throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
` Paper 19
`Entered: March 1, 2013
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`
`
`
`LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CO.
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`PROGRESSIVE CASUALTY INSURANCE CO.
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case CBM2012-00003 (JL)
`Patent 8,140,358
`____________
`
`
`
`Before JAMESON LEE, JONI Y. CHANG, and MICHAEL R. ZECHER,
`Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`LEE, Administrative Patent Judge
`
`
`ORDER
`Conduct of the Proceeding
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5
`On February 28, 2013, a telephone conference call was held between
`
`respective counsel for the parties and Judges Lee, Chang, and Zecher. The
`subject of discussion was what motions the parties intend to file.
`
`

`

`Case CBM2012-00003
`Patent 8,140,358
`
`The parties indicated a general desire to have a protective order put in
`place to cover disclosure of confidential information. Counsel for the parties
`agreed to work toward that end and to ask the Board for assistance if they
`need authorization to deviate from the default protective order in Appendix
`B to the Board’s Trial Practice Guide. See Office Patent Trial Practice
`Guide, 77 Fed. Reg. 48756, 48769 (Aug. 14, 2012). Counsel offered to
`submit a red-lined copy based on the default protective order prior to
`initiating a conference call to discuss any variation from the default
`protective order. The panel appreciates the offer. The red-lined copy for
`discussion should not be officially filed. It should be sent by electronic mail
`as a courtesy copy for use in the telephone conference call to each party and
`the Board.
`Petitioner proposed to file a motion for pro hac vice admission of a
`number of individuals. The panel referred counsel to an order posted on the
`Board’s website with regard to the filing of such a motion.
`Counsel for the patent owner indicated that the patent owner may seek
`to amend one or more claims. The panel expressed appreciation for patent
`owner’s commitment to not add new matter and not to enlarge the scope of
`existing claims. Note also that all proposed amendments must reasonably
`reflect an effort to obviate or otherwise render moot one or more of
`petitioner’s arguments against an unamended claim.
`Finally, counsel for petitioner proposed joining this covered business
`method patent review with any covered business method patent review to be
`instituted on CBM2013-00009 directed to the same involved patent.
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case CBM2012-00003
`Patent 8,140,358
`
`Counsel for the patent owner indicated that he could not take a meaningful
`position on that request prior to reviewing the decision to institute a covered
`business method patent review in CBM2013-00009. Nevertheless, counsel
`for both parties agreed to work together in a cooperative manner, if and
`when a decision to institute a review is rendered in CBM2013-00009, to see
`what measures can be proposed to improve the efficiencies of the two
`reviews on the same patent.
`It is
`ORDERED that the petitioner is authorized to file a motion for pro
`hac vice admission under 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c), and that such a motion shall
`be filed in accordance with the “Order -- Authorizing Motion for Pro Hac
`Vice Admission” in Case IPR2013-00010 (MPT), a copy of which is
`available on the Board Web site (at http://www.uspto.gov/PTAB) under
`“Representative Orders, Decisions, and Notices”; the patent owner has one
`week from the time of filing of the motion to oppose the motion; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that the patent owner may file a motion to
`amend one or more of its claims which are subject to at least one ground of
`unpatentability for which this review has been instituted; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner may initiate a joint
`conference call, if a review is instituted in CBM2013-00009, to discuss
`potential joinder.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case CBM2012-00003
`Patent 8,140,358
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`J. Steven Baughman
`Nicole M. Jantzi
`Ropes & Gray
`Email: steven.baughman@ropesgray.com
`Email: Nicole.jantzi@ropesgray.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Calvin P. Griffith
`James L. Wamsley, III
`John V. Biernacki
`Jones Day
`Email: cpgriffith@jonesday.com
`Email: jlwamsleyiii@jonesday.com
`Email: jvbiernacki@jonesday.com
`
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket