`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`CALLIDUS SOFTWARE INC.
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`VERSATA SOFTWARE, INC. AND VERSATA DEVELOPMENT
`GROUP, INC.
`Patent Owner
`____________
`
`Case CBM2013-00054
`Patent 7,098,304
`____________
`
`Filed: September 17, 2013
`
`Before PATRICK E. BAKER, Trial Paralegal
`
`DECLARATION OF ASSAD H. RAJANI IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO
`APPEAR PRO HAC VICE
`
`I, Assad H. Rajani, declare as follows:
`
`1.
`
`I am an associate with the law firm of Dickstein Shapiro LLP. I have
`
`personal knowledge of the following facts, except those stated on information and
`
`belief, which I believe to be true. If called to testify, I could and would testify
`
`competently to the contents hereof.
`
`(cid:40)(cid:91)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:20)(cid:19)(cid:20)(cid:23)(cid:3)(cid:3)(cid:19)(cid:20)(cid:18)(cid:19)(cid:22)
`
`Callidus Ex. 1014
`CBM2013-00054
`(Callidus v. Versata)
`
`
`
`Pro Hac Order, Part 2 (b)(i) -- Membership in Good Standing of a State Bar:
`
`2.
`
`I am a member in good standing of the Bar of the State of California.
`
`Pro Hac Order, Part 2 (b)(ii) -- No Suspensions or Disbarments:
`
`3.
`
`I have not been suspended or disbarred from practice before any court
`
`or administrative body.
`
`Pro Hac Order, Part 2 (b)(iii) -- No Application for Admission Denied:
`
`4.
`
`I have not been denied on any application to practice before any court
`
`or administrative body.
`
`Pro Hac Order, Part 2 (b)(iv) -- No Sanctions or Contempt Citations:
`
`5.
`
`I have not been sanctioned or cited for contempt by any court or
`
`administrative body.
`
`Pro Hac Order, Part 2 (b)(v) -- Compliance with Rules:
`
`6.
`
`I have read and will comply with the Office Patent Trial Practice
`
`Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials set forth in part 42 of the C.F.R.
`
`Pro Hac Order, Part 2 (b)(vi) -- Subject to Professional Responsibility Rules
`
`and Jurisdiction:
`
`7.
`
`I will be subject to the USPTO Code of Professional Responsibility
`
`set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 10.20 et seq., the USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct
`
`as mandated by Final Rule, 78 Fed. Reg. 20180 (Apr. 3, 2013) (effective May 3,
`
`2013), and disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a).
`
`-2-
`(cid:40)(cid:91)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:20)(cid:19)(cid:20)(cid:23)(cid:3)(cid:3)(cid:19)(cid:21)(cid:18)(cid:19)(cid:22)
`
`
`
`Pro Hac Order, Part 2 (b)(vii) -- Other Proceedings Before the Office:
`
`8.
`
`I have not previously applied to appear pro hac vice in any other
`
`proceedings before the Office.
`
`Pro Hac Order, Part 2 (b)(viii) -- Familiarity with the Subject Matter:
`
`9.
`
`I have familiarity with the subject matter at issue in the proceeding
`
`because I have over 5 years of experience litigating patent suits, have litigated
`
`patent validity and enforceability issues numerous times in federal court, and
`
`because I represent Petitioner in the related proceeding Versata Software, Inc. and
`
`Versata Development Group, Inc. v. Callidus Software Inc., Case No. 1:12-cv-
`
`00931-SLR (D. Del.) concerning U.S. Patent No. 7,098,304.
`
`I hereby declare that all statements made herein of my own knowledge are
`
`true and that all statements made on information and belief are believed to be true;
`
`and further that these statements were made with the knowledge that willful false
`
`statements and the like so made are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or both,
`
`under 18 U.S.C. 1001 and that such willful false statements may jeopardize the
`
`validity of the application or any patent issued thereon. I hereby acknowledge that
`
`any willful false statement made in this declaration is punishable under 18 U.S.C.
`
`1001 by fine or imprisonment of not more than five (5) years, or both.
`
`Executed on September 17, 2013 at Palo Alto, California.
`
`/Assad H. Rajani/
`Assad H. Rajani
`
`-3-
`(cid:40)(cid:91)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:20)(cid:19)(cid:20)(cid:23)(cid:3)(cid:3)(cid:19)(cid:22)(cid:18)(cid:19)(cid:22)
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
