`Trials@uspto.gov
`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Paper 14
`
`
` Entered: November 15, 2013
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________________
`
`
`
`VOLUSION, INC.
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`VERSATA SOFTWARE, INC. AND
`VERSATA DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC.
`Patent Owner
`____________
`
`Case CBM2013-00017
`Patent 6,834,282 B1
`____________
`
`Before HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP, SALLY C. MEDLEY, and
`KEVIN F. TURNER, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`MEDLEY, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`ORDER
`Conduct of the Proceeding
` 37 C.F.R. § 42.5
`
`
`
`
`
`Case CBM2013-00017
`Patent 6,834,282 B1
`
`
`On November 12, 2013, the initial conference call 1 was held between
`
`counsel for the respective parties and Judges Medley, Blankenship, and
`
`Turner.
`
`Motions
`
`Neither party seeks authorization to file a motion at this time. If
`
`Patent Owner determines that it will file a motion to amend, Patent Owner
`
`must arrange a conference call soon thereafter with the Board and opposing
`
`counsel to discuss the proposed motion to amend. See 37 C.F.R. §
`
`42.121(a).
`
`
`
`Schedule
`
`Counsel for the respective parties indicated that they have no issues
`
`with the Scheduling Order (Paper 9) entered October 24, 2013.
`
`
`
`It is
`
`Order
`
`ORDERED that no motions are authorized at this time.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 The initial conference call is held to discuss the Scheduling Order and any
`motions that the parties anticipate filing during the trial. Office Patent Trial
`Practice Guide, 77 Fed. Reg. 48756, 48765 (Aug. 14, 2012).
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case CBM2013-00017
`Patent 6,834,282 B1
`
`For PETITIONER:
`
`Keith Broyles
`keith.broyles@alston.com
`
`Jason Cooper
`jason.cooper@alston.com
`
`David Frist
`david.frist@alston.com
`
`
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`
`Kent Chambers
`kchambers@tcchlaw.com
`
`Alisa Lipski
`alipski@azalaw.com
`
`
`
`3
`
`