throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
` BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`Page 186
`
` LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE )
` COMPANY, ) No. CBM2012-00002
` ) CBM2012-00004 (JL)
` Petitioner, ) Patent 6,064,970
` )
` vs. ) No. CBM2013-0004 (JL)
` ) Patent 8,090,598
` PROGRESSIVE CASUALTY )
` INSURANCE COMPANY, ) No. CBM2012-0003
` ) CBM2013-0009 (JL)
` Patent Owner. ) Patent 8,140,358
` ______________________________)
`
` VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF SCOTT ANDREWS
` Palo Alto, California
` Tuesday, September 24, 2013
` Volume 2
`
`Reported by:
`LESLIE ROCKWOOD, RPR, CSR 3462
`Job No. 65807
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`1
`2
`
`3 4 5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`

`

`Page 203
`
`Page 204
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` Do you see that?
` A. I see that.
` Q. What references do you believe this person of
`ordinary skill in the art would correct -- would
`consult? Excuse me.
` A. Well, for example, they might consult the Wang
`book that was quoted by or recited by Dr. Ehsani. If
`they were doing this in 1999, they'd probably use the
`Langari and Yen book. There are other texts on fuzzy
`logic.
` And there also quite often -- certainly at this
`time in the development of the technology, there were
`many articles in things like electronic design news and
`electrical engineering magazines, kind of trade
`magazines that would be very hands-on specific examples
`of how to use one sort of technology or another. And
`many engineers used those as a vehicle for understanding
`how to make use of a new technology, and then they would
`go and find a reference that had specific details on it.
` Q. As you sit here today, can you identify any
`such articles that related to the field of fuzzy logic
`as of 1996 that these engineers would have consulted, in
`your opinion?
` A. To actually identify them by name and
`publication date, no, but I recall reading articles like
`
`Page 205
`
` MR. MYERS: Objection. 402, 403.
` THE WITNESS: I don't think that they would
`need to because Kosaka is fairly explicit about its
`application of fuzzy logic. I would think that someone
`reading Kosaka would look at it and say, well, this is
`clearly an application of fuzzy logic to this
`classification problem so I'm going to go to a textbook
`like Wang or Langari and Yen and find out the specific
`details of how to implement that.
` The engineers that you were referring to
`earlier, the engineers that I supervised that were
`making use of these kinds of systems, didn't have a
`patent in front of them saying to use fuzzy logic. They
`had a problem, which was they needed to classify things
`which were being classified on the basis of a wide
`number of possibly conflicting variables.
` And so they're faced with that problem, they
`would have recalled reading an article that that was --
`that fuzzy logic was a good technology to use for that,
`and then they would have gone and probably reread that
`article, if they could find it, and then gone and gotten
`a text.
` So I think you're talking about two different
`situations here. Someone reading Kosaka would not need
`to have that information because Kosaka tells them.
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`that in periodicals.
` Q. Do you recall when you read them?
` A. Well, pretty much all my career. So beginning
`in the early '80s, I would -- all of us would subscribe
`to those magazines and periodicals, but I don't recall a
`specific article which is what you would like me to cite
`to. So I don't have a specific article that I can --
` Q. I'm sorry, did you finish?
` A. Yeah.
` Q. Okay. And is it your testimony under oath
`today that you recall reviewing such articles dealing
`with fuzzy logic prior to 1996?
` A. Almost certainly I recall reading articles on
`fuzzy logic, on Solitons, there are a whole lot of
`technologies like this which are not typically the
`things that you learn in school, but they're very, very
`useful technologies. And there were always articles
`about these things in those trade magazines, but I can't
`recall a particular article that I read.
` Q. So is it your opinion, Mr. Andrews, that this
`hypothetical person of ordinary skill in the art would
`be able to combine what was taught in those articles or
`other publications dealing with fuzzy logic with the
`disclosure of the Kosaka patent application in order to
`understand how to apply that?
`
`Page 206
`
`BY MR. WAMSLEY:
` Q. Let me direct your attention to paragraph 8 of
`your rebuttal declaration. Again, that's Exhibit 1019.
`And here you're stating opinions with respect to the
`membership functions described in Kosaka; correct?
` A. That's right.
` Q. Mr. Andrews, would you agree with me that
`Kosaka does not disclose the particular parameter values
`that are associated with the membership functions he
`uses in his device?
` A. Do you have -- I'm sorry, do you have a copy of
`Kosaka?
` Q. I do and you do.
` A. That's fine.
` Q. That's Exhibit 1004.
` A. I was thrown off by the Japanese.
` Q. And if you want the question back, we can have
`the reporter read it back.
` A. Why don't you go ahead and read it back.
` (The record was read by the reporter
` as follows:
` "QUESTION: Mr. Andrews, would you agree with
` me that Kosaka does not disclose the particular
` parameter values that are associated with the
` membership functions he uses in his device?")
`
`6 (Pages 203 to 206)
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

`

`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Page 239
`
`BY MR. WAMSLEY:
` Q. And among the many things you say you could
`have put in your original declaration was this opinion
`in the first sentence of paragraph 10.
` Am I right?
` MR. MYERS: Objection. 402, 403.
` THE WITNESS: As long as we're speculating, I
`could have put this in there.
`BY MR. WAMSLEY:
` Q. Does that require speculation for you to say
`you could have done it?
` A. Well, we're speculating here about things that
`I could have put into my original declaration as opposed
`to why I put them in this declaration. I put them in
`this declaration to respond to Dr. Ehsani.
` I could have put, you know, a comprehensive
`claim chart about Kosaka into my first declaration, but
`I didn't feel that it was necessary.
` Q. Dr. Ehsani didn't testify in his declaration
`that fuzzy logic had to be used in Kosaka, did he?
` MR. MYERS: Objection. 402, 403.
` THE WITNESS: I don't -- I have to read through
`his entire declaration, I guess, to answer definitively,
`but I don't recall that he did that.
`BY MR. WAMSLEY:
`
`Page 241
`
` Am I right?")
` MR. MYERS: Objection. 402, 403.
` THE WITNESS: He actually says at the bottom of
`the first column of page 6: "But determination may be
`carried out without using fuzzy logic. Calculation may
`also be carried out using a common insurance table."
` So he provides an alternative, which would be
`just implementing an insurance table in crisp logic. He
`doesn't provide you with a diagram of that.
`BY MR. WAMSLEY:
` Q. There's no disclosure of how those crisp logic
`functions would be carried out.
` Am I right?
` MR. MYERS: Objection. 402, 403.
` THE WITNESS: They would be carried out using a
`common insurance table.
`BY MR. WAMSLEY:
` Q. Do you have familiarity with a common insurance
`table, Mr. Andrews?
` A. Well, I think we've established that I'm not an
`expert in insurance.
` Q. So your answer is "no"?
` A. No.
` MR. MYERS: Objection. 402, 403.
`BY MR. WAMSLEY:
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Page 240
` Q. Now later in paragraph 10, you testify that if
`Kosaka implemented the system using crisp logic, many of
`the same components as described for the fuzzy logic
`system would be required.
` Do you see that?
` A. I see that.
` Q. Would you agree with me that some of the
`components would not be the same if he -- if his system
`were implemented as you suggest in crisp logic?
` A. Well, you probably wouldn't have the fuzzy
`logic parts.
` Q. Exactly. Moreover, there's no disclosure in
`Kosaka of how those crisp logic units would be used.
` Am I right?
` MR. MEYERS: Objection. 402, 403.
` THE WITNESS: Do you want to restate your
`question?
`BY MR. WAMSLEY:
` Q. Do you want me to restate it or can the
`reporter just read it back, please.
` (The record was read by the reporter
` as follows:
` "QUESTION: Moreover, there's no disclosure in
` Kosaka of how those crisp logic units would be
` used.
`
`Page 242
` Q. So how the crisp logic would be carried out
`were it to be used in building the Kosaka invention,
`that would require insurance expertise?
` MR. MYERS: Objection. 402, 403.
` THE WITNESS: Someone would need to understand
`what a common insurance table contained, appropriate for
`this application, and how one would compare measured
`values to that table. But that comparison process is
`fairly straightforward from a technical perspective.
`It's just that I don't know what the content of a common
`insurance table would be.
`BY MR. WAMSLEY:
` Q. Let's turn to your testimony in paragraphs 11,
`12 and 13 of your rebuttal declaration, please.
` A. Okay.
` Q. And that refers to the article entitled "An
`Interest in Black Magic," which is Liberty Mutual
`Exhibit 1008. Do you have that?
` A. I have that.
` Q. Now, in your original declaration, you didn't
`provide any testimony with respect to this article, did
`you? And feel free to consult it. You have it there in
`front of you.
` A. Yeah. It's been a long time, so --
` In this declaration, it's not listed as one of
`
`15 (Pages 239 to 242)
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket