throbber
Grokster Calls It Quits on Sharing Music Files - New York Times
`
`More Articles in Technology >
`
`NYTimes.com
`
`Go to a Section
`
`Log In - Register Now
`
` All of Technology
`
`
`
`Technology Home
`
`Circuits
`
`Product Reviews
`
`How To's
`
`Deals
`
`Grokster Calls It Quits on
`Sharing Music Files
`
`Advertisement
`
`By JEFF LEEDS
`Published: November 8, 2005
`
`Sign In to E-Mail This
`Printer-Friendly
`Reprints
`Save Article
`
`LOS ANGELES, Nov. 7 - Grokster, a
`developer of file-swapping software
`used to trade copyrighted music and
`movie files, said Monday that it would
`halt distribution of the software and
`cut off support for its associated
`network as part of a landmark
`settlement with the recording industry and Hollywood
`studios.
`
`Past 24 Hours | Past 7 Days
`1. Well: Attention Disorders Can Take a Toll on Marriage
`2. Prone to Error: Earliest Steps to Find Cancer
`3. Adventures in Very Recent Evolution
`4. Many States Adopt National Standards for Their Schools
`5. Recipes for Health: Spicy Quinoa, Cucumber and Tomato Salad
`
`Go to Complete List
`
`The pact comes four months
`after the Supreme Court
`unanimously ruled that
`Grokster could be held liable
`for copyright infringement by
`users of its software, a
`decision that delivered a
`decisive victory for
`entertainment companies,
`particularly music labels,
`which have blamed
`widespread digital piracy for a
`worldwide slump in sales.
`
`The court decision sent the
`case back to a trial court, but
`the settlement - submitted to a
`
`Evolution of a Court Ruling
`
`Message Displayed on
`Grokster.com
`Supreme Court Opinion (June 27,
`2005)
`
`http://www.nytimes.com/2005/11/08/technology/08grokster.html?_r=2&[3/18/2014 2:40:00 PM]
`
`
`
`Apple Exhibit 4399
`Apple v Sightsound Technologies
`CBM2013-00023
`Page 00001
`
`

`
`Grokster Calls It Quits on Sharing Music Files - New York Times
`
`federal judge in Los Angeles on Monday - averts further
`legal wrangling for Grokster in the four-year-old lawsuit.
`Grokster also agreed to pay up to $50 million in damages,
`though music executives say they do not expect to collect
`because the software company lacks the resources to pay.
`
`The deal also includes an injunction that bars Grokster from
`directly or indirectly infringing plaintiffs' copyrighted
`material.
`
`While Grokster is disappearing in its original form, the
`underlying case that culminated in the Supreme Court
`showdown may continue. Grokster's co-defendant in the
`case, Streamcast Networks, the promoter of a file-sharing
`network known as Morpheus, has indicated it plans to keep
`battling the movie studios and record labels in court.
`
`And it is a global problem. In Hong Kong on Monday, a man
`was sentenced to three months in jail for using an Internet
`file-sharing system to make three Hollywood movies
`available for free downloading. [Page 4.]
`
`More broadly, the popularity of file-sharing networks shows
`little sign of waning in the wake of the settlement or the
`earlier court decision. An estimated 9.2 million people are
`using various so-called peer-to-peer networks at any one
`time, according to BigChampagne, a data service. The figure
`has edged up from 8.8 million in June.
`
`With Monday's settlement, "I don't think, practically
`speaking, we're expecting to see much impact in the peer-to-
`peer landscape," said Eric Garland, BigChampagne's chief
`executive. "People moved on from tools like Grokster some
`time ago."
`
`The entertainment industry continues to scramble to keep
`pace, taking legal action against file-sharing networks in
`Australia and South Korea. The campaign, spearheaded by
`the Recording Industry Association of America, has also
`aimed at individuals. (The major labels have sued more than
`15,000 people since the effort began two years ago.)
`
`The recording industry has said that its legal campaign is
`intended to gradually deter the entrepreneurs who run many
`of the biggest file-sharing networks and the advertisers that
`support them, all while driving music fans to authorized
`services like iTunes from Apple Computer, which sells songs
`for 99 cents each.
`
`http://www.nytimes.com/2005/11/08/technology/08grokster.html?_r=2&[3/18/2014 2:40:00 PM]
`
`Page 00002
`
`

`
`Grokster Calls It Quits on Sharing Music Files - New York Times
`
`A result, industry executives say, should be to corral digital
`piracy to the point that it is a tolerable nuisance instead of a
`huge drain.
`
`If the industry can hang on, music executives say, its four
`major record corporations will eventually rejuvenate their
`businesses with new products, including digital downloads,
`ring tones and music videos.
`
`So far this year, sales of downloads at licensed services -
`where consumers are favoring the purchase of cheaper
`individual songs over more expensive full-length albums by
`a wide margin - have risen sharply. But the gains are not
`enough to offset the decline in "physical" album sales, which
`have been dwindling for four of the last five years.
`
`For its part, Grokster has added a new message to its Web
`site: "There are legal services for downloading music and
`movies. This service is not one of them."
`
`The company said it planned to create a "safe and legal"
`service and refer users to a new Web site,
`www.grokster3g.com. Grokster is expected to be absorbed by
`Mashboxx, a new venture run by Wayne Rosso, a former
`Grokster president, who has already struck a deal to license
`music from Sony BMG Music Entertainment, the world's
`second-biggest music company.
`
`Consumers who have already downloaded the Grokster
`software can still use it to trade files, though they risk being
`sued.
`
`More Articles in Technology >
`
`Ads by Google
`
`what's this?
`
`Windows XP Driver Updates
`Windows XP Drivers Latest Download.
`
`Microsoft Certified. (Recommended)
`windows-xp.driverupdate.net
`
`RELATED ARTICLES
`In Hong Kong, a Jail Sentence for Online File-Sharing (November 8, 2005)
`Grokster File-Sharing Service Shuts Down in Settlement (November 7,
`2005)
`A Pro-Bug Vote on the Court? (November 5, 2005)
` Justices Turn Down a New York Tax Case (November 1, 2005)
`
`http://www.nytimes.com/2005/11/08/technology/08grokster.html?_r=2&[3/18/2014 2:40:00 PM]
`
`Page 00003
`
`

`
`Grokster Calls It Quits on Sharing Music Files - New York Times
`
` Chief Justice Denies Stay in BlackBerry Case (October 27, 2005)
`
`RELATED SEARCHES
`Supreme Court Computers and the Internet Copyrights Courts
`
`INSIDE NYTIMES.COM
`
`Charles Taylor's
`Rise and Fall
`
`The Ghost in the
`Baghdad Museum
`
`Making of a Toddler
`Supergroup
`
`Digital
`Composer
`
`Sharp's Gamble on
`L.C.D. TV's Paid Off
`
`Copyright 2005 The New York Times Company
`Back to Top
`
`
` Home
`
` Privacy Policy
`
` Search
`
` Corrections
`
` XML
`
` Help
`
` Contact Us
`
` Work for Us
`
` Site Map
`
`http://www.nytimes.com/2005/11/08/technology/08grokster.html?_r=2&[3/18/2014 2:40:00 PM]
`
`Page 00004

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket