throbber
ositionin and Co
`
`Market Share of Selected Communications Systems
`
`R\
`
`El
`
`Telephone
`
`El Voice Radio
`
`I Cellular
`
`/
`,/ /,
`_‘_.
`r.'.'s..:
`
`_.\\\\\
`&§?§:"’*‘i:'.:.'¢%;§§:_
`
`»'.‘~"*".~‘c~.'-‘-3‘:;’.,s‘:~*,r>»1:
`
`[4 KO X 3
`
`Figure 10 :
`
`communications
`selected
`of
`share
`Market
`(The shades of grey m ay be difficult
`technologies.
`to discriminate.
`Read downwards from the
`top
`following the order of the listed systems.)
`
`public telephones or voice radios (the same is true in the European countries [33]). This reflects
`
`convenience, ease of use, and affordable cost (it typically costs a few dollars per truck per month to
`
`operate a simple voice radio shared system), although the technology is range-limited.
`
`Using voice radios, the fleet manager and the driver can be constantly in touch and exchange
`
`messages reporting changes in schedules, expected time of arrival, directions to the shipper’s dock, and
`
`traffic updates. New load information is generally not communicated because many systems do not offer
`
`privacy. The capability also exists to interface voice radios to telephones so that customers can talk
`
`directly to the truck driver.
`
`Fleets report that this option is valued by the customers. There are
`
`44
`
`Page 000057
`
`

`
`Positioning and Communications
`
`indications that the situation could change rapidly. For instance, the California Trucking Association
`
`(CTA) has plans to offer competitively priced cellular services to its members. CTA officials feel
`
`confident that in one year after introduction it the new technology will have replaced most of the voice
`
`radios in existence today.
`
`Many of the systems discussed previously are not well suited for short haul services. Motorola’s
`
`CoveragePLUS is uniquely suited for broad regional coverage. Their offering of position reporting and
`
`sophisticated software integrated with the fleet dispatch system appeals to some fleets operating, say,
`
`within 500 miles or more from their base. Although the technology has true nationwide potential,
`
`achieving that potential depends on cooperative, local area, two-way radio systems so it would be difficult
`
`to match the comprehensive coverage of satellites. Company officials do not release detailed data. They
`
`will only say that they have sold $50 million worth of equipment.
`
`Satellite systems are at a disadvantage in short haul operations: their capabilities can be
`
`duplicated by other systems at a lower cost without any reception problems. In addition, they do not
`
`offer voice communications. Consequently, most fleets using this technology are in the long haul
`
`business.
`
`Data communication is common only among large and sophisticated companies, mainly couriers
`
`(excluding public safety fleets). Discussions with fleet operators revealed that within the context of
`
`electronic data interchange (EDI) they see a future for data communications between trucks and dispatch
`
`centers, but not necessarily in their own fleets (the general attitude was that voice communications would
`
`be used for many years).
`
`The proprietary systems used by couriers and other small package transporters help them achieve
`
`high levels of internal efficiency and customer satisfaction. They consider the information collected
`
`locally as part of their product offering.
`
`In an advanced system, when a package is picked up all relevant
`
`information (e.g., origin, destination, names of consignor and consignee, value, weight) is transmitted
`
`through a hierarchical computer network to the courier company offices at the destination. This enables
`
`load planning at intermediate transfer points, as well as at the destination. During the trip the shipment
`
`is continuously tracked. Customers may have access to tracking information through the courier’s
`
`tracking system.
`
`Although some form of communications system is used by all firms, position reporting systems
`
`are not common in short haul operations. This may change with the widespread use of real-time route
`
`Page 000058
`
`

`
`Positioning and Communications
`
`scheduling and the advent of navigation and route guidance systems. Some fleets have already automated
`
`their dispatching operations so that drivers call in, report their status, give their location, and get a new
`
`assignment.
`
`In a truly dynamic fleet management system, however, the position of the vehicle would be
`
`known at all times and would be matched with the demand for services. Such systems are used by public
`
`safety fleets (e.g., Detroit Emergency Response System, or DETERS which is jointly used by the police
`
`and fire departments of the city).
`
`Another application of location reporting technologies, in this case proximity systems, is at
`
`interrnodal transfer points (e.g., ports or rail/truck hubs). A truck enters a port, the container it carries
`
`is electronically identified and the container inventory database is updated. Problems often mentioned
`
`include untagged containers and a lack of common standards. Although an AEI standard was recently
`
`adopted, EDI formats used by the different parties at modal interfaces now vary.
`
`6.2
`
`LONG HAUL OPERATIONS
`
`The line haul trip of an LTL operation is usually between break bulk terminals. Drivers can
`
`legally drive up to about 10 hour shifts so the need for positioning and communications is only felt in
`
`cases of theft, accidents, or other emergencies. However, at least one large company has installed and
`
`uses technologies to respond quickly to shipper requests for quick pick-up and priority deliveries.
`
`By contrast, in TL operations the trip may take several days and the routes are often irregular.
`
`Because drivers must give regular status reports and obtain new instructions, a communications system
`
`with nationwide coverage is needed to provide a continuous link between dispatchers and drivers. Most
`
`fleets still use public telephones to communicate with their drivers, sometimes in conjunction with voice
`
`radios, pagers, and voice mail systems. This usually means that the driver has to find a telephone, wait
`
`in line (most of the drivers call early in the morning), and try to reach the fleet manager whose line may
`
`be busy.
`
`Wired telephones may be enhanced with nationwide paging and voice mail systems. Cellular
`
`phones and other radio systems, such as CoveragePLUS, can be used under certain circumstances but
`
`depend on the existence of an extensive ground infrastructure. Only satellites offer comprehensive
`
`nationwide coverage. As mentioned, a potential problem is in built-up environments where it may not
`
`45
`
`Page 000059
`
`

`
`Positioninn and Communications
`
`be possible for the vehicle to continuously maintain a line of sight with the satellite. Although travel in
`
`urban areas is a small percentage of total trips, most trips originate and terminate in urban areas.
`
`Ideally,
`
`a “dual” system would be the ultimate solution. Nevertheless, some fleets have reported fair reception
`
`in metropolitan areas.
`
`The first adopters of the satellite technology were motivated by the savings in telephone bills and
`
`better utilization of equipment. Later, time-sensitive customers who wanted to better manage their
`
`logistics flows pushed for the technology. Now, many firms consider the satellite systems a source of
`
`competitive advantage (one company claims to compete in its service area with second day air delivery)
`
`and an essential business tool. Industry analysts have predicted that soon communications and positioning
`
`equipment will be necessary for the success of firms [36].
`
`Discussions with fleet operators made it clear that their biggest frustration was trying to integrate
`
`data with their dispatch systems or with the increasingly popular on-board computers. Attempts to
`
`establish links with EDl systems were also mentioned as a frustration. Most fleets, however, report that
`
`the benefits far outweigh any integration problems encountered. Among the benefits as reported in the
`
`trade press are:
`
`-
`
`-
`
`Long distance phone calls are eliminated resulting in reduced phone bills.
`
`Service to time-sensitive customers is improved. Customers see the benefits and strongly push
`
`towards the installation of more systems.
`
`A carrier gains competitive advantage by offering advanced communications services to its
`
`customers. A small firm can continue expanding without abandoning the personal touch in the
`
`services it offers.
`
`Scheduling flexibility and real time information increase the number of trips per vehicle and
`
`reduce the number of empty miles. Carriers operating with trailer to tractor ratios close to l
`
`realize immediate benefits.
`
`Drivers waste less time waiting at pay phones, sleep more, and earn more money. Many drivers
`
`consider the electronic terminal in the cab something of a status symbol. Their satisfaction leads
`
`to better labor relations and reduced turnover.
`
`Improved driver accountability since drivers know they are not “alone” any more.
`
`Increased safety.
`
`Page 000060
`
`

`
`Positioning and Communications
`
`Vehicle maintenance costs are minimized if vehicle attributes bearing on maintenance are
`
`monitored.
`
`Shipments of hazardous materials are continuously monitored so in case of accident the necessary
`
`actions can be taken. (The federal government has imposed strict reporting requirements for
`
`hazardous loads and forbids any unauthorized route deviations.)
`
`Similar benefits have been observed in Europe after a series of field trials [35,37].
`
`In the U.S. there are about 500,000 trucks travelling more than 200 miles from their base [4],
`
`and the satellite system suppliers have sold no more than 30,000 units (April 1991). Therefore, despite
`
`the positive experiences, not many fleets use the satellite technology. The following simplified
`
`calculations, however, suggest that it might not be difficult to justify the investment (the data were
`
`obtained from the references cited, the trade press, and discussions with users):
`
`At $4,500 the fixed cost of satellite equipment is about 4.5% of the cost of an average tractor
`
`($105,000 [38]). The operating cost which includes tracking service plus message charges is
`
`about $50 per month per truck. Total cost is likely to be close to $180 per month per truck when
`
`equipment leasing and maintenance costs are included. Figures released by the American
`
`Trucking Associations [3 8] indicate that in 1988 per mile tractor-trailer line haul costs were $1.07
`
`($1.19 for owner operators). If the drivers saved 2 miles a day by not having to search for a pay
`
`phone, in a month savings would be close to system operating costs. Furthermore, a tractor
`
`trailer rig is typically driven 10,000 miles a month. A 2 percent reduction of the line haul costs
`
`(attributable to the systems) would cover the total system costs.
`
`This analysis does not include other benefits such as more efficient equipment use, improved
`
`service, and customer satisfaction, which are difficult to quantify. These impacts take time to develop
`
`and are not completely under the control of the carrier itself Using an engineering cost model, one study
`
`concluded that under certain circumstances a cost reduction of about 8 percent would be feasible [39].
`
`Vendors have also completed studies that show the pay-offperiod to be between one and two years, and
`
`an estimated annual cost reduction of $2,828 per tractor [40].
`
`Trucking fleets and their customers are not the only ones to benefit, however. The Ministry of
`
`Transportation in Ontario (instrumental in the design of the vehicle monitoring system employed in
`
`48
`
`Page 000061
`
`

`
`Positioning and Communications
`
`Canada) calculated that the Ontario economy would increase GDP by CN$l 10 million and would gain
`
`about 2,100 person-years of employment [29]. The calculation was based on a high degree of local
`
`manufacturing content.
`
`6.3
`
`THE HELP PROJECT
`
`The Heavy Vehicle Electronic License Plate (HELP) project was initiated by highway planners
`
`and managers in Arizona and Oregon who wanted to simplify the data gathering process. Agencies
`
`collect data to support highway planning, design, and management, as well as for monitoring the size and
`
`weight of trucks, speed limit enforcement, and tax administration. The HELP concept was to deploy
`
`emerging electronic technologies at state borders and other locations, in order to create an integrated
`
`system that would collect, communicate, store, and process data. The trucking industry, although at first
`
`reluctant to participate in the project, was attracted by the prospect of using the data for more efficient
`
`fleet management and reduction of reporting expenses at state points of entry.
`
`HELP has mainly focused on three technologies: Automatic Vehicle Identification (AVI),
`
`Weigh-in-Motion (WIM), and Automatic Vehicle Classification (AVC). Additional technologies have
`
`also been investigated to determine whether they would enhance the program (e.g., satellite
`
`communications and on-board computers). Vehicles are identified using on-board transponders and
`
`roadside readers. The transponder tags are not compatible with the ISO standard used by the container
`
`shipping industry, for it was felt that a system with such data collection capabilities was not needed.
`
`WIM systems use in-pavement sensors to obtain the axle and gross weights of vehicles travelling at speed,
`
`while data for highway management and maintenance are to be provided by AVC systems.
`
`In contrast
`
`with AVI, neither WIM nor AVC need be standardized as long as they comply to a set of minimum
`
`specifications.
`
`After detailed technical feasibility studies were completed, the Crescent demonstration phase
`
`started involving 14 U.S. states and 1 Canadian province (British Columbia). The name Crescent was
`
`given because British Columbia and many of the states participating are located along the west coast and
`
`the southern U.S. border inland to Texas, thus forming a crescent. There are approximately 40 equipped
`
`sites along Interstates I-5, I-10, and I-20 that will be used in the demonstration and at least 4,000
`
`49
`
`Page 000062
`
`

`
`Positioning and Communications
`
`transponder-equipped trucks. Several potential applications have been identified, which are divided into
`
`three categories: data collection, enforcement, and vehicle management (Figure 11).
`
`The demonstration phase is expected to last until the end of 1992, and it will be followed by a
`
`detailed evaluation. At this time no plans exist to deploy the system nationwide if proven successful.
`
`One of the issues that has not yet been fully resolved is to whom and under what conditions will the data
`
`be accessible. The database will include motor carrier name, address, and license number; vehicle owner
`
`and registration number; and a chronic offender flag and FHWA unsafe carrier flag). A private company
`
`has been contracted to manage the Crescent and perform the computer integration work. There seems
`
`to be a consensus that an independent organization responsible to both government and fleet operators
`
`should administer the system.
`
`50
`
`Page 000063

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket