throbber
WO 00/79727
`
`PCT/CA00/00712
`
`Evenr_GpsReporr_Handler0 is the method invoked when the GpsReporr signaled by the
`
`ATP is removed by the cluster process from its queue. The inputs to this method are:
`
`(i)
`
`!D_Remore_ Vehicle - which should be the unique IP address of the
`
`vehicle;
`
`Us
`
`10
`
`(ii)
`
`GpsPosz'tz'on -— which is a latitude-longitude coordinate pair. determined by
`
`the GPS receiver ofthe remote node and contained in the payload of the UDP
`
`segment received from the remote; and
`
`(iii)
`
`GpsHeaa’ing — which is a heading determined by the GPS receiver ofthe
`
`remote node and contained in the payload of the UDP segment received from the
`TCTUOIC.
`
`Event_GpsReport_HandZer (1D_Remote_Vehz'cle, GpsPosz'tz'on, Gp5Heaa’z'ng/
`I
`I
`
`Rem0te_Vehz'cle = GetRemote( ID_Rem0Ie_ Vehicle):
`
`Proximity
`
`= CompareGps(Remote_Vehicle, GpsPosirz'on,
`
`GpsHeading/,-
`
`[f(Proxz'miry) {
`
`AtpRequest( Remote Vehicle, speed, frequency, duration, amplitude ).'
`
`AtpRequest(Remote_Velzicle,f0ot brake, 0, O, 0,);
`
`Evem_Gp5Report_Handler carries out the following functions:
`
`(i)
`
`lnvokes the pn'vate function GetRemoIe using the input
`
`1D_Remote_ Vehicle.
`
`(The term private signifies that the function is usable only
`
`-31-
`
`SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26)
`
`Page 001363
`
`

`
`wo 00/79727
`
`PCT/CA00/00712
`
`VII
`
`10
`
`by the cluster module and is not accessible to “extemal" software modules). This
`
`searches the cluster’s container of remote vehicles for the object matching
`
`/D_Remore_ Vehicle;
`
`(ii)
`
`Uses the private function CompareGps to determine whether this vehicle
`
`is within a specified distance threshold. This function takes as inputs:
`
`(a)
`
`pointer to the Remote Vehicle object; and
`
`(b)
`
`the new GPS position and heading.
`
`The GPS position and heading of the remote vehicle are compared to the
`
`position and heading of the “local" vehicle. The “local" position and heading are
`
`maintained in the DIB (diagnostic information base). Since the ATP is a peer—to—peer
`
`protocol. cluster intelligence request/response exchanges can be symmetrical. The DIB
`
`can therefore be used by the ATP client to obtain GPS information for comparison with
`
`reports from remote nodes, as well as by the local OBD server to respond to cluster
`
`intelligence requests from remote nodes
`
`The output of CompareGps is a boolean variable (Proximity) indicating
`
`whether ATP requestslto this remote are warranted because the vehicle is within a
`
`specified distance threshold to require preventive measures if there is a sudden change in
`
`speed. Since the implementation of cluster intelligence is not within the scope of the
`
`present invention. the internal algorithm of CompareGps is not defined here. However. it
`
`should be noted that any implementation of CompareGps must account for margins of
`
`error in the accuracy of the GPS receiver where the remote position report originates.
`
`Furthermore. it may not be possible to distinguish between several remote vehicles
`
`moving in parallel in different lanes ahead ofthe “local" vehicle so that the identity of the
`
`-32-
`
`SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26)
`
`Page 001364
`
`

`
`WO 00/79727
`
`PCT/CA00/00712
`
`vehicle directly in front may remain indeterminate. The cluster intelligence decision
`
`algorithm may have to assume that all of these vehicles are equally important to monitor.
`
`If Proximity is TRUE, then ATP requests can be issued to the remote
`
`node’s OBD server. the responses to which enable the cluster to provide decision support
`to other intelligent modules within the complete automotive system. A minimum set of
`
`requests could consist of speed reports. at values of frequency and duration established by
`the owner of the cluster. (ie, one of the aforementioned automotive modules), and of
`
`notifications for the application of the foot brake.
`
`10
`
`15
`
`Another embodiment of the present invention is shown in figure 7 A
`mobile automotive telemetry system is shown generally at 1 10 in Figure 1. System 410
`comprises a diagnostic means 415 for monitoring the operational functions of the vehicle
`
`in which system 410 is installed and generating operational information. The generated
`operational information may be stored in a memory 420 until required. Both diagnostic
`
`means 415 and memory 420 are in communication with a server 425 which ultimately
`controls the operation of system 410.
`
`Server 425 can communicate with a remote client 430 via a data link 435
`
`To this end. server 425 comprises a means (440) to receive a request for information from
`
`remote client 430; a means (445a, 445b) to retrieve the generated operational information
`from memory 420; and a means (450) to transmit the retrieved generated operational
`information to remote client 43 0. Server 425 is a processor which is programmed to
`
`respond to requests for information from remote clients and to respond to control
`commands.
`
`Diagnostic means 415 may be a conventional. computer—based OBD
`module which monitors various operational functions of the vehicle in which system 410
`is located. Diagnostic means 415 may, for example, monitor exhaust emissions, fuel use.
`
`-33-
`
`SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26)
`
`Page 001365
`
`

`
`WO 00/79727
`
`PCT/CA00/00712
`
`'11
`
`l0
`
`l5
`
`ignition timing. engine temperature. speed andlor distance travelled. Diagnostic means
`
`415 receives inputs from the various vehicle sites via a plurality of communication lines
`
`460 and. after interpreting the inputs and generating formatted operational information.
`
`passes the operational information to memory 420 via communication line 465.
`
`Diagnostic modules suitable for use in the present invention are known in the art and are
`
`referred to as Electronic Control Modules (ECM) or Electronic Control Units (ECU).
`
`The specifications for the diagnostic modules may be found in Society of Automotive
`
`Engineers. "On-Board Diagnostics for Light and Medium Duty Vehicle. Standards
`
`Manual" 1997 Edition. the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
`
`Memory 420 may be any conventional computer memory, the size and
`
`operation of which will be dependent on the nature of the operational features of the
`
`vehicle a user wishes to monitor. The choice of suitable memory is believed to be within
`
`the purview of a person of skill in the art.
`
`In one embodiment of the present invention.
`
`system 410 comprises a memory 420 which includes 32k of non-volatile RAM and a
`
`configurable amount of additional RAM, allocated at run-time from the host processor
`
`system. Memory 420 receives the operational infomiation, generated by diagnostic
`
`means 415. via communication line 465 and stores the operational information. Memory
`
`means 420 15 in communication with server 420 and is capable of receiving instructions
`
`from server 425 and sending information to server 425 via communication lines 470a and
`
`470b. respectively. As will be apparent to a person of skill in the art. communication
`
`lines 470a and 470b may be replaced by a single communication line if the appropriate
`
`communication protocol is used.
`
`Server 425 acts as a gateway between remote client 430 and diagnostic
`
`means 415 and eliminates the requirement that remote client 430 has knowledge of the
`
`IJ '1:
`
`specialist OBD protocols of diagnostic means 415. Server 425 in effect acts as a
`
`"universal translator". allowing a remote client to interact with any diagnostic means of
`
`any vehicle. One way of achieving this end is through the implementation of a
`
`-34-
`
`SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26)
`
`Page 001366
`
`

`
`wo no/79727
`
`PCT/CA00/00712
`
`request/‘response protocol which acts as a proxy for the corresponding OBD protocols.
`
`Under this type of protocol. an abstract request from the remote client which is received
`
`by the server is mapped to the corresponding request under the specialist OBD protocols
`
`and is then transmitted on the diagnostic means or memory. as appropriate. ln the other
`
`1/1
`
`direction. the responses returned by the diagnostic means or memory to the server are
`
`then mapped to an abstract response which is sent back to the client.
`
`Such request/response protocols are known in the an and include. for
`
`example. IAS protocol for infrared links and UDP/IP protocol for widearea network
`
`communications.
`
`Data link 435 may be any conventional communication link, including, for
`
`example. telephony (wired and mobile wireless). specialized mobile radio (SMR),
`
`infrared and satellite (both low earth orbit (LEO) and geosynchronous). Server 425 may
`
`be provided with the hardware and operational protocols necessary for communicating
`
`with remote client 430 by a variety of means. thereby not restricting communication to a
`
`remote client having one particular type of data link. Providing server 425 with a
`
`plurality of communication protocols aids in making the system of the present invention
`
`universally acceptable.
`
`In one embodiment. server 425 is provided with infrared data link
`
`capabilities. An infrared data link between the server and the remote client provides a
`
`local wireless method of acquiring data from an OBD module. It therefore removes the
`
`need for the client's equipment to incorporate a system—cornpatible connector (ie, an
`
`OBD-connector as specified by the SAE) and to be physically joined by a cable in order
`
`to communicate with the system.
`
`I.) (/1
`
`When. for example. the client is test equipment in a garage. the use ofan
`
`infrared data link renders possible the development of service bays where information can
`
`-35-
`
`SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 25)
`
`Page 001367
`
`

`
`wo 00/79727
`
`PCT/CA00/00712
`
`Ui
`
`10
`
`15
`
`be transferred almost instantaneously from the vehicle to the service technician's
`
`computer without requiring the customer to get out of the vehicle. The infrared
`
`connection may be achieved by attaching a serial infrared connector to a serial port on the
`
`server and by ensuring that there is an unobstructed path for IR transmission between the
`
`LED‘s of the infrared connector and that of the service technician's computer.
`
`As will be apparent. the reliability of an infrared data link is improved
`
`with the implementation of a robust protocol which detects transmission errors and
`
`avoids collisions by operating in a half—duplex fashion. Such protocols are known and
`
`have. for example. been implemented by computer and software manufacturers for
`
`incorporation in consumer electronic products such as micro-computers. modems and
`
`cellular phones (ie. the IrDA stack). Suitable protocols are described in Infrared Data
`
`Association. "Serial Infrared Link Access Protocol (IrLAP)". Version 1.1. June 1996 and
`
`Infrared Data Association. "Link Management Protocol". Version 1.1. January 1996, the
`
`contents of both of which are incorporated herein by reference.
`
`Through compliance with these infrared protocols, the server achieves a
`
`goal of rendering client test equipment independent of the OBD protocols. Accordingly.
`
`any micro-computing equipment which is infrared—aware, such as a desk-top, notebook or
`
`palm—top (Personal Digital Assistant or PDA) can effectively become a remote client.
`
`In an alternative embodiment. the infrared data link may be replaced or
`
`enhanced by incorporating mobile wireless data links, coupled with the UDP/LP
`
`infrastructure for peer-to-peer client/server exchanges over a wide area network. This
`
`adaptation of the system extends the range of the services offered by the server beyond its
`
`capabilities with only the infrared connector and data link. The principles described in the
`
`previous sections remain the same. with the exception that access to OBD information no
`
`longer requires that the vehicle be moved within infrared detection range (typically 2-5
`
`metres) of the test equipment. The vehicle can be in any location which is reachable on
`
`the Internet. Via a mobile data link.
`
`-36-
`
`SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26)
`
`Page 001368
`
`

`
`wo 00/79727
`
`PCT/CA00/00712
`
`In
`
`15
`
`The system of the present invention may further comprise a means to
`
`transmit generated operational information to a remote client. in the absence of a request
`
`from the client. when the generated operational infonnation satisfies predetermined
`
`criteria. Such transmissions of the generated operational information implies that server
`
`25 effectively becomes a client with respect to a remote site which is capable of logging
`
`the transmission. This functionality can be achieved by utilizing the peer-to-peer
`
`communication architecture described above and is useful in, for example,
`
`alarrrv emergency situations.
`
`If. for example. while monitoring the exhaust emissions of a vehicle on the
`
`road. the level of carbon monoxide in the exhaust gases exceeds a predetermined level.
`
`the diagnostic means can communicate this information directly to server l25 via
`
`communication line 175. Server 125 can then transmit an alarm report to a remote site
`
`advising of the problem. This report can be transmitted in real—time, allowing the
`
`problem to be dealt with immediately, rather than having to wait until the vehicle
`
`undergoes routine servicing and diagnosis. days or even months after the problem has
`
`first come to light.
`
`It is envisioned that the threshold values for alarms. as well as the
`
`frequency and duration of the alarm message, can be configured either directly at the
`
`server during installation or servicing, or by using remote commands from the client.
`
`The system described herein may also incorporate lntemet access
`
`technology for the drivers or passengers. The existing method of lntemet access for
`
`individual personal computers (PC) is well-known. The PC establishes a serial link with a
`
`computer which has a permanent Internet (IP) address. The latter computer. for the
`
`purposes of this description. can be called a gateway. The serial link is physically either
`
`a direct cable connection or via a telephone circuit. using modems at both ends of the
`
`link. The PC does not have a permanent IP address. It is assigned a temporary IP address
`
`-37-
`
`SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26)
`
`Page 001369
`
`

`
`W0 00/79727
`
`PCT/CA00/00712
`
`()1
`
`10
`
`by the gateway for the duration of the connection. Therefore. if the link is maintained via
`
`a telephone circuit, then the connection automatically terminates when the circuit is
`
`dropped and the temporarily assigned IP address ceases to be valid.
`
`One of the conventional methods of Internet access from a vehicle follows
`
`the technique described above. using an analog cellular phone and a cellular modem. By
`
`connecting the PC to the cellular modem. the driver/passenger can obtain a temporary IP
`
`address in the same fashion as with wired telephony.
`
`Another method of Internet access from a vehicle is a technology called
`
`Cellular Digital Packet Data (CDPD), which is a form of packet-switching overlaid on the
`
`existing analog cellular infrastructure in the United States. CDPD operates with a portion
`
`of the bandwidth of the analog cellular system and provides a multiple access data link
`
`technology within each cellular base station’s territory of coverage. However. contrary to
`
`the method already described, the network architecture of CDPD also allows each access
`
`device (C DPD modem) to have its own permanent IP address. Therefore. no dial—up
`
`connection is required to establish the presence of the PC on the Internet. It suffices for
`
`the PC to be connected to the CDPD modem (which is typically in the form ofa credit-
`
`card style PCMCIA card) for any Internet traffic from another location to reach the PC.
`
`IP V6 is a new version of the Internet Protocol. One of the design
`
`objectives of [P V6 is to enable portable computing devices (notebooks. palm-tops. etc.)
`
`to have permanent IP addresses which can be reached regardless of where the portable
`
`device is physically connected to the lntemet. Therefore. the device could be connected.
`
`at different times. to both an office LAN (Local Area Network) as well as a residential
`
`LAN. without requiring manual intervention by a network administrator in either LAN to
`
`ensure delivery of Internet traffic. This is achieved by ensuring that both LAN’s have at
`
`least one node (computer) which acts as a "Mobility Agent". The Mobility Agent
`
`incorporates software which implements [P V6 and related protocols. The purpose of the
`
`-33-
`
`SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26)
`
`Page 001370
`
`

`
`wo oo/79727
`
`PCT/CA00/00712
`
`mobility—related functions in this software is to ensure that roaming computing devices
`
`are automatically "discovered" when they establish a link to the Mobility Agent and that
`
`the rest of the Internet is informed of the new path which must be used to route traffic to
`
`the roaming device, Only those routers in the Internet which have been upgraded to
`
`Ur
`
`support [P V6 will participate in this function.
`
`A Mobility Agent can reside in a mobile environment as well as a fixed
`
`LAN. This scenario is a distinct departure from the existing models of Internet access
`
`already described. A mobile Mobility Agent. installed in a vehicle in the form of a mobile
`
`computer. can effectively "host" any IP V6-enable portable computing device. provided
`
`that it has a wireless data link to a network which is capable of routing packets on the
`
`Internet. such as CDPD. The implication is that ifa vehicle is equipped with a Mobility
`
`Agent using. for instance. CDPD. then any portable device which a driver or passenger
`
`wishes to use in the vehicle to obtain access to the Internet does not also need the CDPD
`
`modem. It only requires the IP V6 software.
`
`In order to equip any vehicle with IP V6 support. a hardware platform is
`
`required to host all of the required protocols and to provide the data links for portable
`
`devices trying to connect to the Mobility Agent.
`
`In order to support the SAE diagnostic
`
`test modes in the remote fashion described herein. the server contains all of the
`
`components which will also allow it to function as a mobile Mobility Agent.
`
`It is envisioned that the Infrared port (and I_tDA protocols). which is
`
`primarily useful for OBD diagnostic test modes while the vehicle is stationary and being
`
`examined. can ''double'' as an in-vehicle wireless point of entry to the internet for portable
`
`devices operated by the driver/passengers.
`
`Another embodiment is shown in figures 8a. 8b which provides an
`
`integrated circuit board for a vehicular computing device which supports the following:
`
`-39-
`
`SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 25)
`
`Page 001371
`
`

`
`wo 00/79727
`
`PCT/CA00/00712
`
`a) Acquisition of diagnostic data via an automotive data bus interface (or directly
`
`through analog and digital inputs) and storage of the data.
`
`b) Data communications using spread spectrum radio in accordance with the IEEE
`
`802.1 l specification for wireless local area networks.
`
`c) Reception of signals from Global Positioning System satellites and
`
`determination of position. heading and speed based on these signals.
`
`C1) The IEEE 802.1 1 protocol stack is implemented in an additional task executed
`
`by the host CPU. Depending on the choice of processing resources. the GPS
`
`position determination may be carried out by an additional task executed by the
`
`lO
`
`host CPU.
`
`In both Figures 8a) and 8b), the CPU board 510 comprises the Universal
`
`OBD Server host system into which both the spread spectrum modem and GPS receiver
`
`functions are integrated in the form of chipsets.
`
`In Figure 8a). spread spectrum transceiver circuitry 512 comprises the RF
`
`processing functions required for implementation of a spread spectrum radio modem.
`
`These are embodied in a series of semiconductor devices constituting a chipset for
`
`integration of spread spectrum radio in a host CPU board. As these devices constitute
`
`externally defined components that are integrated in the present invention. only those
`
`components that interface with the host system are numbered.
`
`Host CPU 520 communicates with spread spectrum transceiver circuitry
`
`512 through two (2) serial interfaces. Serial interface 514 handles inbound data received
`
`from the sequence generator 516 while serial interface 518 handles outbound data sent to
`
`the decimator 519.
`
`-40-
`
`SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26)
`
`Page 001372
`
`

`
`wo oo/79727
`
`PCT/CA00/00712
`
`ll]
`
`l0
`
`The embedded software required to drive the spread spectrum transceiver
`
`IS an implementation of the IEEE 802.1 1 specification. executed by the host CPU. The
`
`functional interface between the host CPU and the spread spectrum sub-system
`
`corresponds to the interface between the two bottom layers of the IEEE 802.1 1 physical
`
`layer architecture. The lower layer is called the Physical Medium Dependent (PMD) sub-
`
`layer. which is embodied in the spread spectrum transceiver circuitry. The upper layer is
`
`called the Physical Layer Convergence Procedure (PLCP) sub-layer, which constitutes
`
`the lowest level of the protocol stack implemented in software to be executed by the host
`
`system.
`
`Similarly. in Figure 8 b), GPS reception circuitry 542 comprises the RF
`processing functions required for implementation of a GPS receiver. These are embodied
`
`in a series of semiconductor devices constituting a chipset for implementation of a GPS
`
`receiver. As these devices constitute extemally defined components that are integrated in
`
`the present invention. only those components that interface with the host system are
`
`l5
`
`numbered.
`
`Yet another embodiment is shown in figures 9 to 15. The term
`
`".4 utomotive Telemetry " refers to the conveyance of operational data from a mobile
`
`vehicle to a regulatory or maintenance authority as well as to other. neighboring mobile
`
`vehicles. The data transmitted are acquired directly from analog and digital sensors. the
`
`in—vehicle data bus, ECU and from a GPS receiver. The data are conveyed via a wireless
`
`packet—oriented data links provided by terrestrial RF packet networks. spread spectrum
`
`and satellite.
`
`An Automotive Telemetry System according to the present invention may
`
`be configured to enable interested parties (regulatory agencies. OEM's. dealers) to obtain
`
`critical automotive performance information in a wireless manner. It is believed that a
`
`system according to the present invention may also be configured to enable:
`
`-4]-
`
`SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26)
`
`Page 001373
`
`

`
`W0 00/79727
`
`PCT/CA00/00712
`
`[II
`
`10
`
`15
`
`— reliable. substantially error-free data communications between the on-board
`
`CPU and persistent data storage;
`
`- high—level services in the form of API‘s (Application Programmer Interfaces)
`
`for real—time alarm monitoring, trending and back-office decision—support
`
`systems. IT developers responsible for maintenance. performance monitoring and
`
`automotive engineering systems can invoke high-level services that make the
`
`C AN-bus. or any sensors and actuators. appear as though they are directly
`
`connected to the fixed—location host system.
`
`- flexible communications architecture enabling many—to—many, simultaneous.
`
`multiple virtual connections between on-board CPU’s and fixed—location host
`
`systems. This means that both the on—board CPU and the ground-based
`
`workstation can maintain client-server relationships with several peers at the sa.me
`time.
`
`on-board filtering intelligence and remote configuration capability. The on-board
`
`CPU should have the ability to restrict real—time transmission of diagnostic data
`
`according to threshold levels that can be dynamically changed from a fixed-
`
`location host. In addition. the host should also be able to remotely configure the
`
`frequency and duration of telemetry reports as well as logging to nonvolatile ram
`
`(NOVRAM);
`
`— minimal use of wireless bandwidth. There is an inherent economic cost
`
`associated with the deployment of infrastructures supporting wireless data links.
`
`regardless ofthe method used to recover this cost. Therefore both the application
`
`-42-
`
`SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26)
`
`Page 001374
`
`

`
`wo 00/79727
`
`PCT/CA00/00712
`
`and the communication software should. where possible. minimize the use of
`
`these links through such methods as exception-driven reporting and data
`
`compression.
`
`An exemplified system according to the present invention has three components:
`
`U:
`
`10
`
`— Universal On-Board Diagnostic (UOBD) Server (in-vehicle telemetry
`
`computer)
`
`— Communications Protocol Stack
`
`- Application Programmer interface (API)
`
`A hardware instantiation of the in-vehicle UOBD Server has been built
`
`based on an embedded 80386 CPU and a hard real-time multitasking kernel. The cuirent
`
`model incorporates the following features:
`
`- 512KB flash memory (192 KB for data logging)
`
`— 512 SRAM
`
`— 8 A/D channels for analog sensor inputs
`
`— 8 digital channels for discrete inputs (each channel configurable as an output)
`
`- CAN-interface
`
`- RS-485 serial ports for interface to J—l708 bus (heavy trucks and buses)
`
`- 2 RS-232 ports for PPP and/or IIDA (Infra.Red) connections with external
`
`computing devices.
`
`— GPS receiver with NMIEA-compliant data link to the CPU
`
`- RF packet radio network interface (Mobitex or ARDIS)
`
`-43_
`
`SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26)
`
`Page 001375
`
`

`
`W() ()()/79727
`
`PCT/CA00/00712
`
`- Spread spectrum data link (2.4 GHz ISM band. frequency hopping CMSA/CA
`
`protocol)
`
`Real-Time Executive
`
`VJI
`
`10
`
`._a (ll
`
`The operating kernel adopted for the UOBD is RTEMS (Real-time
`
`executive for multi—processor systems). However. the entire body of software embedded
`
`in the UOBD (with the exception of the real-time kernel itself and bootstrapping code) is
`
`capable of running in alternative operating environments. This is achieved through the
`
`definition of an abstract operating system in terms of an object-oriented abstract base
`
`class. with specific instantiations for whatever operating environments are required.
`
`In particular. a Windows NT instantiation of the operating environment
`
`has been developed for emulation and testing of the embedded system.
`
`C ornmunications Sub-System
`
`The communications sub-system is a protocol stack which supports any
`
`combination of terrestrial R_F packet network. satcom packet networks and short—range
`
`spread spectrum data links. As shown in Figure 9, the software architecture treats each
`
`wireless data link as part of a sub-network according to the lntemet paradigm.
`
`The Intemet standards are implemented within the protocol stack so that.
`
`ifrequired. the UOBD Server can become addressable on the Internet. Internet
`
`accessibility to the UOBD Server is an option which facilitates remote diagnostics by a
`
`-44-
`
`SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26)
`
`Page 001376
`
`

`
`WO 00/79727
`
`PCT/CA00/0071 2
`
`IJI
`
`10
`
`15
`
`variety of authorized clients. The protocol capabilities of the device include both PPP
`
`and IrDA (InfraRed) which provide connectivity to other devices in the vehicle such as
`
`palm—tops or notebook computers.
`
`The architecture of the communications sub—system is designed to provide
`
`an infrastructure for "seamless" peer—to-peer communications between the vehicle and a
`
`fixed-location host system or another vehicle.
`
`The following sections describe the various layers of the protocol stack in
`
`more detail.
`
`Session Layer: Automotive Telemetry Protocol
`
`The Automotive Telemetry Protocol (ATP) provides a simple and effective
`
`bi-directional request—response mechanism. From the vehicle. ATP allows the diagnostic
`
`monitor embedded in the UOBD Server to report fault conditions to a host system
`
`application. In the reverse direction. diagnostic inquiries and parameter configurations can
`
`be issued from the host. The ATP message syntax is similar to that of SNTVEP and contains
`
`streamed versions of Object Identifiers (OID’s) as a means of specifying the performance or
`
`operational parameter to which the message pertains.
`
`Figure 10 illustrates this mechanism with the request initiated from a fixed
`
`location host. However, the implementation of the ATP supports both client and server
`
`functionality in either the host or the UOBD Server. As such, the UOBD Server may provide
`
`simultaneous OBD services to more than one (authorized) OBD "client".
`
`Sub—net and DataLink Layers: Hybrid RP
`
`.45.
`
`SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 25)
`
`Page 001377
`
`

`
`wo 00/79727
`
`PCT/CA00/00712
`
`‘)1
`
`10
`
`15
`
`Short—range spread spectrum data links provide apowerful complement to RF
`
`packet networks for vehicle-to-vehicle telemetry and a potentially low-cost mechanism for
`
`OBD—IH compliance monitoring. The UOBD incorporates both technologies with the
`
`intelligence to switch between them on a "least~cost" basis. In order to preserve the IP
`
`addressing mechanism allowing for a unique IP address at the interface between the UOBD
`
`Se"'er's IP module and the drivers for its wireless data links,
`
`the present system has
`
`implemented the concept of
`
`— an Hybrid Network, which is an abstraction that combines multiple physical data
`
`links. This is illustrated in Figure 11.
`
`Any node on a Hybrid Network is either an in-vehicle UOBD Server or a
`
`Hybrid Network Gateway (HNG). This is a ground—based 113 gateway to the Hybrid Network
`
`and is functionally symmetrical to the UOBD Server. It has an EP module boundto a network
`
`interface for the Hybrid Network. This network interface has a unique IP address.
`
`The current HNG resides on a dedicated Windows NT workstation and
`
`effectively provides an IP-level gateway between the Hybrid Network and the rest of the
`
`Internet or corporate Intranet.
`
`The complete protocol stack for a hybrid network node is illustrated in Figure
`
`9. At the lowest level of this stack are data link drivers for RF packet networks. A
`
`combination of such data links is subsumed by a single abstract Hybrid Network interface.
`
`which is responsible for switching outbound transmissions over the least—cost data link in a
`
`manner that is transparent to the IP. The "cost" of using any given wireless data link is
`
`expressed as a measure of "impedance", which is established in terms of the monetary cost
`
`of transmission and of the availability of service.
`
`-45-
`
`SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26)
`
`Page 001378
`
`

`
`WO 00/79727
`
`PCT/CA00/00712
`
`Figure 12 illustrates the mechanism implemented for switching of mobile-
`
`originated frames over the 1east—cost wireless data link. Note that this describes the protocol
`
`behavior only at the data link layer of the stack. The behavior ofthe stack at other layers is
`
`described hereinbelow.
`
`{[1
`
`l0
`
`15
`
`In part (a) of Figure 12. the UOBD CPU sencb a frame over the serial link to
`
`the primary RF radio modern (spread spectrum), which in turn successfully sends it over the
`
`airlink to a base radio modem (spread spectrum access point). From there. the payload is sent
`
`to the Hybrid Network Gateway from where it can be routed over a-network backbone
`
`(possibly the Internet) to a host system.
`
`Part ( b) of Figure 12 shows the instance where a mobile-originated frame fails
`
`to traverse the airlink. In this instance. a failure notification is received. either from the radio
`
`modem. or from a timer expiry within the CPU. The failure notification is propagated back
`
`up the protocol stack to the process which was responsible for the message contained in the
`
`frame (e.g. the ATP client or server process). which can then choose to reschedule the
`
`transmission. The failure notification also causes the impedance level for the destination
`
`address to be raised to a maximum level. The retry is therefore carried out over the alternate
`
`RF data link. The impedance will be lowered whenever a notification 15 received that the
`
`mobile has returned within "RF range" of the base.
`
`Network Layer: In-Vehicle Routing and IP Header Compression
`
`The IP implementation is intended to enable the UOBD Server to act as a
`
`gateway from the wireless HybridNetwork to a subnet of computing devices used within the
`
`vehicle. The data link used for any of the devices is PPP (point-to—point protocol) over an
`
`RS-232 serial connection. This is designed to support a palm—top or notebook computer
`
`using PPP with a direct serial link to obtain a temporary U’ address.
`
`-47-
`
`SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26)
`
`Page 001379
`
`

`
`wo 00/79727
`
`PCTICAOO/00712
`
`In many cases. the Automotive Telemetry System does not encompass more
`
`than one host site (client). The mobile UOBD Servers do not therefore need to distinguish
`
`between remote addresses. Furthermore. the HybridNetwork Gateway has address tables for
`
`resolving all IP addresses to unique physical addresses, associated with each of the RF data
`
`links. for each UOBD. Therefore. mobile—temiinated datagrams do not require an explicit
`
`destination address in transmission. Similarly, mobile-originated datagiams do not require
`
`an explicit source address in transmission. In these cases. the [P headers can be compressed
`
`from 20 to 3 bytes. without loss of information. The overhead of 3 bytes is necessary to
`
`provide a sequence number for the datagram, an identifier for the transport protocol to be
`
`l0
`
`used and the in-vehicle subnet address of the destination. Regardless of the protocol. this
`
`amount

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket