`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Paper 11
`
` Date: December 31, 2013
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`TRULIA, INC.
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`ZILLOW, INC.
`Patent Owner
`
`
`Case CBM2013-00056
`Patent 7,970,674
`
`
`Before JAMESON LEE and MICHAEL W. KIM, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`LEE, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`DECISION
`Patent Owner’s Motion for
`Pro Hac Vice Admission of Ramsey M. Al-Salam
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case CBM2013-00056
`Patent 7,970,674
`
`
`Introduction
`
`On October 14, 2013, the Patent Owner (“Zillow”) filed a motion for pro
`hac vice admission of Ramsey M. Al-Salam, under 37 C.F.R. § 42.10. Petitioner
`(“Trulia”) has filed no opposition. We note that in co-pending proceeding
`involving the same Patent 7,970,674, Case IPR2013-00034, Mr. Al-Salam was
`granted pro hac vice admission on January 3, 2013 (Paper 15) and is now backup
`counsel in that proceeding.
`
`Discussion
`The motion is supported by the affidavit of Ramsey M. Al-Salam. Mr. Al-
`
`Salam states that he has not been suspended or disbarred from practice before any
`court or administrative body, that he has never had an application for admission to
`practice before any court or administrative body denied, and that no sanction or
`contempt citation has been imposed against him by any court or administrative
`body. Affidavit ¶¶ 2-4.
`
`Mr. Al-Salam further states that he has read and will comply with the Office
`Trial Practice Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials set forth in part 42
`of the Code of Federal Regulations, and that he will be subject to the USPTO Code
`of Professional responsibility set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 10.20 et seq. and
`disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a). Affidavit ¶¶ 5-6.
`
`Zillow represents that Mr. Al-Salam has advised Zillow on various patent
`issues and has appeared as lead counsel for Zillow in at least five district court
`patent suits. According to Zillow, Mr. Al-Salam is knowledgeable about the
`technology to which this proceeding relates. Zillow notes that Mr. Al-Salam
`
`
`
`
`-2-
`
`
`
`Case CBM2013-00056
`Patent 7,970,674
`
`already has been admitted pro hac vice in Case IPR2013-00034, which involves
`the same Patent 7,970,674.
`
`We have also reviewed a copy of Mr. Al-Salam’s biography submitted with
`his affidavit as Exhibit A.
`
`Zillow has shown that Mr. Al-Salam has sufficient qualifications to
`represent Zillow in this proceeding. Zillow also has shown that it has a need for
`Mr. Al-Salam to be involved in this proceeding. On this record, Zillow has
`established good cause for admission of Mr. Al-Salam, pro hac vice, but for an
`apparent oversight that ¶ 6 of Mr. Al-Salam’s affidavit refers to the USPTO’s Code
`of Professional Responsibility, rather than the USPTO’s Rules of Professional
`Conduct. The USPTO’s Code of Professional Responsibility has been replaced by
`the USPTO’s Rules of Professional Conduct. See Changes to Representation of
`Others Before the United States Patent and Trademark Office; Final Rule, 78 Fed.
`Reg. 20180 (Apr. 3, 2013). The USPTO’s Rules of Professional Conduct took
`effect on May 3, 2013. Id. at 20180-81.
`Conclusion
`This decision is made on the presumption that Mr. Al-Salam agrees to be
`
`subject to the USPTO’s Rules of Professional Conduct.
`
`It is
`ORDERED that Zillow’s motion for pro hac vice admission of Ramsey M.
`
`Al-Salam for this proceeding is conditionally granted, provided that within one
`week of the date of posting of this decision, Zillow files a declaration or affidavit
`of Mr. Al-Salam, which states that Mr. Al-Salam agrees to be subject to the
`
`
`
`
`-3-
`
`
`
`Case CBM2013-00056
`Patent 7,970,674
`
`USPTO’s Rules of Professional Conduct as set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et
`seq.;
`FURTHER ORDERED that if the above-noted declaration or affidavit
`
`statement is timely filed, Mr. Al-Salam is authorized to be designated as backup
`counsel, but not lead counsel, in this proceeding;
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Al-Salam will comply with the Office
`Patent Trial Practice Guide, and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials as set forth
`in Part 42 of Title 37, Code of Federal Regulations; and
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Al-Salam will be subject to the Office’s
`disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a), and comply with the USPTO’s
`Rules of Professional Conduct as set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq.
`
`
`
`For PETITIONER
`Michael Rosato
`Jennifer Schmidt
`mrosato@wsgr.com
`jschmidt@wsgr.com
`
`For PATENT OWNER
`
`Steven D. Lawrenz
`Ryan J. McBrayer
`PERKINS COIE, LLP
`slawrenz@perkinscoie.com
`rmcBrayer@perkinscoie.com
`
`
`
`
`-4-
`
`