`
`25
`
`enforceable claims of the ‘325 patent. OLO provides instruction and direction regarding the
`
`26
`
`use of the OLO Ordering System and advertises, promotes, and encourages the use of the OLO
`
`27
`
`Ordering System.
`
`28
`
`8
`COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 3:12-cv-01642-DMS-WVG Document 1 Filed 06/29/12 Page 10 of 15
`
`
`
`36. On information and belief, Defendant actively induces others to infringe the ‘325
`
`patent in violation of 35 U.S.C. §271(b) by knowingly encouraging, aiding and abetting
`
`customers of OLO, including consumers and restaurant operators, to use the infringing OLO
`
`Ordering System in the United States without authority or license from Ameranth.
`
`37. On information and belief, Defendant contributorily infringes and continues to
`
`contributorily infringe one or more valid and enforceable claims of the ‘325 patent, in violation
`
`of 35 U.S.C. § 271(c) by offering to sell and/or selling components of systems on which claims
`
`of the ‘325 patent read, constituting a material part of the invention, knowing that the
`
`components were especially adapted for use in systems which infringe claims of the ‘325
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`patent.
`
`11
`
`38. By distributing, selling, offering, offering to sell or license and/or selling or licensing
`
`12
`
`the OLO Ordering System, Defendant provides non-staple articles of commerce to others for
`
`13
`
`use in infringing systems, products, and/or services. Additionally, OLO provides instruction
`
`14
`
`and direction regarding the use of the OLO Ordering System and advertises, promotes, and
`
`15
`
`encourages the use of the OLO Ordering System. Users of the OLO Ordering System directly
`
`16
`
`infringe one or more valid and enforceable claims of the ‘325 patent, for the reasons set forth
`
`17
`
`hereinabove.
`
`18
`
`39. On information and belief, the OLO Ordering System infringes one or more valid
`
`19
`
`and enforceable claims of the ‘325 patent, for the reasons set forth hereinabove.
`
`20
`
`40. OLO has had knowledge of the ‘325 patent, including knowledge that the OLO
`
`21
`
`Ordering System, which is a non-staple articles of commerce, has been used as a material part
`
`22
`
`of the claimed invention of the ‘325 patent, and that there are no substantial non-infringing
`
`23
`
`uses for the OLO Ordering System.
`
`24
`
`41. On information and belief, the aforesaid infringing activities of defendant OLO have
`
`25
`
`been done with knowledge and willful disregard of Ameranth’s patent rights, making this an
`
`26
`
`exceptional case within the meaning of 35 U.S.C. § 285.
`
`27
`
`28
`
`42. The aforesaid infringing activity of defendant OLO has directly and proximately
`
`caused damage to plaintiff Ameranth, including loss of profits from sales it would have made
`9
`COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 3:12-cv-01642-DMS-WVG Document 1 Filed 06/29/12 Page 11 of 15
`
`
`
`but for the infringements. Unless enjoined, the aforesaid infringing activity will continue and
`
`cause irreparable injury to Ameranth for which there is no adequate remedy at law.
`
`COUNT III
`
`Patent Infringement (U.S. Pat. No. 8,146,077)
`
`(35 U.S.C. § 271)
`
`43. Plaintiff reiterates and incorporates the allegations set forth in paragraphs 1-42 above
`
`as if fully set forth herein.
`
`44. On March 27, 2012, United States Patent No. 8,146,077 entitled “Information
`
`Management and Synchronous Communications System with Menu Generation, and
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`Handwriting and Voice Modification of Orders” (a true copy of which is attached hereto as
`
`11
`
`Exhibit C and incorporated herein by reference) was duly and legally issued by the United
`
`12
`
`States Patent & Trademark Office.
`
`13
`
`45. Plaintiff Ameranth is the lawful owner by assignment of all right, title and interest in
`
`14
`
`and to the ‘077 patent.
`
`15
`
`46. On information and belief, Defendant directly infringes and continues to directly
`
`16
`
`infringe one or more valid and enforceable claims of the ‘077 patent, in violation of 35 U.S.C.
`
`17
`
`§ 271(a) by making, using, offering for sale or license and/or selling or licensing infringing
`
`18
`
`systems, products, and/or services in the United States without authority or license from
`
`19
`
`Ameranth, including but not limited to the OLO Ordering System.
`
`20
`
`47. On information and belief, the OLO Ordering System, as deployed and/or used at or
`
`21
`
`from one or more locations by OLO, its agents, distributors, partners, affiliates, licensees,
`
`22
`
`and/or their customers, infringes one or more valid and enforceable claims of the ‘077 patent,
`
`23
`
`by, inter alia, doing at least one of the following: (a) Configuring and transmitting menus in a
`
`24
`
`system including a central processing unit, a data storage device, a computer operating system
`
`25
`
`containing a graphical user interface, one or more displayable master menus, menu
`
`26
`
`configuration software enabled to generate a menu configuration for a wireless handheld
`
`27
`
`computing device in conformity with a customized display layout, and enabled for
`
`28
`
`synchronous communications and to format the menu configuration for a customized display
`10
`COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 3:12-cv-01642-DMS-WVG Document 1 Filed 06/29/12 Page 12 of 15
`
`
`
`layout of at least two different wireless handheld computing device display sizes, and/or (b)
`
`Enabling ordering and other hospitality functions via iPhone, Android, and other internet-
`
`enabled wireless handheld computing devices as well as via Web pages, storing hospitality
`
`information and data on at least one database, on at least one wireless handheld computing
`
`device, and on at least one Web server and Web page, and synchronizing applications and data,
`
`including but not limited to applications and data relating to orders, between at least one
`
`database, wireless handheld computing devices, and at least one Web server and Web page;
`
`utilizing communications control software enabled to link and synchronize hospitality
`
`information between at least one database, wireless handheld computing device, and web page,
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`to display information on web pages and on different wireless handheld computing device
`
`11
`
`display sizes, and to allow information to be entered via Web pages, transmitted over the
`
`12
`
`internet, and automatically communicated to at least one database and to wireless handheld
`
`13
`
`computing devices; allowing information to be entered via wireless handheld computing
`
`14
`
`devices, transmitted over the internet, and automatically communicated to at least one database
`
`15
`
`and to Web pages.
`
`16
`
`48. On information and belief, Defendant has indirectly infringed and continues to
`
`17
`
`indirectly infringe one or more valid and enforceable claims of the ‘077 patent, in violation of
`
`18
`
`35 U.S.C. § 271(b), by actively, knowingly, and intentionally inducing direct infringement by
`
`19
`
`other persons.
`
`20
`
`49. On information and belief, customers of OLO, including consumers and restaurant
`
`21
`
`operators, use the OLO Ordering System in a manner that infringes upon one or more valid and
`
`22
`
`enforceable claims of the ‘077 patent. OLO provides instruction and direction regarding the
`
`23
`
`use of the OLO Ordering System and advertises, promotes, and encourages the use of the OLO
`
`24
`
`Ordering System.
`
`25
`
`50. On information and belief, Defendant actively induces others to infringe the ‘077
`
`26
`
`patent in violation of 35 U.S.C. §271(b) by knowingly encouraging, aiding and abetting
`
`27
`
`customers of OLO, including consumers and restaurant operators, to use the infringing OLO
`
`28
`
`Ordering System in the United States without authority or license from Ameranth.
`11
`COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 3:12-cv-01642-DMS-WVG Document 1 Filed 06/29/12 Page 13 of 15
`
`
`
`51. On information and belief, Defendant contributorily infringes and continues to
`
`contributorily infringe one or more valid and enforceable claims of the ‘077 patent, in violation
`
`of 35 U.S.C. § 271(c) by offering to sell and/or selling components of systems on which claims
`
`of the ‘077 patent read, constituting a material part of the invention, knowing that the
`
`components were especially adapted for use in systems which infringe claims of the ‘077
`
`patent.
`
`52. By distributing, selling, offering, offering to sell or license and/or selling or licensing
`
`the OLO Ordering System, Defendant provides non-staple articles of commerce to others for
`
`use in infringing systems, products, and/or services. Additionally, OLO provides instruction
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`and direction regarding the use of the OLO Ordering System and advertises, promotes, and
`
`11
`
`encourages the use of the OLO Ordering System. Users of the OLO Ordering System directly
`
`12
`
`infringe one or more valid and enforceable claims of the ‘077 patent, for the reasons set forth
`
`13
`
`hereinabove.
`
`14
`
`53. On information and belief, each of the OLO Ordering System infringes one or more
`
`15
`
`valid and enforceable claims of the ‘077 patent, for the reasons set forth hereinabove.
`
`16
`
`54. On information and belief, OLO has had knowledge of the ‘077 patent, including
`
`17
`
`knowledge that the OLO Ordering System, which is a non-staple article of commerce, has been
`
`18
`
`used as a material part of the claimed invention of the ‘077 patent, and that there are no
`
`19
`
`substantial non-infringing uses for the OLO Ordering System.
`
`20
`
`55. On information and belief, the aforesaid infringing activities of defendant OLO have
`
`21
`
`been done with knowledge and willful disregard of Ameranth’s patent rights, making this an
`
`22
`
`exceptional case within the meaning of 35 U.S.C. § 285.
`
`23
`
`56. The aforesaid infringing activity of defendant OLO has directly and proximately
`
`24
`
`caused damage to plaintiff Ameranth, including loss of profits from sales it would have made
`
`25
`
`but for the infringements. Unless enjoined, the aforesaid infringing activity will continue and
`
`26
`
`cause irreparable injury to Ameranth for which there is no adequate remedy at law.
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`12
`COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 3:12-cv-01642-DMS-WVG Document 1 Filed 06/29/12 Page 14 of 15
`
`
`
`PRAYER FOR RELIEF
`
`WHEREFORE, plaintiff Ameranth respectfully prays for judgment against Defendant,
`
`as follows:
`
`1.
`
`Adjudging that the manufacture, use, offer for sale or license and /or sale or
`
`license of the OLO Ordering System infringes valid and enforceable claims of the ‘850 patent,
`
`and the ‘325 patent, and the ‘077 patent, as set forth hereinabove;
`
`2.
`
`Adjudging that Defendant has infringed, actively induced others to infringe
`
`and/or contributorily infringed valid and enforceable claims of the ‘850 patent, and the ‘325
`
`patent, and the ‘077 patent, as set forth hereinabove;
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`3.
`
`Adjudging that Defendant’s infringement of the valid and enforceable claims of
`
`11
`
`the ‘850 patent, and the ‘325 patent, and the ‘077 patent, has been knowing and willful;
`
`12
`
`4.
`
`Enjoining Defendant, and its officers, directors, employees, attorneys, agents,
`
`13
`
`representatives, parents, subsidiaries, affiliates and all other persons acting in concert,
`
`14
`
`participation or privity with Defendant, and their successors and assigns, from infringing,
`
`15
`
`contributorily infringing and/or inducing others to infringe the valid and enforceable claims of
`
`16
`
`the ‘850 patent, and the ‘325 patent, and the ‘077 patent;
`
`17
`
`5.
`
`Awarding Ameranth the damages it has sustained by reason of Defendant’s
`
`18
`
`infringement, together with interest and costs pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 284;
`
`19
`
`6.
`
`Awarding Ameranth increased damages of three times the amount of damages
`
`20
`
`found or assessed against Defendant by reason of the knowing, willful and deliberate nature of
`
`21
`
`Defendant’s acts of infringement pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 284;
`
`22
`
`7.
`
`Adjudging this to be an exceptional case and awarding Ameranth its attorney’s
`
`23
`
`fees pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §285;
`
`24
`
`25
`
`8.
`
`9.
`
`Awarding to Ameranth its costs of suit, and interest as provided by law; and
`
`Awarding to Ameranth such other and further relief that this Court may deem
`
`26
`
`just and proper.
`
`27
`
`/ / /
`
`28
`
`
`
`13
`COMPLAINT FO