`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
`
`FRANK DIAZ, TABET DIAZ, and PIERRE-
`LOUIS SEA MOSS LLC,
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`
` -against-
`
`
`GERARDO RAY, TAMIKA RAY, MAJESTIC
`RAY’S LLC, AND MAJESTIC RAY’S LLC &
`PIERRE-LOUIS SEA MOSS LLC,
`
`Defendants.
`
`Case No. 22-CV-10404-VF
`
`
`
`
`ANSWER
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendants, Gerardo Ray, Tamika Ray, and Majestic Ray’s LLC (“Defendants”), by and
`
`through their attorney, Barry E. Janay, Esq., hereby submit their Answer to Plaintiffs’ Complaint
`
`as follows:
`
`ANSWER
`
`1.
`
`Deny generally each and every allegation made in Plaintiffs’ Complaint except
`
`for those specifically admitted.
`
`2.
`
`Admit paragraph 1 to the extent that it details Plaintiffs’ business independent
`
`from Defendants’ business and provides general information on sea moss.
`
`3.
`
`Deny the claims made in paragraph 2 as to the existence of any partnership
`
`agreement or meeting of the minds between the parties.
`
`4.
`
`Deny the claims made in paragraph 3 as to the existence of any partnership
`
`agreement or meeting of the minds between the parties.
`
`5.
`
`Deny the claims made in paragraph 4 as to the existence of any partnership
`
`agreement or meeting of the minds between the parties.
`
`6.
`
`Deny the claims made in paragraph 5 as to the existence of any partnership
`
`agreement or meeting of the minds between the parties.
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-10404-VF Document 23 Filed 03/10/23 Page 2 of 13
`
`7.
`
`Deny the claims made in paragraph 6 as to the existence of any partnership
`
`agreement or meeting of the minds between the parties.
`
`8.
`
`Deny the claims asserted in paragraph 7 and the relief requested.
`
`9.
`
`10.
`
`11.
`
`12.
`
`13.
`
`14.
`
`15.
`
`The Parties
`
`Admit paragraph 8 as to the identity of the parties.
`
`Admit paragraph 9 as to the identity of the parties.
`
`Admit paragraph 10 as to the identity of the parties.
`
`Deny paragraph 11 as to the existence of the partnership business.
`
`Admit paragraph 12 as to the identity of the parties.
`
`Admit paragraph 13 as to the identity of the parties.
`
`Admit paragraphs 14 as to the identity of the parties.
`
`Jurisdiction and Venue
`
`16.
`
`Deny the claims of jurisdiction set forth in paragraph 15 insofar as they relate to
`
`general jurisdiction of the court over the parties because Plaintiffs have stated no viable claims.
`
`17.
`
`Deny the claims of jurisdiction set forth in paragraph 16 insofar as they relate to
`
`general jurisdiction of the court over the parties because Plaintiffs have stated no viable claims.
`
`18.
`
`Deny the claims of jurisdiction set forth in paragraph 17 insofar as they relate to
`
`supplemental jurisdiction of the court over the parties because Plaintiffs have stated no viable
`
`claims.
`
`19.
`
`Deny information or knowledge sufficient to for a belief as to the truth of the
`
`claims set forth in paragraph 18 insofar as they relate to whether venue is proper.
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-10404-VF Document 23 Filed 03/10/23 Page 3 of 13
`
`20.
`
`Deny the claims of personal jurisdiction set forth in paragraph 19 insofar as they
`
`relate to personal jurisdiction of the court over the parties because Plaintiffs have stated no viable
`
`claims.
`
`Plaintiffs’ Statement of Facts
`
`21.
`
`Deny paragraph 20 as to the agreement of the parties to create and the actual
`
`creation of a partnership agreement or partnership business.
`
`22.
`
`Deny paragraph 21 as to the agreement of the parties to create and the actual
`
`creation of a partnership agreement or partnership business.
`
`23.
`
`Deny paragraph 22 as to the agreement of the parties to create and the actual
`
`creation of a partnership agreement or partnership business.
`
`24.
`
`Deny paragraph 23 as to the agreement of the parties to create and the actual
`
`creation of a partnership agreement or partnership business.
`
`25.
`
`Deny paragraph 24 as to the agreement to share profits and losses and the
`
`existence or applicability of the alleged partnership agreement.
`
`26.
`
`Deny paragraphs 25 regarding the process of creating the alleged partnership
`
`agreement, the terms Plaintiffs claim were agreed upon, and the existence of such partnership
`
`agreement.
`
`27.
`
`Deny paragraph 26 regarding the process of creating the alleged partnership
`
`agreement, the terms Plaintiffs claim were agreed upon, and the existence of such partnership
`
`agreement.
`
`28.
`
`Deny paragraph 27 including subsections thereof regarding the process of creating
`
`the alleged partnership agreement, the terms Plaintiffs claim were agreed upon, and the existence
`
`of such partnership agreement.
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-10404-VF Document 23 Filed 03/10/23 Page 4 of 13
`
`29.
`
`Deny paragraph 28 regarding the process of creating the alleged partnership
`
`agreement, the terms Plaintiffs claim were agreed upon, and the existence of such partnership
`
`agreement.
`
`30.
`
`Deny knowledge and information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the
`
`allegations contained in paragraph 29.
`
`31.
`
`Deny knowledge and information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the
`
`allegations in paragraph 30 as to the location where the sea moss was stored and where
`
`packaging occurred and deny the existence of the partnership business.
`
`32.
`
`33.
`
`34.
`
`Deny paragraph 31 alleging Defendants’ wrongful actions in its entirety.
`
`Deny paragraph 32 alleging Defendants’ wrongful actions in its entirety.
`
`Admit in part and deny in part paragraph 33. Admit to the extent that the
`
`Defendants did carry on their business past the date alleged but deny the allegations that such
`
`partnership did exist at that time or any time prior, that Plaintiffs were somehow entitled to
`
`profits from and involvement in Defendants’ independent business operations and
`
`responsibilities, and that there was any agreement between the parties as to the existence of a
`
`partnership and any rights, obligations, or duties associated.
`
`35.
`
`Admit in part and deny in part paragraph 34. Admit to the extent that the
`
`Defendants did carry on their business past the date alleged but deny the allegations that such
`
`partnership did exist at that time or any time prior, that Plaintiffs were somehow entitled to
`
`profits from and involvement in Defendants’ independent business operations and
`
`responsibilities, and that there was any agreement between the parties as to the existence of a
`
`partnership and any rights, obligations, or duties associated.
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-10404-VF Document 23 Filed 03/10/23 Page 5 of 13
`
`36.
`
`Admit in part and deny in part paragraph 35. Admit to the extent that the
`
`Defendants did carry on their business past the date alleged but deny the allegations that such
`
`partnership did exist at that time or any time prior, that Plaintiffs were somehow entitled to
`
`profits from and involvement in Defendants’ independent business operations and
`
`responsibilities, and that there was any agreement between the parties as to the existence of a
`
`partnership and any rights, obligations, or duties associated.
`
`37.
`
`Admit in part and deny in part paragraph 36. Admit to the extent that the
`
`Defendants did carry on their business past the date alleged but deny the allegations that such
`
`partnership did exist at that time or any time prior, that Plaintiffs were somehow entitled to
`
`profits from and involvement in Defendants’ independent business operations and
`
`responsibilities, and that there was any agreement between the parties as to the existence of a
`
`partnership and any rights, obligations, or duties associated.
`
`38.
`
`Admit in part and deny in part paragraph 37. Admit to the extent that the
`
`Defendants did carry on their business past the date alleged but deny the allegations that such
`
`partnership did exist at that time or any time prior, that Plaintiffs were somehow entitled to
`
`profits from and involvement in Defendants’ independent business operations and
`
`responsibilities, and that there was any agreement between the parties as to the existence of a
`
`partnership and any rights, obligations, or duties associated.
`
`39.
`
`Admit in part and deny in part paragraph 38. Admit to the extent that the
`
`Defendants did carry on their business past the date alleged but deny the allegations that such
`
`partnership did exist at that time or any time prior, that Plaintiffs were somehow entitled to
`
`profits from and involvement in Defendants’ independent business operations and
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-10404-VF Document 23 Filed 03/10/23 Page 6 of 13
`
`responsibilities, and that there was any agreement between the parties as to the existence of a
`
`partnership and any rights, obligations, or duties associated.
`
`40.
`
`Admit in part and deny in part paragraph 39. Admit to the extent that the
`
`Defendants did carry on their business past the date alleged but deny the allegations that such
`
`partnership did exist at that time or any time prior, that Plaintiffs were somehow entitled to
`
`profits from and involvement in Defendants’ independent business operations and
`
`responsibilities, and that there was any agreement between the parties as to the existence of a
`
`partnership and any rights, obligations, or duties associated.
`
`41.
`
`Admit in part and deny in part paragraph 40. Admit regarding Ms. Haddad’s
`
`cease and desist letter, the contents of such letter, and that Defendants carried on their business
`
`independent of Plaintiffs but deny paragraph 40 regarding the timeline of the events at issue,
`
`existence and breach of the alleged partnership agreement, and alleged infringement.
`
`42.
`
`Admit in part and deny in part paragraph 41. Admit regarding Ms. Haddad’s
`
`cease and desist letter, the contents of such letter, and that Defendants carried on their business
`
`independent of Plaintiffs but deny paragraph 41 regarding the timeline of the events at issue,
`
`existence and breach of the alleged partnership agreement, and alleged infringement.
`
`43.
`
`Deny knowledge and information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the
`
`allegations contained in paragraph 42 including subsections thereof.
`
`Plaintiffs’ Statements Regarding the Pierre-Louis Sea Moss Trademark and the Sea Moss
`
`Distribution Business
`
`44.
`
`Deny knowledge and information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the
`
`allegations contained in paragraph 43.
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-10404-VF Document 23 Filed 03/10/23 Page 7 of 13
`
`45.
`
`Deny knowledge and information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the
`
`allegations contained in paragraph 44.
`
`46.
`
`Deny knowledge and information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the
`
`allegations contained in paragraph 45.
`
`47.
`
`Deny knowledge and information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the
`
`allegations contained in paragraph 46.
`
`Plaintiffs’ Statements Regarding the Pierre Louis Copyright
`
`Deny paragraph 47 regarding creation of Plaintiffs’ alleged copyright.
`
`Admit in part and deny in part paragraph 48. Admit to the extent that Plaintiffs
`
`48.
`
`49.
`
`have provided a copyright registration as an Exhibit but deny the veracity and legitimacy of the
`
`document’s content.
`
`50.
`
`Admit in part and deny in part paragraph 49. Admit only insofar as the allegations
`
`that Defendants were operating their business as of the dates listed but deny the assertions
`
`regarding the existence of a valid copyright and associated infringing use.
`
`51.
`
`Admit in part and deny in part paragraph 50. Admit only insofar as the allegations
`
`that Defendants were operating their business as of the dates listed but deny the assertions
`
`regarding the existence of a valid copyright and associated infringing use.
`
`52.
`
`Admit in part and deny in part paragraph 51. Admit to the extent that Defendants
`
`did use the allegedly copyright protected material on their product bags on the date listed.
`
`
`
`FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION
`(Breach of Contract)
`
`53.
`
`Deny the allegations contained in paragraph 52.
`
`54.
`
`Deny the allegations contained in paragraph 53.
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-10404-VF Document 23 Filed 03/10/23 Page 8 of 13
`
`55.
`
`Deny the allegations contained in paragraph 54.
`
`56.
`
`Deny the allegations contained in paragraph 55.
`
`57.
`
`Deny the allegations contained in paragraph 56.
`
`58.
`
`Deny the allegations contained in paragraph 57.
`
`
`
`SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION
`(Breach of Fiduciary Duty)
`
`59.
`
`Deny the allegations contained in paragraph 59.
`
`60.
`
`Deny the allegations contained in paragraph 60.
`
`61.
`
`Deny the allegations contained in paragraph 61.
`
`62.
`
`Deny the allegations contained in paragraph 62.
`
`63.
`
`Deny the allegations contained in paragraph 63.
`
`64.
`
`Deny the allegations contained in paragraph 64.
`
`65.
`
`66.
`
`Deny the allegations contained in paragraph 65.
`
`Deny the allegations contained in paragraph 66.
`
`67.
`
`Deny the allegations contained in paragraph 67.
`
`68.
`
`Deny the allegations contained in paragraph 68.
`
`69.
`
`Deny the allegations contained in paragraph 69.
`
`70.
`
`Deny the allegations contained in paragraph 70.
`
`
`
`THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION
`(Alternative to First Cause of Action: Constructive Trust)
`
`71.
`
`Deny the allegations contained in paragraph 72.
`
`72.
`
`Deny the allegations contained in paragraph 73.
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-10404-VF Document 23 Filed 03/10/23 Page 9 of 13
`
`73.
`
`Deny the allegations contained in paragraph 74.
`
`74.
`
`Deny the allegations contained in paragraph 75.
`
`75.
`
`Deny the allegations contained in paragraph 76.
`
`76.
`
`Deny the allegations contained in paragraph 77.
`
`77.
`
`Deny the allegations contained in paragraph 78.
`
`78.
`
`Deny the allegations contained in paragraph 79.
`
`79.
`
`Deny the allegations contained in paragraph 80.
`
`
`
`FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION
`(Trademark Infringement)
`
`80.
`
`Deny the allegations contained in paragraph 81.
`
`81.
`
`Deny the allegations contained in paragraph 82.
`
`82.
`
`Deny the allegations contained in paragraph 83.
`
`83.
`
`Deny knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the
`
`allegations contained in paragraph 84.
`
`84.
`
`Deny the allegations contained in paragraph 85.
`
`85.
`
`Deny knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the
`
`allegations contained in paragraph 86.
`
`86.
`
`Deny the allegations contained in paragraph 87.
`
`87.
`
`Deny the allegations contained in paragraph 88.
`
`88.
`
`Deny the allegations contained in paragraph 89.
`
`89.
`
`Deny the allegations contained in paragraph 90.
`
`
`
`FIFTH CAUSE OF ACTION
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-10404-VF Document 23 Filed 03/10/23 Page 10 of 13
`
`(Copyright Infringement)
`
`90.
`
`Deny the allegations contained in paragraph 92.
`
`91.
`
`Deny the allegations in paragraph 93.
`
`92.
`
`Deny knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the
`
`allegations in paragraph 94 regarding the presence of the allegedly copyrighted Pierre Louis Sea
`
`Moss LLC on Defendants’ product packaging but deny the assertion of the existence of a
`
`partnership between the parties.
`
`93.
`
`Deny the allegations in paragraph 95.
`
`94.
`
`Deny the allegations in paragraph 96.
`
`95.
`
`Deny the allegations in paragraph 97.
`
`
`
`
`
`AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES
`
`Defendants assert the following affirmative and other defenses, without assuming the
`
`burden of proof with respect to any issue as to which applicable law places the burden of proof
`
`upon Plaintiffs. Defendants expressly reserve the right to supplement and/or amend any or all of
`
`the following defenses, as warranted by discovery or other investigation, or as justice may
`
`require.
`
`FIRST AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`Plaintiffs’ Complaint fails to state any viable causes of action against Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`SECOND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`Plaintiffs’ Complaint fails to state any cause of action upon which relief can be granted.
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-10404-VF Document 23 Filed 03/10/23 Page 11 of 13
`
`THIRD AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`Plaintiffs’ claims are barred by the doctrine of unclean hands.
`
`FOURTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`Plaintiffs’ damages, if any, were caused by Plaintiffs’ own actions or inactions.
`
`
`
`
`
`FIFTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`Plaintiffs’ claims are fraudulent in their assertions.
`
`
`
`SIXTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`Plaintiffs’ claims are barred, in whole or in part, because Defendants acted lawfully at all times.
`
`
`
`SEVENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`Plaintiffs’ infringement claims fail due to the existence of an explicit and implicit license for use
`
`
`
`
`
`of any and all intellectual property at issue.
`
`EIGHTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`Plaintiffs’ claims only appear to have merit as a result of their own fraudulent conduct or
`
`fraudulent misrepresentations.
`
`NINTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`Plaintiffs’ claims are barred, in whole or in part, because Plaintiffs have not suffered and injury,
`
`directly or indirectly, as a result of the matters alleged in the complaint.
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-10404-VF Document 23 Filed 03/10/23 Page 12 of 13
`
`TENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`Plaintiffs’ claims are barred because no benefit was conferred upon Defendants under the
`
`preliminary distribution agreement, thus Plaintiffs were unjustly enriched.
`
`
`
`ELEVENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
`
`Plaintiffs acquiesced to Defendants’ actions.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: Livingston, New Jersey
`March 10th, 2023,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Signature:
`
`Email:
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`
`______________________
`Barry E. Janay, Esq. (BJ9311)
`Law Offices of Barry E. Janay, P.C.
`90 Broad Street, 25th Floor
`New York, NY 10004
`bjanay@lobej.com and
`azeitz@lobej.com and
`asanchez@lobej.com
`
`
`
`
`
`Barry Janay
`
`bjanay@lobej.com
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-10404-VF Document 23 Filed 03/10/23 Page 13 of 13
`
`Answer - 10 Mar 23
`
`Final Audit Report
`
`2023-03-10
`
`Created:
`
`By:
`
`Status:
`
`2023-03-10
`
`Angelina Sanchez (asanchez@lobej.com)
`
`Signed
`
`Transaction ID:
`
`CBJCHBCAABAAA2E4JfAhI_C86J8U3s_E52JhtSvJv1CR
`
`"Answer - 10 Mar 23" History
`Document created by Angelina Sanchez (asanchez@lobej.com)
`2023-03-10 - 7:13:18 PM GMT
`
`Document emailed to Barry Janay (bjanay@lobej.com) for signature
`2023-03-10 - 7:14:36 PM GMT
`
`Email viewed by Barry Janay (bjanay@lobej.com)
`2023-03-10 - 8:10:05 PM GMT
`
`Document e-signed by Barry Janay (bjanay@lobej.com)
`Signature Date: 2023-03-10 - 8:18:51 PM GMT - Time Source: server
`
`Agreement completed.
`2023-03-10 - 8:18:51 PM GMT
`
`