throbber

`
`Page 1
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`—
`
`—
`
`—
`
`—
`
`—
`
`—
`
`—
`
`—
`
`—
`
`—
`
`—
`
`—
`
`—
`
`—
`
`—
`
`—
`
`—
`
`—
`
`— —x
`
`SAP AMERICA,
`
`INC., ET AL,
`
`Petitioner,
`
`—against-
`
`Patent of VERSATA DEVELOPMENT GROUP,
`
`INC.,
`
`Patent Owner.
`
`Case CBM2012-00001
`
`Patent 6,553,350
`
`_
`
`_
`
`_
`
`_
`
`_
`
`_
`
`_
`
`_
`
`_
`
`_
`
`_
`
`_
`
`_
`
`_
`
`_
`
`_
`
`_
`
`_
`
`_
`
`-x
`
`May 7, 2013
`
`10:35 a.m.
`
`T E L E C O N F E R E N C E
`
`H E A R I N G
`
`B E F O R E:
`
`MICHAEL TIERNEY,
`
`Administrative Patent Judge
`
`SALLY MEDLEY,
`
`Administrative Patent Judge
`
`
`
`
`
`mquIIDWNH
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`RAMA ELLURU,
`Administrative Patent Judge
`
`
`VERSATAEXHHHTZHm
`SAPV'VERQUH
`CASE CBM2012—00001
`
`212-267-6868
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`516-608-2400
`
`VERITEXT REPORTING COMPANY
`
`

`

`Page 2
`
`A P P E A R A N C E S:
` FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
` GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
` Attorneys for Petitioner
` 11955 Freedom Drive
` Reston, Virginia 20190
` BY: ERIKA ARNER, ESQ.
` MICHAEL V. YOUNG, SR., ESQ.
` JOSEPH E. PALYS, ESQ.
` ROPES & GRAY
` Attorneys for Petitioner
` One Metro Center
` Washington, DC 20005
` BY: J. STEVEN BAUGHMAN, ESQ.
` ROTHWELL FIGG ERNST & MANBECK, P.C.
` Attorneys for Patent Owner
` 607 14th Street, NW
` Washington, DC 20005
` BY: MARTIN M. ZOLTICK, ESQ.
` BRIAN S. ROSENBLOOM, ESQ.
` * * *
`
`12
`
`3
`4
`5
`6
`
`78
`
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-267-6868
`
`VERITEXT REPORTING COMPANY
`www.veritext.com
`
`516-608-2400
`
`

`

`Page 3
`
` Proceeding
` HON. TIERNEY: The Judges have
` arrived on the call. Are the parties
` here? I am going to start with
` Petitioner.
` MS. ARNER: Yes, Judge, from
` Petitioner you have me, Erika Arner,
` Joe Palys and Michael Young from
` Finnegan, as well as backup counsel,
` Steve Baughman from Ropes & Gray.
` HON. TIERNEY: Do we have the
` Patent Owner present here?
` MR. ZOLTICK: Yes, Your Honor,
` good morning. Marty Zoltick and Brian
` Rosenbloom from Rothwell, Figg on
` behalf of Patent Owner.
` HON. TIERNEY: And as I started
` dialing in and I got on the call,
` there was mention that someone else
` might be calling in for Patent Owner?
` MR. ZOLTICK: Well, Dr. Linck
` may be dialing in as well.
` HON TIERNEY: Do we need to wait
` for her?
` MR. ZOLTICK: No.
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-267-6868
`
`VERITEXT REPORTING COMPANY
`www.veritext.com
`
`516-608-2400
`
`

`

`Page 4
`
` Proceeding
` HON. TIERNEY: Okay. Also, just
` so we know, is there a court reporter
` on today's call?
` THE COURT REPORTER: Yes, Lisa
` Sansone from Veritext.
` HON. TIERNEY: That wasn't clear
` from the e-mail we received. Okay, so
` we do have a court reporter.
` MR. ZOLTICK: Yes, my paralegal
` was instructed to send an e-mail. I
` apologize if he didn't do that.
` HON. TIERNEY: He might and it
` just hasn't reached us. We don't need
` this on the record.
` (At this time, a discussion was
` held off the record.)
` HON. TIERNEY: Court reporter,
` are you ready?
` THE COURT REPORTER: Yes, I am
` ready.
` HON. TIERNEY: Do you have the
` list of people that are attending the
` call or do we need to go over that
` again?
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-267-6868
`
`VERITEXT REPORTING COMPANY
`www.veritext.com
`
`516-608-2400
`
`

`

`Page 5
`
` Proceeding
` THE COURT REPORTER: No. I took
` that down on the record in the
` beginning.
` HON. TIERNEY: Great.
` Mr. Zoltick, if I may begin
` then.
` Court Reporter, is it acceptable
` to start now?
` THE COURT REPORTER: Yes.
` HON. TIERNEY: Thank you.
` Mr. Zoltick, you requested this
` conference call. If you could please
` explain the purpose of the call?
` MR. ZOLTICK: Yes, Your Honor.
` The purpose of the call is to address
` Petitioner SAP has just filed a
` request for ex parte reexamination of
` the 350 patent, the patent involved in
` this proceeding. That was on April
` 25th that the petitioner filed this
` request. It involves the same patent,
` the 350 patent. It involves the same
` claims, claims 17, 26 to 29. It
` involves the same alleged prior art
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-267-6868
`
`VERITEXT REPORTING COMPANY
`www.veritext.com
`
`516-608-2400
`
`

`

`Page 6
`
` Proceeding
` that is the R3 documentation and the
` same 102 issue that SAP had agreed to
` withdraw as a ground for challenging
` patentability in this case and that
` the Board based on that representation
` from SAP agreed to expedite the
` schedule. The purpose of the call is
` to address that request for reexam.
` HON. TIERNEY: Okay. Well,
` thank you for alerting us to it. Are
` you making any requests regarding this
` or you just wanted to notify us that
` they filed this?
` MR. ZOLTICK: I mean I have a
` couple of facts that I wanted to go
` through and then in terms of a
` request, ultimately the request is
` that the quid proquo for expediting
` the proceeding was SAP's agreement to
` drop the 102 challenge. Now SAP has
` raised it and it appears intends to
` pursue it and in view of that
` agreement, we think that the Board
` should take away what it provided in
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-267-6868
`
`VERITEXT REPORTING COMPANY
`www.veritext.com
`
`516-608-2400
`
`

`

`Page 7
`
` Proceeding
` exchange, that is that the Board
` should not expedite its decision in
` the proceeding and should delay the
` judgement until the 102 issue has been
` resolved. That is one option.
` The other option is if SAP wants
` judgement in this proceeding to be
` expedited based on this agreement then
` it should withdraw the request for
` reexam or in accordance with at least
` the way we read it 35 USC 325(d) and
` 37 CFR 42.222(a), the board or the
` director can reject the request for ex
` parte reexam or I guess alternatively
` the board or director could stay or
` terminate the reexam if it is -- if
` their request is granted. That is the
` relief.
` In terms of the facts, I mean
` I'm sure the Board is well aware of
` the facts but just to recap a few, as
` I mentioned, this was the same 102
` issue that was raised in the petition
` that SAP filed during the month from
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-267-6868
`
`VERITEXT REPORTING COMPANY
`www.veritext.com
`
`516-608-2400
`
`

`

`Page 8
`
` Proceeding
` when the petition was filed until the
` institution decision. There were
` numerous conference calls with the
` board, e-mails, conference calls
` between the parties, papers filed by
` the parties, orders issued by the
` Board specifically addressing the 102
` challenge and the issues relating to
` it. There were documents and
` testimony relied on by SAP to support
` the 102 challenge. We had to deal
` with the scope of the request of
` discovery on the 102 issue, the
` documents and testimony from the
` infringement suit on the R3
` documentation which is the alleged
` prior art they are relying on and so
` on.
` In addition to all of that,
` Versata, you know, we prepared and had
` to provide a detailed analysis on the
` 102 challenge in our preliminary
` response, then, of course, the Board
` had to evaluate all of that briefing
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-267-6868
`
`VERITEXT REPORTING COMPANY
`www.veritext.com
`
`516-608-2400
`
`

`

`Page 9
`
` Proceeding
` and the voluminous testimony and the
` claim charts and documentation and so
` on regarding the 102 challenge in
` providing the institution decision
` which the Board did. You know and
` then after all of the resources of
` Versata and the Board and all of the
` hundreds of hours of work by counsel
` and technical experts and so on
` addressing that issue, SAP requested
` that the proceeding be expedited which
` the Board had initially rejected
` because of the 102 issue and prejudice
` to Versata, increased cost, delay and
` so on. However, the Board, of course,
` made an offer to SAP that it would
` expedite the proceeding if SAP would
` drop the 102 challenge.
` So as I mentioned in the
` beginning, the quid proquo for
` expediting a proceeding was SAP's
` agreement to drop the 102 issue, and
` SAP decided to make that deal with the
` Board so that the case would proceed
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-267-6868
`
`VERITEXT REPORTING COMPANY
`www.veritext.com
`
`516-608-2400
`
`

`

`Page 10
`
` Proceeding
` to judgement on an expedited schedule.
` I think you are going to hear
` from SAP about estoppel and that they
` are allegedly not estopped from
` bringing this request, but this issue
` is not about estoppel. It's about SAP
` making a deal with the Board and
` breaking it and now trying to bring
` back the 102 challenge that it agreed
` to drop.
` And I also think it's worth
` noting that when SAP made the deal
` with the Board and agreed to drop the
` 102 challenge, it never mentioned
` that, you know, by the way, we are
` still going to bring the same 102
` challenge in the office, it's just we
` are going to wait until after you
` agree to expedite the proceeding and
` the briefing and the hearing is
` completed and we'll slip it in before
` the final written decision comes out.
` So we think SAP had this planned
` and they made a strategic decision not
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-267-6868
`
`VERITEXT REPORTING COMPANY
`www.veritext.com
`
`516-608-2400
`
`

`

`Page 11
`
` Proceeding
` to disclose it and that they shouldn't
` be awarded for making and breaking the
` deal that they made and not revealing
` what they actually intended to do with
` it.
` HON. TIERNEY: Ms. Arner?
` MS. ARNER: Yes, your Honor.
` HON. TIERNEY: Do you have
` anything to say regarding this matter?
` MS. ARNER: Yes, I do. Thank
` you. Well, first of all, SAP has not
` violated any terms of the agreement
` with the Board, and it certainly had
` no ulterior motive when it struck the
` deal with the Board that resulted in
` expediting this proceeding. As we
` discussed at the time and the Board
` noted in its order expediting it, the
` request by the Board was that SAP
` withdraw the instituted grounds of 102
` from this trial. And I'm sure we all
` remember we were asked that, we asked
` for a bit of time to consult with our
` client and then in a phone conference
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-267-6868
`
`VERITEXT REPORTING COMPANY
`www.veritext.com
`
`516-608-2400
`
`

`

`Page 12
`
` Proceeding
` agreed to withdraw the 102 grounds
` from this trial so that it would
` proceed only on the 101 ground and
` enable the expedited schedule that SAP
` requested and the Board ordered.
` Nowhere in the record in fact did SAP
` agree to waive the right to raise 102
` forever in any forum, that wasn't even
` on the table really. And SAP does not
` deny that it filed the ex parte
` reexam. We could have filed it
` anonymously through a third party but
` we did not. We are not trying to hide
` anything from the Board or from
` Versata. Co-counsel in this case
` filed it and served it on Patent
` Owner's counsel.
` And as far as the ability to
` file an ex parte reexam, it's
` available to any member of the public
` and SAP was well within its rights to
` file it. And as far as the timing or
` ulterior motive, SAP filed it a few
` weeks ago after Versata had gone to
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-267-6868
`
`VERITEXT REPORTING COMPANY
`www.veritext.com
`
`516-608-2400
`
`

`

`Page 13
`
` Proceeding
` the Eastern District of Virginia and
` filed the lawsuit challenging the very
` fact of this proceeding and the
` reexam, although SAP's involvement in
` it is now complete, it is an ex parte
` reexam. SAP has no further ability to
` participate unless the Patent Owner
` files its response in the reexam, and
` SAP does not anticipate participating
` at all, it's not planning to
` participate at all, but it does
` provide some measure of protection for
` SAP should Versata's challenge in the
` Eastern District of Virginia to the
` very existence of this entire
` proceeding and the only basis that is
` left in this proceeding move forward.
` HON. TIERNEY: Thank you, Ms.
` Arner. Can you just refresh my
` recollection, have you filed your
` statement in a 42.A regarding related
` matters?
` MS. ARNER: No, sir, we are
` still within the 21 days that is
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-267-6868
`
`VERITEXT REPORTING COMPANY
`www.veritext.com
`
`516-608-2400
`
`

`

`Page 14
`
` Proceeding
` required. We have until May 16th to
` do so.
` HON. TIERNEY: Will you be
` filing one shortly?
` MS. ARNER: Absolutely.
` HON. TIERNEY: Thank you.
` Mr. Zoltick, do you have any
` further comments today?
` MR. ZOLTICK: Well, again, I
` think I have made the point and
` explained what relief we think is
` appropriate at this point. I could
` address the estoppel issue if that is
` something the Board would like to hear
` some discussion of.
` HON. TIERNEY: Not at this time,
` that's okay. Do you have anything
` further though besides the estoppel
` issue that you wanted to cover?
` MR. ZOLTICK: Not at this point
` in time.
` HON. TIERNEY: Okay. At this
` time, the Board will take the matter
` under advisement. We would request a
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-267-6868
`
`VERITEXT REPORTING COMPANY
`www.veritext.com
`
`516-608-2400
`
`

`

`Page 15
`
` Proceeding
` copy of the court reporter's
` transcript be filed as an exhibit in
` due course and again, we will take the
` matter under advisement and will be
` getting back to the parties.
` MR. ZOLTICK: Thank you.
` HON. TIERNEY: I am assuming
` there was nothing else you had to
` cover. Before we conclude, I just
` want to double-check. Hearing nothing
` from the parties, we are now done.
` Thank you for the call.
` MS. ARNER: Thank you.
` MR. ZOLTICK: Thank you.
` [Time noted: 10:43 a.m.]
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`212-267-6868
`
`VERITEXT REPORTING COMPANY
`www.veritext.com
`
`516-608-2400
`
`

`

`Page 16
`
` CERTIFICATION
`
` I, Lisa Sansone, a Notary Public for
`and within the State of New York, do
`hereby certify:
` That the within transcript is a true
`and accurate record of my stenographic
`notes.
` I further certify that I am not
`related to any of the parties to this
`action by blood or marriage, and that I am
`in no way interested in the outcome of
`this matter.
` IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto
`set my hand this day of , 2013.
`
` _____________________
` LISA SANSONE
` * *
`
`212-267-6868
`
`VERITEXT REPORTING COMPANY
`www.veritext.com
`
`516-608-2400
`
`12
`
`34
`
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`

`

`[& - discussed]
`
`&
`& 2:3,8,12 3:10
`1
`
`101 12:4
`102 6:3,21 7:5,23
`8:8,12,14,23 9:4,14
`9:19,23 10:10,15,17
`11:21 12:2,8
`10:35 1:17
`10:43 15:16
`11955 2:4
`14th 2:13
`16th 14:2
`17 5:24
`
`2
`20005 2:9,13
`2013 1:17 16:16
`20190 2:5
`21 13:25
`25th 5:21
`26 5:24
`29 5:24
`
`3
`
`325 7:12
`35 7:12
`350 5:19,23
`37 7:13
`
`4
`42.222 7:13
`42.a 13:22
`6
`6,553,350 1:15
`607 2:13
`
`7
`
`7 1:17
`
`a
`a.m. 1:17 15:16
`ability 12:19 13:7
`absolutely 14:6
`acceptable 5:8
`
`accurate 16:8
`action 16:12
`addition 8:20
`address 5:16 6:9
`14:14
`addressing 8:8 9:11
`administrative 1:23
`1:24,25
`advisement 14:25
`15:5
`ago 12:25
`agree 10:20 12:8
`agreed 6:3,7 10:10
`10:14 12:2
`agreement 6:20,24
`7:9 9:23 11:13
`al 1:5
`alerting 6:11
`alleged 5:25 8:17
`allegedly 10:5
`alternatively 7:15
`america 1:5
`analysis 8:22
`anonymously 12:13
`anticipate 13:10
`apologize 4:12
`appeal 1:3
`appears 6:22
`appropriate 14:13
`april 5:20
`arner 2:5 3:6,7 11:7
`11:8,11 13:20,24
`14:6 15:14
`arrived 3:3
`art 5:25 8:18
`asked 11:23,23
`assuming 15:8
`attending 4:23
`attorneys 2:4,8,12
`available 12:21
`awarded 11:3
`aware 7:21
`
`b
`
`b 1:21
`back 10:10 15:6
`backup 3:9
`based 6:6 7:9
`basis 13:17
`baughman 2:10
`3:10
`beginning 5:4 9:21
`behalf 3:16
`bit 11:24
`blood 16:12
`board 1:3 6:6,24 7:2
`7:13,16,21 8:5,8,24
`9:6,8,13,16,25 10:8
`10:14 11:14,16,18
`11:20 12:6,15 14:15
`14:24
`breaking 10:9 11:3
`brian 2:14 3:14
`briefing 8:25 10:21
`bring 10:9,17
`bringing 10:6
`c
`c 1:19,19 2:2
`call 3:3,18 4:4,24
`5:13,14,16 6:8
`15:13
`calling 3:20
`calls 8:4,5
`case 1:14 6:5 9:25
`12:16
`cbm2012-00001
`1:14
`center 2:9
`certainly 11:14
`certification 16:2
`certify 16:6,10
`cfr 7:13
`challenge 6:21 8:9
`8:12,23 9:4,19
`10:10,15,18 13:14
`challenging 6:4 13:3
`
`Page 1
`
`charts 9:3
`check 15:11
`claim 9:3
`claims 5:24,24
`clear 4:7
`client 11:25
`comes 10:23
`comments 14:9
`complete 13:6
`completed 10:22
`conclude 15:10
`conference 5:13 8:4
`8:5 11:25
`consult 11:24
`copy 15:2
`cost 9:15
`counsel 3:9 9:9
`12:16,18
`couple 6:16
`course 8:24 9:16
`15:4
`court 4:3,5,9,18,20
`5:2,8,10 15:2
`cover 14:20 15:10
`d
`
`d 7:12
`day 16:16
`days 13:25
`dc 2:9,13
`deal 8:12 9:24 10:8
`10:13 11:4,16
`decided 9:24
`decision 7:3 8:3 9:5
`10:23,25
`delay 7:4 9:15
`deny 12:11
`detailed 8:22
`development 1:11
`dialing 3:18,22
`director 7:14,16
`disclose 11:2
`discovery 8:14
`discussed 11:18
`
`212-267-6868
`
`VERITEXT REPORTING COMPANY
`www.veritext.com
`
`516-608-2400
`
`

`

`[discussion - notes]
`
`discussion 4:16
`14:16
`district 13:2,15
`documentation 6:2
`8:17 9:3
`documents 8:10,15
`double 15:11
`dr 3:21
`drive 2:4
`drop 6:21 9:19,23
`10:11,14
`due 15:4
`dunner 2:3
`e
`e 1:19,19,19,19,19
`1:20,21,21 2:2,2,6
`4:8,11 8:5
`eastern 13:2,15
`elluru 1:24
`enable 12:5
`entire 13:16
`erika 2:5 3:7
`ernst 2:12
`esq 2:5,6,6,10,14,14
`estopped 10:5
`estoppel 10:4,7
`14:14,19
`et 1:5
`evaluate 8:25
`ex 5:18 7:14 12:11
`12:20 13:6
`exchange 7:2
`exhibit 15:3
`existence 13:16
`expedite 6:7 7:3
`9:18 10:20
`expedited 7:9 9:12
`10:2 12:5
`expediting 6:19 9:22
`11:17,19
`experts 9:10
`explain 5:14
`explained 14:12
`
`f
`
`f 1:19,21
`fact 12:7 13:4
`facts 6:16 7:20,22
`far 12:19,23
`farabow 2:3
`figg 2:12 3:15
`file 12:20,23
`filed 5:17,21 6:14
`7:25 8:2,6 12:11,12
`12:17,24 13:3,21
`15:3
`files 13:9
`filing 14:5
`final 10:23
`finnegan 2:3 3:9
`first 11:12
`forever 12:9
`forum 12:9
`forward 13:18
`freedom 2:4
`further 13:7 14:9,19
`16:10
`
`g
`
`g 1:20
`garrett 2:3
`getting 15:6
`go 4:24 6:16
`going 3:4 10:3,17,19
`good 3:14
`granted 7:18
`gray 2:8 3:10
`great 5:5
`ground 6:4 12:4
`grounds 11:21 12:2
`group 1:11
`guess 7:15
`h
`
`h 1:20
`hand 16:16
`hear 10:3 14:15
`hearing 10:21 15:11
`
`held 4:17
`henderson 2:3
`hereunto 16:15
`hide 12:14
`hon 3:2,11,17,23 4:2
`4:7,13,18,22 5:5,11
`6:10 11:7,9 13:19
`14:4,7,17,23 15:8
`honor 3:13 5:15
`11:8
`hours 9:9
`hundreds 9:9
`i
`increased 9:15
`infringement 8:16
`initially 9:13
`instituted 11:21
`institution 8:3 9:5
`instructed 4:11
`intended 11:5
`intends 6:22
`interested 16:13
`involved 5:19
`involvement 13:5
`involves 5:22,23,25
`issue 6:3 7:5,24 8:14
`9:11,14,23 10:6
`14:14,20
`issued 8:7
`issues 8:9
`j
`
`j 2:10
`joe 3:8
`joseph 2:6
`judge 1:23,24,25 3:6
`judgement 7:5,8
`10:2
`judges 3:2
`k
`know 4:3 8:21 9:6
`10:16
`
`Page 2
`
`l
`
`l 1:19
`lawsuit 13:3
`left 13:18
`linck 3:21
`lisa 4:5 16:4,19
`list 4:23
`llp 2:3
`
`m
`
`m 2:14
`mail 4:8,11
`mails 8:5
`making 6:12 10:8
`11:3
`manbeck 2:12
`marriage 16:12
`martin 2:14
`marty 3:14
`matter 11:10 14:24
`15:5 16:14
`matters 13:23
`mean 6:15 7:20
`measure 13:13
`medley 1:23
`member 12:21
`mention 3:19
`mentioned 7:23
`9:20 10:15
`metro 2:9
`michael 1:22 2:6 3:8
`month 7:25
`morning 3:14
`motive 11:15 12:24
`move 13:18
`n
`n 1:19,19,20 2:2
`need 3:23 4:14,24
`never 10:15
`new 16:5
`notary 16:4
`noted 11:19 15:16
`notes 16:9
`
`212-267-6868
`
`VERITEXT REPORTING COMPANY
`www.veritext.com
`
`516-608-2400
`
`

`

`[notify - think]
`
`notify 6:13
`noting 10:13
`numerous 8:4
`nw 2:13
`
`o
`o 1:19,21
`offer 9:17
`office 1:2 10:18
`okay 4:2,8 6:10
`14:18,23
`option 7:6,7
`order 11:19
`ordered 12:6
`orders 8:7
`outcome 16:13
`owner 1:13 2:12
`3:12,16,20 13:8
`owner's 12:18
`p
`
`p 2:2,2
`p.c. 2:12
`palys 2:6 3:8
`papers 8:6
`paralegal 4:10
`parte 5:18 7:15
`12:11,20 13:6
`participate 13:8,12
`participating 13:10
`parties 3:3 8:6,7
`15:6,12 16:11
`party 12:13
`patent 1:2,3,11,13
`1:15,23,24,25 2:12
`3:12,16,20 5:19,19
`5:22,23 12:17 13:8
`patentability 6:5
`people 4:23
`petition 7:24 8:2
`petitioner 1:7 2:4,8
`3:5,7 5:17,21
`phone 11:25
`planned 10:24
`planning 13:11
`
`please 5:13
`point 14:11,13,21
`prejudice 9:14
`preliminary 8:23
`prepared 8:21
`present 3:12
`prior 5:25 8:18
`proceed 9:25 12:4
`proceeding 3:1 4:1
`5:1,20 6:1,20 7:1,4
`7:8 8:1 9:1,12,18,22
`10:1,20 11:1,17
`12:1 13:1,4,17,18
`14:1 15:1
`proquo 6:19 9:21
`protection 13:13
`provide 8:22 13:13
`provided 6:25
`providing 9:5
`public 12:21 16:4
`purpose 5:14,16 6:8
`pursue 6:23
`q
`quid 6:19 9:21
`r
`r 1:19,20,21 2:2
`r3 6:2 8:16
`raise 12:8
`raised 6:22 7:24
`rama 1:24
`reached 4:14
`read 7:12
`ready 4:19,21
`really 12:10
`recap 7:22
`received 4:8
`recollection 13:21
`record 4:15,17 5:3
`12:7 16:8
`reexam 6:9 7:11,15
`7:17 12:12,20 13:5
`13:7,9
`reexamination 5:18
`
`refresh 13:20
`regarding 6:12 9:4
`11:10 13:22
`reject 7:14
`rejected 9:13
`related 13:22 16:11
`relating 8:9
`relied 8:11
`relief 7:19 14:12
`relying 8:18
`remember 11:23
`reporter 4:3,5,9,18
`4:20 5:2,8,10
`reporter's 15:2
`representation 6:6
`request 5:18,22 6:9
`6:18,18 7:10,14,18
`8:13 10:6 11:20
`14:25
`requested 5:12 9:11
`12:6
`requests 6:12
`required 14:2
`resolved 7:6
`resources 9:7
`response 8:24 13:9
`reston 2:5
`resulted 11:16
`revealing 11:4
`right 12:8
`rights 12:22
`ropes 2:8 3:10
`rosenbloom 2:14
`3:15
`rothwell 2:12 3:15
`s
`
`s 2:2,14
`sally 1:23
`sansone 4:6 16:4,19
`sap 1:5 5:17 6:3,7
`6:21 7:7,25 8:11
`9:11,17,18,24 10:4
`10:7,13,24 11:12,20
`12:5,7,10,22,24
`
`Page 3
`
`13:7,10,14
`sap's 6:20 9:22 13:5
`schedule 6:8 10:2
`12:5
`scope 8:13
`send 4:11
`served 12:17
`set 16:16
`shortly 14:5
`sir 13:24
`slip 10:22
`specifically 8:8
`sr 2:6
`start 3:4 5:9
`started 3:17
`state 16:5
`statement 13:22
`states 1:2
`stay 7:16
`stenographic 16:8
`steve 3:10
`steven 2:10
`strategic 10:25
`street 2:13
`struck 11:15
`suit 8:16
`support 8:11
`sure 7:21 11:22
`t
`
`t 1:19
`table 12:10
`take 6:25 14:24 15:4
`technical 9:10
`terminate 7:17
`terms 6:17 7:20
`11:13
`testimony 8:11,15
`9:2
`thank 5:11 6:11
`11:11 13:19 14:7
`15:7,13,14,15
`think 6:24 10:3,12
`10:24 14:11,12
`
`212-267-6868
`
`VERITEXT REPORTING COMPANY
`www.veritext.com
`
`516-608-2400
`
`

`

`[third - zoltick]
`
`Page 4
`
`whereof 16:15
`withdraw 6:4 7:10
`11:21 12:2
`witness 16:15
`work 9:9
`worth 10:12
`written 10:23
`x
`
`x 1:4,16
`
`y
`york 16:5
`young 2:6 3:8
`z
`zoltick 2:14 3:13,14
`3:21,25 4:10 5:6,12
`5:15 6:15 14:8,10
`14:21 15:7,15
`
`third 12:13
`tierney 1:22 3:2,11
`3:17,23 4:2,7,13,18
`4:22 5:5,11 6:10
`11:7,9 13:19 14:4,7
`14:17,23 15:8
`time 4:16 11:18,24
`14:17,22,24 15:16
`timing 12:23
`today 14:9
`today's 4:4
`trademark 1:2
`transcript 15:3 16:7
`trial 1:3 11:22 12:3
`true 16:7
`trying 10:9 12:14
`u
`ulterior 11:15 12:24
`ultimately 6:18
`united 1:2
`usc 7:12
`
`v
`
`v 2:6
`veritext 4:6
`versata 1:11 8:21
`9:8,15 12:16,25
`versata's 13:14
`view 6:23
`violated 11:13
`virginia 2:5 13:2,15
`voluminous 9:2
`w
`wait 3:23 10:19
`waive 12:8
`want 15:11
`wanted 6:13,16
`14:20
`wants 7:7
`washington 2:9,13
`way 7:12 10:16
`16:13
`weeks 12:25
`
`212-267-6868
`
`VERITEXT REPORTING COMPANY
`www.veritext.com
`
`516-608-2400
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket