IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`AUSTIN DIVISION
`
`
`
`VERSATA SOFTWARE, INC., F/K/A
`
`TRILOGY SOFTWARE, INC.; and
`
`VERSATA DEVELOPMENT GROUP,
`INC., F/K/A TRILOGY DEVELOPMENT
`GROUP, INC.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`VOLUSION, INC.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-cv-00893
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PLAINTIFFS’ PROPOSED CLAIM CONSTRUCTIONS
`
`Pursuant to the Court’s Docket Control Order (Doc. No. 27), Plaintiffs Versata Software,
`
`Inc., F/K/A Trilogy Software, Inc.; and Versata Development Group, Inc., F/K/A Trilogy
`
`Development Group, Inc. (“Versata” or “Plaintiffs”) respectfully serves its Proposed Claim
`
`Constructions. Versata reserves the right to amend or offer additional constructions depending,
`
`for example, on the parties’ ability or inability to agree on a finalized list of terms for the Court’s
`
`construction.
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,834,282
`
`PLAINTIFFS’ IDENTIFIED CLAIM TERMS
`database
`node(s)
`
`PLAINTIFFS’ PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION
`Collection of data stored within a computer
`Representation of an item or set of items stored
`in a database that inherits the constraints of its
`ancestors
`Requirement based on an attribute associated
`with items in a database and a permissible
`range of values for that attribute
`Arbitrary grouping that does not specify one or
`more constraints
`DEFENDANT’S IDENTIFIED CLAIM TERMS
`constraints defining a scope of the subset of
`See above for proposed definition of
`
`constraint
`
`logical grouping
`
`VOLUSION EXHIBIT 1019
`Volusion v. Versata
`CBM2013-00017
`
`

`

`items represented by each of the first
`portion relative to their parent node
`establishing a logical grouping defining a
`scope of the subset of the items represented by
`each of the second portion
`establishing a logical grouping of the items for
`a second portion of the nodes, the logical
`grouping defining a scope of the subset of
`items represented by each of the second
`portion of nodes
`constraint[s]
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,426,481
`
`“constraint”
`
`See above for proposed definition of “logical
`grouping”
`
`See above for proposed definition of “logical
`grouping”
`
`See above for proposed definition of
`“constraint”
`
`PLAINTIFFS’ IDENTIFIED CLAIM TERMS
`product features
`product model identifier
`
`PLAINTIFFS’ PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION
`Available properties of a product
`Identifying model information that may be
`used by a database that is not an attribute
`Allowable combinations of product features
`Defined properties of a product
`DEFENDANT’S IDENTIFIED CLAIM TERMS
`Collection of data stored within a computer
`Identified product[s]
`Product features and product rules governing
`allowable combinations of the product
`features/ allowable combinations of product
`features
`No construction necessary.
`
`product configurations
`product attributes
`
`database
`product selection[s]
`product configuration information / product
`configuration
`
`identify[ing] products stored in [the / a]
`memory based on two different types, (A) and
`(B), of product identification
`product identification
`product model identifier
`
`product identifier
`
`if the product related data represents
`receiving a product identifier and identifying
`each combination of attributes stored in the
`database that corresponds to the product
`identifier, if the product related data represents
`the product identifier, if the product related
`data represents the product identifier
`
`
`No construction necessary.
`Identifying model information that may be
`used by a database other than an attribute
`Identifying information that may be used by a
`database other than an attribute
`No construction necessary.
`Receiving a product identifier and identifying
`each combination of attributes stored in the
`database that corresponds to the product
`identifier, if the product related data represents
`the product identifier
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`Dated: June 17, 2013
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Steven J. Mitby
`Steven J. Mitby
`State Bar No. 24037123
`smitby@azalaw.com
`Demetrios Anaipakos
`State Bar No. 004793258
`danaipakos@azalaw.com
`Amir H. Alavi
`State Bar No. 00793239
`aalavi@azalaw.com
`Alisa Lipski
`State Bar No. 24041345
`alipski@azalaw.com
`1221 McKinney Street, Suite 3460
`Houston, Texas 77010
`Telephone: 713-655-1101
`Facsimile: 713-655-0062
`
`Patton G. Lochridge
`State Bar No. 12458500
`plochridge@mcginnislaw.com
`Travis Barton
`State Bar No. 00790276
`tcbarton@mcginnislaw.com
`McGinnis, Lochridge & Kilgore, L.L.P.
`600 Congress Avenue, Suite 2100
`Austin, Texas 78701
`Telephone: 512-495-6000
`Facsimile: 512-495-6093
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS
`
`4
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`
`
`I hereby certify that on June 17, 2013, a copy of Plaintiffs’ Proposed Terms and Claim
`
`Elements for Construction was served by email on the following:
`
`David S. Frist
`Keith E. Broyles
`Pamela H. Councill
`Alston & Bird, LLP
`One Atlantic Center
`1201 West Peachtree Street
`Atlanta, GA 30309-3424
`404.881.7000
`Fax: 404.881.7777
`Email: david.frist@alston.com
`Email: keith.broyles@alston.com
`Email: pamela.councill@alston.com
`
`Michael J Newton
`Alston & Bird LLP
`2828 N. Harwood St., Suite 1800
`Dallas, TX 75201
`214-922-3423
`Fax: 214-922-3863
`Email: mike.newton@alston.com
`
`Matthew C. Powers
`Graves Dougherty
`401 Congress Avenue
`Suite 2200
`Austin, TX 78701
`(512)480-5600
`Fax: (512)536-9938
`Email: mpowers@gdhm.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Steven J. Mitby
`Steven J. Mitby
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`4811-7458-5364, v. 1
`4811-7458-5364, v. 1
`
`
`
`6
`
`