Case 1:24-cr-00154-ER Document 42 Filed 05/08/24 Page 1 of 13
`
`Protective Order
`
`24 Cr. 154 (ER)
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
`
`United States of America
`
`Vv.
`
`JOSE CESARI,
`a/k/a “Cry,”
`MIGUEL CINTRON,
`LUIS IZQUIERDO,
`a/k/a “Luis Zapata,”
`WAKIEM JOHNSON,
`a/k/a “Waka,”
`KEMAR BONITTO,
`DEYLIN MARTINEZ-GUERRERO,
`ANTONIO GONZALEZ,and
`JUSTIN BRUNO,
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`Uponthe application of the United States of America, with the consentof the undersigned
`
`counsel, and the defendants having requested discovery under Fed. R. Crim. P. 16, the Court
`
`hereby finds and orders as follows:
`
`Categories
`
`1. Disclosure Material. The Government will make disclosure to the defendants of
`
`documents, objects and information, including electronically stored information (“ESI”), pursuant
`
`to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 16, 18 U.S.C. § 3500, and the Government’s general
`
`obligation to produce exculpatory and impeachment material in criminal cases, all of which will
`
`be referred to herein as “Disclosure Material.’ The Government’s Disclosure Material may
`
`include material that (i) affects the privacy, confidentiality and business interests of individuals
`
`andentities; (ii) would impede,if prematurely disclosed, the Government’s ongoing investigation
`
`of uncharged individuals; (iii) would risk prejudicial pretrial publicity if publicly disseminated;
`
`2023.11.26
`
`

`

`Case 1:24-cr-00154-ER Document 42 Filed 05/08/24 Page 2 of 13
`
`(iv) may be produced with more limited redactions than would otherwise be necessary; and (v)
`
`that is not authorized to be disclosed to the public or disclosed beyond that whichis necessary for
`
`the defense of this criminal case.
`
`2. Sealed Material. Certain of the Government’s Disclosure Material, referred to herein
`
`as “Sealed Material,” contains information that identifies, or could lead to the identification of,
`
`witnesses who may be subject to intimidation or obstruction, and whose lives, persons, and
`
`property, as well as the lives, persons and property of loved ones, will be subject to risk of harm
`
`absent the protective considerations set forth herein or information that may revealtrade secrets or
`
`other information that may cause financial loss or other harm to a businessentity.
`
`3. Attorney’s Possession Only (“APO”) Material. Certain materials in this case raise a
`
`particularrisk of affecting the privacy or safety of victims or witnesses, or the confidentiality of
`
`ongoing investigations. Disclosure Material produced by the Government to the defendantorhis
`
`counsel that is either (1) designated in whole or in part as “Attorney’s Possession Only” by the
`
`Governmentin emails or communications to defense counsel, or (2) that includes a Bates or other
`
`label stating “Attorney’s Possession Only” or “APO” shall be deemed “APO Material.” Any
`
`material designated as APO Materialshall also be deemed Sealed Material.
`
`4,. Attorney’s Eyes Only (“AEO”) Material. Certain materials in this case raise a more
`
`significantrisk of affecting the privacy or safety of victims or witnesses, or the confidentiality of
`
`ongoing investigations. Disclosure Material produced by the Government to the defendantorhis
`
`counsel that is either (1) designated in whole or in part as “Attorney’s Eyes Only” by the
`
`Governmentin emails or communications to defense counsel, or (2) that includes a Bates or other
`
`label stating “Attorney’s Eyes Only” or “AEO”shall be deemed “AEO Material.” Any material
`
`designated as AEO Materialshall also be deemed Sealed Material.
`
`2023.11.26
`
`

`

`Case 1:24-cr-00154-ER Document 42 Filed 05/08/24 Page 3 of 13
`
`NOW, THEREFORE, FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN,IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
`
`Disclosure and Treatment
`
`5. Disclosure Material shall not be disclosed by the defendant or defense counsel,
`
`including any successor counsel (“the defense”) other than as set forth herein, and shall be used
`
`by the defense solely for purposes of defending this action. The defense shall not post any
`
`Disclosure Material on any Internet site or network site, including any social mediasite such as
`
`Facebook or Twitter, to which persons other than the parties hereto have access, and shall not
`
`disclose any Disclosure Material to the media.
`
`6. Sealed Material pertinent to any motion before the Court shouldinitially be filed under
`
`seal, absent consent of the Government or Order of the Court, and may be disclosed by defense
`
`counsel to:
`
`a. The defendant;
`
`b. Personnel for whose conduct defense counsel is responsible,
`
`i.e., personnel
`
`employed by orretained by counsel, as needed for purposes of defending this action; and
`
`c. Prospective witnesses for purposes of defendingthis action.
`
`7. APO Material received by defense counsel shall be maintained in a safe and secure
`
`mannerby defense counsel and any personnel for whose conduct defense counsel is responsible;
`
`shall not be possessed by the defendant, except in the presence of the defendant’s counsel and any
`
`personnel for whose conduct defense counsel is responsible; and shall not be disclosed in any form
`
`by the defendant, his counsel, or any personnel for whose conduct defense counsel is responsible
`
`except as set forth herein.
`
`8. AEO Material received by defense counsel shall be maintained on an attorney’s eyes
`
`only basis, and the defense shall not share any AEO Material orthe content of the AEO Material
`
`2023.11.26
`
`

`

`Case 1:24-cr-00154-ER Document 42 Filed 05/08/24 Page 4 of 13
`
`with any other persons, including the defendant, except for any personnel for whose conduct
`
`defense counselis responsible.
`
`Other Provisions
`
`9. This Order does not prevent the disclosure of any Disclosure Material in any hearing
`
`or trial held in this action, or to any judge or magistrate judge, for purposes of this action but,
`
`except to the extent provided otherwise below, shall not be disclosed or used in any form in any
`
`othercivil litigation, arbitration, or other private or alternative dispute resolution. All filings
`
`should comply with the privacy protection provisions of Fed. R. Crim. P. 49.1 and the above
`
`provisions.
`
`10. The Government’s designation of material will be controlling absent contrary order of
`
`the Court. The parties shall meet and confer regarding any dispute over such designations, after
`
`which the defense may seek de-designation by the Court. The Government may authorize, in
`
`writing, disclosure of Disclosure Material beyond that otherwise permitted by this Order without
`
`further Orderof this Court.
`
`11. The defense shall provide a copy of this Order to prospective witnesses and persons
`
`retained by counsel to whom the defense has disclosed Disclosure Material. All such persons shall
`
`be subject to the terms of this Order. Defense counselshall maintain a record of what information
`
`has been disclosed to which such persons.
`
`12. Except for Disclosure Material that has been made part of the record of this case, the
`
`defense shall return to the Government or securely destroy or delete all Disclosure Material,
`
`including any ESI, within 30 days of the expiration of the period for direct appeal from any verdict
`
`in the above-captioned case; the period of direct appeal from any order dismissing any of the
`
`charges in the above-captioned case; and the granting of any motion made on behalf of the
`
`2023.11.26
`
`

`

`Case 1:24-cr-00154-ER Document 42 Filed 05/08/24 Page 5 of 13
`
`Governmentdismissing any charges in the above-captioned case, whicheverdateis later, subject
`
`to defense counsel’s obligation to retain client files under the Rules of Professional Conduct. If
`
`Disclosure Material is provided to any personnel for whose conduct defense counselis responsible
`
`or prospective witnesses, defense counsel shall make reasonable efforts to seek the return or
`
`destruction of such materials.
`
`13. The Governmenthas advised that information that may be subject to disclosurein this
`
`case may be contained within ESI that the Government has received, pursuant to warrants issued
`
`during the course ofthe investigation, from various computers, cellphones, and other devices and
`
`storage media. This ESI was obtained from: Jose Cesari, Antonio Gonzalez, and Justin Bruno.
`
`Upon consent of all counsel, the Government is authorized to disclose to defense counsel the
`
`entirety of such ESI, which shall be deemed Sealed Material unless otherwise designated.
`
`14, This Order places no restriction on a defendant’s use or disclosure of ESI or other
`
`Disclosure Material that originally belonged to the defendant.
`
`15. The defense shall not provide any Disclosure Material to any foreign persons or
`
`entities, except if such persons or entities are personnel for whose conduct defense counsel is
`
`responsible orif the Court authorizes such disclosure on a case-by-casebasis.
`
`2023.11.26
`
`

`

`Case 1:24-cr-00154-ER Document 42 Filed 05/08/24 Page 6 of 13
`
`Retention of Jurisdiction
`
`16. The provisions of this order shall not terminate at the conclusion of this criminal
`
`prosecution and the Court will retain jurisdiction to enforce this Order following termination of
`
`the case.
`
`AGREED AND CONSENTEDTO:
`
`DAMIAN WILLIAMS
`United States Attorney
`
`
`
`by: a Date:—April 29,2024
`Joseph H. Rosenb g
`Adam Z. Margulies
`Assistant United States Attorney
`
`
`
`SO ORDERED:
`
`Dated: New York, New York
`
`Ney &, 2024
`
`
`
`THE HONORABLE EDGARDO RAMOS
`UNITED STATESDISTRICT JUDGE
`
`2023.11.26
`
`

`

`Case 1:24-cr-00154-ER Document 42 Filed 05/08/24 Page 7 of 13
`
`
`
`Consent to Entry of Protective Order
`
`I, Danya Perry, Esq., have read and reviewed the proposed Protective Orderin the case of United
`States v. Jose Cesari, et al., 24 Cr. 154 (ER), and I consentto the entry of the Order on behalf of
`my client, Kemar Bonitto.
`
`Dog
`
`
`Danya Perry, Esq.
`Attorney for Defendant KemarBonitto
`
`2023.11.26
`
`

`

`Case 1:24-cr-00154-ER Document 42 Filed 05/08/24 Page 8 of 13
`
`Consent to Entry of Protective Order
`
`I, Sylvie Levine, Esq., have read and reviewed the proposed Protective Order in the case of United
`States v. Jose Cesari, et al., 24 Cr. 154 (ER), and I consent to the entry of the Order on behalf of
`myclient, Justin Bruno.
`
`
`
`Sylvie Levine, Esq.
`Attorney for Defendant Justin Bruno
`
`2023.11.26
`
`

`

`Case 1:24-cr-00154-ER Document 42 Filed 05/08/24 Page 9 of 13
`
`
`
`Consent to Entry of Protective Order
`
`I, Jeremy Schneider, Esq., have read and reviewed the proposed Protective Orderin the case of
`United States v. Jose Cesari, et al., 24 Cr. 154 (ER), and I consent to the entry of the Order on
`behalf of my client, Miguel Cintron.
`
`
`
`2023.11.26
`
`

`

`Case 1:24-cr-00154-ER Document 42 Filed 05/08/24 Page 10 of 13
`
`Consent to Entry of Protective Order
`
`I, Ezra Spilke, Esq., have read and reviewed the proposed Protective Orderin the case of United
`States v. Jose Cesari, et al., 24 Cr. 154 (ER), and I consent to the entry of the Order on behalf of
`my client, Antonio Gonzalez.
`
`
`Ezfa Spilke, Esq.
`Attorney for Defendant Antonio Gonzalez
`
`2023.11.26
`
`

`

`Case 1:24-cr-00154-ER Document 42 Filed 05/08/24 Page 11 of 13
`
`Consent to Entry of Protective Order
`
`I, Richard Rosenberg, Esq,, have read and reviewed the proposed Protective Orderin the case of
`United States v. Jose Cesari, et al., 24 Cr. 154 (ER), and I consent to the entry of the Order on
`behalf of my client, Luis Izquierdo, a/k/a “Luis Zapata.”
`
` N
`Richard Rosenberg, Esq.
`Attorney for Defendant Luis Izquierdo
`
`2023.11.26
`
`

`

`Case 1:24-cr-00154-ER Document 42 Filed 05/08/24 Page 12 of 13
`
`Consent to Entry of Protective Order
`
`I, Joshua Horowitz, Esq., have read and reviewed the proposed Protective Order in the case of
`United States v. Jose Cesari, et al., 24 Cr. 154 (ER), and I consent to the entry of the Order on
`
`behalfofmyclient,WayJohnson,a/k/a“Waka.”
`
`5.2.24
`
`Joshua Horowitz, Esq.
`Attorney for Defendant Wakiem Johnson
`
`2023.11.26
`
`

`

`Case 1:24-cr-00154-ER Document 42 Filed 05/08/24 Page 13 of 13
`
`Consent to Entry of Protective Order
`
`I, David Touger, Esq., have read and reviewed the proposed Protective Orderin the case of United
`States v. Jose Cesari, et al.,24 Cr. 154 (ER), and I consent to the entry of the Order on behalf of
`my client, Deylin Martinez-Guerrero.
`
`
`David
`“ESQ.
`Attorney for Defendant Deylin Martinez-Guerrero
`
`2023.11.26
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.