`EXHIBIT 2310
`CBM2013-00023 (APPLE INC. v. SIGHTSOUND TECHS., LLC)
`PAGE 000001
`
`
`
`Mail Stop PATENT BOARD
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`U.S. Patent & Trademark Office
`
`P.0. Box 1450
`
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`I, Scott Sander, hereby declare as follows:
`
`1.
`
`I am a member of the managing board of SightSound Technologies,
`
`LLC (“SightSound”).
`
`I provide this Declaration in support of SightSound’s
`
`Responses to Apple Inc.’s Petitions for Covered Business Method Patent Review of
`
`United States Patent Nos. 5,919,573 (“the ‘S73 Patent”) and 5,966,440 (“the ‘440
`
`Patent”) (collectively “the Patents”).
`
`I am over the age of eighteen, have personal
`
`knowledge of the facts set forth below unless otherwise stated, and if called to
`
`testify as a witness in this matter, I could and would testify competently thereto.
`
`2.
`
`In 1995, together with Arthur Hair (the inventor of the Patents) 1
`
`founded Parsec Sight/Sound,
`
`Inc. and Digital Sight/Sound, Inc., SightSound’s
`
`predecessors in interest, to commercialize Mr. Hair’s invention. Mr. Hair assigned
`
`all of his ownership rights in the ‘5 73 Patent, and every subsequent patent to issue
`
`from that same disclosure, to SightSound. Shortly after obtaining the ‘S73 Patent,
`
`Mr. Hair wrote to John Sculley, the then-Chairman of the Board and CEO of Apple,
`
`informing him of the ‘S73 Patent, which Mr. Hair stated would “revolutionize the
`
`video rental industry and prerecorded music industry, among others, and will serve
`
`as a catalyst to propel the multimedia industry into the 21“ century.” Attached as
`
`-1-
`
`PAGE 000002
`
`
`
`exhibit 2311 is a true and correct copy of Mr. Hair’s April 5, 1993 letter to Mr.
`
`Sculley. Page numbers and an exhibit label have been added to this document but
`
`no other alterations have been made.
`
`3.
`
`In the late_ 1990s and early 2000s, SightSound developed an online
`
`commercial system for the sale of digital music and video files which was found at
`
`SightSound.com.
`
`4.
`
`In 1995, SightSound became the first company to offer digital
`
`downloads of music through electronic sale over the Internet, when it offered the
`
`album (as well as individual songs) from the band The Gathering Field’s debut
`
`album “The Gathering Field.” Attached as exhibit 2312 is a true and correct copy
`
`of a screen shot from the SightSound.com website in 1995 offering the Gathering
`
`Field album for sale for $6.00, as well as offering individual songs from the album
`
`for sale for $1.00. Page numbers and an exhibit label have been added to this
`
`document but no other alterations have been made. SightSound.com offered free 30
`
`second previews of the music being offered for sale. Id. (“Free Sample: 5.4 MB:
`
`30 second clip”). SightSound.com also showed the cover art for music being
`
`offered for sale and provided reviews and press coverage regarding the album as
`
`shown in exhibit 2312.
`
`5.
`
`Shortly after Sightsound began offering The Gathering Field’s album
`
`for sale, SightSound temporarily ceased selling music on its website due to
`
`PAGE 000003
`
`
`
`guidance I received from noted venture capitalist, L. John Doerr, who warned that
`
`selling the music of independent artists directly to consumers in this new way
`
`would be perceived by the major record labels as a threat to their current business
`
`model.
`
`I believe the music labels were not ready to adopt such a radical change in
`
`the mid to late l990s, as the new model would have required them to migrate away
`
`from production of physical media (such as CD5) and transition to digital formats,
`
`as well as sell individual songs instead of entire albums which I understood they
`
`believed would be less profitable.
`
`I also understood that the music labels were
`
`reluctant to embrace the new model as they were concerned about unauthorized
`
`copying of their content. For these reasons, I understood that content holders were
`
`reluctant to license their content to SightSound for sale over the Internet.
`
`6.
`
`SightSound.com initially offered individual songs for sale for $1.00.
`
`By
`
`1998, however, Sightsound began offering songs
`
`for $0.99.
`
`The
`
`SightSound.com website presented a menu of music to select for purchase by
`
`showing the cover art of particular albums in a table format. Attached as exhibit
`
`2313 hereto is a true and correct copy of a screen shot from SightSound.com from
`
`1998-1999 reflecting music for sale at SightSound.com. Page numbers and an
`
`exhibit label have been added to this document but no other alterations have been
`
`made.
`
`In 1999, SightSound offered the first sale of a movie over the Internet
`
`(Darren Aronofsl<y’s movie “Pi”).
`
`PAGE 000004
`
`
`
`7.
`
`SightSound.com received press and media coverage praising the
`
`innovative new method for selling digital content. Accurate information about the
`
`history of SightSound, the website and press coverage regarding the company and
`
`website can still be found at http://www.sightsound.com/. Some specific press
`
`articles and television coverage about Mr. I-Iair’s invention and SightSound.com are
`
`under the drop down menu “In the News.” As just a few examples of the press
`
`coverage SightSound received, attached as exhibit 2314 is a true and correct copy
`
`of a November 1998 article "from the Pittsburgh Business Times entitled “Internet
`
`Firm Pioneers Downloadable Music Sales.” Page numbers and an exhibit label
`
`have been added to this document, and text has been organized to fit on an 8 1/2” x
`
`11” page, but no other alterations have been made. Further, the September 6, 1999
`issue of Time magazine featured SightSound.corn in an article entitled i‘Movies Hit
`
`the Net.” Attached as exhibit 2315 is a true and correct copy of the September 1999
`
`article. Page numbers and an exhibit label have been added to this document but no
`
`other alterations have been made. Further, in January 2000, Yahoo Internet Life
`
`magazine featured SightSour1d.com as the lead story in its article on the 100 best
`
`sites for 2000. Attached as exhibit 2316 is a true and correct copy of the January
`
`2000 Yahoo Internet Life magazine article. Page numbers and an exhibit label have
`
`been added to this document but no other alterations have been made.
`
`PAGE 000005
`
`
`
`8.
`
`On January 15, 1999, I wrote to Steve Jobs, the then-Chairman and
`
`CEO of Apple, informing him of the business of SightSound.com and the potential
`
`for Apple to participate with SightSound in the business of selling digital content
`
`over the Internet.
`
`I informed Mr. Jobs that “we believe that the download sale of
`
`movies and music will become the consumers’ method of choice,” and further, that
`
`the Mac OS (operating system) required specific functionality to support the
`
`download sales of music and movies.
`
`I also suggested that there could be an
`
`opportunity for Apple to participate in the “manufacture of an open platform audio
`
`player.” I further attached a graphical schematic detailing how the SightSound.com
`
`servers stored content, permitted the downloaded content to be received by the
`
`consumer, and could be used on a handheld device that SightSound suggested that
`
`Apple develop. Attached as exhibit 2317 is a true and correct copy of my January
`
`15, 1999 letter to Mr. Jobs with the attached schematic. Page numbers and an
`
`exhibit label have been added to this document but no other alterations have been
`
`made.
`
`9.
`
`On or around February 3, 1999, SightSound was contacted by Apple
`
`with a proposal to discuss the potential business described in my January 15, 1999
`
`letter. The letter from Apple requested that a meeting take place on a non-
`
`confidential and non-obligation basis and asked SightSound to confirm that
`
`understanding. With full confidence in the protection afforded SightSound by
`
`PAGE 000006
`
`
`
`virtue of our patents,
`
`I accepted Mr. Cefa1o’s ‘‘non-confidential and without
`
`obligation” standard for the proposed meeting. Attached as exhibit 2318 is a true
`
`and correct copy of the February 3, 1999 letter from Mr. Albert P. Cefalo on behalf
`
`of Apple to me. Page numbers and an exhibit label have been added to this
`
`document but no other alterations have been made.
`
`10.
`
`On or around February 26, 1999, Mr. Hair and I met with Mark
`
`Gavini and Tom Weyer from Apple in Los Angeles.
`
`I understood that Mr. Weyer
`
`was an Apple engineer and that Mr. Gavini was Partnership Manager of Worldwide
`
`Developer Relations. During that meeting, Mr. Hair and I explained our patents,
`
`expressed our belief in the superiority of our download purchase model versus
`
`streaming subscription services, and made several requests of Apple, notably that
`
`they manufacture a hand held portable player, and re-architect their operating
`
`system. We discussed in more detail the written schematic previously provided to
`
`Steve Jobs. We requested enhancements to Apple’s operating system to bolster
`
`digital rights management (DRM) capabilities——specifically encryption—to permit
`
`the sale of digital audio and video for download on Mac computers. After a lengthy
`
`discussion,
`
`I recall Messrs. Gavini and Weyer concluding that it would take an
`
`entire re-write of the Mac operating system to adequately support the level of
`
`encryption that would be needed to satisfy the media and entertainment industry.
`
`PAGE 000007
`
`
`
`Messrs. Gavini and Weyer indicated that SightSound should not expect such a re-
`
`write of the Mac operating system anytime soon.
`
`11.
`
`In May 2001, SightSound was the first company to electronically sell
`
`a movie into a handheld pocket personal computer; the movie “Quantum Project”
`
`was sold into the iPAQ, which was sold by Compaq Computer Corporation.
`
`Attached as exhibit 2319 is a true and correct copy of a screen shot
`
`from
`
`SightSound.com from 2001
`
`reflecting the Quantum Project
`
`for
`
`sale
`
`SightSound.com. Page numbers and an exhibit label have been added to this
`
`document but no other alterations have been made.
`
`12.
`
`SightSound continued to promote SightSound.com and the patented
`
`invention in the early 2000s. However, we were unable to successfully convince
`
`the major record labels that music and video distribution via a digital online
`
`download format was the future of the music industry and obtain licenses to sell
`
`their content.
`
`I believe that the record labels were resistant for the reasons
`
`mentioned above, and were slow to understand the market potential for online
`
`digital music and video sales. Without sufficient licenses for content to sell through
`
`SightSound.com,
`
`it was difficult
`
`to generate significant revenue from digital
`
`download sales.
`
`13.
`
`In 2002, paradoxically, our Patents, the very things that enabled us to
`
`raise the capital to launch the download industry, now were draining us of cash,
`
`PAGE 000008
`
`
`
`given the heavy cost of defending against infringers. Further, content holders were
`
`largely unwilling to give
`
`us
`
`licenses
`
`to their
`
`content
`
`to
`
`sell
`
`through
`
`SightSound.com.
`
`I understood that content holders, particularly record "labels, were
`
`unwilling for the reasons outlined above, but also because SightSound.com sold
`
`only to users of Microsoft’s’ operating system, which the record labels feared as a
`
`monopoly with its 96% market share, was of further concern to the record labels. In
`
`contrast, Apple’s 4% share made it a far less threatening partner to the record
`
`labels, or so they thought, so they were willing to grant Apple licenses to their
`
`content. Time magazine confirmed my understanding on this point, stating that the
`
`record labels gave Apple a “sweet deal” because “Apple with its miniscule share of
`
`the computer market was never going to be a real distribution threat.” Attached as
`
`exhibit 2320 is a true and correct copy of the November 17, 2003 Time magazine
`
`article “Invention of the Year.” Page numbers and an exhibit label have been added
`
`to this document but no other alterations have been made.
`
`14.
`
`In 2002, Sightsound ceased its own commercial operations, as
`
`SightSound.com was unable to generate sufficient revenue to fund SightSound’s
`
`expenses, including the costs associated with defending the Patents.
`
`PAGE 000009
`
`
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
`
`Sworn this 2_7fl' day of December, 2013 at Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
`
`
`
`PAGE 000010