throbber
Paper 23
`Date: May 1, 2014
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`_____________
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`____________
`
`TRULIA, INC.
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`ZILLOW, INC.
`Patent Owner
`
`____________
`
`Case CBM2013-000561
`Patent 7,970,674
`____________
`
`
`Before JAMESON LEE, JOSIAH C. COCKS, and MICHAEL W. KIM,
`Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`LEE, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`Order
`Conduct of Proceeding
`37 C.F.R. § 42.05
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 Case CBM2014-00115 has been joined with this proceeding.
`
`
`
`

`
`CBM2013-00056
`Patent 7,970,674
`
`
`
`Introduction
`
`
`
`
`
`In a telephone conference held on April 7, 2014, we informed counsel for
`
`each party that the grounds instituted for trial, based in any part on Foster (Patent
`
`7,130,810), Keyes (Patent 7,120,599), or Lamont (Patent 7,219,078), cannot be
`
`maintained because all three patents are prior art under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) and thus
`
`do not meet the criteria for supporting a challenge under Section 18(a)(1)(C) of the
`
`Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, Pub. L. No. 112-29, 125 Stat. 284, 329 (2011)
`
`(“AIA”). Paper 19. All three patents, however, have corresponding published
`
`applications which constitute prior art under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b). Id.
`
`
`
`We considered, but declined to substitute the published applications for the
`
`associated patents, in order to convert the non-maintainable grounds under
`
`35 U.S.C. § 102(e) and § 102(e)/103 to maintainable grounds under 35 U.S.C.
`
`§ 102(b) and § 102(b)/103. Paper 19. Instead, the parties agreed that Petitioner
`
`would file a new petition for covered business method patent review, including
`
`only the grounds based on the corresponding published applications, and a motion
`
`to join that new proceeding with this proceeding, and that Patent Owner would not
`
`oppose the joinder motion. Paper 21.
`
`
`
`On April 10, 2014, Petitioner filed the new petition and that new proceeding
`
`is CBM2014-00115. Also on April 10, 2014, Petitioner filed a motion for joinder
`
`in CBM2014-00115, to join that proceeding with CBM2013-00056. That motion
`
`is unopposed by Patent Owner. We have instituted trial in CBM2014-00115 and
`
`granted Petitioner’s motion for joinder, in a concurrent paper.
`
`Discussion
`
`
`
`By this communication, we summarize and make clear what grounds of
`
`unpatentability are pending in this joined proceeding of CBM2013-00056 and
`
`CBM2014-00115, and address issues with papers, exhibits, and the schedule.
`
`2
`
`
`

`
`CBM2013-00056
`Patent 7,970,674
`
`A. Grounds Withdrawn
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The institution of trial on the basis of the following grounds are vacated and
`
`they are considered withdrawn and no longer pending in this joined proceeding:
`
`
`
`(1) claims 2, 5, 15-18, and 40 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as
`
`anticipated by Foster (Patent 7,130,810);
`
`
`
`(2) claims 19-24 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over
`
`Foster (Patent 7,130,810), Keyes (Patent 7,120,599), and Charles A.
`
`Calhoun, Property Valuation Methods and Data in the United States,
`
`Housing Finance International Journal 16.2 (2001)(“Calhoun”);
`
`
`
`(3) claims 2, 5, and 15-18 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as
`
`anticipated by Lamont (Patent 7,219,078); and
`
`
`
`(4) claims 19 and 21-24 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable
`
`over Lamont (Patent 7,219,078), Foster (Patent 7,130,810), Keyes
`
`(Patent 7,120,599), and Calhoun.
`
`B. Grounds Added
`
`
`
`The following grounds on the basis of which trial is instituted in CBM2014-
`
`00115 are included in this joined proceeding:
`
`
`
`(1) claims 2, 5, 15-18, and 40 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as
`
`anticipated by Foster (U.S. Application Publication 2004/0073508);
`
`
`
`(2) claims 19-24 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over
`
`Foster (U.S. Application Publication 2004/0073508), Keyes (U.S.
`
`Application Publication 2001/0044766), and Charles A. Calhoun,
`
`Property Valuation Methods and Data in the United States, Housing
`
`Finance International Journal 16.2 (2001)(“Calhoun”);
`
`3
`
`
`

`
`CBM2013-00056
`Patent 7,970,674
`
`
`
`(3) claims 2, 5, and 15-18 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as
`
`
`
`
`
`anticipated by Lamont (U.S. Application Publication 2003/0046099);
`
`and
`
`
`
`(4) claims 19 and 21-24 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable
`
`over Lamont (U.S. Application Publication 2003/0046099), Foster
`
`(U.S. Application Publication 2004/0073508), Keyes (U.S.
`
`Application Publication 2001/0044766, and Calhoun.
`
`C.
`
`Identification of References
`
`
`
`For future papers to be filed in this joined proceeding, the parties shall
`
`follow this usage for the terms “Foster,” “Lamont,” and “Keyes” when they
`
`are used alone without any modifier: “Foster” identifies and refers to U.S.
`
`Application Publication 2004/0073508; “Lamont” identifies and refers to
`
`U.S. Application Publication 2003/0046099; and “Keyes” identifies and
`
`refers to U.S. Application Publication 2001/0044766.
`
`D.
`
`Scheduling Order
`
`
`
`A revised scheduling order is issued in a separate and concurrent
`
`paper for this joined proceeding, which supersedes the scheduling order
`
`issued in CBM2013-00056 on March 10, 2014 (Paper 14).
`
`E.
`
`Exhibits
`
`
`
`Petitioner has five business days from the date of this communication
`
`to file in this joined proceeding those exhibits filed in CBM2014-00115 but
`
`not of record in CBM2013-00056, identifying them with the same exhibit
`
`numbers as used in CBM2014-00115, and also file an updated exhibit list
`
`pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.63(e).
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`

`
`CBM2013-00056
`Patent 7,970,674
`
`
`
`Order
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`It is
`
`ORDERED that all future papers for the joined proceeding of
`
`CBM2014-00115 and CBM2013-00056 are to be filed only in CBM2013-
`
`00056, and that no more paper shall be filed in CBM2014-00115;
`
`
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that the various grounds instituted for trial, as
`
`identified in Section A above are vacated and withdrawn such that they are
`
`no longer pending in this joined proceeding;
`
`
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that the various grounds as identified in
`
`Section B above, on the basis of which trial has been instituted in
`
`CBM2014-00115, are included for trial in this joined proceeding;
`
`
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that the scheduling order issued on March 10,
`
`2014 (Paper 14) is superseded by the revised scheduling order issued in a
`
`concurrent paper;
`
`
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner shall file, within five business
`
`days of the date of this communication, those exhibits filed in CBM2014-
`
`00115 but not previously of record in CBM2013-00056, identifying them
`
`with the same exhibit numbers as used in CBM2014-00115, and also file an
`
`updated exhibit list pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.63(e);
`
`
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that in future papers filed in this joined
`
`proceeding, “Foster” refers to U.S. Application Publication 2004/0073508;
`
`“Lamont” refers to U.S. Application Publication 2003/0046099; “Keyes”
`
`refers to U.S. Application Publication 2001/0044766”;
`
`
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that for this joined proceeding, the parties
`
`shall use the same caption as that used for this communication; and
`
`5
`
`
`

`
`CBM2013-00056
`Patent 7,970,674
`
`
`
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner’s request, conveyed during the
`
`
`
`initial conference call held on April 1, 2014, to make of record U.S.
`
`Application Publication 2004/0073508, U.S. Application Publication
`
`2003/0046099, and U.S. Application Publication 2001/0044766 is dismissed
`
`as moot, in light of the joinder of CBM2014-00115 and CBM2013-00056.
`
`6
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`For Petitioner:
`
`Michael Rosato
`Jennifer Schmidt
`mrosato@wsgr.com
`jschmidt@wsgr.com
`
`For Patent Owner:
`
`Steven D. Lawrenz
`Ryan J. McBrayer
`slawrenz@perkinscoie.com
`rmcBrayer@perkinscoie.com

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket