throbber
Trial@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Paper No. 45
`
` Entered: September 6, 2013
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`PROGRESSIVE CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
`Patent Owner,
`
`
`Case CBM2012-00003 (JL)
`Patent 8,140,358
`
`
`Before JAMESON LEE, JONI Y. CHANG, and MICHAEL R. ZECHER,
`Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`LEE, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`ORDER
`Conduct of the Proceeding
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5
`
`A telephone conference call was held on September 4th, 2013, between
`
`Judges Lee, Chang, and Zecher, and respective counsel for the parties. The subject
`matter of the call was the timing of the cross examination of Petitioner’s reply
`declarants by the Patent Owner. Petitioner has offered the declarants for cross-
`examination on September 6th and 10th, but lead counsel for Patent Owner is
`unavailable during that time. Also, because of other matters in litigation, lead
`
`

`
`Case CBM2012-00003
`Patent No. 8,140,358
`
`counsel for Patent Owner will be unavailable to conduct the cross-examination
`until September 23rd, 2013. Patent Owner has proposed to postpone oral hearing in
`this case by more than three weeks, from October 8th, 2013, to October 30th, and
`beyond.
`
`Even if cross-examination of reply declarants is not conducted until
`September 23rd, when Patent Owner’s lead counsel is available, the circumstance
`does not justify postponement of oral hearing by more than three weeks. We note,
`however, that counsel for Patent Owner has indicated that one backup counsel is
`available to conduct the cross examination on September 6th or 10th, or sometime
`during the week of September 16th when the witnesses may be available. Counsel
`for Petitioner has indicated that Petitioner can submit its response to observations
`on cross-examination within four days of the filing of the observations.
`
`It is
`ORDERED that Due Date 7, the date of oral hearing in this trial, is herein
`
`reset to October 15th, 2013; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that the parties may stipulate to different Due
`
`Dates 4-6 so long as none is later than Due Date 7, to accommodate the scheduling
`requirements on both sides, and that such stipulation shall be filed prior to any Due
`Date that is changed by the stipulation.
`
`-2-
`
`
`
`

`
`Case CBM2012-00003
`Patent No. 8,140,358
`
`By Electronic Transmission
`
`Attorney for Petitioner Liberty Mutual Ins. Co.:
`
`J. Steven Baughman, Esq.
`Nicole M. Jantzi, Esq.
`Ropes & Gray LLP
`steven.baughman@ropesgray.com
`nicole.jantzi@ropesgray.com
`
`
`
`Attorneys for Patent Owner Progressive Casualty Ins. Co.:
`
`Calvin P. Griffith
`James L. Wamsley, III
`John V. Biernacki
`Jones Day
`Email: cpgriffith@jonesday.com
`Email: jlwamsleyiii@jonesday.com
`Email: jvbiernacki@jonesday.com
`
`
`-3-

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket