`
` 104677-5005-801
`Customer No. 28120
`
`Petitioner: Apple Inc.
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`§
`Inventor: Hair
`United States Patent No.: 5,191,573 §
`Formerly Application No.: 586,391 §
`Issue Date: March 2, 1993
`§
`Filing Date: September 18, 1990
`§
`Former Group Art Unit: 369
`§
`Former Examiner: Hoa Nguyen
`§
`
`For: Method for Transmitting a Desired Digital Video or Audio Signal
`
`MAIL STOP PATENT BOARD
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`Post Office Box 1450
`Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450
`
`DECLARATION OF CHING-LEE FUKUDA IN SUPPORT OF PETITION
`FOR COVERED BUSINESS METHOD PATENT REVIEW OF
`UNITED STATES PATENT NO. 5,191,573
`PURSUANT TO 35 U.S.C. § 321, 37 C.F.R. § 42.304
`
`
`
`
`I, Ching-Lee Fukuda, make the following Declaration pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
`
`1746:
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`I am a Partner at the law firm of Ropes & Gray LLP.
`
`I provide this Declaration in connection with the above-identified
`
`Covered Business Method Patent Review proceeding that is being requested at the
`
`United States Patent and Trademark Office by Apple Inc. under 35 U.S.C. § 321, 37
`
`C.F.R. § 42.304. Unless otherwise stated, the facts stated in this Declaration are based
`
`on my personal knowledge.
`
`
`
`3.
`
`Exhibit 1017 hereto is a true and correct copy of an excerpt from
`
`Chambers Science and Technology Dictionary, published in 1988 by W & R
`
`Chambers Ltd and Cambridge University Press, which was retrieved by InfoNOW, a
`
`commercial and document delivery service of the University of Minnesota, at my
`
`request. The excerpt contains markings at the top of each page because it was filed as
`
`part of Apple Inc.’s Identification and Appendix of Extrinsic Evidence in Support of
`
`Its Proposed Claim Constructions in SightSound Techs., LLC v. Apple Inc., No. 11-
`
`01292, before the District Court of the Western District of Pennsylvania, on
`
`September 7, 2013 (Dkt. No. 94-11). The document is available from the Public
`
`Access to Court Electronic Records (“PACER”) website and is a record of the
`
`aforementioned District Court to which all parties have access. Page numbers have
`
`been added to the bottom of this document and an exhibit label has been added to
`
`the top of this document but no alterations, other than the noted markings, have been
`
`made.
`
`4.
`
`Exhibit 1029 hereto is a true and correct copy of an excerpt from
`
`Webster’s II New Riverside University Dictionary, published in 1984 by the Riverside
`
`Publishing Company, which was retrieved by InfoNOW, a commercial and document
`
`delivery service of the University of Minnesota, at my request. The excerpt contains
`
`markings at the top of each page because it was filed as part of Apple Inc.’s
`
`Identification and Appendix of Extrinsic Evidence in Support of Its Proposed Claim
`
`
`
`Constructions in SightSound Techs., LLC v. Apple Inc., No. 11-01292, before the District
`
`Court of the Western District of Pennsylvania, on September 7, 2013 (Dkt. No. 94-7).
`
`The document is available from the Public Access to Court Electronic Records
`
`(“PACER”) website and is a record of the aforementioned District Court to which all
`
`parties have access. Page numbers have been added to the bottom of this document
`
`and an exhibit label has been added to the top of this document but no alterations,
`
`other than the noted markings, have been made.
`
`5.
`
`I make this declaration of my own personal knowledge. If called to
`
`testify as to the truth of the matters stated herein, I could and would testify
`
`competently.
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
`
`6.
`
`
`
`Executed this 5th day of May, 2013 in New York, NY.
`
`
`
`Ching-Lee Fukuda
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
