throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`U.S. BANCORP
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`RETIREMENT CAPITAL ACCESS MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLC
` Patent Owner
`
`
`
`
`Case No. CBM2013-00014
`Patent No. 6,625,582
`
`
`
`
`
`DECLARATION OF CASEY L. GRIFFITH
`IN SUPPORT OF PATENT OWNER
`RETIREMENT CAPITAL ACCESS MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLC’S
`SUPPLEMENTAL EVIDENCE PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R. § 42.64(b)(2)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`  
`
`

`
`1, Casey L. Griffith, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1746, declare under penalty of
`
`perjury, pursuant to the laws of the United States, that the following is true and
`
`correct and within my own personal knowledge.
`
`If called as a witness, I would
`
`testify as follows:
`
`I represent Retirement Capital Access Management Company LLC in
`
`the above captioned Covered Business Method review.
`
`The attached exhibit 2016 is a true and correct copy of Regulators to
`
`Restrict Big Banks’ Payday Lending, Deal Book 1, The New York
`
`Times Company, 2013 WLNR 9953554 (April 23, 2013) that
`
`I
`
`personally obtained from http://next.westlaw.com on November 19,
`
`2013.
`
`Exhibit 2016 continues to be available today on Westlaw.
`
`It can be
`
`accessed by entering the citation 2014 WLNR 9953554 at
`
`the
`
`Westlaw website located at URL http://next.westlaw.com.
`
`Executed on December 9, 2013
`
`

`
`Regulators to Restrict Big Banks' Payday Lending, 2013 WLNR 9953554
`
`4/23/13 DealBook 1
`2013 WLNR 9953554
`
`DealBook
`Copyright (c) 2013 The New York Times Company
`
`April 23, 2013
`
`Section: dealbook
`
`Regulators to Restrict Big Banks' Payday Lending
`DealBook
`
`JESSICA SILVER-GREENBERG
`
`Federal regulators are expected to crack down on short-term, high-cost credit offered by large banks like Wells Fargo and U.S.
`Bank.
`
`April 23, 2013
`
`8:53 p.m. | Updated
`
`Federal regulators are poised to crack down on payday loans — the short-term, high-cost credit that can mire borrowers in
`debt.But instead of taking aim at storefront payday lenders, the banking authorities are focusing on the small operations' big
`bank rivals, likeWells Fargoand U.S. Bank, according to several people briefed on the matter.
`
`A handful of banks offer the loans tied to checking accounts, with the understanding that the lender can automatically withdraw
`the loan amount, plus the origination fee, when it is due.
`
`Regulators from theOffice of the Comptroller of theCurrencyand theFederal Deposit Insurance Corporationare expected to
`clamp down on the loans, which carry interest rates that can soar above 300 percent, by the end of the week, these people said.
`
`The F.D.I.C. and the comptroller's office declined to comment.
`
`The regulators are expected to impose more stringent requirements on the loans.Before making a loan, for example, banks will
`have to assess a consumer's ability to repay the money.
`
`Banking authorities are also expected to institute a mandatory cooling-off period of 30 days between loans — a reform intended
`to halt what consumer advocates call a debt spiral of borrowers taking out fresh loans to cover their outstanding debt.As part
`of that, banks will not be able to extend a new loan until a borrower has paid off any previous ones.
`
`Another requirement, the people said, will address marketing.Because the advances are not typically described as loans, the
`interest rates are largely opaque to borrowers.Wells Fargo, for example, charges $1.50 for every $20 borrowed.While the bank's
`
` © 2013 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.
`
`1
`
`RCAMC EXHIBIT 2016
`
`

`
`Regulators to Restrict Big Banks' Payday Lending, 2013 WLNR 9953554
`
`Web site warns that the products are "expensive," there is no calculation of an interest rate.The banking regulators will require
`that banks disclose the interest rates, according to the people familiar with the guidance.
`
`Some of the guidelines would hew closely to mortgage rules already required under the Dodd-Frank financial overhaul
`law.Under the law, lenders have to calculate a customer's ability to shoulder the principal and interest payments over the life
`of a mortgage.
`
`The loans have proliferated since the financial crisis, according to consumer advocates — spurred in part by banks' aggressive
`search for fresh revenue after losing billions of dollars in income from regulations that restrict fees on debit and credit cards.
`
`Banks deny that the loans are predatory and point out that lenders are simply catering to demand from consumers.
`
`"Checking Account Advance gives customers access to funds for use in case of an emergency, with transparent pricing and
`safeguards and cooling-off periods built in to help customers avoid becoming overextended," said Teri Charest, a spokeswoman
`for U.S. Bank.
`
`Richele J. Messick, a Wells Fargo spokeswoman, echoed that position. "The loan is designed to help customers through an
`emergency situation," she said.
`
`For low-income consumers, the loans can result in a torrent of overdraft charges and fees.Borrowers who take out payday loans
`are roughly two times as likely to be hit with overdraft fees, according to a March report by the Center for Responsible Lending,
`an advocacy group.
`
`The impact of the loans can be devastating for seniors, according to the report, becauseSocial Securityand disability payments
`deposited directly into checking accounts can be siphoned to satisfy fees incurred by the loan.
`
`Annette Smith, 69, a retired caretaker in Rocklin, Calif., said she had been ensnared by the loans since she borrowed $500 more
`than five years ago against her Wells Fargo checking account.
`
`She vows every month to never take out the high-cost credit again, she said, but each month a slew of bills undermines that
`promise.To cover the cost of the loan, the bank draws from Ms. Smith's Social Security income after her benefits of about
`$1,200 a month are deposited in her account.
`
`"This is predatory lending, plain and simple," Ms. Smith said.
`
`The move by regulators is the latest salvo in a push against the loans.On Wednesday, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
`issued a report that found the payday and direct-deposit loans could transform from short-term credit into a long-term burden.
`"For too many consumers, payday and deposit advance loans are debt traps," Richard Cordray, the agency's director, said in
`a statement.
`
`Last May, the F.D.I.C. said the agency was "deeply concerned" about payday lending.The comptroller's office said in June
`2011 that the loans increased "operational and credit risks and supervisory concerns."Lawmakers, led by SenatorJeff Merkley,
`Democrat of Oregon, are also looking to rein in payday loans.In July, he introduced a bill that would force payday lenders to
`abide by state usury caps where the borrower lives.
`
`"Payday lending and other predatory loans strip wealth from working families," Mr. Merkley said.
`
`---- Index References ----
`
` © 2013 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.
`
`2
`
`RCAMC EXHIBIT 2016
`
`

`
`Regulators to Restrict Big Banks' Payday Lending, 2013 WLNR 9953554
`
`Company: US BANCORP; WELLS FARGO AND CO
`
`News Subject: (Major Corporations (1MA93))
`
`Industry: (Banking (1BA20); Consumer Finance (1CO55); Financial Services (1FI37); Loans (1LO12); Mortgage Banking
`(1MO85); Retail Banking Services (1RE38); Subprime Lending (1SU05))
`
`Language: EN
`
`Other Indexing: (Richard Cordray; Annette Smith; Annette Smith; Merkley; Richele Messick; Teri Charest)
`
`Word Count: 826
`
`End of Document
`
`© 2013 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.
`
` © 2013 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.
`
`3
`
`RCAMC EXHIBIT 2016

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket