throbber
MM Vendor Evaluation Guide
`
`Click on one of the following topics for more information:
`
`For Help on Help, Press F1
`Version
`
`SAP-00008797
`
`

`
`Version
`Prepared for R/3 Release 2.2.
`August 94
`
`SAP-00008798
`
`

`
`Copyrights
`
`@1994 SAP AG. All rights reserved.
`Neither this documentation nor any part of it may be copied or reproduced in any form or by any
`means or translated into another language, without the prior consent of SAP AG.
`
`SAP-00008799
`
`

`
`Introduction
`
`Overview
`
`This section introduces you to the SAP component Vendor Evaluation. It describes the master data
`and the organizational levels for vendor evaluation.
`
`Price
`
`Delivery
`
`Quality
`
`Service
`
`~ Vendor evaluation system ~,~if
`WILSON@ SMITH@ BROWN@ JONES@
`Corn parable !
`I Objective
`
`Integration of the Vendor Evaluation System
`
`In R/3 Release 2.1, the Vendor Evaluation component has been competely integrated into MM
`Purchasing. Information, such as, delivery dates, prices, and quantities can be taken from purchase
`orders. Vendor evaluation also uses data from Quality Management, for example, results from
`goods receipt inspections or quality audits. It also accesses basic data in materials management,
`goods receipt data from Inventory Management, and data from the Logistics Information System
`(LIS).
`This section contains the following topics:
`~.
`
`Click on a topic for more information
`
`SAP-00008800
`
`

`
`What is Vendor Evaluation?
`
`The Vendor Evaluation module helps you select vendors for procuring materials. It makes in easier
`for you to determine sources of supply and enables you to assess your relationship with vendors. It
`provides you with accurate information on prices, terms of payment, and delivery. By evaluating
`vendors, you can improve your company’s competitiveness.
`You can quickly determine and solve procurement problems on the basis of detailed information in
`the vendor evaluation system.
`There is a scoring system in the SAP Standard System from 1 to 100 points which is used to
`measure the performance of your vendors based on four main criteria.
`You can determine and compare the performance of your vendors based on their overall scores.
`The main criteria in the standard system are:
`¯ Price
`¯ Quality
`¯ Delivery
`¯ Service
`You can define other or additional main criteria to meet your requirements. You can allocate
`different weighting factors to the individual criteria. The scores a vendor receives for the main
`criteria are calculated according to their weighting factors to form an overall score.
`The vendor evaluation system ensures that evaluation of vendors is objective, since all vendors are
`assessed according to the same criteria. In this way, subjective evaluations can be avoided.
`
`Subcriteria
`
`To create a detailed evaluation, each main criterion is divided into several subcriteria. The standard
`system provides you with certain subcriteria which provide a basis for evaluation. You can also
`define your own subcriteria.
`The scores for the subcriteria are calculated using three different scoring methods:
`¯ automatic

`semi-automatic
`¯ manual
`With the automatic scoring method, scores are calculated by the system on the basis of existing
`data.
`With the semi-automatic scoring method, you can enter individual scores for important materials
`yourself. The system then calculates the overall score on the basis of these scores.
`With the manual scoring method, you can enter the scores for subcriteria yourself. You can
`determine which of these methods you want to use.
`The results of vendor evaluation are displayed in the form of analyses. For example, you can
`generate ranking lists of the best vendors according to overall score or ranking lists for specific
`materials.
`Changes to evaluations are recorded in logs and evaluation sheets can be printed.
`
`SAP-00008801
`
`

`
`Master Data and Organizational Levels for Vendor Evaluation
`
`This section describes the master data which is required for vendor evaluation and the
`organizational level for evaluations.
`
`The R/3 Company Structure
`
`This section describes how the organization of a company is portrayed in the R/3 System. It also
`shows how this organization is reflected in MM Purchasing.
`The organization of a company is broken down into the following organizational levels:
`
`I 001
`I
`
`I
`I °°°’ I1\
`, °°°’1
`
`Client
`
`Company code
`
`Purchasing
`organization
`
`Plant
`
`I
`
`I
`’1’ I°°°~’,~’~~
`I°°°~1
`,’1 °°°~ I’, -
`
`’/I ;o0, I I’o0 "I I
`
`Client
`a grouping of legal, organizational, business, and/or administrative units with a common purpose. A
`group within a corporation (for example, a consulting group) is an example of a client.
`Company code
`represents an independent accounting unit. Each company code has its own balance sheet and
`creates its own profit-and-loss statement.
`Plant
`a branch office or plant location within a company code. As a rule, purchasing is responsible for
`procuring supplies and services for a specific plant.
`Purchasing organization
`an organizational unit responsible for procuring materials and services for one or more plants and
`for negotiating prices and delivery conditions with the vendor. A purchasing organization is
`assigned to a company code.
`Purchasing group
`a purchasing organization is further subdivided into purchasing groups which are responsible for
`operational tasks.
`
`Organizational Level for Vendor Evaluation
`
`The organizational level for vendor evaluation is the purchasing organization:
`Each purchasing organization evaluates its own vendors.
`
`SAP-00008802
`
`

`
`The system does not support a comparison of vendor evaluations on the company code level.
`
`Master Data
`
`Vendor evaluation uses the following master data:
`¯ vendor master record
`¯ material master record
`¯ purchasing info record
`
`What is a Vendor Master?
`
`A vendor master contains information on a company’s vendors. This information is stored in
`individual vendor master records. As well as the name and address of the vendor, the record
`contains the following information:
`¯ vendor’s currency
`¯ terms of payment

`contact person
`A vendor master record also contains accounting data (for example, a control account).
`A vendor master record is maintained by accounting and purchasing.
`
`What is a Material Master?
`
`The material master contains descriptions of materials which a company procures, produces, and
`stores. The material master is a company’s central source for information on a specific material.
`The individual material master records contain data, such as unit of measure, purchasing group,
`and over/underdelivery tolerance.
`
`What is a Purchasing Info Record?
`
`A purchasing info record (also referred to as an info record) is used as a source of information for
`purchasing. It is a repository of information for a specific material and a vendor supplying the
`material. For example, the vendor’s current pricing is stored in the info record.
`The info record also enables buyers to quickly determine:
`¯ which materials have been previously offered or delivered by a specific vendor
`¯ which vendors have offered or supplied a specific material
`
`Information in Info Record?
`
`An info record contains, for example:

`current prices and pricing conditions
`¯ number of the last purchase order
`¯ tolerance limits for overdeliveries and underdeliveries
`¯ planned delivery time (time the vendor requires to deliver the material)
`An info record also contains quotation and ordering data.
`
`More Information
`
`SAP-00008803
`
`

`
`For detailed information on master data and organizational levels, please consult the following
`manuals:
`¯ MM Purchasing Guide,
`¯ MM Managing Material Master Data,
`
`SAP-00008804
`
`

`
`Introduction to Vendor Evaluation
`This section describes the functionality available for evaluating a vendor and provides an overview
`of the scoring system.
`
`Overview
`
`This section contains the following topics:
`V.e.rld.o.r.E v.aluat [o.n
`O~ermJl~tg~r~
`Click on a topic for more information
`For more information on how to calculate scores, see Calculatinq Scores. You will learn how to
`evaluate a vendor in Evaluatinq Vendors.
`
`SAP-00008805
`
`

`
`Vendor Evaluation
`
`This section describes the most important features of vendor evaluation:
`¯ overall score
`¯ main criteria

`subcriteria

`score card
`¯ weighting factor
`The following graphic displays the scores on various levels of vendor evaluation:
`
`Overall score
`for vendor
`
`Price
`
`Quality
`
`Delivery
`
`Service
`
`Scores for
`main criteria
`
`Price Price
`level history
`
`GR System Delivery Quantity Shipping
`check audit performance reliability instructions
`
`Scores for
`subcriteria
`
`Overall Score
`
`The overall score represents the complete evaluation of a vendor. It is a combination of the scores
`the vendor has received for all the main criteria.
`You can compare different vendors on the basis of their overall scores without generating a
`detailed analysis of their evaluations.
`
`Vendor
`
`Smith
`Brown
`Jones
`Thompson
`Wilson
`
`Overall score out of 100
`
`85
`83
`69
`57
`40
`
`SAP-00008806
`
`

`
`Out of the five vendors Smith received the best overall score and Wilson the worst; Smith and
`Brown scored almost the same points. For a more detailed analysis, you can compare Smith and
`Brown on the main criteria level.
`
`Main Criterion
`
`The main criteria form the basis for assessing the performance of a vendor. The system calculates
`the overall score for a vendor from the main criteria scores.
`You can evaluate vendors according to several main criteria which you consider important. The
`scores for the main criteria represent the performance of a vendor. They are then combined to form
`an overall score.
`By comparing scores on the main criteria level, you can determine that vendor Jones received a
`lower overall score than vendor Smith, but vendor Jones scored better in the main criterion Price. If
`the price of the material is the decisive factor when you decide on your next procurement, then you
`would select vendor Jones.
`
`Required Main Criteria
`
`You can determine the type and number of main criteria yourself. The system supports a maximum
`of 99 main criteria. You can specify the number of main criteria for each purchasing organization
`and decide which main criteria are to be calculated in the overall score.
`The standard system proposes the following four main criteria:
`¯ Price
`¯ Quality
`¯ Delivery
`¯ Service
`You can also define additional main criteria or you can calculate an overall score on the basis of
`only three main criteria.
`
`Subcriterion
`
`Subcriteria are the smallest units which can be allocated scores in vendor evaluation. The system
`calculates a score for the main criterion based on the scores a vendor receives for the various
`subcriteria.
`There are three types of subcriteria:
`¯ manual

`semi-automatic
`¯ automatic
`They are named after the different methods of scoring. The individual scoring methods are
`maintained differently and can be used for different purposes (see ~.
`
`Required Subcriteria
`
`You can evaluate a vendor with the automatic subcriteria in the standard system. With this method,
`you are not required to maintain scores for manual or semi-automatic subcriteria.
`The system allocates a maximum of twenty subcriteria to each main criterion. In the SAP Standard
`System there are two automatic subcriteria for the main criterion Price and three automatic
`subcriteria for the main criteria Quality and Delivery. You can determine 17 to 18 additional
`subcriteria for these main criteria. There are no automatic subcriteria for the main criterion Service,
`
`SAP-00008807
`
`

`
`however, two semi-automatic subcriteria are included in the SAP Standard System. Therefore, for
`this main criterion, you can define an additional 18 subcriteria manually or semi-automatically.
`Please note when calculating subcriteria scores manually, the fewer criteria you define the easier it
`is to maintain them.
`
`Short Description of Automatic Subcriteria
`
`This section describes the individual automatic subcriteria in more detail. The automatic subcriteria
`are:
`¯ Price Level
`Price History
`Goods Receipt
`Quality Audit
`On-Time Delivery Performance
`Quantity Reliability
`Shipping Instructions
`Price Level
`The Price Level is a subcriterion for the main criterion Price. This subcriterion compares the
`vendor’s price to the market price. If the vendor’s price is lower than the market price, he/she
`receives a good score, if it is higher than the market price he/she is allocated a poor score.
`On the basis of the subcriterion Price Level you can compare a vendor’s price to the current market
`price at a certain point in time.
`Price History
`The Price History is a subcriterion for the main criterion Price. This subcriterion compares the
`development of the vendor’s price with the market price.
`On the basis of the subcriterion Price History, you can determine within a certain period if the
`vendor’s price has increased or decreased and compare it with the market price trend.
`On-Time Delivery Performance
`On-Time Delivery Performance is a subcriterion for the main criterion Delivery. This subcriterion
`determines if a vendor has adhered to the specified delivery dates.
`Quantity Reliability
`Quantity Reliability is a subcriterion for the main criterion Delivery. This subcriterion determines
`whether a vendor has delivered the quantity specified in the purchase order.
`Shipping Instructions
`Compliance with Shipping Instructions is a subcriterion for the main criterion Delivery. This
`subcriterion determines whether the vendor complies with the instructions for shipping or packaging
`of a material.
`Goods Receipt
`Goods Receipt is a subcriterion for the main criterion Quality. This subcriterion evaluates the quality
`of the material that the vendor delivers. A quality inspection takes place at goods receipt.
`Quality Audit
`The Quality Audit is a subcriterion for the main criterion Quality. This subcriterion evaluates the
`quality assurance system used by a company when they manufacture products.
`
`Score Card
`
`A score card is used to compare the performance of one vendor with another. A score card ranges
`
`SAP-00008808
`
`

`
`from the best to the worst possible score.
`The examples in this manual are based on a score card from 1 to 100 points. The score card
`enables you to grade the performance of individual vendors.
`NoteThe score card is determined when the system is installed. For more details, see ~mizin.~q’
`
`Weighting Scores
`
`The scores a vendor receives for main criteria can be weighted differently.
`
`Weighting Factor
`
`By using weighting factors, you can increase or reduce the importance of certain criteria when the
`score is calculated on the next highest level.
`Example: Suppose a vendor receives 80 points for the criterion Price and 80 points for the criterion
`Service. Since the price of the material is more important than the service the vendor provides, you
`allocate the criterion Price a weighting factor of 3 and the criterion Service a factor of 1. The 80
`points for Price are then worth three times more than the 80 points for Service when the overall
`score is calculated.
`
`Weighting Key
`
`A weighting key is an indicator under which the weighting factors for a group of main criteria can be
`combined and saved.
`If you want to repeat an evaluation with certain main criteria and certain weighting factors, you can
`save this combination under a weighting key.
`When you carry out the next vendor evaluation, just enter the relevant weighting key instead of
`entering a weighting factor for each individual criterion. The system automatically sets all the
`weighting factors.
`There are two possible types of weighting key in the standard system:
`¯ Key 01
`equal weighting for all criteria
`¯ Key 02
`For example, evaluation of small parts vendors. The weighting factors are distributed as follows:
`Price
`5
`Quality
`3
`Delivery
`2
`Service
`1
`
`SAP-00008809
`
`

`
`KDetermining Scores
`
`This section explains which data is used in vendor evaluation and how the system calculates an
`overall score for a vendor on the basis of main and subcriteria scores.
`
`Determining an Overall Score
`
`The system calculates the overall score for a vendor from the scores for the individual main criteria,
`taking into account the weighting factors you allocated for each main criterion.
`
`Determining Main Criteria Scores
`
`The system calculates a vendor’s main criterion score from the subcriteria scores. If you do not
`define any subcriteria for the main criterion, the system cannot calculate a score. In this case, you
`must manually enter a score for the main criterion.
`You can weight subcriteria in the same way as main criteria, except that subcriteria do not have a
`weighting key.
`Note
`There are no automatic main criteria. For example, if you want to have a main criterion called
`Delivery for which the score is calculated automatically, you must define the automatic subcriterion
`Delivery as the only subcriterion for the main criterion. The score calculated for this subcriterion
`corresponds to the main criterion.
`
`Determining Subcriteria Scores
`
`The following methods can be used to calculate subcriteria scores.
`¯ manual

`semi-automatic
`¯ automatic
`Note
`There is no field in the info record for evaluations. The info records referred to in this manual are
`evaluation records on info record level.
`
`SAP-00008810
`
`

`
`o/o%Manual
`
`method
`
`Semi-auto.
`method
`
`Automatic
`method
`
`Overall score
`
`SCOreS for
`main criteria
`
`Scores for
`s ubcrite ri a
`
`Info record level
`
`Purchase orders
`Goods reiceipts
`Quality inspection lots
`
`Manual Scoring
`
`With this method you enter the vendor’s score for a subcriterion in the vendor evaluation system
`yourself before carrying out an evaluation. The system includes this score when calculating the
`main criterion score.
`
`Score for
`main criteria
`
`Score for
`subcriterion
`
`manually
`[~ User enters score
`for subcriterion
`
`SAP-00008811
`
`

`
`The manual score for the vendors applies to all their materials.
`This method is recommended for evaluations which are not based on specific materials. It does not
`require much maintenance since you are not required to enter individual scores over a period of
`time.
`Before each new evaluation, you should check and, if necessary, change the scores for manual
`subcriteria.
`
`Semi-Automatic Scoring
`
`Instead of giving vendors an overall score for all their materials as you do with manual subcriteria,
`you can maintain a number of scores for each important material on info record level with this
`method.
`
`Score for
`main criterion
`
`~ Score for
`
`subcriterion
`
`I scores via info record I
`
`Semi-automatic
`[~ User enters scores
`for subcriteria via
`info records
`
`[~ System calculates
`score for subcriterion
`
`This method enables you to calculate a score for a subcriterion based on purchasing data in the
`SAP system. The scores obtained using this method are more accurate and objective.
`The system includes all the scores you have entered when it calculates the subcriteria scores.
`Material-specific evaluations can be used to compare different vendors who provide the same
`material (see _M___o_nj_tprjng___V__e__nd_o_[__E__y_a_]uatjo_n.
`
`Automatic Scoring
`
`With this method, you are not required to enter any data or scores yourself.
`
`SAP-00008812
`
`

`
`Score for
`main criterion
`
`Score for
`subcriterion
`
`Scores via
`info record
`
`Automatic
`Data enterd at procurement,
`goods movement and QM
`~> System updates data
`and calculates score
`for subcriterion
`
`Purchase orders
`Goods receipts
`Quality inspection lots
`
`The system calculates the scores for automatic subcriteria based on data from other areas of the
`company (for example, goods receipt or quality assurance). This data is entered into the vendor
`evaluation system via an automatic update of the statistics files.
`Each automatic subcriterion is based on one scoring method. For example, the system checks all
`the purchase orders and goods receipts, then it calculates a vendor’s score for the subcriterion
`On-Time Delivery Performance based on the average variance between actual and planned
`delivery dates.
`The following table displays the automatic subcriteria for the four main criteria in the standard
`system:
`
`Main criterion
`
`Subcriterion
`
`Price
`
`Quality
`
`Delivery
`
`Service
`
`Price Level
`Price History
`Goods Receipt
`Quality Audit
`In-Production Rejection (not in 2.1)
`On-Time Delivery Performance
`Quantity Reliability
`Shipping Instructions
`Reliability (semi-automatic)
`Innovation "
`Customer Service "
`
`SAP-00008813
`
`

`
`Changing Scores Manually
`
`In certain cases, you might want to change the automatic scores.
`For example, suppose a vendor has missed delivery dates because of a strike. Therefore, he/she
`has obtained a very poor score for the automatic subcriterion On-time delivery performance. If you
`do not want this exceptional situation to make a significant difference to the vendor’s score, you can
`overwrite the score with a better one.
`Before you can overwrite the score for this subcriterion, you require an authorization to change
`scores.
`Note
`Authorizations and field attributes are maintained via system configuration. For more information
`see .C...u.s..t..o..m...Lzj..ng and/or contact your system administrator.
`
`SAP-00008814
`
`

`
`Evaluating Vendors
`
`This section explains how to evaluate vendors. You will learn how to evaluate a vendor based on
`the following subcriteria:
`¯ automatic
`¯ automatic and semi-automatic
`¯ automatic, semi-automatic, and manual
`You also learn how to display, change, and delete evaluations.
`This section also includes a section on the SAP hierarchy and presentation graphics which can be
`used to graphically display a vendor evaluation.
`If you are not familiar with the functionality and scoring methods in the vendor evaluation system,
`please read !.rlt[.(~d.L4£.’cj.q.rl..to.Ve.!?.d.o.r..E~f.a.!u.at!on.
`
`Requirements
`
`Before you evaluate a vendor, you must consider the following questions:
`¯ Have you maintained the system configurations?
`¯ Do you have the required authorizations?
`¯ Which vendor do you want to evaluate?
`¯ Which purchasing organization is to evaluate the vendor?

`Is this the first time the vendor has been evaluated?

`If not, when was the last evaluation?
`
`Overview of Procedure
`
`The following graphic displays the steps you must carry out to evaluate a vendor:
`
`SAP-00008815
`
`

`
`(~ Enter
`- vendor
`- purchasing organization
`
`1
`
`~) Enter weighting key
`
`1
`
`(~) Enter scores for manual
`subcriteria
`
`1
`
`@ Evaluate all main criteria
`
`l
`
`~) Save evaluation
`
`Overview
`
`This section contains the following topics:
`
`
`................... : ..........~ ............................[ ...................- ........L.
`
`
`................... : ..........~ ..................[- .....................~ ....................: .......L.
`F,,v.al.uating..w[tb..Man.uaJ..~.ub~r.i.t.e.ri.a
`Main.tain[ng...V..e.ndo.r..Ev..aJtuati.o.n
`Graphi~al..DJs..I.#J~....o.f...V..ertd.o.r.JEv.al.ua.ti.o.ns.
`Click on a topic for more information
`
`SAP-00008816
`
`

`
`KEvaluating with Automatic Subcriteria
`
`This section explains how to evaluate a vendor based only on automatic subcriteria. For this type of
`evaluation, you are only required to carry out the basic steps.
`
`Determining a Scoring Method for Subcriteria
`
`You can determine which scoring method has been allocated to a subcriterion on the subcriteria
`screen.
`The key for different scoring methods can be found in the last column of the area Evaluation of
`subcriteria. The following table displays how they are allocated.
`
`Scoring method
`
`Manually
`Semi-automatically
`Automatically
`
`Key
`
`’_’
`1
`2 - 9
`
`Scoring Method for Automatic Subcriteria
`
`Automatic subcriteria can be calculated as follows:
`
`Scoring method
`
`4 5 7 9 8 3 2 6
`
`Subcriterion
`
`Price Level
`Price History
`
`Goods Receipt
`Quality Audit
`In-Production Rejection
`
`On-Time Delivery Performance
`Quantity Reliability
`Shipping Instructions
`
`Procedure
`
`To evaluate a vendor, proceed as follows:
`1.
`From the system menu select Logistics -->Materials management -->Purchasing and then
`Master data--> Vendor evaluation -->Maintain. The initial screen appears.
`Enter a purchasing organization and vendor and then press ENTER. An overview of the main
`criteria for this purchasing organization is displayed.
`If you have the SAP Classification System, you can enter a vendor class instead of a vendor. A list
`of the class is displayed from which you can select a vendor for evaluation. Use the entry help F4 or
`the matchcode =k.
`
`.
`
`SAP-00008817
`
`

`
`For more information about the classification system, see MM Classification Guide,
`3. Maintain the required field Weighting key.If you do not know the weighting key, press F4.
`4. From the menu bar select Edit-~Auto.new evaluation
`The system first calculates the scores for the automatic subcriteria, then the scores for the main
`criteria, and finally the overall score for the vendor.
`5. Save your evaluation with Fl1.
`Other fields on the overview screen include:
`
`¯ Deletion indicator
`¯ Main criteria scores
`Deletion indicator: please see I~.ai.rlt.a.i.n.i.n...y.e.rldor..l~.y.a!.uat.i.o.n to learn how this indicator
`works.
`
`Log for Calculating Automatic Subcriteria
`
`The log provides a breakdown of the the vendor’s score for a subcriterion. It displays the automatic
`subcriteria scores for all the info records included in the current calculation.
`After you have carried out an evaluation of the automatic subcriteria for several or all of the main
`criteria, you can display the log. From the menu bar select Goto --~AII logs.
`If you did not start a new evaluation, the system will not generate a log.
`
`Calculating Score for Individual Main Criterion
`
`.
`
`If you want the system to calculate a score for an individual main criterion rather than an overall
`score based on all the main criteria, proceed as follows:
`Press F16 on the overview screen for main criteria. A window appears in which you can select
`the main criterion.
`Select the criterion you want and press ENTER. The main criterion screen appears.
`.
`3.
`Press F5, to calculate the score for this main criterion.
`You can display the log for the automatic subcriteria for this main criterion
`--~Log per main criterion.
`
`by selecting Goto
`
`SAP-00008818
`
`

`
`Evaluating with Semi-Automatic Subcriteria
`
`This section explains how to evaluate a vendor on the basis of semi-automatic subcriteria.
`
`Requirements
`
`If you want to calculate main criteria scores on the basis of automatic subcriteria and
`semi-automatic subcriteria, you must maintain scores for the semi-automatic criteria over a period
`of time.
`
`Maintaining Scores for Semi-Automatic Subcriteria
`
`You can maintain scores in two ways; in vendor evaluation and when maintaining a purchasing info
`record. To access vendor evaluation from an info record, select Details -->Vendor evaluation.
`To enter scores for semi-automatic subcriteria via the vendor evaluation menu, proceed as follows:
`1. From the overview screen for main criteria select Goto --~ Evaluation perinfo recordto access
`the info record level.
`A window appears in which you enter the number of the material for evaluation. If the material
`does not have a material master record, you can enter the info record number.
`2. Enter the material number or info record and press ENTER. The screen for the first main criterion
`appears.
`3. Enter scores for your subcriteria.
`4. You can branch with F18 to the screen for the next main criterion. Maintain the scores for your
`subcriteria.
`5. Repeat this procedure for the other main criteria. Save your evaluation with F11.
`The next time you carry out a vendor evaluation, the system uses both the automatic and
`semi-automatic subcriteria to calculate the scores.
`
`Re-evaluating Semi-Automatic and Automatic Subcriteria
`
`The scores for subcriteria are allocated to main criteria which are displayed on separate screens
`when you maintain a vendor evaluation.
`The function Automatic new evaluation enables you to re-evaluate the scores for a vendor for
`semi-automatic and automatic subcriteria only. You can determine how a vendor’s scores for
`semi-automatic and automatic subcriteria have changed since the last evaluation. The manually
`maintained scores from the last evaluation remain unchanged so that you can compare the results.
`If the manually maintained scores were not included in the calculation, the overall score would be
`very different. It would not be possible to compare the new results with the old results.
`The scores for semi-automatic and automatic subcriteria are displayed together in a list so they can
`be compared easily.You can also compare the old and new scores and replace the old scores by
`the new ones.
`
`Procedure
`
`.
`
`Perform the following steps to re-evaluate existing subcriteria. Select Master data -->Vendor
`evaluation ->Automatic new evaluation from the purchasing menu.
`2. Enter a vendor and purchasing organization.
`
`SAP-00008819
`
`

`
`3. Press F8 to compare the old and new scores.
`4. If you want to replace the old scores by the new scores, save the new ones with F11.
`Select Individual log or All logs to branch into the log display.
`Generating List of Vendors to be Evaluated
`You can also use this function to generate a work list of vendors to be evaluated.
`Enter a date and leave the field Vendor empty. When you press Execute, the system generates a list
`of all the vendors who have not been evaluated since this date. The list includes both vendors with
`outdated evaluations and vendors who have never been evaluated.
`From this list you can branch into the screens for maintaining evaluations and overwrite the old
`scores with the new scores.
`
`Evaluating Vendors in Batch
`
`You can evaluate your vendors on a regular basis via batch processing. The function Evaluation in
`batch can be found under the purchasing menu.
`
`Requirements
`
`If you want to start a batch request for vendor evaluation, you require a variant to limit the number
`of vendors for evaluation.
`Maintaining and displaying variants
`You can display existing variants by selecting Goto --~Variant overview. You can use one of these
`variants for your batch request.
`
`If you want to create a new variant, select Goto --~Maintain variant. Enter the name of the variant
`and press Edit. You can determine your selection criteria and/or parameters on the maintenance
`screen. Save your variant.
`
`Procedure
`
`To evaluate vendors in batch, proceed as follows:
`1. Select Master data -~ Vendor evaluation --~Follow-on functions -~Evaluation in batch.
`2. On the request screen, enter a job name and the name of the variant. Specify when the batch
`evaluation should take place and how often it should be repeated.
`3. Save the batch request.
`Note
`To carry out evalutions in batch and to define variants you require certain authorizations. If you
`have any further questions, please consult your system administrator.
`For more information about batch requests, please read Getting Started with the R/3 System.
`
`Subsequent Evaluation of Batch Evaluations
`
`In batch processing you usually evaluate vendors who belong to the same group, for example,
`vendors who have the same weighting key. It is possible, though, that you have selected an interval
`that contains different groups of vendors. Due to this reason, you do not enter a weighting key for
`evaluations in batch.
`To ensure that the scores are calculated correctly, you must subsequently maintain the weighting
`key for these evaluation records.
`
`SAP-00008820
`
`

`
`The evaluation records in question can be determined through the evaluation of vendors without
`weighting keys.
`
`This function can be found in the purchasing menu under Masterdata --~ Vendor evaluation
`--~Follow-on functions -~ Vendors without weighting key
`From this report you can branch directly into the screens for maintaining evaluations. For more
`information on analyses, please read Monitorin~LVendor Evaluation
`
`SAP-00008821
`
`

`
`Evaluating with Manual Subcriteria
`
`This section explains how to include scores for manual subcriteria in the evaluation.
`
`Requirements
`
`Before you can evaluate vendors based on manual subcriteria, you must maintain the scores for
`these subcriteria.
`
`Maintaining Scores for Manual Subcriteria
`
`To enter scores manually, proceed as follows:
`1. Press F17 to display the first main criterion screen.
`2. Enter scores for the manual subcriteria.
`3. Press F18 to reach the next main criterion screen and enter scores here.
`4. Repeat this procedure for all your other main criteria.
`
`If you then carry out the next vendor evaluation via Edit -~Automatic new evaluation, the system
`calculates the scores on the basis of the automatic, semi-automatic, and manual subcriteria.
`
`SAP-00008822
`
`

`
`KMaintaining Vendor Evaluation
`
`This section explains how to display, change, and delete a vendor evaluation and how to generate
`a vendor evaluation sheet.
`
`Display Vendor Evaluation
`
`Proceed as follows to display an evaluation:
`1. From the system menu select Logistics -->Materials management ->Purchasing and then
`->Vendor evaluation ->Display. You reach the initial screen for

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket