throbber
Exhibit 1005
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
`
`SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
`
`ATTESTATION
`
`
`
`I HEREBY A'I'I'EST
`
`that:
`
`Attached is a copy ofan annual report on Form 1 0-K, for the
`
`fiscal year ended December 3], 1989, received in this
`
`Commission on April 16, 1990, under the name of Geostar
`
`Corp, File No. 0-] 6868, pursuant to the provisions ofthe
`
`Securities Exchange Act of I 93 4.
`
`
`(Date) Curtis Francisco
`
`
`
`on file in this Commission
`
`
`
`September 18, 2012
`
`sec 334 (10/07)
`
`Records Ofiicer
`It is hereby certified that the Secretary ofthe U.S. Securities and Exchange
`Commission, Washington, D.C., which Commission was created by the
`Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.) is official
`custodian ofthe records and files of said Commission, and all records and
`files created or established by the Federal Trade Commission pursuant to
`the provisions of the Securities Act of 1933 and transferred to this
`Commission in accordance with Section 210 of the Securities Exchange
`Act of 1934, and was such official custodian at the time of executing the
`above attestation, and that helshe, and persons holding the positions of
`Deputy Secretary, Assistant Director, Records Officer, Branch Chief of
`Records Management, and the Program Analyst for the Records Officer,
`or any one of them, are authorized to execute the above attestation.
`
`For the Commission
`
`W:
`
`Secretary
`
`772. WW
`Exhibit 1005
`
`Liberty Mutual
`
`Page 000001
`
`Page 000001
`
`

`

` FORM lO-K
`
` SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
`
`Washington, D.C.
`
`20549
`
`
`
`[x1
`
`ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15
`ACT or 1931.
`
`(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
`
`HEUI’EJEO.
`
`For the fiscal year ended December 31,or
`APR 18 1990
`ANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SE URITIES
`
`FEE 108
`]
`TRANSITION REPORT PURSU
`EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
`
`1989
`
`For the transition period from
`
`Commission File No. O-léséfi
`
`to
`
`GEOSTAR CORPORATION
`(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
`22-2h78651
`
`(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
`
`_
`
`_
`
`'
`
`Delaware
`(State or other jurisdiction of
`incorporation or organization)
`20037
`1001 22nd Street, N.fl., Washington, 9.8.
`(Zip code)
`(Address of principal executive offices)
`rant's telephone number,
`including area code: {2021 887—0870
`Em)
`Name of each exchangq}:j
`APR191990
`on yhich registeredgj?
`itle of each class
`[:23
`E5:
`None
`:3
`None
`Eb
`Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
`Common Stock, par value 5. .01 per share a
`(Title of Class)
`
`Regist
`
`Securities registered pursuant to Sect
`
`ion 12(b) of the Act:
`
`m.
`
`T
`
`“
`ig駧
`V
`
`Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all
`he Securities Exchange
`reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of t
`Act of 193h during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
`registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
`filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes_x_ No___
`lic trading market for the Common Stock
`value of the Common Stock held by
`be accurately estimated.
`
`There is no established pub
`and accordingly, no aggregate market
`non-affiliates of the registrant can
`The number of shares of Common Stock outstanding as of March 1, 1990 was
`11,490,068.
`
`73m. Now 0; fees-150 aWWM 94‘ V”- 74
`
`I
`
`Page 000002
`
`
`
`
`
`Beams!MommationServices
`
`
`
`Gflflmbmg,Marylanq
`
`
`
`Page 000002
`
`

`

`
`
`2369-90-20204
`
`PART I
`
`Item 1 - Business
`
`a,
`
`Geostar Corporation (the "Company") operates a nation—
`wide mobile positioning and two-way digital message satellite
`communications system which was being used as of March 1, 1990 by
`approximately seventy-five trucking companies and government
`agencies. As of that date,
`these customers transmitted approxi-
`mately 65,000 messages per day through the Company's satellite
`transponders and computer-communications network. User terminals
`for the Company's current system are produced by Sony Corporation
`of America ("Sony"), Hughes Network Systems, Inc., a subsidiary
`of General Motors Corporation ("Hughes") and Kenwood Corporation
`("Kenwood") and marketed principally by Sony and Hughes.
`The
`Company was incorporated in Delaware on February 18, 1983 to de-
`velop and operate a system (referred to herein as the "GEOSTAR
`System" or the "System")
`to provide radio determination satellite
`service ("RDSS").
`RDSS means the determination of the position,
`velocity or other characteristics of an object, or the obtaining
`of information relating to these parameters, by means of the
`propagation properties of radio waves,
`including ancillary data
`communications.
`The Federal Communications Commission ("FCC")
`has permitted the Company to provide other-data communications
`services as well so long as the primary purpose of the Company's
`satellites is RDSS.
`The GEOSTAR RDSS System will employ satel-
`lites in geostationary orbit, a ground station known as GEOSTAR
`Central and user terminals to determine and transmit the location
`and other data from a user terminal, which may be stationary or
`on a car,
`truck, boat, aircraft or railcar, or hand carried, and
`to provide two-way communications between user terminals or be-
`tween a user terminal and a user's central control site.
`
`the Company signed an Exclusive Patent
`In May 1989,
`_
`License and Technology Transfer Agreement with a European company
`to establish a compatible RDSS system covering Europe,
`the Med-
`iterranean,
`the Middle East and Africa.
`The shareholders of the
`European company approved an increase in its capitalization in
`March 1990 to enable that company to begin the development of its
`3355 program.
`The Company currently has a 7.5% percent ownership
`interest in the EurOpean company and has the right to share in
`its revenues and designate a member of its Board of Directors.
`
`In June 1989, a United States patent was issued to the
`C
`aggpany covering a vehicle navigation system using two satellites
`a digital terrain map.
`See "Patents."
`
`ti
`
`the Company began commercial opera-
`In September 1989,
`_
`on Of its two-way System 2C mobile positioning and satellite
`
`_
`
`:L
`
`Page000003
`
`Page 000003
`
`

`

`g‘
`~
`
`System 2C permits position determination
`communications service.
`and fully integrated two-way communications between mobile users
`and central control sites.
`See "Products and Services -- GEOSTAR
`systems 2.0 and 2C (Phase 1)."
`In October 1989,
`the GTE satellite carrying the Com-
`pany's two L-band transponders, which was launched in September
`1988,
`reached its proper orbital location.
`The satellite is
`operational and is estimated to have a life of up to five years.
`One transponder will provide coverage for the Caribbean basin,
`including Central America and northern South America, while the
`second transponder will provide back-up coverage for the conti-
`nental United States.
`
`the Company amended its satellite
`In December 1989,
`construction contract with General Electric Corporation, Astro
`Space Division ("GE Astro") to include the construction and
`delivery of two single beam satellites to precede the construc-
`tion and delivery of the three multiple beam satellites original-
`ly contracted for. Once operational,
`these two single beam
`satellites and a digital terrain map will permit commencement of
`the Company's RDSS service.
`Subsequent to the signing of this
`agreement,
`the Company decided to defer construction of the
`satellites for at least one year.
`See "Products and Services --
`GEOSTAR RDSS (Phase 2)."
`
`;
`
`‘
`
`h exploring and evaluating financing alternatives for operations
`
`The Company believes it can meet its financing require-
`ments through the end of the second quarter of 1990 from revenues
`from operations and existing funds (assuming no repayment of
`existing indebtedness payable on demand) and is in the process of
`
`subsequent to that date. There can be no assurance that the
`Company will be successful in obtaining such financing.
`See
`"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
`Results of Operations."
`
`The Company's operations are currently in one industry:
`position determination and mobile satellite communications.
`
`Products and Services
`
`The Company's revenues are generated from (i) contracts
`with agencies of the United States government; (ii) the licensing
`of the Company‘s technology to foreign entities when approved by
`the appropriate government agencies for export; (iii) the sale of
`software and hardware for use in connection with GEOSTAR System
`services;
`(iv) the provision of GEOSTAR System services; and (V)
`the provision of related technical services and equipment.
`The
`following are descriptions of systems currently being operated by
`
`3 P
`
`age 000004
`
`Page 000004
`
`

`

`
`
`2369-90—20204
`
`the Company and the status of systems being developed by the Com—
`pany.
`The services provided by each system being developed or
`operated by the Company generally represent or will represent
`progressive enhancements to position determination capabilities,
`message transfer or other capabilities or capacity over services
`currently being offered.
`
`In March 1988,
`GEOSTAR Systems 2.0 and 2C (Phase 1).
`the Company's primary and back-up L—band transponders for its
`system 2.0 were successfully placed in orbit aboard the GTE
`satellite, Spacenet 3R.
`System 2.0, which commenced commercial
`operation in July 1988, provides position information and one-way
`messaging consisting of up to 100 characters per transmission
`from mobile users located anywhere in the continental United
`States through one of the Company's L—band transponders to the
`Company's central computer facility ("GEOSTAR Central") (inbound)
`for transmission to the user's central control site.
`
`GEOSTAR System 2C service, which is the Company's
`anationwide satellite-based, positioning and two—way message ser-
`vice, commenced operations in September 1989. As in System 2.0,
`positioning and message data are transmitted to GEOSTAR Central
`through one of the L-band transponders (inbound).
`In contrast to
`System 2.0,
`the System 2C terminals,
`through an additional omni-
`directional antenna connected to a receiver unit, receive digital
`messages from GEOSTAR Central
`(outbound) which have been trans-
`mitted through a relay station and a C-band transponder on board
`an existing satellite. Those messages, which are addressed to
`each user individually through a unique identification code, can
`be communicated to the mobile user and can be printed or shown on
`a liquid crystal display unit.
`The primary L-band and C-band
`transponders being used by the Company are both located on the
`Spacenet 3R satellite.
`The Company owns the C-band transponder
`on Spacenet 3R.
`The Company also leases a back-up C-band tran-
`sponder aboard another satellite.
`
`Position information in Systems 2.0 and 2C is obtained
`through the use of Loran-C units which provide position informa-
`tion to an accuracy that varies from one-sixteenth of a mile to
`one mile. Position information could also be obtained through
`Global Positioning System ("GPS") units, which the Company's li-
`censed manufacturers may offer for sale when the GPS System is
`Operational, which is expected to occur by the end of 1991.
`See
`"Competition." Processed information can be sent from GEOSTAR
`Central to the users' central control sites by conventional dial—
`up telephones, very small aperture terminals ("VSAT") satellite
`dishes or public data networks. Personnel at the customer's cen-
`tral control sites, using personal computers or an integrated
`computer system and software developed by third parties in
`éssociation with the Company or its vendors,
`locate their veh-
`lcles on maps which provide various levels of detail (nationwide,
`
`4.
`
`Page 000005
`
`Page 000005
`
`

`

`2369-90-20204
`
`quadrant or local) that may be selected by the user, and read
`messages from each vehicle on the computer screen.
`
`Although System 2.0 one-way service remains available
`for customers of the Company, most existing accounts are being
`a converted to, and new orders are generally for,
`the two-way capa-
`bility of System 2C.
`The Company has licensed Sony, Hughes and
`Kenwood to manufacture user terminals for GEOSTAR System 2C.
`Systems 2.0 and ZC service, hardware and software revenues ac-
`counted for approximately 34% and 22% of the Company's revenues
`in 1989 and 1988, respectively.
`
`The Company's second and third L-band transponders, one
`of which will provide coverage for the Caribbean basin,
`including
`Central America and northern South America, were launched on
`September 8, 1988 aboard another GTE satellite. When the satel-
`lite failed to reach its proper orbit as a result of a malfunc-
`tion,
`the on-board fuel normally used to keep a satellite in its
`proper orbit was used to boost the satellite into geosynchronous
`orbit. Although the useful life of the satellite was reduced
`from the normal life of ten years to approximately five years by
`this procedure,
`the satellite was placed in geosynchronous orbit,
`and the transponders are operational. Because of the launch mal-
`function and the resulting reduced satellite life,
`the Company
`filed a constructive total loss insurance claim relating to the
`two transponders and,
`in March 1989,
`receiVed insurance proceeds
`of $5 million, $1.75 million of which was used to repay certain
`obligations. As a result,
`the insurance carriers are entitled to
`50% of any revenues (net of all costs associated with the oper-
`ation of such transponders) generated by the Company from the use
`of the transponders.
`The Company is not currently providing com-
`mercial service through the transponders, but is using them for
`testing and back-up.
`The Company expects to provide commercial
`service through one of the transponders to the Caribbean basin in
`1990.
`
`Elements of risk related to the GEOSTAR System, as well
`as other satellite-based systems,
`include the possibility of sig-
`nificant delays in the launch of satellites,
`the possibility that
`the launch of a satellite may fail and the possibility that one
`or more transponders or satellites may cease to operate or may
`not cperate according to specifications once in orbit, with no
`possibility of repair.
`
`mation will be determined through triangulation (or
`
`GEOSTAR RDSS (also known as
`GEOSTAR RDSS (Phase 2).
`System 3.0) will be a complete two-way service capable of provid-
`ing precise position information and two-way transfer of messages
`(consisting of up to 110 characters per transmission) between low
`cost, miniaturized, portable user terminals. Rather than relying
`on external sources such as Loran-C or GPS, RDSS position infor-
`
`Page 000006
`
`Page 000006
`
`

`

`2369—90—20204
`
`bilaterization with a digital terrain map) calculations utilizing
`the times of arrival of radio signals received from the Company‘s
`satellites and satellite transponders.
`System 3.0 can operate
`utilizing at least one satellite operated entirely by the Company
`(a "dedicated satellite") and the Company's existing trans-
`ponders.
`System 3.0 would provide more precise positioning,
`higher transmission speeds, miniaturization of user terminals and
`greater system capacity than Systems 2.0 and 2C. One single beam
`satellite has the capacity to serve 500,000 user terminals, pro-
`vided that GEOSTAR Central has sufficient capacity.
`The Company
`plans to increase the capacity of GEOSTAR Central as required to
`meet customer demand.
`
`the Company amended its satellite
`In December 1989,
`construction contract with GE Astro to provide for the construc-
`tion and delivery of two single beam dedicated satellites by GE
`Astro at an aggregate cost of $86,575,000.
`The construction of
`the single beam satellites would precede that of the three mul-
`tiple beam satellites originally contracted for.
`The amended
`agreement calls for monthly progress payments in varying amounts
`to be paid during the construction period.
`The amended agreement
`also calls for a decrease in the cost of the multi-beam satel-
`lites from $161,575,000 to $155,000,000.
`If the delivery of the
`satellites by GE Astro or the launch of the satellites is de-
`layed,
`the Company can postpone for specified periods certain
`payments to CE Astro, depending on the reason for and the length
`of the delay.
`The Company is currently negotiating an
`arrangement with GE Astro which would allow the Company to defer
`construction of the satellites for at least one year.
`See
`"Regulatory and Governmental Matters."
`
`The Company's contract with the National Aeronautics
`and Space Administration ("NASA") for the launch of dedicated
`satellites provides for the deferral of payment of the launch
`costs of those satellites.
`Such payments will be made over a
`five year period beginning two years after launch with the final
`payment being made in the sixth year after launch.
`The contract
`provides that such deferred launch costs shall have that priority
`equal to at least the highest priority among unsecured creditors.
`The amount of such launch costs will equal NASA's price at the
`date of launch (the Company estimates that NASA's current price
`is approximately $36 million per launch).
`In addition to these
`costs,
`the Company would be required to purchase an upper stage
`vehicle to boost the satellite into geosynchronous orbit,
`the
`cost of which is currently estimated at $13 million. That amount
`is not included in the NASA financing.
`
`The Company is presently negotiating with NASA to sub-
`stitute a dual
`launch, consisting of two single beam satellites,
`in place of the first of the three single launches of multiple
`beam satellites provided for in the original contract.
`The
`
`.
`'
`
`
`
`Page000007
`
`Page 000007
`
`

`

`WW" __.
`
`_
`
`2369-90-20204
`
`Company is negotiating a similar substitution for the second
`launch.
`The Company is also currently negotiating with NASA to
`reschedule the launches for the last quarter of 1993, 1994 and
`1995.
`
`‘
`
`There can be no assurance that the Company will be able
`to reschedule its launches or that the launches will occur on
`their scheduled dates.
`Launch failures, satellite operation
`failures, or significant delays in the construction or launches
`of the Company's satellites or satellite capacity would have a
`material adverse impact on the Company's revenues from GEOSTAR
`RDSS.
`
`The Company has licensed Sony and a joint venture con-
`sisting of Hughes and Kenwood to develop, manufacture and sell
`user terminals for GEOSTAR RDSS.
`The Company has entered into a
`contract with the United States Government for the development of
`miniaturized user terminals for GEOSTAR RDSS. That work has been
`subcontracted principally to another manufacturer. That subcon-
`tractor is developing a hand-held RDSS user terminal which would
`be less than 6 inches long and weigh approximately 22 ounces.
`Portions of the communications capabilities of a prototype of
`that user terminal have been successfully tested through the Com-
`pany's satellite transponders. Additional testing is scheduled.
`
`The Company has had discussions
`International RDSS.
`with various entities and countries throughout the world concern-
`ing future implementation on a global basis of RDSS with GEOSTAR-
`compatible technology.
`The Company intends to coordinate the
`operation of a network of compatible regional RDSS systems, owned
`
`that would require a minimum of six
`
`*
`
`".
`
`3 or licensed by the Company,
`
`orbital transponders or satellites and three central ground sta—
`tions. During 1988,
`the Company and various governmental and
`commercial entities from Western Europe formed a European com-
`pany, Locstar, S.A.
`("Locstar"),
`to establish a compatible RDSS
`system covering the area consisting of Europe,
`the Mediterranean,
`the Middle East and Africa.
`The Company acquired an initial
`11.5% ownership interest in Locstar for approximately $1,176,000
`entitling it to a share in Locstar's gross RDSS revenues, re-
`ceived a preemptive right as to subsequent stock offerings to
`increase its ownership interest to up to 15% and nominated one
`“
`director to serve on the Board of Directors of Locstar.
`In
`December 1989,
`the shareholders of Locstar approved a proposal to
`double its contributed capital.
`The Company participated in this
`offering and reached agreement with Locstar to maintain the Com-
`Pany's share in Locstar's‘RDSS revenues and the Company's Board
`seat with a 7.5% ownership interest. Locstar and the Company
`Signed an Exclusive Patent License and Technology Transfer Agree-
`ment and a Technical Services Agreement in May 1989 which pro—
`vides for payments to the Company in the amount of 6.745 million
`European Currency Units (equal to approximately $8,070,000 at
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 000008
`
`-7-
`
`.
`
`7
`
`Page 000008
`
`

`

`
`
`2369-90-20204
`
`March 1, 1990) payable over several years upon the occurrence of
`certain events or the achievement of certain GEOSTAR System per-
`formance milestones.
`In 1989,
`the Company accrued revenues of
`approximately $3,350,000 pursuant to these agreements which ac-
`counted for approximately 31% of the Company's total revenues for
`the year.
`
`The Company and the Australian Telecommunications Com-
`mission ("Telecom") executed a Memorandum of Understanding in
`March 1989 for the license of the Company's RDSS technology and
`the assignment of the Company's Australian patent rights to Tele—
`com. As part of the proposed agreement,
`the Company and Telecom
`would form a joint venture to pursue further RDSS technology
`agreements in Australia and Asia, excluding Japan.
`The Company
`has also entered into discussions with a major Japanese company,
`with the goal of creating a Geostar Japan and with a major
`Spanish company, with the goal of creating a Geostar Latin
`America.
`
`The Company's wholly-owned
`GEOSTAR DLMSS (Phase 3).
`subsidiary Geostar Messaging Corporation ("GMC") has requested
`the FCC to allocate frequencies for a Digital Land Mobile Satel-
`lite Service (“DLMSS”), which would include voice, facsimile and
`volume data transmission capabilities.
`In February 1990,
`the FCC
`issued a notice of proposed rulemaking for the allocation of fre-
`quencies for mobile satellite service (of which DLMSS is a sub-
`set).
`If the FCC allocates those frequencies, CMC would seek a
`license to launch and operate satellites providing DLMSS.
`A
`DLMSS system would provide two—way digital communications ser-
`vices to a wide variety of users who would be equipped with mo-
`bile or portable (brief case type) terminals which would communi-
`cate Via the satellite with their home office, a host computer,
`or another mobile terminal.
`
`The Company expects that the user terminals
`Products.
`for the GEOSTAR System will be sold principally by its licensed
`manufacturers. However,
`the Company has, subject to the
`satisfaction of certain production and performance conditions,
`guaranteed the sale of 5,000 user terminals for use in connection
`with System 2C by December 30, 1990 by one manufacturer and the
`sale of 5,000 System 2C receiver units by December 31, 1991 by
`another manufacturer.
`As of January 1990,
`the Company and its
`licensed manufacturers have installed approximately 1,500 user
`terminals. As of January 31, 1990,
`the Company and its manufac-
`turers have contracts for the installation of approximately 7,000
`additional user terminals.
`The Company believes that the major—
`ity of this backlog of orders for user terminals will be filled
`during 1990. Although this unit backlog represents future users
`of GEOSTAR System services, no dollar amount of service revenues
`for the Company can be attributed to those units since they are
`being sold by the Company's licensed manufacturers.
`The Company
`
`3
`
`Page 000009
`
`Page 000009
`
`

`

`2369-90-20204
`
`testing of the terminals.
`
`believed that the backlog of orders as of January 31, 1989 was
`not firm because the orders were subject to successful two-way
`
`The Company licenses software that has been developed
`for it by independent software writers specifically for use in
`connection with current GEOSTAR System services.
`The software
`consists of a United States Highway System map and communications
`and database software.
`The Company will also license similar
`software for System 3.0 service.
`'
`
`the Company entered into
`In 1986,
`Government Contract.
`a contract with the United States Customs Service (the "Customs
`service") to develop and sell to the government miniaturized
`electronic tag devices (user terminals) which would determine and
`report position and provide two—way communications in the western
`hemisphere through GEOSTAR RDSS.
`The total contract price is
`approximately $21 million, of which approximately $19.2 million
`has been allocated for expenditure. As of March 1, 1990,
`the
`Company had billed the Customs Service $15.9 million pursuant to
`that contract.
`The government has the right to terminate the
`contract at any time, subject to payment of all costs incurred to
`the date of termination plus profits, and the program remains at
`all times subject to the current availability of government fund-
`ing.
`The Company's contract with the Customs Service is not sub-
`ject to renegotiation of profits except with the consent of the
`Company. Revenues from this contract accounted for 34% of the
`Company's revenues in 1989, 78% of the Company's revenues in 1988
`and 96% of its revenues in 1987. Under the contract,
`the govern-
`ment has an option to purchase up to 20,000 of the tag devices at
`a price to be negotiated.
`The Company, as prime contractor, has
`subcontracted the development of these devices, which are pro-
`posedlto be manufactured in a hand-held size.
`See "GEOSTAR
`RDSS.'
`
`Markets
`
`The primary market for GEOSTAR System 2C service is in
`the management of mobile assets.
`System 2C (Phase 1) service is
`targeted for the "heavy" commercial transportation markets, such
`as the trucking, aviation, rail and maritime markets.
`The Com-
`pany believes that GEOSTAR RDSS (Phase 2) will be useful in addi«
`tional transportation markets, such as private fleets, rental and
`"light" trucking, specialized and conventional trailers, and spa-
`cialized railcars.
`In addition,
`the Company believes that addi~
`tional markets for GEOSTAR RDSS include:
`control of field opera-
`tions;
`transaction services; fixed site and mobile remote moni-
`toring and control of equipment; business communications; and
`goVernment communications, command and control services.
`
`Page 000010
`
`Page 000010
`
`

`

`
`
`2369-90-20204
`
`The Company believes that the GEOSTAR System enables
`commercial fleet owners to increaSe asset utilization,
`reduce
`deadhead miles, shorten billing cycles,
`improve just-in—time de-
`liveries, enhance security,
`lower insurance premiums,
`reduce com-
`munications costs, perform real-time operations and maintenance
`monitoring, scheduling, and controlling to achieve more efficient
`operations and reduce operating costs. Most of the Company's
`current customers are long distance trucking companies.
`
`The Company believes a market exists in the construc-
`tion, civil engineering, utility, agriculture and natural re-
`sources industries for GEOSTAR System services because its real-
`time location and status reporting, operations monitoring and
`control, scheduling, emergency assistance and data base queries
`will result in more efficient field operations.
`
`The Company believes a market exists in the insurance,
`financial and retail industries for GEOSTAR System services be-
`cause its real-time nationwide mobile processing of insurance
`claims, point-of-sales, credit verification, and funds transfer
`transactions will reduce financial and information float decision
`delays.
`
`The Company believes that a market exists in the oil
`and gas, utility, terrestrial communications, security, weather,
`environmental and traffic control industries for the GEOSTAR Sy-
`stem as the core of nationwide mobile and remote fixed site com-
`munications, command and control networks.
`It will allow for
`economic increases in equipment population, monitoring and con—
`trol,
`reduce operations and maintenance costs and achieve im-
`proved equipment and system reliability and performance.
`
`The Company believes that a market exists for profes-
`sional people and industries with nationwide mobile marketing,
`sales or field service staff.
`In these situations,
`the GEOSTAR
`System could be used as a nationwide support for electronic data
`interchange (EDI) central data base queries, ordering, schedul-
`ing, status reporting and invoicing.
`The GEOSTAR System can re-
`duce information float decision delays resulting from unavailable
`data.
`It will also provide mobile business professionals and
`staff access to central mainframe computing power and data bases
`much in the same way that office local area networks tie individ-
`ual offices into a company's central computer facility. More
`efficient business communications will cut operating.costs,
`im-
`prove customer service and offer users a competitive edge.
`
`The Company believes that an application exists for
`GEOSTAR RDSS for precision navigation, collision avoidance, pre-
`cision landing approach and operational communications services
`for aircraft.
`For the past several years,
`the Company has been
`working with the Radio Technical Committee for Aeronautics, which
`
`-10-
`
`/O
`
`Page 000011
`
`Page 000011
`
`

`

`
`
`stablished a special committee to set the standards for the
`:viation applications of radio determination satellite service.
`
`”'_________
`Distribution
`
`the Company implemented a system inte-
`In July 1989,
`gration marketing program whereby Sony, Hughes and value-added
`resellers sell hardware, software and GEOSTAR System services,
`and provide installation and repair support, direct y to end user
`customers.
`Sony and Hughes have established sales,
`installation
`and service centers across the United States. This marketing
`strategy does not preclude the Company from selling directly to
`end user customers through the sales efforts of its own staff.
`The Company has agreements with Railstar Control Technology In-
`corporated ("Railstar"), a subsidiary of the New England-based
`railroad, Guilford Transportation Industries, Inc., which grant
`Railstar the exclusive right to develop and market applications
`of the GEOSTAR System to the fixed route transportation ("FRT")
`market
`(which consists primarily of rail transportation).
`In
`addition, Railstar has the right to distribute GEOSTAR System
`services on a non-exclusive basis outside the FRT market.
`The
`Company and Railstar are currently negotiating a distribution
`agreement in connection with‘the non-FRT market.
`See "Legal
`Proceedings."
`-
`
`In general, a customer must pay for products or ser-
`vices provided by the Company within 30 days of the date of in—
`voice.
`
`//
`
`The Company, which is primarily responsible for sales
`to government agencies, plans to meet the unique requirements of
`the various government submarkets with tailored systems installed
`and maintained under contract between the Company or its licensed
`manufacturers and the government agency involved.
`The standard
`GEOSTAR System will be sold to government agencies through the
`Company's licensed manufacturers or distributors.
`The Company
`plans to bid for future government contracts as the prime con-
`tractor using as subcontractors the aerospace and telecommunica—
`tions firms currently working on the GEOSTAR System.
`
`Competition
`
`The competition which the Company believes it faces or
`will face for the services provided by the GEOSTAR System can be
`divided into three major categories -- combined communications
`and positioning systems; communication systems; and mobile
`
`_
`
`Page 000012
`
`Page 000012
`
`

`

`
`
`2369-90-20204
`
`
`
`Some of the Company's existing and poten-
`positioning systems.
`tial competitors are substantially larger and have far greater
`financial, marketing and technological resources than the
`Company.
`
`Combined Systems. One competitor is operating commer-
`cially a positioning and two-way communications system which re—
`ceived FCC approval on a secondary, non—interference basis (the
`competitor's system must stop operations if it interferes with
`VSAT users) in February 1989. That system uses leased satellite
`transponders on existing satellites to provide two-way communica-
`tion between mobile users utilizing rotating antennas. That sys-
`tem determines the position of the mobile user by using Loran-C,
`but recently proposed to determine position information by relay-
`ing signals to and from transponders on two satellites and multi-
`ple fixed sites on the ground. While the user terminals and
`other hardware for the GEOSTAR and this competitor's system are
`similarly priced,
`the Company believes that its charges for
`similar message transmissions are lower than the competitor's and
`that the Company's omnidirectional antenna affords less
`transmission delay than the competitor's rotating antenna which
`must first locate and fix onto the satellite.
`In addition,
`the
`Company believes that, as a result of a much higher bit rate,
`customers of System ZC can send more data in a given time period
`from mobile

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket