throbber

`EXHIBIT 2015
`
`
`EXHIBIT 2015
`
`

`

`Case 2:07-cv-00271-CE Document 229 Filed 09/09/10 Page 1 of 2
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`CASE NO. 2:07-CV-271-CE
`
`§§§§
`





`
`ORDER
`
`AMERANTH, INC.
`
`vs.
`
`MENUSOFT SYSTEMS CORPORATION
`and CASH REGISTER SALES &
`SERVICE OF HOUSTON, INC.
`
`Currently before the Court is paragraph 5 of Plaintiff’s Second Motion in Limine. (Dkt. No.
`
`188). Contained within paragraph 5 of Plaintiff’s motion are three sub-motions addressed to
`
`testimony inconsistent with the Court’s claim construction order. Plaintiff seeks to exclude
`
`evidence, testimony, and argument that (5a) “transmitting ... to a web page” is not transmitting to
`
`a traditional web client; (5b) that “actual transmission” is required; and (5c) that data must reside on
`
`or be stored on a client device.
`
`With regard to part 5a of Plaintiff’s motion in limine, the Court has ordered the parties to
`
`provide supplemental briefing for the purpose of construing the term “transmitting ... to a web page.”
`
`Until the Court construes this term, neither party is to argue or offer evidence or testimony to the jury
`
`that the claim limitation at issue requires anything more than transmitting to a traditional web client
`
`without first approaching the bench. In the event that the Court construes the term more narrowly,
`
`the jury will receive an appropriate instruction.
`
`

`

`Case 2:07-cv-00271-CE Document 229 Filed 09/09/10 Page 2 of 2
`
`With regard to part 5b of Plaintiff’s motion in limine, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion.
`
`Limitation g of the asserted independent claims requires “software for generating ... and
`
`transmitting,” not actual transmission.
`
`With regard to part 5c of Plaintiff’s motion in limine, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s motion.
`
`The Court’s construction requires that “a change to data made on a central server is updated on client
`
`devices and vice versa” which implicitly, if not explicitly, requires data on the client devices. In the
`
`context of the invention, the client devices must have some capacity for data storage, even if only
`
`temporary, because the systems of the independent claims require software capable of transmitting
`
`data in the form of menus to the client devices. However, Defendant is cautioned against presenting
`
`evidence, testimony, or argument to the jury that any kind of permanent data storage capability is
`
`required in the client devices without first approaching the bench. The Court’s construction does
`
`not require the client device to contain a database or to retain a complete copy of the data from the
`
`central server.
`
`2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket