`571-272-7822
`
`
`
` Paper 27
`
`Entered: November 19, 2012
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`SAP AMERICA, INC.
`Petitioner,
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`VERSATA DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC.
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case CBM2012-00001 (MPT)
`Patent 6,553,350
`____________
`
`Before MICHAEL P. TIERNEY, Lead Administrative Patent Judge, and SALLY
`C. MEDLEY and RAMA G. ELLURU, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`TIERNEY, Lead Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`DECISION
`Conduct of the Proceedings – Protective Order
` 37 C.F.R. § 42.54
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case CBM2012-00001
`Patent 6,553,350
`
`
`
`The parties have jointly submitted a proposed protective order, Versata
`
`Exhibit 2004, for this proceeding. The Board enters the protective order and it
`
`shall control the conduct of the proceeding unless otherwise modified.
`
`
`
`For future reference, the Board requests that parties generally identify how a
`
`proposed protective order differs from the Board’s default protective order.
`
`
`
`
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`
`Erika.arner@finnegan.com
`CPdocketkiklis@oblon.com
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`nlinck@rfem.com
`VERSATA-PGR@rfem.com
`
`
`
`2
`
`