`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CO.
`
`Petitioner
`
`V.
`
`PROGRESSIVE CASUALTY INSURANCE CO.
`
`Patent Owner
`
`Case CBM2012-00002
`
`Patent 6,064,970
`
`Before the Honorable JAMESON LEE, JONI Y. CHANG, and MICHAEL R.
`
`ZECI—IER,
`Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION OF JAMES R.
`MYERS
`
`Pursuant to Rule 42.10(c), and as authorized in the Board’s Order on the
`
`Conduct of the Proceeding (Paper 17), Petitioner Liberty Mutual Insurance
`
`Company (“Liberty Mutual”) respectfully requests pro hac vice admission of
`
`James R. Myers as counsel in this proceeding.
`
`
`
`Time for Filing
`
`This Motion is timely because it is being filed no sooner than twenty one
`
`(21) days after service of the Petition in this proceeding, which occurred on
`
`September 16, 2012.
`
`Statement of Facts
`
`The following statement of facts demonstrates that there is good cause for
`
`the Board to recognize James R. Myers as counsel pro hac vice in this proceeding.
`
`Mr. Myers is an experienced litigation attorney and has an established
`
`familiarity with the subject matter at issue in this proceeding. Mr. Myers has been
`
`practicing law since 1976 and has extensive experience litigating patent
`
`infringement cases in many different District Courts across the country. Among
`
`his experience in patent litigation matters, Mr. Myers has been lead counsel in
`
`multiple trials, Markrnan hearings, patent summary judgment proceedings, and
`
`other patent-related hearings and pleadings concerning, inter alia, patent validity
`
`and infringement issues. Mr. Myers has also been recognized as a leading patent
`
`litigation attorney by several different organizations, including Who’s Who in
`
`America, Who’s Who in American Law, Who’s Who in the World, Euromoney’s
`
`Guide to the World’s Leading Patent Law Experts, Intellectual Asset Magazine
`
`Patent 1000, and ThomsonReuters Washington DC Super Lawyers.
`
`
`
`Mr. Myers is familiar with US. Patent No. 6,064,970 (“the ‘970 Patent”)
`
`and the issues involved in this case. Mr. Myers has been representing Liberty
`
`Mutual against Patent Owner Progressive Casualty Insurance Co. (“Progressive”)
`
`as lead counsel in pending District Court litigation since June 2010 When
`
`Progressive first filed its infringement action involving its telematics patent
`
`portfolio against Liberty Mutual—asserting the ‘970 Patent. Mr. Myers has been
`
`actively involved as lead counsel for Liberty Mutual throughout the life of the
`
`District Court case. As lead counsel in the District Court litigation, Mr. Myers has,
`
`among other things, been heavily involved with forming non—infringement and
`
`invalidity positions against Progressive’s telematics patent portfolio. Accordingly,
`
`Liberty Mutual prefers that Mr. Myers continue as counsel in this CBM proceeding
`
`as well; and, further, Progressive does not oppose Mr. Myers being admitted pro
`
`hac vice.
`
`Declaration of James R. Myers
`
`As directed by the Board, this Motion is also accompanied by the
`
`Declaration of James R. Myers in Support of Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission
`
`attesting to the requirements laid out in the Board’s Order Authorizing Motion for
`
`Pro Hac Vice Admission in Case IPR2013—00010 (MPT) (Paper 6).
`
`
`
`For the foregoing reasons as well as the reasons contained in the attached
`
`declaration, Liberty Mutual respectfully requests admission of James R. Myers as
`
`counsel pro hac vice.
`
`Dated: March 14,2013
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`By: /Nicole M. Jantzi/
`J. Steven Baughman, Lead Counsel
`Nicole M. J antzi
`
`ROPES & GRAY LLP
`
`Prudential Tower
`
`800 Boylston Street
`Boston, Massachusetts 02199-3 600
`
`Steven.bauglnnangazrogesgraycom
`Nicolefantzi (are es ra .com
`
`
`Attorneys for Petitioner Liberty Mutual
`Insurance Co.
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CO.
`
`Petitioner
`
`V.
`
`PROGRESSIVE CASUALTY INSURANCE CO.
`
`Patent Owner
`
`Case CBM2012—00002
`
`Patent 6,064,970
`
`Before the Honorable JAMESON LEE, JONI Y. CHANG, and MICHAEL R.
`
`ZECHER,
`Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`DECLARATION OF JAMES R. MYERS IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR
`
`PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION
`
`1, James R. Myers, being duly sworn and upon oath, hereby attest to the
`
`following:
`
`I am a member in good standing of the Bars of Virginia, Massachusetts, and
`
`the District of Columbia.
`
`I have never been suspended or disbarred from practice before any court or
`
`administrative body.
`
`I have never been denied an application for admission to practice before any
`
`
`
`No sanction or contempt citation has ever been imposed against me by any
`
`court or administrative body.
`
`I have read and will comply with the Office Patent Trial Practice Guide and
`
`the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials set forth in part 42 of the Code of Federal
`
`Regulations.
`
`I will be subject to the USPTO Code of Professional Responsibility set forth
`
`in 37 C.F.R. §§ 10.20 et seq. and disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. §
`
`11.19(a).
`
`I have not applied to appear pro hac vice before the Office in the last three
`
`(3) years, except that, concurrently with the present Motion and Declaration, I
`
`intend to file motions to apply to appear pro hac vice before the Office in two (2)
`
`other pending CBM proceedings involving Liberty Mutual—Cases CBM2012—
`
`00003 and CBM2012-00004.
`
`I am an experienced litigation attorney having familiarity with the subject
`
`matter at issue in this proceeding.
`
`I have been practicing law since 1976 and have
`
`extensive experience litigating patent infringement cases in many different District
`
`Courts across the country, including participation in multiple trials, Markman
`
`hearings, patent summary judgment proceedings, and other patent—related hearings
`
`and pleadings concerning, inter alia, patent validity and/or infringement.
`
`I have
`
`received professional recognition in the field of patent litigation by several
`
`
`
`different organizations, including Who’s Who in America, Who’s Who in American
`
`Law, Who’s Who in the World, Euromoney’s Guide to the World’s Leading Patent
`
`Law Experts, Intellectual Asset Magazine Patent 1000, and ThomsonReuters
`
`Washington DC Super Lawyers.
`
`1 am very familiar with US. Patent No. 6,064,970
`
`(“the ‘970 Patent”) and the issues involved in this case.
`
`I have represented Liberty
`
`Mutual against Progressive as lead counsel in pending District Court litigation
`
`since June 2010 when Progressive first filed its infringement action involving its
`
`telematics patent portfolio against Liberty Mutual—asserting the ‘970 Patent.
`
`I
`
`have been actively involved as lead counsel for Liberty Mutual throughout the life
`
`of the District Court case. As lead counsel in the District Court litigation, I have,
`
`among other things, been heavily involved with forming non-infringement and
`
`invalidity positions against Progressive’s telematics patent portfolio.
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed
`
`this 14th day of March, 2013, in Washington, DC.
`
`2).
`we” "
`"’7:
`
`
`. James R. Mye1;_s,.j/
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing UNOPPOSED
`
`MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION OF JAMES R. MYERS and
`
`DECLARATION OF JAMES R. MYERS IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PRO
`
`HAC VICE ADMISSION was served on March 14, 2013, to the following
`
`Counsel for Patent Owner via e—mail, pursuant to the parties’ agreement
`
`concerning service:
`
`Calvin P. Griffith, Lead Counsel
`
`James L. Wamsley, III
`John V. Biernacki
`
`JONES DAY
`
`North Point
`
`901 Lakeside Avenue
`
`Cleveland, Ohio 44114-1190
`cpgriffith@jonesday.com
`j lwamsleviii@_,j onesdavcom
`jvbiemackitiflonesdayxmn
`
`Attorneys for Patent Owner
`Progressive Casualty Insurance Co.
`
`/s/ Darrell W. Stark
`
`Darrell W. Stark
`
`ROPES & GRAY LLP
`
`