throbber
FILED: ERIE COUNTY CLERK 12/20/2023 09:17 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 9
`
`INDEX NO. 814633/2023
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/20/2023
`
`SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
`COUNTY OF ERIE
`----------------------------------------------------------------------
`TROY SHANE SMITH and ALLYSON JANE SMITH,
`
`
`
`-against-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`84 LUMBER COMPANY, et al.,
`
`
`
`----------------------------------------------------------------------
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Index No.: 814633/23
`
`VERIFIED ANSWER
`
`Plaintiff(s),
`
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` O U N S E L O R S :
`
`Defendant, DOMCO PRODUCTS TEXAS INC. s/i/a DOMCO PRODUCTS TEXAS INC.,
`
` C
`
`
`
`
`d/b/a Tarkett, Inc. Individually and as successor to Azrock Industries, Inc. (hereinafter DOMCO
`
`PRODUCTS TEXAS INC..), through its attorneys, BARRY McTIERNAN & MOORE LLC,
`
`answering the Verified Complaint of the plaintiff, states as follows:
`
`1.
`
`Denies any knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the allegations
`
`contained in paragraphs numbered “1”, “2”, “3”, “6”, “7”, “8”, “9”, “10”, “11”, “12”, “13”, “14”,
`
`“15”, “16”, “17”, “18”, “19”, “20”, “21”, “22”, “23”, “24”, “25”, “27”, “28”, “29”, “30”, “31” ,
`
`“32”, “33”, “34”, “35”, “36”, “37”, “38”, “39”, “40”, “41”, “42”, “43”, “44”, “45”, “46”, “47”, “48”,
`
`“49”, “50”, “51”, “52”, “53”, “54”, “55”, “56”, “57”, “58”, “59”, “60” and “61” of the Verified
`
`Complaint.
`
`2.
`
`Denies upon information and belief, each and every allegation contained in
`
`paragraphs numbered “4” and “5” of the Verified Complaint with all questions of law referred to the
`
`Court.
`
`1 of 13
`
`

`

`FILED: ERIE COUNTY CLERK 12/20/2023 09:17 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 9
`
`INDEX NO. 814633/2023
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/20/2023
`
`3.
`
`Denies upon information and belief, each and every allegation contained in paragraph
`
`numbered “26” of the Verified Complaint except admits DOMCO PRODUCTS TEXAS INC. is a
`
`foreign corporation.
`
`4.
`
`Denies each and every allegation contained in paragraph numbered “62”, “63”, “64”,
`
`“65”, “66”, “67”, “68” and “69” of the Verified Complaint.
`
`
`
`ANSWERING FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION
`
`5.
`
`Answering paragraph numbered “70” of the Verified Complaint, defendant, DOMCO
`
`PRODUCTS TEXAS INC., repeats, reiterates and realleges each and every response contained in
`
`paragraphs numbered “1” through “4” of this Verified Answer.
`
`
`
`6.
`
`Denies each and every allegation contained in paragraph numbered “71”, “72”, “73”,
`
`“74”, “75”, “76”, “77” and “78” of the Verified Complaint.
`
`ANSWERING SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION
`
`7.
`
`Answering paragraph numbered “79” of the Verified Complaint, defendant, DOMCO
`
`PRODUCTS TEXAS INC., repeats, reiterates and realleges each and every response contained in
`
`paragraphs numbered “1” through “6” of this Verified Answer.
`
`8.
`
`Denies upon information and belief, each and every allegation contained in paragraph
`
`numbered “80” of the Verified Complaint with all questions of law referred to the Court.
`
`
`
`9.
`
`Denies each and every allegation contained in paragraphs numbered “81”, “82” and
`
`“83” of the Verified Complaint.
`
`
`
`
`
`2 of 13
`
`

`

`FILED: ERIE COUNTY CLERK 12/20/2023 09:17 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 9
`
`INDEX NO. 814633/2023
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/20/2023
`
`ANSWERING THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION
`
`10. Answering paragraph numbered “84” of the Verified Complaint, defendant, DOMCO
`
`PRODUCTS TEXAS INC., repeats, reiterates and realleges each and every response contained in
`
`paragraphs numbered “1” through “9” of this Verified Answer.
`
`
`
`11.
`
`Denies each and every allegation contained in paragraphs numbered “85”, “87”, “89”,
`
`“90”, “91”, “92” and “93” of the Verified Complaint.
`
`12.
`
`Denies upon information and belief, each and every allegation contained in
`
`paragraphs numbered “86” and “88” of the Verified Complaint with all questions of law referred to
`
`the Court.
`
`ANSWERING FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION
`
`13. Answering paragraph numbered “94” of the Verified Complaint, defendant, DOMCO
`
`PRODUCTS TEXAS INC., repeats, reiterates and realleges each and every response contained in
`
`paragraphs numbered “1” through “12” of this Verified Answer.
`
`
`
`14.
`
`Denies each and every allegation contained in paragraph “95”, “96”, “97”, “98”,
`
`“99”, “100”, “101”, “102”, “103”, “104”, “105”, “106”, “107”, “108”, “109”, “110”, “111” and
`
`“112” of the Verified Complaint.
`
`ANSWERING FIFTH CAUSE OF ACTION
`
`15. Answering paragraph numbered “113” of the Verified Complaint, defendant,
`
`DOMCO PRODUCTS TEXAS INC., repeats, reiterates and realleges each and every response
`
`contained in paragraphs numbered “1” through “14” of this Verified Answer.
`
`16.
`
`Denies any knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the allegations
`
`contained in paragraphs numbered “114”, “115”, “116”, “117”, “118”, “119” and “120” of the
`
`Verified Complaint.
`
`3 of 13
`
`

`

`FILED: ERIE COUNTY CLERK 12/20/2023 09:17 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 9
`
`INDEX NO. 814633/2023
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/20/2023
`
`ANSWERING SIXTH CAUSE OF ACTION
`
`17. Answering paragraph numbered “121” of the Verified Complaint, defendant,
`
`DOMCO PRODUCTS TEXAS INC., repeats, reiterates and realleges each and every response
`
`contained in paragraphs numbered “1” through “16” of this Verified Answer.
`
`
`
`18.
`
`Denies each and every allegation contained in paragraph numbered “122”, “123”,
`
`“124”, “125”, “126”, “127”, “128”, “129”, “130”, “131”, “132”, “133”, “134”, “135” and “136” of
`
`the Verified Complaint.
`
`ANSWERING SEVENTH CAUSE OF ACTION
`
`19. Answering paragraph numbered “137” of the Verified Complaint, defendant,
`
`DOMCO PRODUCTS TEXAS INC., repeats, reiterates and realleges each and every response
`
`contained in paragraphs numbered “1” through “18” of this Verified Answer.
`
`20.
`
`Denies any knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the allegations
`
`contained in paragraphs numbered “138”, “139”, “140”, “141”, “142”, “143”, “144”, “145”, “146”,
`
`“147”, “148”, “149” and “150” of the Verified Complaint.
`
`ANSWERING EIGHTH CAUSE OF ACTION
`
`21. Answering paragraph numbered “151” of the Verified Complaint, defendant,
`
`DOMCO PRODUCTS TEXAS INC., repeats, reiterates and realleges each and every response
`
`contained in paragraphs numbered “1” through “20” of this Verified Answer.
`
`22.
`
`Denies any knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the allegations
`
`contained in paragraphs numbered “152”, “153”, “154”, “155”, “156”, “157”, “158”, “159”, “160”
`
`and “161” of the Verified Complaint.
`
`23.
`
`Denies each and every allegation contained in paragraph numbered “162”, “163”,
`
`and “164” of the Verified Complaint.
`
`4 of 13
`
`

`

`FILED: ERIE COUNTY CLERK 12/20/2023 09:17 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 9
`
`INDEX NO. 814633/2023
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/20/2023
`
`24.
`
`Denies upon information and belief, each and every allegation contained in
`
`paragraphs numbered “165” and “166” of the Verified Complaint with all questions of law referred
`
`to the Court.
`
`ANSWERING NINTH CAUSE OF ACTION
`
`25. Answering paragraph numbered “167” of the Verified Complaint, defendant,
`
`DOMCO PRODUCTS TEXAS INC., repeats, reiterates and realleges each and every response
`
`contained in paragraphs numbered “1” through “24” of this Verified Answer.
`
`26.
`
`Denies upon information and belief, each and every allegation contained in
`
`paragraphs numbered “168”, “169”, “170”, “171”, “172”, “173”, “174”, “175”, “176”, “177”, “178”,
`
`“177”, “178” and “179” of the Verified Complaint with all questions of law referred to the Court.
`
`ANSWERING TENTH CAUSE OF ACTION
`
`27. Answering paragraph numbered “180” of the Verified Complaint, defendant,
`
`DOMCO PRODUCTS TEXAS INC., repeats, reiterates and realleges each and every response
`
`contained in paragraphs numbered “1” through “26” of this Verified Answer.
`
`28.
`
`Denies each and every allegation contained in paragraph numbered “181” of the
`
`Verified Complaint.
`
`ANSWERING EVELENTH CAUSE OF ACTION
`
`29. Answering paragraph numbered “182” of the Verified Complaint, defendant,
`
`DOMCO PRODUCTS TEXAS INC., repeats, reiterates and realleges each and every response
`
`contained in paragraphs numbered “1” through “28” of this Verified Answer.
`
`30.
`
`Denies any knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the allegations
`
`contained in paragraph numbered “183” of the Verified Complaint.
`
`5 of 13
`
`

`

`FILED: ERIE COUNTY CLERK 12/20/2023 09:17 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 9
`
`INDEX NO. 814633/2023
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/20/2023
`
`31.
`
`Denies each and every allegation contained in paragraph numbered “184” of the
`
`Verified Complaint.
`
`AS AND FOR A FIRST AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`
`
`32.
`
`This Court lacks jurisdiction over the answering defendant as a result of improper,
`
`and lack of, service of process.
`
`
`AS AND FOR A SECOND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`
`
`
`
`33.
`
` All claims are time-barred by the applicable Statutes of Limitations.
`
`AS AND FOR A THIRD AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`34.
`
`All claims brought under the New York Statute of Limitations approved July 30,
`
`1986 are time barred in that the statute is unconstitutional.
`
`AS AND FOR A FOURTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`
`
`35.
`
`The causes of action pleaded in the complaint have not been maintained in a timely
`
`fashion and plaintiffs have neglected the same and should be barred by the doctrine of laches.
`
`AS AND FOR A FIFTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`
`
`36.
`
`The forum chosen by the plaintiffs lacks personal jurisdiction over this answering
`
`defendant.
`
`
`AS AND FOR A SIXTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`
`
`37.
`
`The complaint and each and every allegation considered separately fails to state any
`
`cause of action against the answering defendant upon which relief can be granted.
`
`AS AND FOR A SEVENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`
`
`38.
`
`Insofar as the complaint, and each cause of action considered separately, alleges a
`
`cause of action accruing on or after September 1, 1975, to recover damages for personal injuries, the
`
`amount of damages recoverable thereon must be diminished by reason of the culpable conduct
`
`attributable to the plaintiff including contributory negligence and assumption of risk, in the
`
`6 of 13
`
`

`

`FILED: ERIE COUNTY CLERK 12/20/2023 09:17 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 9
`
`INDEX NO. 814633/2023
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/20/2023
`
`proportion which the culpable conduction attributable to the plaintiffs bears to the culpable conduct
`
`which cause the damages.
`
`
`AS AND FOR AN EIGHTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`
`
`39.
`
`Insofar as the complaint, and each cause of action considered separately, alleges a
`
`cause of action accruing before September 1, 1975, each such cause of action is barred by reason of
`
`the culpable conduct attributable to the plaintiffs including contributory negligence and assumption
`
`of the risk.
`
`
`AS AND FOR A NINTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`
`
`40.
`
`If the plaintiffs should prove that they sustained injuries and damages as alleged, such
`
`injuries and damages resulted from acts or omissions on the part of the third-parties over whom this
`
`answering defendant had no control or right of control.
`
`
`AS AND FOR A TENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`
`
`41. While this answering defendant denies the plaintiffs' allegations of negligence,
`
`statutory liability and/or strict liability, any injury and damages, to the extent that plaintiffs may be
`
`able to prove them, were the results of intervening and/or interceding acts of superseding negligence
`
`on the part of parties over whom this answering defendant neither controlled nor had the right to
`
`control.
`
`
`AS AND FOR AN ELEVENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`
`
`42.
`
`At all times during the conduct of its corporate operations, the agents, servants and/or
`
`employees of this answering defendant used methods in manufacturing its products in conformity
`
`with the available knowledge, state of the art and research of the scientific and industrial
`
`communities.
`
`
`AS AND FOR A TWELFTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`
`
`43.
`
`Plaintiffs, their co-workers and employers misused, abused, mistreated and
`
`misapplied the product designated as asbestos material as alleged in the complaint.
`
`AS AND FOR A THIRTEENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`7 of 13
`
`

`

`FILED: ERIE COUNTY CLERK 12/20/2023 09:17 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 9
`
`INDEX NO. 814633/2023
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/20/2023
`
`
`
`44.
`
` If the Court finds that any misuse, abuse, mistreatment and/or misapplication of the
`
`product caused and/or contributed to the alleged damages or injuries to the plaintiffs, then this
`
`answering defendant requests that the amount of damages which might be recoverable shall be
`
`diminished by the proportion which the same misuse, abuse, mistreatment and/or misapplication,
`
`attributed to the plaintiffs, their co-workers and/or employers bear to the conduct which caused the
`
`alleged damages or injuries.
`
`
`AS AND FOR A FOURTEENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`
`
`45.
`
`Any oral warranties upon which plaintiffs relied are inadmissible and unavailable
`
`because of the provisions of the applicable Statue of Frauds.
`
`AS AND FOR A FIFTEENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`
`
`46.
`
`As to all causes of action pleaded in the complaint which are based upon expressed or
`
`implied warranties and/or representations, the alleged breaches thereof as against this answering
`
`defendant are legally insufficient by reason of their failure to allege privity of contract between the
`
`plaintiffs and this answering defendant.
`
`
`AS AND FOR A SIXTEENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`
`
`47.
`
`Plaintiffs did not directly or indirectly purchase any asbestos containing products or
`
`materials from this answering defendant and plaintiffs neither received nor relied on any
`
`representation or warranty allegedly made by this answering defendant.
`
`
`AS AND FOR A SEVENTEENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`
`
`48.
`
`In the event that any breach of warranty is proven, plaintiffs failed to give proper and
`
`prompt notice of any such breach of warranty to this answering defendant.
`
`
`AS AND FOR AN EIGHTEENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`
`
`49.
`
`To the extent that the causes of action pleaded by plaintiffs fail to accord with the
`
`Uniform Commercial Code, including, but not limited to Section 2-725 thereof, the plaintiffs'
`
`complaint is time-barred.
`
`
`
`
`8 of 13
`
`

`

`FILED: ERIE COUNTY CLERK 12/20/2023 09:17 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 9
`
`INDEX NO. 814633/2023
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/20/2023
`
`
`AS AND FOR A NINETEENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`
`
`50.
`
`Upon information and belief, plaintiffs filed to mitigate or otherwise act to lessen or
`
`reduce the injuries and disabilities alleged in the complaint.
`
`
`AS AND FOR A TWENTIETH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`
`
`51.
`
`To the extent that plaintiff seeks punitive damages against answering defendant, these
`
`damages are improper, unwarranted, not authorized by law and are unconstitutional in the context of
`
`this litigation. Subjecting the defendant to multiple trials and multiple imposition of punitive
`
`damages for the same course of conduct is violation of both substantive and procedural due process
`
`under the United States Constitution and the State of New York. Punitive damages are a violation of
`
`due process. The standard for the award of punitive damages is constitutionally void for vagueness.
`
`Lack of limitation on possible multiple imposition of punitive damage awards for the same alleged
`
`course of conduct is unconstitutional.
`
`
`AS AND FOR A TWENTY-FIRST AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`52.
`
`Plaintiffs are estopped from asserting the causes of action alleged in the complaint.
`
`AS AND FOR A TWENTY-SECOND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`53.
`
`Plaintiffs have waived the causes of action and recovery alleged in the complaint.
`
`AS AND FOR A TWENTY-THIRD AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`54.
`
`Plaintiffs have failed to name and join essential and necessary parties.
`
`AS AND FOR A TWENTY-FOURTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`55.
`
`The defendant answering herein incorporated by reference, as if more fully set forth
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`at length herein, all defenses, both affirmative and otherwise, raised, pleaded or asserted by all other
`
`answering defendants and third-party defendants.
`
`
`AS AND FOR A TWENTY-FIFTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`
`
`56.
`
`The injuries allegedly suffered by the plaintiffs, if any (which injuries are specifically
`
`denied by the answering defendant), were the result of culpable conduct or fault of third persons for
`
`whose conduct this answering defendant is not legally responsible, and the damaged recovered by
`
`9 of 13
`
`

`

`FILED: ERIE COUNTY CLERK 12/20/2023 09:17 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 9
`
`INDEX NO. 814633/2023
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/20/2023
`
`the plaintiffs, if any, should be diminished or reduced in the proportion to which said culpable
`
`conduct bears upon the culpable conduct which caused the damages. Any liability on the part of this
`
`answering defendant (which liability is vigorously and specifically denied) is fifty percent or less of
`
`the liability of all persons who are the cause of the alleged injuries, if any, and the liability of this
`
`answering defendant for non-economic loss does not exceed this answering defendant's equitable
`
`share determined in accordance with the relative culpability of each person causing or contributing
`
`to the total liability for non-economic loss pursuant to CPLR section 1601 through 1603.
`
`AS AND FOR A TWENTY-SIXTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`
`
`57.
`
`Plaintiffs lack requisite capacity, standing and authority to bring the within action, as
`
`they are not real parties in interest.
`
`
`AS AND FOR A TWENTY-SEVENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`
`
`58.
`
`The within action cannot be maintained as there is another action pending between
`
`the same of similar parties for the same cause of action in a court of a state or the United States.
`
`AS AND FOR A TWENTY-EIGHTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`
`
`59.
`
`This cause of action may not be maintained because of arbitration and award,
`
`collateral estoppel, a discharge in bankruptcy, infancy (or some other disability) of the plaintiffs,
`
`payment, release and/or res judicata.
`
`
`AS AND FOR A TWENTY-NINTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`
`
`
`
`60.
`
`Plaintiffs do not specifically make any allegations against the answering defendant.
`
`AS AND FOR A THIRTIETH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`61.
`
`The defendant, DOMCO PRODUCTS TEXAS INC. alleges and asserts that the
`
`action has been improperly venued.
`
`
`
`10 of 13
`
`

`

`FILED: ERIE COUNTY CLERK 12/20/2023 09:17 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 9
`
`INDEX NO. 814633/2023
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/20/2023
`
`
`
`
`
`
`AS AND FOR A THIRTY-FIRST AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`62.
`
`Any asbestos-containing product of this answering defendant that may be present at
`
`plaintiff’s job locations were placed in any such buildings upon specification, approval or at the
`
`instruction of governmental or legislative agencies or bodies.
`
`AS AND FOR A THIRTY-SECOND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`
`
`63.
`
`Exposure to asbestos fibers attributable to this defendant is so minimal so as to be
`
`insufficient to establish to a reasonable degree of probability that the products are capable of causing
`
`injury or damages and must be considered speculative as a matter of law.
`
`AS AND FOR A THIRTY-THIRD AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`
`
`64.
`
`At all times relevant to this litigation, this defendant complied with all applicable law,
`
`regulations and standards applicable law, regulations and standards.
`
`
`AS AND FOR A THIRTY-FOURTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`
`
`65.
`
`Plaintiff contributed to the illness, either in whole or in part, by exposure to or the use
`
`of tobacco products and/or other substances, products, medications or drugs.
`
`
`AS AND FOR A THIRTY-FIFTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`
`
`66.
`
`Upon information and belief, some or all of the causes of action may not be
`
`maintained because of arbitration and award.
`
`
`AS AND FOR A THIRTY-SIXTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`
`
`67.
`
`Upon information and belief, some or all of the causes of action may not be
`
`maintained because of payment.
`
`
`AS AND FOR A THIRTY-SEVENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`
`
`68.
`
`Upon information and belief, some or all of the causes of action may not be
`
`maintained because of release.
`
`
`
`11 of 13
`
`

`

`FILED: ERIE COUNTY CLERK 12/20/2023 09:17 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 9
`
`INDEX NO. 814633/2023
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/20/2023
`
`AS AND FOR A THIRTY-EIGHTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`
`
`69.
`
`That plaintiff’s action against DOMCO PRODUCTS TEXAS INC.. is barred by the
`
`omnibus Workers’ Compensation Act of 1996 enacted on September 10, 1996.
`
`AS AND FOR A THIRTY-NINTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`That this defendant sold the products of reputable manufacturers and thus acted
`
`70.
`
`
`
`reasonably in relying on the skill and expertise of said manufacturers.
`
`AS AND FOR A FORTIETH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`That defendant asserts that the law of another state may apply and defendant reserves
`
`
`
`71.
`
`the right to assert a defense based upon that state’s law, and/or maritime law.
`
`
`
`WHEREFORE, defendant, DOMCO PRODUCTS TEXAS INC., demands judgment
`
`dismissing the Complaint of the plaintiffs herein as to said defendant, together with the costs and
`
`disbursements of this action.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: New York, New York
`
`December 18, 2023
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`TO: Belluck & Fox
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`546 Fifth Ave – 5th Floor
`New York, NY 10036
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Yours, etc.,
`
`BARRY McTIERNAN & MOORE LLC
`
`
`___________________________________
`Suzanne M. Halbardier
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`DOMCO PRODUCTS TEXAS INC.
`101 Greenwich Street, 14th Floor
`New York, NY 10006
`(212) 313-3600
`
`
`
`
`
`
`12 of 13
`
`

`

`FILED: ERIE COUNTY CLERK 12/20/2023 09:17 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 9
`
`INDEX NO. 814633/2023
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/20/2023
`
`
`VERIFICATION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`)
`STATE OF NEW YORK
`) §:
`
`
`
`
`COUNTY OF NEW YORK )
`
`
`
`
`SUZANNE M. HALBARDIER, being duly sworn, deposes and says that I am the
`
`attorney for the defendant, DOMCO PRODUCTS TEXAS INC.; I have read the foregoing
`
`Verified Answer to Verified Complaint and it is true to the best of my knowledge, except to
`
`those matters stated to be alleged on information and belief, and to those matters I believe them
`
`to be true.
`
`
`
`Deponent further states that the grounds of my belief as to the matters stated on
`
`information and belief are derived from admissions of the defendant to the deponent and the
`
`reason that this verification is not made by the defendant is that defendant lives outside of this
`
`County.
`
`
`Dated: New York, New York
`
`December 18, 2023
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`________________________________
`SUZANNE M. HALBARDIER, ESQ.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`13 of 13
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket