throbber

`
`Technology, resistance on part of record companies could slow
`efforts to grow business in a market now valued at $116 million
`Br KAREN Kovs'rcs
`sell to record labels, artists and
`others who own the rights to au-
`dio recordings.
`This may not be easy to do.
`Record companies have al-
`ready taken a hard—line stance
`against the online sale of music,
`which they see as potentially si-
`phoning off their profits.
`And consumers may not be
`hip to the'idea that, for now.
`songs downloaded from Sight-
`sound.corn‘s site can only be
`played on the computers they're
`downloaded to.
`
`-. ightsoundcom is ready to
`hit the electronic com—
`merce market with a ser—
`
`
`
`vice that makes it possible
`to distribute and purchase muv
`.- sic (War the Internet. But is the
`
`market ready for the company?
`Founded as Digital Sight!
`Sound in 1995, Sightsoundcom
`holds patents to technology that
`makes it possible to dowuload
`music over the Internet fore fee.
`
`Earlier this year. the company
`took this technology and built
`a World Wide Web-based ser-
`
`Nov. 10 - 16, l993WHorsemen Busmsss TiMES
`
`PhotobyDM. Scott
`Siglltsoundmom is seeking equity financing to help fund its growth strategy. Art Hair, left, is chairman
`Z. and Scott Sander CEO of the Mount Lebanon company that makes recordings available via downloading
`from the Internet
`
`lotemet iirro pioseers downloadshie Hassle soles
`
`ing ahead with its seryice.
`"if you’re going to sell music
`in download fashion, you need
`to format it. do credit card pro-
`cessing online and provide ma-
`terials to market and promote
`it." said Sightsoundcom presi-
`dent and CEO Scott Sander.
`
`Sightsound.com handles all
`these tasks from‘its headquar-
`ters on Washington Road in
`Mount Lebanon. where it em~
`plays 6 people. Working with is-
`bels or individual bands, the ‘
`
`company takes redordings and
`puts them in a computer-code
`forms: so they‘can be played on
`
`Still, company executives be-
`lieve these issues can be overw
`
`
`
`vice around it. which it hopes to
`
`come. So the company is mov—
`
`See DIGITAL page 5i]
`
`
`
`SIGHTSOUND TECHNOLOGIES
`EXHIBIT 2314
`
`CBM2013-00023 (APPLE v. SIGHTSOUND)
`PAGE 000001
`
`
`
`

`

`saohjrntirsosi
`‘ Nov. 211 41,1913
`50
`Pirrssussii 31151111155 T111115
`f Ih‘lfi'fillhtzlocnl musicians Dillai’md Sonsporticipoted 111 11 11111111110111” via internet 111137 811111111191"
`
`From page 3 -
`
`the World Wide .Web. It also scans in pho~
`tos and other promotional materials to sell
`the music so that browsers can learn more
`
`about the bands they hear.
`"in a store. you might have a cardboard
`cutout.“ Mr.» Sander said. “We do packages
`where people can see a video and getsome
`exposure to the'band.”
`The demand for such a service is just be-
`ginning to develop — International Data
`Corp. estimates the market is currently
`worth about $116 million.
`
`But Goldman Sachs, a New York City in-
`vestment banking firm. has expressed con-
`
`
`
`fidence that it will grow‘largex:
`Thefirm is helping-lSi'ghtsoundcom ne- ‘
`gotiate‘ a round enquiry financing to help
`fund its g1owth strategy. Mr. Sander de—
`clined to say howmuchmoney the com-
`pany is planningto raise.
`"They.are trying to line up companies in
`the media and entertainment industries '
`that might wantto invest in us,’Mr. Sander
`said.
`Though the market for Sightsounds tech—
`nology15 still erne1ging. Tom Cossie. pies-
`ident and CEO of DormontTechnologies
`Ltd, a Ross Township—based firm that the
`velops marketing softwarefor the music 111—-
`dustry. thinksISightsoundcom is' hitting it
`
`
`
`at the right time.
`“Downloading music from the Internet
`is becoming'a trend that‘can no longer be
`avoided." he said. "More and more artists
`
`and labels — indies and majors ~ are mak-
`ing their music available over the. Net. There
`is also a rising tideIofNet-only labels and
`artists. as well as technology-to address
`piracy issues."
`Some industry experts say the internal:
`is an ideal medium for, distributing music.
`~ "Alot of bands will utilizeit because they
`have no other way toreach people through
`out the-‘11Porld.u said Andy Morris, manager
`of'AMivl'.Managem eat, a New York City-
`. based recording industry management firm'
`
`that has managed local bands. including
`Dhaima Sons
`-
`M1. Morris andDharma Sons took a shot
`
`,
`
`at: Internet marketng this summer. partic-
`ipating in a "Virtual Tour” organized by
`Sightsoundcom.
`I
`The tour, conducted onlineat Sight-
`soundcom’s Web site, enabled surfers to lis-
`
`ten to the music of Dharma Sons and eight
`other bands and download selections they
`liked for a fee.'lt also allowed them to ex-
`
`perience the cities the tour stopped in
`through digital images.
`
`"It was really quite well done," Mr. Mo r-
`ris said.
`
`To date. Sightsound.com has packaged
`80 songs for distribution on its site. But sell- .
`ing thesis songshas hotbeen easy.
`Part of the prciblem-is that the company
`does not ship‘CDs ortapes that can be
`played anywhere. Thecompany delivers the
`selections consumeis purchase to thei1
`computers _ and these selections cannot
`be played ales-where
`While this may please recording indus—
`try trade groups concerned that music is
`being distributed free to large numbers of
`people via the lnternet. some consumers
`may find it unappealing.
`Also. downloading music from the Sight-
`sound.com site requires technology that
`most‘Consumers do not have yet. such as
`high-speed ISDN lines and cable modems.
`Once thistechnology is widely available.
`Mt Morris thinks consumers will eventu-
`ally use it to download music.
`"It‘s like (digital video diseslj' he said.
`"DVD isnow the hip thing people want to
`buy. but it took awhile for that to happen."
`
`Resistancefrom--recoiding industry trade
`"'Igioupssuch1111111:Recording Industry
`Artists Associationmay be room difficult
`to overcome.
`"Ithink theyve set a tone for the debate I
`on thisissuethat they are doing everything
`they can toprotectthe rights of their mem-
`bers." said Paul Verna p10 audioeditol fin
`Billboaid Magazine a weekly publication
`that covers the music industry. "And that
`means makingsure people cant dong-dead
`music for free—'thatsomehowti1eI1es a
`payment mechanism."
`'
`Because Sightsound.com enciypts mu-
`sic so that it can only be played on the com—
`'puter itis do'vmloaded to and collects a fee
`before delivering the goods. Mr. Sander be-
`iieves the companywill have the support of
`groups like the RIAA. .
`They may not get the support ofrecord
`executives who see download service
`providers like Sightsound.com cutting into
`their profits.
`
`“1 deal with record companiesevery day
`in New York and it's definitely an issue with
`them.” Mr. Morris said. "And it's going to be
`fol awhile?
`'
`.
`Without the supportof record compa-
`nies. which control the rights-to a majori-
`ty ofthe music- distributed Sightsound.com
`willnot have a product to package
`The company has not negotiated rela-
`tionships with any label's yet. But Mr. Mor-
`risI thinks it eventually will.
`“A lot ofthese companies are having to
`address these issues right now because their
`artists are going to want to sell records in
`this format and they want to get their roy-
`alties.” Mr Morris said.
`This15 exactly what Sightsound. com is
`counting on
`"This market will come.”Mr. Sander said.
`"And when it does, someone has to be able
`to service it at scale. We are in a state of
`
`readiness to do that."
`
`
`PAGE 000002
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket