throbber
Case 3:12-cv-00858-DMS-WVG Document 1 Filed 04/06/12 Page 1 of 15
`
`CALDARELLI HEJMANOWSKI & PAGE LLP
`William J. Caldarelli (SBN #149573)
`12340 El Camino Real, Suite 430
`San Diego, CA 92130
`Tel: (858) 720-8080
`Fax: (858) 720-6680
`wjc@chplawfirm.com
`
`FABIANO LAW FIRM, P.C.
`Michael D. Fabiano (SBN #167058)
`12526 High Bluff Drive, Suite 300
`San Diego, CA 92130
`Telephone: (619) 742-9631
`mdfabiano@fabianolawfirm.com
`
`OSBORNE LAW LLC
`John W. Osborne (Pro Hac Vice App. Pending)
`33 Habitat Lane
`Cortlandt Manor, NY 10567
`Telephone: (914) 714-5936
`josborne@osborneipl.com
`
`WATTS LAW OFFICES
`Ethan M. Watts (SBN #234441)
`12340 El Camino Real, Suite 430
`San Diego, CA 92130
`Telephone: (858) 509-0808
`Facsimile: (619) 878-5784
`emw@ewattslaw.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff Ameranth, Inc.
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`AMERANTH, INC.
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`AGILYSYS, INC.,
`
`SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`Case No.
`. '12CV0858
`COMPLAINT FOR PATENT
`INFRINGEMENT
`
`H
`
`MDD
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
`
`Defendant.
`
`COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:12-cv-00858-DMS-WVG Document 1 Filed 04/06/12 Page 2 of 15
`
`COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`
`Plaintiff Ameranth, Inc., for
`
`its Complaint against defendant Agilysys, Inc.
`
`(“Agilysys”), avers as follows:
`
`PARTIES
`
`1. Plaintiff Ameranth, Inc. (“Ameranth”) is a Delaware corporation having a principal
`
`place of business at 5820 Oberlin Drive, Suite 202, San Diego, California 92121. Ameranth
`
`develops, manufactures and sells, inter alia, hospitality industry, entertainment, restaurant and
`trademarks 21st Century
`Communications™, and 21st Century Restaurant™, among others, comprising
`the
`
`food service
`
`information
`
`technology solutions under
`
`the
`
`synchronization and integration of hospitality information and hospitality software applications
`
`between fixed, wireless and/or internet applications, including but not limited to computer
`
`servers, web servers, databases, affinity/social networking systems, desktop computers,
`
`laptops, “smart” phones and other wireless handheld computing devices.
`
`2. Defendant Agilysys, Inc. (“Agilysys”) is, on information and belief, an Ohio
`
`corporation having a principal place of business and headquarters in Solon, Ohio, with offices
`
`for its Hospitality Services business in Santa Barbara, California, Alpharetta, Georgia, and Las
`
`Vegas, Nevada. On information and belief, Agilysys makes, uses, sells and/or offers for sale,
`
`restaurant, foodservice, point-of-sale and property management and other hospitality
`
`information technology products, software, components and/or systems within this Judicial
`
`District, including, inter alia, Infogenesis POS by Agilysys with Infogenesis Roam Mobile
`
`Software Solution and/or mPOS; Lodging Management Solution by Agilysys with LMS
`
`ResNet and/or Mobile ResNet, Guest360 Property Management Solution by Agilysys; and
`
`ResPAK Restaurant Management (collectively, the “Agilysys Systems”).
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`3. This is an action for patent infringement arising under the Patent Laws of the United
`
`States, 35 U.S.C. §§ 271, 281-285.
`
`4. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and
`
`1338(a).
`
`2
`COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:12-cv-00858-DMS-WVG Document 1 Filed 04/06/12 Page 3 of 15
`
`5. On information and belief, Defendant engages in (a) the offer for sale or license and
`
`sale or license of hospitality, restaurant, food service, ordering, products and/or components in
`
`the United States, including this Judicial District, including services, products, software, and
`
`components, comprising wireless and internet POS and/or hospitality aspects; (b) the
`
`installation and maintenance of said services, products, software, components and/or systems
`
`in hospitality industry, restaurant, food service, and/or entertainment information technology
`
`systems in the United States, including this Judicial District; and/or (c) the use of hospitality
`
`industry, restaurant, food service, and/or entertainment information technology systems
`
`comprising said services, products, software, components and/or systems in the United States,
`
`including this Judicial District.
`
`6. This Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendant because Defendant commits acts
`
`of patent infringement in this Judicial District including, inter alia, making, using, offering for
`
`sale or license, and/or selling or licensing infringing services, products, software, components
`
`and/or systems in this Judicial District.
`
`7. Venue is proper in this Judicial District pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391(b) and (c) and
`
`1400(b).
`
`BACKGROUND
`8. Ameranth was established in 1996 to develop and provide its 21st Century
`Communications™ innovative information technology solutions for the hospitality industry
`
`(inclusive of, e.g., restaurants, hotels, casinos, nightclubs, cruise ships and other entertainment
`
`and sports venues). Ameranth has been widely recognized as a technology leader in the
`
`provision of wireless and internet-based systems and services to, inter alia, restaurants, hotels,
`
`casinos, cruise ships and entertainment and sports venues. Ameranth’s award winning
`
`inventions enable, in relevant part, generation and synchronization of menus, including but not
`
`limited to restaurant menus, event tickets, and other products across fixed, wireless and/or
`
`internet platforms as well as synchronization of hospitality information and hospitality
`
`software applications across fixed, wireless and internet platforms, including but not limited to,
`
`3
`COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:12-cv-00858-DMS-WVG Document 1 Filed 04/06/12 Page 4 of 15
`
`computer servers, web servers, databases, affinity/social networking systems, desktop
`
`computers, laptops, “smart” phones and other wireless handheld computing devices.
`
`9. Ameranth began development of the inventions leading to the patent-in-suit and the
`
`other patents in this patent family in the late Summer of 1998, at a time when the then-
`
`available wireless and internet hospitality offerings were extremely limited in functionality,
`
`were not synchronized and did not provide an integrated system-wide solution to the pervasive
`
`ordering, reservations, affinity program and information management needs of the hospitality
`
`industry. Ameranth uniquely recognized the actual problems that needed to be resolved in
`
`order to meet those needs, and thereafter conceived and developed its breakthrough inventions
`
`and products to provide systemic and comprehensive solutions directed to optimally meeting
`
`these industry needs. Ameranth has expended considerable effort and resources in inventing,
`
`developing and marketing its inventions and protecting its rights therein.
`
`10. Ameranth’s pioneering inventions have been widely adopted and are thus now
`
`essential to the modern wireless hospitality enterprise of the 21st Century. Ameranth’s
`
`solutions have been adopted, licensed and/or deployed by numerous entities across the
`
`hospitality industry.
`
`11. The adoption of Ameranth’s technology by industry leaders and the wide acclaim
`
`received by Ameranth for its technological innovations are just some of the many
`
`confirmations of the breakthrough aspects of Ameranth’s inventions. Ameranth has received
`
`twelve different technology awards (three with “end customer” partners) and has been widely
`
`recognized as a hospitality wireless/internet technology leader by almost all major national and
`
`hospitality print publications, e.g., The Wall Street Journal, New York Times, USA Today and
`
`many others. Ameranth was personally nominated by Bill Gates, the Founder of Microsoft, for
`
`the prestigious Computerworld Honors Award that Ameranth received in 2001 for its
`
`breakthrough synchronized reservations/ticketing system with the Improv Comedy Theatres.
`
`In his nomination, Mr. Gates described Ameranth as “one of the leading pioneers of
`
`information technology for the betterment of mankind.” This prestigious award was based on
`
`Ameranth’s innovative synchronization of wireless/web/fixed hospitality software technology.
`4
`COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:12-cv-00858-DMS-WVG Document 1 Filed 04/06/12 Page 5 of 15
`
`Subsequently, the United States Patent and Trademark Office granted Ameranth a number of
`
`currently-issued patents, two of which are the basis for this lawsuit. Ameranth has issued press
`
`releases announcing these patent grants on business wires, on its web sites and at numerous
`
`trade shows attended by various of the Defendants since the first of the two presently-asserted
`
`patents issued in 2002. A number of companies have licensed patents and technology from
`
`Ameranth, recognizing the value of Ameranth’s innovations, including a limited-scope patent
`
`license with Agilysys for many years, which has now expired..
`
`RELATED CASES PREVIOUSLY FILED
`
`12. The Ameranth patents asserted herein, U.S. Patent No. 6,384,850 (the “’850 patent”),
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,871,325 (the “’325 patent”), and U.S. Patent No. 8,146,077 (the “’077
`
`patent”), are all patents in Ameranth’s “Information Management and Synchronous
`
`Communications” patent family.
`
`13. Ameranth is also currently asserting claims of these same patents in separate
`
`lawsuits, against other defendants, that are already pending in this Court. The first-filed
`
`lawsuit asserts claims of the ‘850 and ‘325 patents and is entitled Ameranth v. Pizza Hut, Inc.
`
`et al., Case No. 3:11-cv-01810-JLS-NLS. Lawsuits subsequently filed by Ameranth in this
`
`Court, asserting claims of the ‘077 patent, are Case Nos. 3:12-cv-00729-JLS-NLS; 3:12-cv-
`
`00731-JLS-NLS; 3:12-cv-00732-JLS-NLS; 3:12-cv-00733-JLS-NLS; 3:12-cv-00737-JLS-
`
`NLS; 3:12-cv-00738-JLS-NLS; 3:12-cv-00739-JLS-NLS; and 3:12-cv-00742-JLS-NLS.
`
`COUNT I
`
`Patent Infringement (U.S. Pat. No. 6,384,850)
`
`(35 U.S.C. § 271)
`
`14. Plaintiff reiterates and incorporates the allegations set forth in paragraphs 1-13 above
`
`as if fully set forth herein.
`
`15. On May 7, 2002, United States Patent No. 6,384,850 entitled “Information
`
`Management and Synchronous Communications System with Menu Generation” (“the ‘850
`
`patent”) (a true and copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A) was duly and legally issued
`
`by the United States Patent & Trademark Office.
`5
`COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:12-cv-00858-DMS-WVG Document 1 Filed 04/06/12 Page 6 of 15
`
`16. Plaintiff Ameranth is the lawful owner by assignment of all right, title and interest in
`
`and to the ‘850 patent.
`
`17. On information and belief, Defendant directly infringes and continues to directly
`
`infringe one or more valid and enforceable claims of the ‘850 patent, in violation of 35 U.S.C.
`
`§ 271(a) by making, using, offering for sale or license and/or selling or licensing infringing
`
`systems, products, and/or services in the United States without authority or license from
`
`Ameranth, including but not limited to the Agilysys Systems.
`
`18. On information and belief, each of the Agilysys Systems, as deployed and/or used
`
`at or from one or more locations by Agilysys, its agents, distributors, partners, affiliates,
`
`licensees, and/or their customers, infringes one or more valid and enforceable claims of the
`
`‘850 patent, by, inter alia, doing at least one of the following: (a) Generating and transmitting
`
`menus in a system including a central processing unit, a data storage device, a computer
`
`operating system containing a graphical user interface, one or more displayable main menus,
`
`modifier menus, and sub-modifier menus, and application software for generating a second
`
`menu and transmitting it to a wireless handheld computing device or a Web page; and/or (b)
`
`Enabling ordering and other hospitality functions via iPhone, Android, and other internet-
`
`enabled wireless handheld computing devices as well as via Web pages, storing hospitality
`
`information and data on at least one central database, on at least one wireless handheld
`
`computing device, and on at least one Web server and Web page, and synchronizing
`
`applications and data, including but not limited to applications and data relating to ordering,
`
`between at least one central database, wireless handheld computing devices, and at least one
`
`Web server and Web page; utilizing an interface that provides a single point of entry that
`
`allows the synchronization of at least one wireless handheld computing device and at least one
`
`Web page with at least one central database; allowing information to be entered via Web pages,
`
`transmitted over the internet, and automatically communicated to at least one central database
`
`and to wireless handheld computing devices; allowing information to be entered via wireless
`
`handheld computing devices, transmitted over the internet, and automatically communicated to
`
`at least one central database and to Web pages.
`
`6
`COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:12-cv-00858-DMS-WVG Document 1 Filed 04/06/12 Page 7 of 15
`
`19. On information and belief, defendant Agilysys has indirectly infringed and continues
`
`to indirectly infringe one or more valid and enforceable claims of the ‘850 patent, in violation
`
`of 35 U.S.C. § 271(b), by actively, knowingly, and intentionally inducing direct infringement
`
`by other persons.
`
`20. On information and belief, customers of Agilysys, including consumers and
`
`restaurant operators, use the Agilysys Systems. Agilysys provides instruction and direction
`
`regarding the use of the Agilysys Systems, and advertises, promotes, and encourages the use of
`
`the Agilysys Systems.
`
`21. On information and belief, each of the Agilysys Systems infringes one or more valid
`
`and enforceable claims of the ‘850 patent for the reasons set forth hereinabove.
`
`22. Agilysys has long had knowledge of the ‘850 patent, and knew or should have
`
`known that its continued offering and deployment of the Agilysys Systems, and its continued
`
`support of consumers, restaurant operators, and other users of this system/product/service,
`
`would induce direct infringement by those users. Additionally, Agilysys intended that its
`
`actions would induce direct infringement by those users.
`
`23. On information and belief, Defendant has indirectly infringed and continues to
`
`indirectly infringe one or more valid and enforceable claims of the ‘850 patent, in violation of
`
`35 U.S.C. § 271(c).
`
`24. By distributing, selling, offering, offering to sell or license and/or selling or licensing
`
`the Agilysys Systems, Agilysys provides non-staple articles of commerce to others for use in
`
`infringing systems, products, and/or services. Additionally, Agilysys provides instruction and
`
`direction regarding the use of the Agilysys Systems, and advertises, promotes, and encourages
`
`the use of the Agilysys Systems. Users of one or more of the Agilysys Systems directly
`
`infringe one or more valid and enforceable claims of the ‘850 patent for the reasons set forth
`
`hereinabove.
`
`25. On information and belief, each of the Agilysys Systems infringes one or more valid
`
`and enforceable claims of the ‘850 patent, for the reasons set forth hereinabove.
`
`7
`COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:12-cv-00858-DMS-WVG Document 1 Filed 04/06/12 Page 8 of 15
`
`26. Agilysys has long had knowledge of the ‘850 patent, including knowledge that each
`
`of the Agilysys Systems, which are non-staple articles of commerce, were used as a material
`
`part of the claimed invention of the ‘850 patent, and that there were no substantial non-
`
`infringing uses for the Agilysys Systems.
`
`27. On information and belief, the aforesaid infringing activities of defendant Agilysys
`
`have been done with knowledge and willful disregard of Ameranth’s patent rights, making this
`
`an exceptional case within the meaning of 35 U.S.C. § 285.
`
`28. The aforesaid infringing activity of defendant Agilysys has directly and proximately
`
`caused damage to plaintiff Ameranth, including loss of profits from sales it would have made
`
`but for the infringements. Unless enjoined, the aforesaid infringing activity will continue and
`
`cause irreparable injury to Ameranth for which there is no adequate remedy at law.
`
`COUNT II
`
`Patent Infringement (U.S. Pat. No. 6,871,325)
`
`(35 U.S.C. § 271)
`
`29. Plaintiff reiterates and reincorporates the allegations set forth in paragraphs 1-28
`
`above as if fully set forth herein.
`
`30. On March 22, 2005, United States Patent No. 6,871,325 entitled “Information
`
`Management and Synchronous Communications System with Menu Generation” (“the ‘325
`
`patent”) (a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit B) was duly and legally
`
`issued by the United States Patent & Trademark Office.
`
`31. Plaintiff Ameranth is the lawful owner by assignment of all right, title and interest in
`
`and to the ‘325 patent.
`
`32. On information and belief, Defendant directly infringes and continues to directly
`
`infringe one or more valid and enforceable claims of the ‘325 patent, in violation of 35 U.S.C.
`
`§ 271(a) by making, using, offering for sale or license and/or selling or licensing infringing
`
`systems, products, and/or services in the United States without authority or license from
`
`Ameranth, including but not limited to the Agilysys Systems.
`
`8
`COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:12-cv-00858-DMS-WVG Document 1 Filed 04/06/12 Page 9 of 15
`
`33. On information and belief, each of the Agilysys Systems, as deployed and/or used
`
`at or from one or more locations by Agilysys, its agents, distributors, partners, affiliates,
`
`licensees, and/or their customers, infringes one or more valid and enforceable claims of the
`
`‘325 patent, by, inter alia, doing at least one of the following: (a) Generating and transmitting
`
`menus in a system including a central processing unit, a data storage device, a computer
`
`operating system containing a graphical user interface, one or more displayable main menus,
`
`modifier menus, and sub-modifier menus, and application software for generating a second
`
`menu and transmitting it to a wireless handheld computing device or a Web page; and/or (b)
`
`Enabling ordering and other hospitality functions via iPhone, Android, and other internet-
`
`enabled wireless handheld computing devices as well as via Web pages, storing hospitality
`
`information and data on at least one central database, on at least one wireless handheld
`
`computing device, and on at least one Web server and Web page, and synchronizing
`
`applications and data, including but not limited to applications and data relating to orders,
`
`between at least one central database, wireless handheld computing devices, and at least one
`
`Web server and Web page; and sending alerts, confirmations, and other information regarding
`
`orders to various wireless mobile devices.
`
`34. On information and belief, Defendant has indirectly infringed and continues to
`
`indirectly infringe one or more valid and enforceable claims of the ‘325 patent, in violation of
`
`35 U.S.C. § 271(b), by actively, knowingly, and intentionally inducing direct infringement by
`
`other persons.
`
`35. On information and belief, customers of Agilysys, including consumers and
`
`restaurant operators, use the Agilysys Systems in a manner that infringes upon one or more
`
`valid and enforceable claims of the ‘325 patent. Agilysys provides instruction and direction
`
`regarding the use of the Agilysys Systems and advertises, promotes, and encourages the use of
`
`the Agilysys Systems.
`
`36. On information and belief, Defendant actively induces others to infringe the ‘325
`
`patent in violation of 35 U.S.C. §271(b) by knowingly encouraging, aiding and abetting
`
`9
`COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:12-cv-00858-DMS-WVG Document 1 Filed 04/06/12 Page 10 of 15
`
`customers of Agilysys, including consumers and restaurant operators, to use the infringing
`
`Agilysys Systems in the United States without authority or license from Ameranth.
`
`37. On information and belief, Defendant contributorily infringes and continues to
`
`contributorily infringe one or more valid and enforceable claims of the ‘325 patent, in violation
`
`of 35 U.S.C. § 271(c) by offering to sell and/or selling components of systems on which claims
`
`of the ‘325 patent read, constituting a material part of the invention, knowing that the
`
`components were especially adapted for use in systems which infringe claims of the ‘325
`
`patent.
`
`38. By distributing, selling, offering, offering to sell or license and/or selling or licensing
`
`the Agilysys Systems Defendant provides non-staple articles of commerce to others for use in
`
`infringing systems, products, and/or services. Additionally, Agilysys provides instruction and
`
`direction regarding the use of the Agilysys Systems and advertises, promotes, and encourages
`
`the use of the Agilysys Ordering System. Users of the Agilysys Systems directly infringe one
`
`or more valid and enforceable claims of the ‘325 patent, for the reasons set forth hereinabove.
`
`39. On information and belief, each of the Agilysys Systems infringes one or more valid
`
`and enforceable claims of the ‘325 patent, for the reasons set forth hereinabove.
`
`40. Agilysys has long had knowledge of the ‘325 patent, including knowledge that each
`
`of the Agilysys Systems, which are non-staple articles of commerce, were used as a material
`
`part of the claimed invention of the ‘325 patent, and that there were no substantial non-
`
`infringing uses for the Agilysys Systems.
`
`41. On information and belief, the aforesaid infringing activities of defendant Agilysys
`
`have been done with knowledge and willful disregard of Ameranth’s patent rights, making this
`
`an exceptional case within the meaning of 35 U.S.C. § 285.
`
`42. The aforesaid infringing activity of defendant Agilysys has directly and proximately
`
`caused damage to plaintiff Ameranth, including loss of profits from sales it would have made
`
`but for the infringements. Unless enjoined, the aforesaid infringing activity will continue and
`
`cause irreparable injury to Ameranth for which there is no adequate remedy at law.
`
`10
`COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:12-cv-00858-DMS-WVG Document 1 Filed 04/06/12 Page 11 of 15
`
`COUNT III
`
`Patent Infringement (U.S. Pat. No. 8,146,077)
`
`(35 U.S.C. § 271)
`
`43. Plaintiff reiterates and incorporates the allegations set forth in paragraphs 1-42 above
`
`as if fully set forth herein.
`
`44. On March 27, 2012, United States Patent No. 8,146,077 entitled “Information
`
`Management and Synchronous Communications System with Menu Generation, and
`
`Handwriting and Voice Modification of Orders” (a true copy of which is attached hereto as
`
`Exhibit C and incorporated herein by reference) was duly and legally issued by the United
`
`States Patent & Trademark Office.
`
`45. Plaintiff Ameranth is the lawful owner by assignment of all right, title and interest in
`
`and to the ‘077 patent.
`
`46. On information and belief, Defendant directly infringes and continues to directly
`
`infringe one or more valid and enforceable claims of the ‘077 patent, in violation of 35 U.S.C.
`
`§ 271(a) by making, using, offering for sale or license and/or selling or licensing infringing
`
`systems, products, and/or services in the United States without authority or license from
`
`Ameranth, including but not limited to the Agilysys Systems.
`
`47. On information and belief, each of the Agilysys Systems, as deployed and/or used
`
`at or from one or more locations by Agilysys, its agents, distributors, partners, affiliates,
`
`licensees, and/or their customers, infringes one or more valid and enforceable claims of the
`
`‘077 patent, by, inter alia, doing at least one of the following: (a) Configuring and transmitting
`
`menus in a system including a central processing unit, a data storage device, a computer
`
`operating system containing a graphical user interface, one or more displayable master menus,
`
`menu configuration software enabled to generate a menu configuration for a wireless handheld
`
`computing device in conformity with a customized display layout, and enabled for
`
`synchronous communications and to format the menu configuration for a customized display
`
`layout of at least two different wireless handheld computing device display sizes, and/or (b)
`
`Enabling ordering and other hospitality functions via iPhone, Android, and other internet-
`11
`COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:12-cv-00858-DMS-WVG Document 1 Filed 04/06/12 Page 12 of 15
`
`enabled wireless handheld computing devices as well as via Web pages, storing hospitality
`
`information and data on at least one database, on at least one wireless handheld computing
`
`device, and on at least one Web server and Web page, and synchronizing applications and data,
`
`including but not limited to applications and data relating to orders, between at least one
`
`database, wireless handheld computing devices, and at least one Web server and Web page;
`
`utilizing communications control software enabled to link and synchronize hospitality
`
`information between at least one database, wireless handheld computing device, and web page,
`
`to display information on web pages and on different wireless handheld computing device
`
`display sizes, and to allow information to be entered via Web pages, transmitted over the
`
`internet, and automatically communicated to at least one database and to wireless handheld
`
`computing devices; allowing information to be entered via wireless handheld computing
`
`devices, transmitted over the internet, and automatically communicated to at least one database
`
`and to Web pages.
`
`48. On information and belief, Defendant has indirectly infringed and continues to
`
`indirectly infringe one or more valid and enforceable claims of the ‘077 patent, in violation of
`
`35 U.S.C. § 271(b), by actively, knowingly, and intentionally inducing direct infringement by
`
`other persons.
`
`49. On information and belief, customers of Agilysys, including consumers and
`
`restaurant operators, use the Agilysys Systems in a manner that infringes upon one or more
`
`valid and enforceable claims of the ‘077 patent. Agilysys provides instruction and direction
`
`regarding the use of the Agilysys Systems and advertises, promotes, and encourages the use of
`
`the Agilysys Systems.
`
`50. On information and belief, Defendant actively induces others to infringe the ‘077
`
`patent in violation of 35 U.S.C. §271(b) by knowingly encouraging, aiding and abetting
`
`customers of Agilysys, including consumers and restaurant operators, to use the infringing
`
`Agilysys Systems in the United States without authority or license from Ameranth.
`
`51. On information and belief, Defendant contributorily infringes and continues to
`
`contributorily infringe one or more valid and enforceable claims of the ‘077 patent, in violation
`12
`COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:12-cv-00858-DMS-WVG Document 1 Filed 04/06/12 Page 13 of 15
`
`of 35 U.S.C. § 271(c) by offering to sell and/or selling components of systems on which claims
`
`of the ‘077 patent read, constituting a material part of the invention, knowing that the
`
`components were especially adapted for use in systems which infringe claims of the ‘077
`
`patent.
`
`52. By distributing, selling, offering, offering to sell or license and/or selling or licensing
`
`the Agilysys Systems, Defendant provides non-staple articles of commerce to others for use in
`
`infringing systems, products, and/or services. Additionally, Agilysys provides instruction and
`
`direction regarding the use of the Agilysys Systems and advertises, promotes, and encourages
`
`the use of the Agilysys Systems. Users of the Agilysys Systems directly infringe one or more
`
`valid and enforceable claims of the ‘077 patent, for the reasons set forth hereinabove.
`
`53. On information and belief, each of the Agilysys Systems infringes one or more valid
`
`and enforceable claims of the ‘077 patent, for the reasons set forth hereinabove.
`
`54. Agilysys has had knowledge of the ‘077 patent at least as of the filing and/or service
`
`of this complaint, including knowledge that each of the Agilysys Systems, which are non-
`
`staple articles of commerce, were used as a material part of the claimed invention of the ‘077
`
`patent, and that there were no substantial non-infringing uses for the Agilysys Systems.
`
`55. On information and belief, the aforesaid infringing activities of defendant Agilysys
`
`have been done with knowledge and willful disregard of Ameranth’s patent rights, making this
`
`an exceptional case within the meaning of 35 U.S.C. § 285.
`
`56. The aforesaid infringing activity of defendant Agilysys has directly and proximately
`
`caused damage to plaintiff Ameranth, including loss of profits from sales it would have made
`
`but for the infringements. Unless enjoined, the aforesaid infringing activity will continue and
`
`cause irreparable injury to Ameranth for which there is no adequate remedy at law.
`
`//
`
`//
`
`//
`
`//
`
`//
`
`13
`COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:12-cv-00858-DMS-WVG Document 1 Filed 04/06/12 Page 14 of 15
`
`PRAYER FOR RELIEF
`
`WHEREFORE, plaintiff Ameranth respectfully prays for judgment against Defendants,
`
`and each of them, as follows:
`
`1.
`
`Adjudging that the manufacture, use, offer for sale or license and /or sale or
`
`license of each of the Agilysys Systems infringes valid and enforceable claims of the ‘850
`
`patent, and the ‘325 patent, and the ‘077 patent, as set forth hereinabove;
`
`2.
`
`Adjudging that Defendant has infringed, actively induced others to infringe
`
`and/or contributorily infringed valid and enforceable claims of the ‘850 patent, and the ‘325
`
`patent, and the ‘077 patent, as set forth hereinabove;
`
`3.
`
`Adjudging that Defendant’s infringement of the valid and enforceable claims of
`
`the ‘850 patent, and the ‘325 patent, and the ‘077 patent, has been knowing and willful;
`
`4.
`
`Enjoining Defendant, and its officers, directors, employees, attorneys, agents,
`
`representatives, parents, subsidiaries, affiliates and all other persons acting in concert,
`
`participation or privity with Defendant, and their successors and assigns, from infringing,
`
`contributorily infringing and/or inducing others to infringe the valid and enforceable claims of
`
`the ‘850 patent, and the ‘325 patent, and the ‘077 patent;
`
`5.
`
`Awarding Ameranth the damages it has sustained by reason of Defendant’s
`
`infringement, together with interest and costs pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 284;
`
`6.
`
`Awarding Ameranth increased damages of three times the amount of damages
`
`found or assessed against Defendant by reason of the knowing, willful and deliberate nature of
`
`Defendant’s acts of infringement pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 284;
`
`7.
`
`Adjudging this to be an exceptional case and awarding Ameranth its attorney’s
`
`fees pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §285;
`
`8.
`
`9.
`
`Awarding to Ameranth its costs of suit, and interest as provided by law; and
`
`Awarding to Ameranth such other and further relief that this Court may deem
`
`just and proper.
`
`//
`
`//
`
`14
`COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 3:12-cv-00858-DMS-WVG Document 1 Filed 04/06/12 Page 15 of 15
`
`
`
`Ameranth demands trial by jury of its

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket