throbber
Music Industry to Abandon Mass Suits - WSJ.com
`
`Page 1 of 2
`
`Dow Jones Reprints: This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. To order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or
`customers, use the Order Reprints tool at the bottom of any article or visit www.djreprints.com
`• See a sample reprint in PDF format.
`• Order a reprint of this article now
`
`TECHNOLOGY
`
`Music Industry to Abandon Mass Suits
`
`BySARAH MCBRIDE and ETHAN SMITH
`Updated Dec. 19, 2008 12:01 a.m. ET
`
`After years of suing thousands of people for allegedly stealing music via the Internet, the recording industry
`is set to drop its legal assault as it searches for more effective ways to combat online music piracy.
`
`The decision represents an abrupt shift of strategy for the industry, which has opened legal proceedings
`against about 35,000 people since 2003. Critics say the legal offensive ultimately did little to stem the tide
`of illegally downloaded music. And it created a public-relations disaster for the industry, whose lawsuits
`targeted, among others, several single mothers, a dead person and a 13-year-old girl.
`
`Instead, the Recording Industry Association of America said it plans to try
`an approach that relies on the cooperation of Internet-service providers.
`The trade group said it has hashed out preliminary agreements with major
`ISPs under which it will send an email to the provider when it finds a
`provider's customers making music available online for others to take.
`
`Depending on the agreement, the ISP will either forward the note to
`customers, or alert customers that they appear to be uploading music
`illegally, and ask them to stop. If the customers continue the file-sharing,
`they will get one or two more emails, perhaps accompanied by slower
`service from the provider. Finally, the ISP may cut off their access
`altogether.
`
`The RIAA said it has agreements in principle with some ISPs, but
`declined to say which ones. But ISPs, which are increasingly cutting
`content deals of their own with entertainment companies, may have more
`incentive to work with the music labels now than in previous years.
`
`The new approach dispenses with one of the most contentious parts of the lawsuit strategy, which involved
`filing lawsuits requiring ISPs to disclose the identities of file sharers. Under the new strategy, the RIAA
`would forward its emails to the ISPs without demanding to know the customers' identity.
`
`Though the industry group is reserving the right to sue people who are particularly heavy file sharers, or
`who ignore repeated warnings, it expects its lawsuits to decline to a trickle. The group stopped filing mass
`lawsuits early this fall.
`
`It isn't clear that the new strategy will work or how effective the collaboration with the ISPs will be. "There
`isn't any silver-bullet anti-piracy solution," said Eric Garland, president of BigChampagne LLC, a piracy
`consulting company.
`
`Mr. Garland said he likes the idea of a solution that works more with consumers. In the years since the
`RIAA began its mass legal action, "It has become abundantly clear that the carrot is far more important
`than the stick." Indeed, many in the music industry felt the lawsuits had outlived their usefulness.
`
`http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB122966038836021137
`
`3/18/2014
`
`Apple Exhibit 4205
`Apple v. SightSound Technologies
`CBM2013-00020
`Page 00001
`
`

`
`Music Industry to Abandon Mass Suits - WSJ.com
`Page 2 of 2
`"I'd give them credit for stopping what they've already been doing because it's been so destructive," said
`Brian Toder, who represents a Minnesota mother involved in a high-profile file-sharing case. But his client
`isn't off the hook. The RIAA said it plans to continue with outstanding lawsuits.
`
`Over the summer, New York State Attorney General Andrew Cuomo began brokering an agreement
`between the recording industry and the ISPs that would address both sides' piracy concerns. "We wanted
`to end the litigation," said Steven Cohen, Mr. Cuomo's chief of staff. "It's not helpful."
`
`As the RIAA worked to cut deals with individual ISPs, Mr. Cuomo's office started working on a broader
`plan under which major ISPs would agree to work to prevent illegal file-sharing.
`
`The RIAA believes the new strategy will reach more people, which itself is a deterrent. "Part of the issue
`with infringement is for people to be aware that their actions are not anonymous," said Mitch Bainwol, the
`group's chairman.
`
`Mr. Bainwol said that while he thought the litigation had been effective in some regards, new methods
`were now available to the industry. "Over the course of five years, the marketplace has changed," he said
`in an interview. Litigation, he said, was successful in raising the public's awareness that file-sharing is
`illegal, but now he wants to try a strategy he thinks could prove more successful.
`
`The RIAA says piracy would have been even worse without the lawsuits. Citing data from consulting firm
`NPD Group Inc., the industry says the percentage of Internet users who download music over the Internet
`has remained fairly constant, hovering around 19% over the past few years. However, the volume of music
`files shared over the Internet has grown steadily.
`
`Meanwhile, music sales continue to fall. In 2003, the industry sold 656 million albums. In 2007, the number
`fell to 500 million CDs and digital albums, plus 844 million paid individual song downloads -- hardly enough
`to make up the decline in album sales.
`
`—Amol Sharma contributed to this article.
`
`Write to Sarah McBride at sarah.mcbride@wsj.com and Ethan Smith at ethan.smith@wsj.com
`
`Copyright 2013 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved
`This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. Distribution and use of this material are governed by our Subscriber Agreement and by copyright law.
`For non-personal use or to order multiple copies, please contact Dow Jones Reprints at 1-800-843-0008 or visit
`www.djreprints.com
`
`http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB122966038836021137
`
`3/18/2014
`
`Page 00002

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket