`
`
`
`-against-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`USDC SDNY
`DOCUMENT
`
`ELECTRONICALLY FILED
`DOC #: __________________
`
`DATE FILED: __4/4/2025___
`
`
`23 Cr. 118 (AT)
`
`ORDER REGARDING
`LETTERS AND MOTIONS
`FROM NONPARTIES
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
`UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
`
`
`
`MILES GUO, KIN MING JE,
`and YVETTE WANG,
`
`
`
`
`
` Defendants.
`ANALISA TORRES, District Judge:
`
`
`
`By order dated April 3, 2025, the Court explained the limited circumstances in which a
`nonparty may file a letter, motion, or other filing in a criminal case. ECF No. 528. The Court
`discussed specific filings by individuals who have identified themselves as Chunk Chyi and Bei
`Bei Zhu. Id. The Court explained why these individuals’ filings were improper and, in some
`instances, could be construed as threatening, harassing, or—at a minimum—vexatious. See id.
`The Court advised that further improper filings could subject the filers to a permanent filing
`injunction. See id.
`
`In the twenty-four hours since the Court’s order was docketed, Chunk Chyi and Bei Bei
`Zhu have filed six additional improper filings. See ECF Nos. 553–57, 582. Accordingly, the
`Court finds that Chunk Chyi and Bei Bei Zhu are vexatious nonparties who have abused the
`public’s right of access to the Court in clear violation of Court orders. The Court ORDERS that
`any further filing by Chunk Chyi or Bei Bei Zhu, or any aliases or representatives thereof, shall
`be screened and docketed only if the Court determines that the filing is made in accordance with
`applicable court rules, in good faith, and with a proper basis under the law.
`
`The requests filed by nonparty Carolyn Sun at ECF Nos. 559 and 568 are DENIED for
`the reasons stated in the Court’s April 3 order.
`
`The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motions at ECF Nos. 519,
`557, 559, and 582.
`
`
`SO ORDERED.
`
`Dated: April 4, 2025
` New York, New York
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ ChargeStill Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site