throbber
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/21/2024 12:01 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 33
`
`
`INDEX NO. 190011/2024
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/21/2024
`
`
`
`
`
`- against -
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`Defendants.
`
`SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
`COUNTY OF NEW YORK
`- -------------------------------------------------------------------- X
`
`
`:
`DENNIS KILKENNY and PATRICIA KILKENNY,
`
`: Index No. 190011/2024
`
`:
`
`
`:
`
`
`: HEXION INC.’S VERIFIED
`
`
`: ANSWER TO PLAINTIFFS’
`
`
`: VERIFIED COMPLAINT WITH
`
`
`: AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES AND
`AII ACQUISITION, LLC, et al.,
`
`: CROSS CLAIMS
`
`
`:
`:
`-- ------------------------------------------------------------------- X
`
`
`Defendant Hexion Inc., f/k/a Momentive Specialty Chemicals Inc. and as a successor-in-
`
`interest to Borden Chemical Inc., (hereinafter “Hexion”), by its attorneys, Harris Beach PLLC, for
`
`its answer to Plaintiffs’ Verified Complaint (“Verified Complaint”) states as follows:
`
`1.
`
`Paragraph “1” of the Verified Complaint does not contain an allegation that requires
`
`a response.
`
`2.
`
`To the extent the allegations contained in paragraph “2” of the Verified Complaint
`
`are directed towards Hexion, Hexion admits that, at times, it “conducted business in” the State of
`
`New York, and refers all questions of law to this honorable Court.
`
`3.
`
`To the extent the allegations contained in paragraph “3” of the Verified Complaint
`
`are directed towards Hexion, Hexion denies the allegations contained in paragraph “3” of the
`
`Verified Complaint.
`
`4.
`
`Hexion denies the allegations contained in paragraph “4” of the Verified
`
`Complaint, and refers all questions of law to this honorable Court.
`
`5.
`
`Hexion denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth
`
`of each and every allegation contained in paragraph “5” of the Verified Complaint, and therefore
`
`denies the same.
`
`
`
`1 of 23
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/21/2024 12:01 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 33
`
`
`INDEX NO. 190011/2024
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/21/2024
`
`6.
`
`To the extent the allegations contained in paragraph “6” of the Verified Complaint
`
`are directed to Hexion, Hexion denies each and every allegation contained in paragraph “6” of the
`
`Verified Complaint.
`
`7.
`
` To the extent the allegations contained in paragraph “7” of the Verified Complaint
`
`are directed to Hexion, Hexion denies each and every allegation contained in paragraph “7” of the
`
`Verified Complaint, and refers all questions of law to this honorable Court.
`
`8.
`
` Hexion denies the allegations contained in paragraph “8” of the Verified
`
`Complaint and refers all questions of law to this honorable Court.
`
`9.
`
`Hexion denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth
`
`of each and every allegation contained in paragraph “9” of the Verified Complaint, and therefore
`
`denies the same.
`
`AS AND FOR A FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION,
`HEXION ANSWERS AS FOLLOWS:
`
`Hexion repeats and reiterates each and every response hereinbefore made with the
`
`10.
`
`same force and effect as though the same were set forth at length herein in response to the
`
`unnumbered paragraph preceding paragraph “10” of the Verified Complaint.
`
`11.
`
`Hexion denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth
`
`of each and every allegation contained in paragraphs “10” and “11” of the Verified Complaint,
`
`and therefore denies the same.
`
`12.
`
`To the extent the allegations contained in paragraphs “12” and “13” of the Verified
`
`Complaint are directed to Hexion, Hexion denies each and every allegation contained in
`
`paragraphs “12” and “13” of the Verified Complaint.
`
`
`
`2
`
`2 of 23
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/21/2024 12:01 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 33
`
`
`INDEX NO. 190011/2024
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/21/2024
`
`13.
`
`Hexion denies knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth
`
`of each and every allegation contained in paragraph “14” of the Verified Complaint, and therefore
`
`denies the same.
`
`14.
`
`To the extent the allegations contained in paragraphs “15” and “16” of the Verified
`
`Complaint are directed to Hexion, Hexion denies each and every allegation contained in
`
`paragraphs “15” and “16” of the Verified Complaint.
`
`15.
`
`Hexion denies each and every allegation contained in paragraphs “17” (including
`
`all sub-paragraphs thereof) and “18” of the Verified Complaint, and refers all questions of law to
`
`this honorable Court.
`
`16.
`
`To the extent the allegations contained in paragraph “19” of the Verified Complaint
`
`are directed to Hexion, Hexion denies each and every allegation contained in paragraph “19” of
`
`the Verified Complaint.
`
`17.
`
`Hexion denies each and every allegation contained in paragraphs “20”, “21”, and
`
`“22” of the Verified Complaint.
`
`18.
`
`To the extent the allegations contained in paragraphs “23”, “24”, “25”, and “26” of
`
`the Verified Complaint are directed to Hexion, Hexion denies each and every allegation contained
`
`in paragraphs “23”, “24”, “25”, and “26” of the Verified Complaint, and refers all questions of law
`
`to this honorable Court.
`
`19.
`
`To the extent the allegations contained in paragraphs “27”, “28”, “29”, and “30” of
`
`the Verified Complaint are directed to Hexion, Hexion denies each and every allegation contained
`
`in paragraphs “27”, “28”, “29”, and “30” of the Verified Complaint.
`
`20.
`
`To the extent the allegations contained in paragraphs “31”, “32”, “33” (including
`
`all sub-paragraphs thereof), “34”, and “35” of the Verified Complaint are directed to Hexion,
`
`
`
`3
`
`3 of 23
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/21/2024 12:01 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 33
`
`
`INDEX NO. 190011/2024
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/21/2024
`
`Hexion denies each and every allegation contained in paragraphs “31”, “32”, “33” (including all
`
`sub-paragraphs thereof), “34”, and “35” of the Verified Complaint, and refers all questions of law
`
`to this honorable Court.
`
`21.
`
`Hexion denies each and every allegation contained in the unnumbered paragraph
`
`following paragraph “35” of the Verified Complaint.
`
`AS AND FOR A SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION,
`HEXION ANSWERS AS FOLLOWS:
`
`Hexion repeats and reiterates each and every response hereinbefore made with the
`
`22.
`
`same force and effect as though the same were set forth at length herein in response to the
`
`unnumbered paragraph preceding paragraph “36” of the Verified Complaint.
`
`23.
`
`To the extent the allegations contained in paragraphs “36”, “37”, “38”, and “39” of
`
`the Verified Complaint are directed to Hexion, Hexion denies each and every allegation contained
`
`in paragraphs “36”, “37”, “38”, and “39” of the Verified Complaint, and refers all questions of law
`
`to this honorable Court.
`
`24.
`
`Hexion denies each and every allegation contained in the unnumbered paragraph
`
`following paragraph “39” of the Verified Complaint.
`
`AS AND FOR A THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION,
`HEXION ANSWERS AS FOLLOWS:
`
`Hexion repeats and reiterates each and every response hereinbefore made with the
`
`25.
`
`same force and effect as though the same were set forth at length herein in response to the
`
`unnumbered paragraph preceding paragraph “40” of the Verified Complaint.
`
`26.
`
`To the extent the allegations contained in paragraphs “40” and “41” of the Verified
`
`Complaint are directed to Hexion, Hexion denies each and every allegation contained in
`
`
`
`4
`
`4 of 23
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/21/2024 12:01 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 33
`
`
`INDEX NO. 190011/2024
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/21/2024
`
`paragraphs “40” and “41” of the Verified Complaint, and refers all questions of law to this
`
`honorable Court.
`
`27.
`
`Hexion denies each and every allegation contained in the unnumbered paragraph
`
`following paragraph “41” of the Verified Complaint.
`
`AS AND FOR A FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION,
`HEXION ANSWERS AS FOLLOWS:
`
`Hexion repeats and reiterates each and every response hereinbefore made with the
`
`28.
`
`same force and effect as though the same were set forth at length herein in response to the
`
`unnumbered paragraph preceding paragraph “42” and to paragraph “42” of the Verified
`
`Complaint.
`
`29.
`
`To the extent the allegations contained in paragraphs “43” and “44” of the Verified
`
`Complaint are directed to Hexion, Hexion denies each and every allegation contained in
`
`paragraphs “43” and “44” of the Verified Complaint, and refers all questions of law to this
`
`honorable Court.
`
`30.
`
`Hexion denies each and every allegation contained in paragraph “45” of the
`
`Verified Complaint.
`
`31.
`
`To the extent the allegations contained in paragraphs “46”, “47”, “48”, “49”, “50”,
`
`“51”, and “52” (including all sub-paragraphs thereof) of the Verified Complaint are directed to
`
`Hexion, Hexion denies each and every allegation contained in paragraphs “46”, “47”, “48”, “49”,
`
`“50”, “51”, and “52” (including all sub-paragraphs thereof) of the Verified Complaint, and refers
`
`all questions of law to this honorable Court.
`
`32.
`
`Hexion denies each and every allegation contained in paragraph “53” of the
`
`Verified Complaint.
`
`
`
`5
`
`5 of 23
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/21/2024 12:01 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 33
`
`
`INDEX NO. 190011/2024
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/21/2024
`
`33.
`
`To the extent the allegations contained in paragraph “54” of the Verified Complaint
`
`are directed to Hexion, Hexion denies each and every allegation contained in paragraph “54” of
`
`the Verified Complaint, and refers all questions of law to this honorable Court.
`
`34.
`
`Hexion denies each and every allegation contained in paragraph “55” of the
`
`Verified Complaint, and refers all questions of law to this honorable Court.
`
`35.
`
`To the extent the allegations contained in paragraphs “56”, “57”, “58”, “59”, “60”,
`
`“61”, “62”, “63”, “64”, “65”, and “66” of the Verified Complaint are directed to Hexion, Hexion
`
`denies each and every allegation contained in paragraphs “56”, “57”, “58”, “59”, “60”, “61”, “62”,
`
`“63”, “64”, “65”, and “66” of the Verified Complaint, and refers all questions of law to this
`
`honorable Court.
`
`36.
`
`Hexion denies each and every allegation contained in paragraph “67” of the
`
`Verified Complaint, and refers all questions of law to this honorable Court.
`
`37.
`
`To the extent the allegations contained in paragraph “68” of the Verified Complaint
`
`are directed to Hexion, Hexion denies each and every allegation contained in paragraph “68” of
`
`the Verified Complaint, and refers all questions of law to this honorable Court.
`
`38.
`
`Hexion denies each and every allegation contained in the unnumbered paragraph
`
`following paragraph “68” of the Verified Complaint.
`
`AS AND FOR A FIFTH CAUSE OF ACTION,
`HEXION ANSWERS AS FOLLOWS:
`
`Hexion repeats and reiterates each and every response hereinbefore made with the
`
`39.
`
`same force and effect as though the same were set forth at length herein in response to the
`
`unnumbered paragraph preceding paragraph “69” and to paragraph “69” of the Verified
`
`Complaint.
`
`
`
`6
`
`6 of 23
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/21/2024 12:01 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 33
`
`
`INDEX NO. 190011/2024
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/21/2024
`
`40.
`
`Hexion denies that the term “contractor” as defined in paragraph “70” of the
`
`Verified Complaint applies to Hexion in this action.
`
`41.
`
`To the extent the allegations contained in paragraphs “71”, “72”, “73”, “74”, “75”,
`
`“76”, “77”, “78”, “79”, “80”, “81”, and “82” of the Verified Complaint are directed to Hexion,
`
`Hexion denies each and every allegation contained in paragraphs “71”, “70”, “71”, “72”, “73”,
`
`“74”, “75”, “76”, “77”, “78”, “79”, “80”, “81”, and “82” of the Verified Complaint, and refers all
`
`questions of law to this honorable Court.
`
`42.
`
`Hexion denies each and every allegation contained in the unnumbered paragraph
`
`following paragraph “82” of the Verified Complaint.
`
`AS AND FOR A SIXTH CAUSE OF ACTION,
`HEXION ANSWERS AS FOLLOWS:
`
`Hexion repeats and reiterates each and every response hereinbefore made with the
`
`43.
`
`same force and effect as though the same were set forth at length herein in response to the
`
`unnumbered paragraph preceding paragraph “83” and to paragraph “83” of the Verified
`
`Complaint.
`
`44.
`
`To the extent the allegations contained in paragraphs “84”, “85”, “86”, “87”, “88”,
`
`“89”, “90”, “91”, “92”, “93”, “94”, “95”, “96”, and “97” of the Verified Complaint are directed to
`
`Hexion, Hexion denies each and every allegation contained in paragraphs “84”, “85”, “86”, “87”,
`
`“88”, “89”, “90”, “91”, “92”, “93”, “94”, “95”, “96”, and “97” of the Verified Complaint, and
`
`refers all questions of law to this honorable Court.
`
`45.
`
`Hexion denies each and every allegation contained in paragraph “98” of the
`
`Verified Complaint, and refers all questions of law to this honorable Court.
`
`46.
`
`Hexion denies each and every allegation contained the unnumbered paragraphs
`
`following paragraph “98” of the Verified Complaint.
`
`
`
`7
`
`7 of 23
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/21/2024 12:01 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 33
`
`
`INDEX NO. 190011/2024
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/21/2024
`
`AS AND FOR A SEVENTH CAUSE OF ACTION,
`HEXION ANSWERS AS FOLLOWS:
`
`Hexion repeats and reiterates each and every response hereinbefore made with the
`
`47.
`
`same force and effect as though the same were set forth at length herein in response to the
`
`unnumbered paragraph preceding paragraph “99” of the Verified Complaint.
`
`48.
`
`Hexion denies each and every allegation contained in paragraph “99” of the
`
`Verified Complaint, and refers all questions of law to this honorable Court.
`
`49.
`
`Hexion denies each and every allegation contained the unnumbered paragraphs
`
`following paragraph “99” of the Verified Complaint.
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`AS AND FOR A FIRST AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE HEXION ALLEGES
`UPON INFORMATION AND BELIEF
`
`The Verified Complaint fails to state a cause of action against Hexion.
`
`AS AND FOR A SECOND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`HEXION ALLEGES
`UPON INFORMATION AND BELIEF
`
`This Court lacks jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action.
`
`AS AND FOR A THIRD AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`HEXION ALLEGES
`UPON INFORMATION AND BELIEF
`
`46.
`
`This Court lacks both specific and/or general personal jurisdiction over Hexion.
`
`AS AND FOR A FOURTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`HEXION ALLEGES
`UPON INFORMATION AND BELIEF
`
`47.
`
`The damages allegedly sustained by Plaintiffs were caused, in whole or in part, by the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`negligence or other culpable conduct of Plaintiff Daniel Kilkenny (“Plaintiff”) and/or defendants
`
`other than Hexion, which conduct constituted a supervening cause of Plaintiff’s alleged injuries.
`
`
`
`8
`
`8 of 23
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/21/2024 12:01 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 33
`
`
`INDEX NO. 190011/2024
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/21/2024
`
`AS AND FOR A FIFTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`HEXION ALLEGES
`UPON INFORMATION AND BELIEF
`
`48.
`
`To the extent that the Verified Complaint and each cause of action considered
`
`
`
`separately may allege a cause of action occurring before September 1, 1975, each such cause of action
`
`is barred by reason of the culpable conduct attributable to Plaintiff, including contributory negligence
`
`and assumption of the risk.
`
`AS AND FOR A SIXTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`HEXION ALLEGES
`UPON INFORMATION AND BELIEF
`
`49.
`
`Any damages allegedly sustained by Plaintiff were the proximate result of the
`
`
`
`unforeseen and/or unforeseeable negligent, grossly negligent, wanton or reckless omission or conduct
`
`of intervening third parties or superseding parties.
`
`AS AND FOR A SEVENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`HEXION ALLEGES
`UPON INFORMATION AND BELIEF
`
`50.
`
`The damages allegedly sustained by Plaintiff were caused, in whole or in part, by the
`
`
`
`negligence or other culpable conduct of one or more persons or instrumentalities over which Hexion
`
`had no control and with whom it had no legal relationship.
`
`AS AND FOR AN EIGHTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`HEXION ALLEGES
`UPON INFORMATION AND BELIEF
`
`51.
`
`The damages allegedly sustained by Plaintiff were caused, in whole or in part, through
`
`
`
`the operation of nature.
`
`
`
`9
`
`9 of 23
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/21/2024 12:01 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 33
`
`
`INDEX NO. 190011/2024
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/21/2024
`
`AS AND FOR A NINTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`HEXION ALLEGES
`UPON INFORMATION AND BELIEF
`
`52.
`
`If Plaintiff sustained damages as alleged, such damages occurred while he engaged in
`
`
`
`activities into which he entered knowing the hazard, risk and danger of the activities and he assumed
`
`the risks incidental to and attendant to the activities.
`
`AS AND FOR A TENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`HEXION ALLEGES
`UPON INFORMATION AND BELIEF
`
`53.
`
`The lawsuit was not commenced by Plaintiffs within the time prescribed by law and
`
`
`
`Plaintiffs, therefore, are barred from recovery pursuant to applicable statutes of limitations.
`
`AS AND FOR AN ELEVENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`HEXION ALLEGES
`UPON INFORMATION AND BELIEF
`
`54.
`
`All claims brought under New York Law, L. 1986 c. 682 Section 4 (enacted July 31,
`
`
`
`1986) are time-barred in that said statute is in violation of the Constitution of the United States and
`
`the Constitution of the State of New York.
`
`AS AND FOR A TWELFTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`HEXION ALLEGES
`UPON INFORMATION AND BELIEF
`
`55.
`
`To the extent applicable to Plaintiffs, this action cannot be maintained, as there is
`
`
`
`another action pending for the same relief.
`
`AS AND FOR A THIRTEENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`HEXION ALLEGES
`UPON INFORMATION AND BELIEF
`
`56.
`
`To the extent that any injury relating to Plaintiff occurred in the context of an
`
`
`
`employer-employee relationship, claims for said injuries are barred by the Workers’ Compensation
`
`Act.
`
`
`
`10
`
`10 of 23
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/21/2024 12:01 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 33
`
`
`INDEX NO. 190011/2024
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/21/2024
`
`AS AND FOR A FOURTEENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`HEXION ALLEGES
`UPON INFORMATION AND BELIEF
`
`57.
`
`No acts or omissions of Hexion proximately caused any damages.
`
`AS AND FOR A FIFTEENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`HEXION ALLEGES
`UPON INFORMATION AND BELIEF
`
`58.
`
`Any product of Hexion that may have been present at Plaintiff’s job locations was
`
`
`
`
`
`placed in any such buildings upon specification, approval or at the instruction of governmental or
`
`legislative agencies or bodies.
`
`AS AND FOR A SIXTEENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`HEXION ALLEGES
`UPON INFORMATION AND BELIEF
`
`59.
`
`The damages allegedly sustained by Plaintiff, which allegedly arose from his work
`
`
`
`with or around allegedly asbestos containing products manufactured by Hexion (the “Products”) were
`
`caused, in whole or in part, by the improper use of the Products, rather than any defect in the design,
`
`manufacture, production, assemblage, installation, testing, labeling, marketing, distribution, sale or
`
`inspection of the Products by Hexion.
`
`AS AND FOR A SEVENTEENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`HEXION ALLEGES
`UPON INFORMATION AND BELIEF
`
`60.
`
`The damages allegedly sustained by Plaintiff which allegedly arose from the Products
`
`
`
`were caused by the alteration, misuse and/or improper maintenance of the Products by one or more
`
`persons or instrumentalities other than Hexion, rather than any defect in the design, manufacture,
`
`production, assemblage, installation, testing, labeling, marketing, distribution, sale or inspection of
`
`the Products by Hexion.
`
`
`
`11
`
`11 of 23
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/21/2024 12:01 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 33
`
`
`INDEX NO. 190011/2024
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/21/2024
`
`AS AND FOR AN EIGHTEENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`HEXION ALLEGES
`UPON INFORMATION AND BELIEF
`
`61.
`
`Hexion is not liable for the damages allegedly sustained by Plaintiff because
`
`
`
`Plaintiff was not in privity of contract with Hexion at any time and the Products were not inherently
`
`dangerous.
`
`AS AND FOR A NINETEENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`HEXION ALLEGES
`UPON INFORMATION AND BELIEF
`
`62.
`
`The Products were not defective or dangerous at any time when Hexion had
`
`
`
`possession or control of them.
`
`AS AND FOR A TWENTIETH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`HEXION ALLEGES
`UPON INFORMATION AND BELIEF
`
`63.
`
`All implied warranties, including the warranties of merchantability and fitness for a
`
`
`
`particular purpose, were excluded at the time of the sale of the Products.
`
`AS AND FOR A TWENTY-FIRST AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`HEXION ALLEGES
`UPON INFORMATION AND BELIEF
`
`64.
`
`No implied warranties, including the warranties of merchantability and fitness for a
`
`
`
`particular purpose, became a part of the basis of the bargain in the sale of the Products.
`
`AS AND FOR A TWENTY-SECOND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`HEXION ALLEGES
`UPON INFORMATION AND BELIEF
`
`65.
`
`Hexion is not liable to Plaintiff for the damages alleged in the Verified Complaint
`
`
`
`because such damages are excluded and not recoverable under express warranty.
`
`
`
`12
`
`12 of 23
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/21/2024 12:01 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 33
`
`
`INDEX NO. 190011/2024
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/21/2024
`
`AS AND FOR A TWENTY-THIRD AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`HEXION ALLEGES
`UPON INFORMATION AND BELIEF
`
`66.
`
`The purchaser of the Products and all beneficiaries of any warranties, express or
`
`
`
`implied, relating to the Products failed to provide notice of the alleged breaches of warranty to Hexion
`
`pursuant to the applicable provision(s) of the Uniform Commercial Code.
`
`
`
`
`
`AS AND FOR A TWENTY-FOURTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`HEXION ALLEGES
`UPON INFORMATION AND BELIEF
`
`67.
`
`Oral warranties upon which Plaintiff allegedly relied are unavailable as violative of
`
`the provisions of the applicable Statute of Frauds.
`
`AS AND FOR A TWENTY-FIFTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`HEXION ALLEGES
`UPON INFORMATION AND BELIEF
`
`68.
`
`To the extent Plaintiff sustained injuries from the use of a product alleged to contain
`
`
`
`asbestos, which is denied, Plaintiffs, Plaintiff’s decedents, other defendants or other parties not under
`
`the control of Hexion misused, abused, misapplied and otherwise mishandled the product alleged to
`
`be asbestos material. Therefore, the amount of damages which may be recoverable must be
`
`diminished by the proportion which said misuse, abuse, misapplication and mishandling bears to the
`
`conduct which caused the alleged damage or injury.
`
`AS AND FOR A TWENTY-SIXTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`HEXION ALLEGES
`UPON INFORMATION AND BELIEF
`
`69.
`
`In the event it should be proven at the time of trial that all the defendants to this action
`
`
`
`are subject to market share liability, which Hexion denies is available in this case, then Hexion’s share
`
`of such liability would be of such a de minimis amount as to make its contribution for damages
`
`
`
`13
`
`13 of 23
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/21/2024 12:01 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 33
`
`
`INDEX NO. 190011/2024
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/21/2024
`
`negligible and Hexion would be entitled to contribution, either in whole or in part, from co-
`
`defendants.
`
`AS AND FOR A TWENTY-SEVENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`HEXION ALLEGES
`UPON INFORMATION AND BELIEF
`
`70.
`
`The asbestos products alleged in Plaintiffs’ Verified Complaint are not products
`
`within the meaning and scope of the Restatement of Torts Section 402A and, as such, the Verified
`
`Complaint fails to state a cause of action in strict liability.
`
`AS AND FOR A TWENTY-EIGHTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`HEXION ALLEGES
`UPON INFORMATION AND BELIEF
`
`71.
`
`Hexion had no knowledge or reason to know of any alleged risks associated with
`
`
`
`asbestos and/or asbestos-containing products at any time during the periods complained of.
`
`AS AND FOR A TWENTY-NINTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`HEXION ALLEGES
`UPON INFORMATION AND BELIEF
`
`72.
`
`Plaintiff did not directly or indirectly purchase any asbestos-containing products or
`
`
`
`materials from Hexion and Plaintiff did not either receive or rely upon any representation or warranty
`
`allegedly made by Hexion.
`
`AS AND FOR A THIRTIETH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`HEXION ALLEGES
`UPON INFORMATION AND BELIEF
`
`73.
`
`To the extent that Plaintiff was exposed to any product containing asbestos as a result
`
`
`
`of conduct by Hexion, which is denied, said exposure was de minimis and not a substantial
`
`contributing factor to any asbestos-related disease which Plaintiff may have developed, and not
`
`actionable at law or equity.
`
`
`
`14
`
`14 of 23
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/21/2024 12:01 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 33
`
`
`INDEX NO. 190011/2024
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/21/2024
`
`AS AND FOR A THIRTY-FIRST AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`HEXION ALLEGES
`UPON INFORMATION AND BELIEF
`
`74.
`
`Exposure to asbestos fibers attributable to the Products, which is denied, is so minimal
`
`
`
`as to be insufficient to establish to a reasonable degree of probability that the Products are capable of
`
`causing injury or damages and must be considered speculative as a matter of law.
`
`AS AND FOR A THIRTY-SECOND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`HEXION ALLEGES
`UPON INFORMATION AND BELIEF
`
`75.
`
`Finished asbestos-containing products are not unreasonably dangerous as a matter of
`
`law.
`
`
`
`AS AND FOR A THIRTY-THIRD AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`HEXION ALLEGES
`UPON INFORMATION AND BELIEF
`
`76.
`
`If Hexion was on notice of any hazard or defect for which Plaintiff seeks relief, which
`
`Hexion denies, Plaintiff also had such notice and is thereby barred from recovery.
`
`
`
`
`
`AS AND FOR A THIRTY-FOURTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`HEXION ALLEGES
`UPON INFORMATION AND BELIEF
`
`77.
`
`Any damages must be reduced by the value of the benefit received by Plaintiff from
`
`the use of Hexion’s products.
`
`AS AND FOR A THIRTY-FIFTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`HEXION ALLEGES
`UPON INFORMATION AND BELIEF
`
`78.
`
`There is no justiciable issue or controversy.
`
`AS AND FOR A THIRTY-SIXTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`HEXION ALLEGES
`UPON INFORMATION AND BELIEF
`
`79.
`
`The claims for damages have not accrued and are purely speculative, uncertain and
`
`
`
`
`
`contingent.
`
`
`
`15
`
`15 of 23
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/21/2024 12:01 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 33
`
`
`INDEX NO. 190011/2024
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/21/2024
`
`AS AND FOR A THIRTY-SEVENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`HEXION ALLEGES
`UPON INFORMATION AND BELIEF
`
`80.
`
`Plaintiff acted voluntarily, unnecessarily, prematurely, with no evidence of injury to
`
`
`
`anyone at any job locations.
`
`AS AND FOR A THIRTY-EIGHTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`HEXION ALLEGES
`UPON INFORMATION AND BELIEF
`
`81.
`
`None of the alleged injuries or damages was foreseeable at the time of the Verified
`
`Complaint or at the time of the alleged acts or omissions in Plaintiffs’ Verified Complaint.
`
`AS AND FOR A THIRTY-NINTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`HEXION ALLEGES
`UPON INFORMATION AND BELIEF
`
`82.
`
`Hexion was under no duty to warn purchasers, those who performed work, or those
`
`
`
`under such purchasers’ control who were in a better position to warn; if warning was required,
`
`Hexion’s failure to do so was not a superseding proximate cause of injury.
`
`AS AND FOR A FORTIETH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`HEXION ALLEGES
`UPON INFORMATION AND BELIEF
`
`83.
`
`Plaintiff was warned of the risks of exposure to and use of asbestos-containing
`
`
`
`materials.
`
`AS AND FOR A FORTY-FIRST AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`HEXION ALLEGES
`UPON INFORMATION AND BELIEF
`
`84.
`
`Plaintiffs’ claims are barred as a matter of public policy, since social utility and benefit
`
`
`
`of asbestos-containing products outweighed the risk.
`
`
`
`16
`
`16 of 23
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/21/2024 12:01 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 33
`
`
`INDEX NO. 190011/2024
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/21/2024
`
`AS AND FOR A FORTY-SECOND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`HEXION ALLEGES
`UPON INFORMATION AND BELIEF
`
`85.
`
`To the extent Plaintiffs seek to maintain a claim for relief on behalf of any decedent,
`
`
`
`Plaintiffs lack capacity and/or standing to maintain such claim for relief against Hexion.
`
`AS AND FOR A FORTY-THIRD AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`HEXION ALLEGES
`UPON INFORMATION AND BELIEF
`
`86.
`
`Plaintiffs’ claims are barred because of Plaintiffs’ failure to join necessary and
`
`
`
`indispensable parties.
`
`AS AND FOR A FORTY-FOURTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`HEXION ALLEGES
`UPON INFORMATION AND BELIEF
`
`87.
`
`Plaintiffs may not bring this action as he has failed to exhaust all of their administrative
`
`
`
`remedies.
`
`
`
`
`
`AS AND FOR A FORTY-FIFTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`HEXION ALLEGES
`UPON INFORMATION AND BELIEF
`
`88.
`
`Plaintiffs and/or Plaintiffs’ decedents failed to mitigate or otherwise act to lessen or
`
`reduce the injuries alleged in the Verified Complaint.
`
`AS AND FOR A FORTY-SIXTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`HEXION ALLEGES
`UPON INFORMATION AND BELIEF
`
`89.
`
`Plaintiffs’ demands for exemplary or punitive damages are barred because such
`
`
`
`damages are not recoverable or warranted in this action.
`
`
`
`17
`
`17 of 23
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/21/2024 12:01 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 33
`
`
`INDEX NO. 190011/2024
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/21/2024
`
`AS AND FOR A FORTY-SEVENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`HEXION ALLEGES
`UPON INFORMATION AND BELIEF
`
`90.
`
`Plaintiffs’ demands for punitive damages are barred by the due process clauses of the
`
`
`
`Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution and the New York State Constitution.
`
`
`
`
`
`AS AND FOR A FORTY-EIGHTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`HEXION ALLEGES
`UPON INFORMATION AND BELIEF
`
`91.
`
`Plaintiffs’ demands for punitive damages are barred by the proscription of the Eighth
`
`Amendment to the United States Constitution, as applied to the states through the Fourteenth
`
`Amendment, and Article I, Section 5 of the New York State Constitution prohibiting the imposition
`
`of excessive fines.
`
`AS AND FOR A FORTY-NINTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`HEXION ALLEGES
`UPON INFORMATION AND BELIEF
`
`92.
`
`Plaintiffs’ demands for punitive damages are barred by the “double jeopardy” clause
`
`
`
`of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution, as applied to the states through the
`
`Fourteenth Amendment, and Article I, Section 6 of the New York State Constitution.
`
`AS AND FOR A FIFTIETH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`HEXION ALLEGES
`UPON INFORMATION AND BELIEF
`
`93.
`
`If Plaintiff sustained injuries in the manner alleged, all of which has been denied by
`
`
`
`Hexion, the liability of Hexion, if any, shall be limited in accordance with Article 16 of the Civil
`
`Practice Law and Rules.
`
`
`
`18
`
`18 of 23
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/21/2024 12:01 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 33
`
`
`INDEX NO. 190011/2024
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/21/2024
`
`AS AND FOR A FIFTY-FIRST AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`HEXION ALLEGES
`UPON INFORMATION AND BELIEF
`
`94.
`
`At all times relevant to this litigation, Hexion complied with all applicable laws,
`
`
`
`regulations and standards.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`AS AND FOR A FIFTY-SECOND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`HEXION ALLEGES
`UPON INFORMATION AND BELIEF
`
`95.
`
`Relief is barred by virtue of the doctrines of estoppel and waiver.
`
`AS AND FOR A FIFTY-THIRD AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`HEXION ALLEGES
`UPON INFORMATION AND BELIEF
`
`96.
`
`At all times relevant to this litigation, the agents, servants and/or employees of Hexion
`
`utilized proper methods in the conduct of their operations, in conformity with the available knowledge
`
`and research of the scientific and industrial communities.
`
`AS AND FOR A FIFTY-FOURTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`HEXION ALLEGES
`UPON INFORMATION AND BELIEF
`
`97.
`
`Plaintiff contributed to his injuries, either in whole or in part, by exposure to or the
`
`
`
`use of tobacco products and/or other substances, products, medications or drugs.
`
`AS AND FOR A FIFTY-FIFTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`HEXION ALLEGES
`UPON INFORMATION AND BELIEF
`
`98.
`
`Some or all of the causes of action may not be maintained because of arbitration
`
`
`
`and award.
`
`
`
`19
`
`19 of 23
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/21/2024 12:01 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 33
`
`
`INDEX NO. 190011/2024
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/21/2024
`
`AS AND FOR A FIFTY-SIXTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`HEXION ALLEGES
`UPON INFORMATION AND BELIEF
`
`99.
`
`Some or all of the causes of action may not be maintained because of collateral
`
`
`
`estoppel.
`
`AS AND FOR A FIFTY-SEVENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`HEXION ALLEGES
`UPON INFORMATION AND BELIEF
`
`100. Some or all of the causes of action may not be maintained because of discharge in
`
`
`
`bankruptcy.
`
`AS AND FOR A FIFTY-EIGHTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`HEXION ALLEGES
`UPON INFORMATION AND BELIEF
`
`101. Some or all of the causes of action may not be maintained because of payment.
`
`AS AND FOR A FIFTY-NINTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`HEXION ALLEGES
`UPON INFORMATION AND BELIEF
`
`102. Some or all of the causes of action may not be maintained because of release.
`
`AS AND FOR A SIXTIETH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`HEXION ALLEGES
`UPON INFORMATION AND BELIEF
`
`103. Some or all of the causes of action may not be maintained because of res judicata.
`
`AS AND FOR A SIXTY-FIRST AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`HEXION ALLEGES
`
`UPON INFORMATION AND BELIEF
`
`104. Plaintiffs’ claims are barred by the doctrine of laches.
`
`20
`
`20 of 23
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`FILED: NEW YORK COUNT

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket