throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Paper 37
`
` Entered: August 29, 2014
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`
`CALLIDUS SOFTWARE INC.
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`VERSATA SOFTWARE, INC. and
`VERSATA DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC.
`Patent Owner
`____________
`
`Cases CBM2013-00052 (Patent 7,904,326 B2)
`CBM2013-00053 (Patent 7,958,024 B2)
`CBM2013-00054 (Patent 7,908,304 B2)1
`
`
`
`Before HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP, SALLY C. MEDLEY, and
`KEVIN F. TURNER, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`MEDLEY, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`ORDER
`Conduct of the Proceedings
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5
`
`
`1 This order addresses an issue that is identical in all three cases. Therefore, we
`exercise discretion to issue one order to be filed in each of the three cases. The
`parties, however, are not authorized to use this style heading in subsequent papers
`since doing so may cause confusion.
`
`

`

`CASES CBM2013-00052, 00053, 00054
`Patents 7,904,326; 7,958,024; 7,908,304
`
`
`
`On August 28, 2014, a conference call was held involving counsel for the
`
`parties and Judges Blankenship, Medley, and Turner. Patent Owner requested the
`
`conference call to discuss the late filing of Petitioner’s reply and Exhibit 1026 in
`
`CBM2013-00053, and Petitioner’s late service of certain papers that were filed in
`
`each of the three proceedings.
`
`
`
`According to counsel for Petitioner, Petitioner ran short of time when it filed
`
`its papers in the three proceedings, resulting in the late filing of the reply, a
`
`corrected reply, and Exhibit 1026 in CBM2013-00053. Petitioner did not contact
`
`the Board to receive authorization to file the documents late, nor did Petitioner
`
`contact the Board to receive authorization to file a corrected reply. Patent Owner
`
`requests the Board to sua sponte expunge the reply, the corrected reply, and
`
`Exhibit 1026. Alternatively, Patent Owner seeks authorization to file a motion to
`
`expunge those late–filed documents.
`
`A late action will be excused on a showing of good cause or upon a Board
`
`decision that consideration on the merits would be in the interests of justice. 37
`
`C.F.R. § 42.5(c)(3). Petitioner should have alerted the Board to the late filing and
`
`should have sought prior authorization to file a corrected version of its reply.
`
`Nonetheless, upon weighing the prejudice to Patent Owner of the one day late
`
`filing versus the prejudice to Petitioner if we do not consider, on the merits, the
`
`corrected reply2 and Exhibit 1026 filed in CBM2013-00053, we determine that it is
`
`in the interests of justice to consider the late–filed documents.
`
`
`2 The original reply (Paper 31) in CBM2013-00053 will be expunged from the
`
` 2
`
`
`
`

`

`CASES CBM2013-00052, 00053, 00054
`Patents 7,904,326; 7,958,024; 7,908,304
`
`
`
`
`According to counsel for Petitioner, the parties had agreed, some time ago,
`
`to serve electronically using electronic mail. Although Petitioner filed its papers
`
`and evidence in the three proceedings on August 22nd and 23rd, Petitioner served,
`
`through electronic mail, the replies and evidence on August 26, 2014. As
`
`discussed, the date from which any objection to evidence submitted in connection
`
`with the replies is five days from August 26, 2014. 37 C.F.R. § 42.64(b)(1).
`
`In consideration of the foregoing, it is hereby:
`
`ORDERED that Patent Owner’s request to file a motion to expunge is
`
`denied;
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that the date from which any objection to the
`
`evidence submitted in connection with the replies is five days from August 26,
`
`2014; and
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Paper 31 (Petitioner’s Reply to Patent Owner’s
`
`Response) be expunged from the record of CBM2013-00053.
`
`
`record.
`
` 3
`
`
`
`

`

`CASES CBM2013-00052, 00053, 00054
`Patents 7,904,326; 7,958,024; 7,908,304
`
`
`
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Deborah Fishman
`fishmand@dicksteinshapiro.com
`
`
`
`Jeffrey Miller
`millerj@dicksteinshapiro.com
`
`
`
`Michael Tonkinson
`tonkinsonm@dicksteinshapiro.com
`
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Kent Chambers
`kchambers@tcchlaw.com
`
`
`David O’Brien
`david.obrien.ipr@haynesboone.com
`
`John Russell Emerson
`russell.emerson.ipr@haynesboone.com
`
`Raghav Bajaj
`raghav.bajaj.ipr@haynesboone.com
`
` 4
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket