Paper ____
`
`Filed on behalf of: Versata Development Group, Inc.
`
`By: Nancy J. Linck, Lead Counsel
`
`Martin M. Zoltick, Backup Counsel
`
`Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C.
`607 14th St., N.W., Suite 800
`
`
`Washington, DC 20005
`
`Phone: 202-783-6040
`
`Facsimile: 202-783-6031
`
`E-mail: nlinck@rfem.com
`
`
` mzoltick@rfem.com
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_______________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_______________
`
`SAP AMERICA, INC. ET AL.
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`VERSATA DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC.
`Patent Owner
`_______________
`
`Case CBM2012-00001 (MPT)
`Patent 6,553,350
`_______________
`
`
`PATENT OWNER VERSATA DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC.’S
`EXHIBIT LIST
`(as of July 11, 2013)
`
`
`
`

`

`1 
`2 
`3 
`4 
`5 
`6 
`7 
`
`8 
`
`9 
`
`10 
`
`11 
`
`12 
`
`13 
`
`Case CBM2012-00001
`Patent 6,553,350
`Attorney Docket No: 4117-101
`
`
`MAIL STOP PATENT BOARD
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`U.S. Patent & Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.63(e), Patent Owner Versata Development
`
`Group, Inc. (“Versata”) hereby furnishes below a current listing of Versata’s
`
`Exhibits and Demonstrative Exhibits to the Board and counsel for Petitioners SAP
`
`America, Inc. and SAP AG (“SAP”). Patent Owner Versata hereby certifies that
`
`copies of Versata Exhibits 2001 – 2106 and Versata Demonstrative Exhibits 1 - 49
`
`have been served on counsel for SAP.
`
`VERSATA EXHIBIT LISTING:
`
`Exhibit
`No.
`
`2001
`
`2002
`
`2003
`2004
`2005
`2006
`2007
`2008
`2009
`
` 
`
`Description
`Final Protective Order Governing Discovery of Confidential and
`Proprietary Information, filed on March 6, 2008, in Versata Software,
`Inc. et al. v. SAP America, Inc. et al., No. 2:07-cv-153 (E.D. TX).
`Amendment to Final Protective Order Governing Discovery of
`Confidential and Proprietary Information, filed on May 5, 2009, in
`Versata Software, Inc. et al. v. SAP America, Inc. et al., No. 2:07-cv-
`153 (E.D. TX).
`Transcript of October 31, 2012, Teleconference Hearing in Case
`CBM2012-00001.
`Protective Order in Case CBM2012-00001.
`Transcript of November 14, 2012, Teleconference Hearing in Case
`CBM2012-00001.
`Excerpts of District Court Trial Transcript (Aug. 17, 2009 AM).
`EXHIBIT NUMBER NOT USED
`Excerpts of District Court Trial Transcript (May 9, 2011 AM).
`Excerpts of District Court Trial Transcript (May 9, 2011 PM).
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case CBM2012-00001
`Patent 6,553,350
`Attorney Docket No: 4117-101
`
`
`Description
`Excerpts of District Court Trial Transcript (Aug. 17, 2009 PM).
`Excerpts of District Court Trial Transcript (Aug. 18, 2009 AM).
`Excerpts of District Court Trial Transcript (May 11, 2011 AM).
`Excerpts of District Court Trial Transcripts (Aug. 19, 2009 AM).
`“Software Pioneers Take the Pain out of Pricing” USA TODAY (Feb.
`24, 1998) (PX 1283).
`Excerpts of Product Profile: Trilogy’s Selling Chain Pricer (Nov. 24,
`1997) (PX 581).
`Excerpts of Distribution Pricing to the Extended Selling Enterprise
`(Nov. 24, 1997) (PX 582).
`Research Note - SAP’s CRM Field Sales Strategy (Oct. 13, 1998) (PX
`665).
`Excerpts of SAP Strategic Sales Initiatives – Applications Business
`Plan: Sales Configuration Engine (PX 493).
`Exhibit 14: Trilogy Revenue Pricer Customers FY 1996-FY2010 (DX
`2644).
`Email from B. Neumann to J. Biddle, et al. (Aug. 17, 1997) (PX 70).
`Gartner Analysis (PX 736).
`Research Note - SAP’s CRM Field Sales Strategy (PX 1132).
`Email from K. Fairbairn to Sapphire re Media Alert Quotes (Sep. 2,
`1997) (PX 1996).
`Email from B. Neumann to B. Neumann, et al. (Oct. 15, 1997) (PX
`1134).
`Excerpts of District Court Trial Transcripts (May 11, 2011 PM).
`Excerpts of District Court Trial Transcripts (Aug. 19, 2009 PM).
`Excerpt of Email from B. Neumann to W. Merkel (May 13, 1998)
`(PX 1082).
`Excerpt of Email from E. Reeves to J. Arck, et al. (Oct. 2, 1997) (PX
`28).
`Email from B. Neumann to M. Daban, et al. (Jan. 9, 1998) (PX 89).
`Email from B. Neumann to P. Zencke, et al. (Aug. 21, 1997) (PX
`1088).
`Email from G. Murray to E. Reeves (Nov. 21, 1997) (PX 7).
`Excerpts of District Court Trial Transcripts (Aug. 24, 2009 AM).
`Email from B. Neumann to P. Lorenz, et al. (May 14, 1997) (PX
`1089).
`
`Exhibit
`No.
`2010
`2011
`2012
`2013
`2014
`
`2015
`
`2016
`
`2017
`
`2018
`
`2019
`2020
`2021
`2022
`2023
`
`2024
`2025
`2026
`2027
`
`2028
`2029
`2030
`2031
`2032
`2033
`
` 
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case CBM2012-00001
`Patent 6,553,350
`Attorney Docket No: 4117-101
`
`
`Description
`Excerpts of District Court Trial Transcripts (Aug. 20, 2009 AM).
`Email from B. Neumann to L. Cahoon (May 23, 1997) (PX 150).
`Pricing and Conditions (SD-BF-PR) (PX 19).
`Amended Permanent Injunction (Sept. 26, 2011) (Dkt. 586).
`Email from A. Steiner to W. Nieswand (Nov. 26, 2003) (PX 2105).
`Jury Verdict Form (Aug. 26, 2009) (Dkt. 318).
`Order Granting-in-Part and Denying-in-Part SAP’s Motions for
`Judgment as a Matter of Law on Liability Issues (Dec. 21, 2010) (Dkt.
`409).
`Memorandum Opinion and Order Granting SAP’s Motion to Exclude
`the Expert Testimony of Neeraj Gupta, Christopher Bakewell and Roy
`Weinstein (Sep. 9, 2011) (Dkt. 570).
`Order Granting-in-Part and Denying-in-Part SAP’s Motion for
`Judgment as a Matter of Law, Remittitur, or New Trial (Jan. 6, 2011)
`(Dkt. 412).
`Excerpts of District Court Trial Transcripts (May 10, 2011 AM).
`CAFC Brief of Defendants-Appellants SAP America, Inc. and SAP
`AG (Feb. 17, 2012) .
`Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law, and/or New Trial,
`Regarding Liability Issues (Oct. 6, 2009) – FILED UNDER SEAL.
`Excertps of Opening Expert Report of Dr. E. Andrew Boyd Regarding
`Invalidity (June 2, 2009) – FILED UNDER SEAL.
`Excerpts of Deposition of Dr. E. Andrew Boyd (July 2, 2009) –
`FILED UNDER SEAL.
`12 U.S.C. § 5537(a)(2).
`12 U.S.C. § 5481(15).
`16 C.F.R. § 313.3(1).
`Section 4(k) of the Bank Holding Company Act.
`12 C.F.R. § 216.3(1).
`Excerpts of Fell, L., “An Introduction to Financial Products and
`Markets,” Continuum (2000).
`Philippon, T., “Finance vs. Wal-Mart: Why are Financial Services so
`Expensive,” RSF Review (2012).
`Excerpts of Khan, M., “Financial Management,” Tata McGraw-Hill
`(2007).
`
`Exhibit
`No.
`2034
`2035
`2036
`2037
`2038
`2039
`
`2040
`
`2041
`
`2042
`
`2043
`2044
`
`2045
`
`2046
`
`2047
`2048
`2049
`2050
`2051
`2052
`2053
`
`2054
`
`2055
`
` 
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case CBM2012-00001
`Patent 6,553,350
`Attorney Docket No: 4117-101
`
`
`Description
`NAICS Sector: 52 Finance and Insurance, found at
`http://www.census.gov/epcd/ec97/def/52.HTM
`“The Financial Services Industry in the United States,” SelectUSA,
`found at http://selectusa.commerce.gov/industry-snapshots/financial-
`services-industry-united-states
`International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic
`Activities (ISIC), United Nations Publication, Dept. of Economic and
`Social Affairs, Statistics Division (Rev. 4, 2008), found at
`http://unstats.un.org/unsd/publication/seriesM/seriesm_4rev4e.pdf
`Sutton, C. and Jenkins, B., “The Role of the Financial Services Sector
`in Expanding Economic Opportunity,” Harvard University (2007)
`Privacy of Consumer Financial Information, 65 F.R. 33646 (May 24,
`2000).
`Excerpts of District Court Trial Transcripts (Aug. 26, 2009 AM).
`Versata Software, Inc. v. SAP America, Inc., 758 F. Supp. 2d 389, 396
`(E.D. Tex. 2010).
`Excerpts of District Court Trial Transcripts (Aug. 24, 2009 PM).
`Excerpts of District Court Trial Transcripts (Aug. 24, 2009 AM).
`Response of Appellee-Director of the United States Patent and
`Trademark Office Opposing Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc, In re
`Baxter Int’l Inc., Appeal No. 2011-1073 (Fed. Cir. Sep. 10, 2012).
`SAP America Inc.’s and SAP AG’s Patent Rule 3-3 and 3-6 Amended
`Invalidity Contentions for U.S. Patent Nos. 5,708,798, 6,002,854,
`5,878,400, 6,553,350, and 7,069,235 (Nov. 10, 2008).
`SAP America Inc.’s and SAP AG’s Second Amended Answer and
`Counterclaims (Feb. 20, 2009) (Dkt. 147).
`Claim Chart for The U.S. Patent No. 6,553,350 (Pricing) SAP AG,
`R/3 2.2 Online Documentation CD (1994).
`Transcript of February 5, 2013, Teleconference Hearing in Case
`CBM2012-00001.
`Transcript of February 12, 2013, Teleconference Hearing in Case
`CBM2012-00001.
`Transcript of February 26, 2013, Teleconference Hearing in Case
`CBM2012-00001.
`Patent Owner Versata’s Notice of Deposition of Michael Siegel,
`Ph.D. in Case CBM2012-00001.
`
`Exhibit
`No.
`2056
`
`2057
`
`2058
`
`2059
`
`2060
`2061
`2062
`2063
`2064
`
`2065
`
`2066
`
`2067
`
`2068
`
`2069
`
`2070
`
`2071
`
`2072
`
` 
`
`5
`
`

`

`Case CBM2012-00001
`Patent 6,553,350
`Attorney Docket No: 4117-101
`
`
`Exhibit
`No.
`2073
`
`2074
`
`2075
`
`2076
`2077
`2078
`2079
`
`2080
`
`2081
`
`2082
`
`2083
`
`2084
`
`Description
`Appendix A to the Expert Declaration of Dr. Michael Siegel in Case
`CBM2012-00001 - Curriculum Vitae of Michael Siegel.
`Appendix B to the Expert Declaration of Dr. Michael Siegel in Case
`CBM2012-00001 - Documents and Things Considered by Michael
`Siegel.
`Appendix C to the Expert Declaration of Dr. Michael Siegel in Case
`CBM2012-00001 - Claim Chart R/3 2.2 Online Documentation and
`U.S. Patent No. 6,553,350.
`Claim 17 of U.S. Patent No. 6,553,350.
`Excerpts from U.S. Patent No. 6,553,350.
`Figures 15A – 15C from U.S. Patent No. 6,553,350.
`SAP AG’s Pricing and Conditions (SD-BF-PR), Release 4.6C – Bates
`Numbered VER0002017642 – VER0002017792 (PX 19).
`Americas’ SAP Users’ Group Sales & Distribution Survey Results
`Summary 1998 – Bates Numbered VSAP_93243534 –
`VSAP_93243565 (PX 27).
`Email from B. Neumann to J. Biddle, L. McGrath, E. Reeves, M.
`Shah and P. Wahl, Regarding R/3 Pricing v. Trilogy (Aug. 17, 1997)
`– Bates Numbered VSAP_01963595 – VSAP_01963597 (PX 70).
`SAP AG Slides – Bates Numbered SAP_015.00006123 –
`SAP_015.00006169 (PX 145).
`SAP Hierarchy Accesses – Bates Numbered VER0002036673 –
`VER0002036674 (PX 1894).
`Email from R. Krugmann on behalf of S. Klimt Regarding Release
`Strategy after 4.0A/B (May 7, 1998) – Bates Numbered
`VSAP_003.00538558 – VSAP003.00538560 (PX 1912).
`Email from K. Nakashima to D. Adams, D. Glessner, M. Hirn, W.
`Merkel, K. Nakashima and T. Nitschke, Regarding Review of 4.5
`Pricing Functionality (Aug. 4, 1998) – Bates Numbered
`VSAP_01866487 – VSAP_01866492 (PX 2137).
`Deposition Transcript of Michael Siegel, Ph.D., dated March 1, 2013,
`in Case CBM2012-00001 – MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL IS
`PENDING.
`SAP Note 16430 - SD Customizing and performance/tuning.
`2087
`2088 Matthias Liebich, “Performance Tuning in Pricing: Guidelines for
`Better System Performance,” www.SAPtips.com (2004).
`
`2085
`
`2086
`
` 
`
`6
`
`

`

`Case CBM2012-00001
`Patent 6,553,350
`Attorney Docket No: 4117-101
`
`
`Description
`SAP’s LO620 Pricing in SD, Release 630 (June 8, 2003).
`Deposition Transcript of Michael Siegel, Ph.D., dated March 1, 2013,
`in Case CBM2012-00001 – REDACTED VERSION.
`Declaration of Matthias Liebich with Attachments, dated
`Mar. 7, 2013.
`Final Judgment, dated Sept. 9, 2011, from Versata v. SAP, Case No.
`2:07-cv-153 (E.D. TX).
`Versata’s Response to SAP’s Renewed Motion for Judgment as a
`Matter of Law or New Trial Regarding Liability Issues, dated Oct. 22,
`2009, from Versata v. SAP, Case No. 2:07-cv-153 (E.D. TX).
`EXHIBIT NUMBER NOT USED
`Brief for the United States as Amicus Curiae on Rehearing En Banc
`In Support of Neither Party, from CLS Bank Int’l et al. v. Alice Corp.
`Pty. Ltd., Appeal No. 2011-1301 (reh’g en banc) (Fed. Cir. Dec. 14,
`2012).
`“Evaluating Subject Matter Eligibility Under 35 USC § 101: August
`2012 Update,” Office of Patent Legal Administration – United States
`Patent and Trademark Office.
`Reply Brief of Plaintiffs-Cross Appellants Versata Software, Inc.,
`Versata Development Group, Inc., and Versata Computer Industry
`Solutions, Inc., from Versata Software, Inc. et al. v. SAP America,
`Inc. et al., Appeal Nos. 2012-1029,-1049 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 9, 2012).
`Transcript of March 14, 2013, Teleconference Hearing in Case
`CBM2012-00001.
`Signature Page and Errata Sheet for Deposition Transcript of Matthias
`Liebich, dated March 22, 2013, in Case CBM2012-00001.
`Transcript of May 7, 2013, Teleconference Hearing in Case
`CBM2012-00001.
`Patent Quality Improvement Act of 2013, S.866, 113th Cong. § 1
`(2013-2014) (introduced May 6, 2013).
`E-mail string dated May 28, 2013, regarding Patent Owner Versata’s
`request for a conference call to discuss the filing of a motion for
`termination of trial based on the Federal Circuit’s Decision in Versata
`Software Inc. v. SAP America Inc.
`
`Exhibit
`No.
`2089
`2090
`
`2091
`
`2092
`
`2093
`
`2094
`
`2095
`
`2096
`
`2097
`
`2098
`
`2099
`
`2100
`
`2101
`
`2102
`
` 
`
`7
`
`

`

`1 
`
`2 
`
`3 
`
`Case CBM2012-00001
`Patent 6,553,350
`Attorney Docket No: 4117-101
`
`
`Description
`E-mail string dated May 14, 2013, regarding Patent Owner Versata’s
`request for a conference call to seek permission to file a motion
`authorizing the parties to file supplemental briefs in view of the
`Federal Circuit’s Decision in CLS Bank Int’l v. Alice Corp. Pty. Ltd.
`CLS Bank Int’l v. Alice Corp. Pty. Ltd., No. 2011-1301, 2013 U.S.
`App. LEXIS 9493 (Fed. Cir. May 10, 2013).
`Decision from Idle Free Systems, Inc. v. Bergstrom, Inc., Case
`IPR2012-00027 (JL), Paper 26 (PTAB June 11, 2013).
`Ultramercial, Inc. v. Hulu, LLC, No. 201-1544, 2013 U.S. App.
`LEXIS 12715 (Fed. Cir. June 21, 2013).
`
`Exhibit
`No.
`
`2103
`
`2104
`
`2105
`
`2106
`
`
`
`
`
`VERSATA DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT LISTING:
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE
`EXHIBIT NO.
`VDX 1
`VDX 2
`VDX 3
`VDX 4
`VDX 5
`VDX 6
`VDX 7
`VDX 8
`VDX 9
`VDX 10
`VDX 11
`VDX 12
`VDX 13
`VDX 14
`VDX 15
`VDX 16
`VDX 17
`VDX 18
`
` 
`
`DESCRIPTION
`Practical Application of Alleged Abstract Idea
`Claim 17
`Claim 27
`Claims 26 & 28
`Claim 29
`Claims 17 & 26-29 Are Patent-Eligible Under § 101
`Claims 17 & 26-29 Are Patent-Eligible Under § 101
`‘350 Patent – Problem and Claimed Solution
`‘350 Patent – Problem and Claimed Solution
`‘350 Patent – Problem and Claimed Solution
`‘350 Patent – Problem and Claimed Solution
`‘350 Patent – Problem and Claimed Solution
`‘350 Patent – Problem and Claimed Solution
`‘350 Patent – Problem and Claimed Solution
`‘350 Patent – Problem and Claimed Solution
`‘350 Patent – Problem and Claimed Solution
`‘350 Patent – Problem and Claimed Solution
`Claim 17 is Not Directed to an Abstract Idea
`
`8
`
`

`

`Case CBM2012-00001
`Patent 6,553,350
`Attorney Docket No: 4117-101
`
`
`DESCRIPTION
`SAP Failed To Evaluate All Elements Of The Claims
`SAP Failed To Evaluate All Elements Of The Claims
`SAP’s New “Calculating” Argument
`“Calculating” ≠ Claimed Storing, Retrieving, Sorting,
`And Eliminating Steps
`“Calculating” ≠ Claimed Storing, Retrieving, Sorting,
`And Eliminating Steps
`“Calculating” ≠ Claimed Storing, Retrieving, Sorting,
`And Eliminating Steps
`Specific, Practical And Advantageous Way
`Specific, Practical And Advantageous Way
`Specific, Practical And Advantageous Way
`Specific, Practical And Advantageous Way
`Specific, Practical And Advantageous Way
`Specific, Practical And Advantageous Way
`Not Routine, Conventional or Well-Known
`Not Routine, Conventional or Well-Known
`No Preemption
`Claims Satisfy Machine-Or-Transformation Test
`Claims Satisfy Machine-Or-Transformation Test
`Claims Satisfy Machine-Or-Transformation Test
`Claims Satisfy Machine-Or-Transformation Test
`Claims Satisfy Machine-Or-Transformation Test
`Claims Satisfy Machine-Or-Transformation Test
`Claims Satisfy Machine-Or-Transformation Test
`Claimed Subject Matter is Not Abstract
`Claimed Subject Matter is Not Abstract
`Claimed Subject Matter is Not Abstract
`Claimed Subject Matter is Not Abstract
`Evidence Establishes That Mr. Liebich Is Qualified
`Evidence Establishes That Mr. Liebich Is Qualified
`Evidence Establishes That Mr. Liebich Is Qualified
`Board Should Give Weight to Mr. Liebich’s Testimony
`Dr. Siegel’s Testimony Should Be Given No Weight
`
`9
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE
`EXHIBIT NO.
`VDX 19
`VDX 20
`VDX 21
`VDX 22
`
`VDX 23
`
`VDX 24
`
`VDX 25
`VDX 26
`VDX 27
`VDX 28
`VDX 29
`VDX 30
`VDX 31
`VDX 32
`VDX 33
`VDX 34
`VDX 35
`VDX 36
`VDX 37
`VDX 38
`VDX 39
`VDX 40
`VDX 41
`VDX 42
`VDX 43
`VDX 44
`VDX 45
`VDX 46
`VDX 47
`VDX 48
`VDX 49
`
`
`1 
`
` 
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: July 11, 2013
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 
`
`2 
`
`3 
`
`4 
`5 
`6 
`7 
`8 
`9 
`10 
`11 
`12 
`13 
`14 
`15 
`16 
`17 
`18 
`
`
`
`Case CBM2012-00001
`Patent 6,553,350
`Attorney Docket No: 4117-101
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` /s/ Martin M. Zoltick
`
`Nancy J. Linck, Lead Counsel
`Martin M. Zoltick, Back-up Counsel
`ROTHWELL, FIGG, ERNST
` & MANBECK, P.C.
`607 14th Street, N.W., Suite 800
`Washington, DC 20005
`Phone: 202-783-6040
`Facsimile: 202-783-6031
`
`Attorneys for Patent Owner Versata
`Development Group, Inc.
`
` 
`
`10
`
`