`
`
`
`‘USDC SDNY
`f
`DOCUMENT
`ELECTRONICALLY FILED If.
`DOC #:
`we
`DATE FILED: aninou
`
`24-CR-00154 (ER-5)
`
`ORDER
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
`eeeeeneeeneeexX
`
`UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
`
`-against-
`
`KEMAR BONITTO,
`
`Defendant.
`
`perenneeennenenanenneneneneceneneneneenaneemernnnnens4
`
`SARAH NETBURN,United States Magistrate Judge:
`
`This Orderis entered, pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 5(f) and the Due
`
`Process Protections Act, Pub. L. No 116-182, 134 Stat. 894 (Oct. 21, 2020), to confirm the
`
`Government’s disclosure obligations under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), and its
`
`progeny, and to summarize the possible consequencesofviolating those obligations.
`
`The Government must disclose to the defense all information “favorable to an accused”
`
`that is “material either to guilt or to punishment” and that is known to the Government. Id.
`
`at 87. This obligation applies regardless of whether the defendant requests this information
`
`or whetherthe information would itself constitute admissible evidence, The Government
`
`shall disclose such information to the defense promptly after its existence becomes knownto
`
`the Governmentso that the defense may make effective use of the information in the
`
`preparation of its case.
`
`Aspart of these obligations, the Government must disclose any information that can be
`
`used to impeachthe trial testimony of a Government witness within the meaning of Giglio v.
`
`United States, 405 U.S. 150 (1972), and its progeny. Such information must be disclosed
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:24-cr-00154-ER Document 36 Filed 04/11/24 Page 2 of 3
`
`sufficiently in advanceoftrial in order for the defendant to make effective useofit at trial or
`
`at such other time as the Court may order.!
`
`The foregoing obligations are continuing ones and apply to materials that become
`
`known to the Governmentin the future. These obligations also apply to informationthatis
`
`otherwise subject to disclosure regardless of whether the Governmentcreditsit.
`
`In the event the Governmentbelieves that a disclosure under this Order would
`
`compromise witness safety, victim rights, national security, a sensitive law-enforcement
`
`technique, or any other substantial governmentinterest, it may apply to the Courtfor a
`
`modification of its obligations, which may include in camera review or withholding or
`
`subjecting to a protective orderali or part of the information otherwise subject to
`
`disclosure.”
`
`For purposesof this Order, the Governmenthas an affirmative obligation to seek all
`
`information subject to disclosure underthis Order from all current or former federal, state,
`
`and local prosecutors, law enforcementofficers, and other officers who have participated in
`
`the prosecution,or investigation that led to the prosecution, of the offense or offenses with
`
`which the defendant is charged.
`
`If the Governmentfails to comply with this Order, the Court, in addition to ordering
`
`production of the information, may:
`
`(1) specify the terms and conditions of such production;
`
`(2) grant a continuance;
`
`(3) impose evidentiary sanctions;
`
`' This Order does not purport to set forth an exhaustive list of the Government’s disclosure obligations.
`2 The Classified Information Procedures Act sets forth separate procedures to be followedin the event that the
`Governmentbelieves matters relating to classified information may arise in connection with the prosecution. See 18
`U.S.C. app. 3 §§ 1 ef seq.
`
`
`
`Case 1:24-cr-00154-ER Document 36 Filed 04/11/24 Page 3 of 3
`
`(4) impose contempt or other sanctions on any lawyer responsible for violations of the
`
`Government’s disclosure obligations, or refer the matter to disciplinary authorities;
`
`(5) dismiss charges before trial or vacate a conviction after trial or a guilty plea; or
`
`(6) enter any other order that is just under the circumstances.
`
`SO ORDERED.
`
`DATED:
`
`April 11, 2024
`New York, New York
`
`SARAH NETBURN
`United States Magistrate Judge
`
`
`
`
`
`

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ ChargeStill Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site