`Case 1:22-cv-02229-MKV Document 42-4 Filed 09/06/22 Page 1 of 75
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT C
`EXHIBIT C
`
`
`
`
`
`(12) United States Patent
`YaWorski et al.
`
`(10) Patent No.:
`(45) Date of Patent:
`
`US 8,822,668 B2
`*Sep. 2, 2014
`
`USOO8822668B2
`
`(54) LIPID FORMULATIONS FOR NUCLEICACID
`DELIVERY
`
`(71) Applicant: Protiva Biotherapeutics, Inc., Burnaby
`(CA)
`
`(72) Inventors: Edward Yaworski, Maple Ridge (CA);
`Kieu Lam, Surrey (CA); Lloyd Jeffs,
`Delta (CA); Lorne Palmer, Vancouver
`s
`(CA); Ian MacLachlan, Mission (CA)
`(73) Assignee: Protiva Biotherapeutics, Inc., Burnaby
`BC (CA)
`
`(*) Notice:
`
`Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this
`patent is extended or adjusted under 35
`U.S.C. 154(b) by 0 days.
`This patent is Subject to a terminal dis-
`claimer.
`
`(21) Appl. No.: 13/928,309
`9
`Jun. 26, 2013
`
`(22) Filed:
`
`8, 1997 Busch et al.
`5,656,743 A
`5,674,908 A 10, 1997 Haces et al.
`5,703,055 A 12/1997 Felgner et al.
`5,705.385 A
`1/1998 Ballv et al.
`5,736,392 A
`4, 1998 Aiy Nelson et al.
`5,820,873. A 10/1998 Choi et al.
`5,877,220 A
`3, 1999 Schwartz et al.
`5,885,613 A
`3, 1999 Holland et al.
`5,958,901 A
`9/1999 Dwyer et al.
`5,976,567 A 11/1999 Wheeler et al.
`5,981,501 A 11/1999 Wheeler et al.
`6,020,202. A
`2/2000 Jessee
`6,020,526 A
`2/2000 Schwartz et al.
`6,034,135 A
`3/2000 Schwartz et al.
`6,051,429 A
`4/2000 Hawley-Nelson et al.
`6,075,012 A
`6/2000 Gebeyehu et al.
`6,165,501 A 12/2000 Tirosh et al.
`6,172,049 B1
`1, 2001 E.A.
`6,251,939 B1
`6/2001 Schwartz et al.
`6.284.267 B1
`9/2001 Aneja
`6,287,591 B1
`9/2001 Semple et al.
`6,339,173 B1
`1/2002 Schwartz et al.
`6,376,248 B1
`4/2002 Hawley-Nelson et al.
`6,534,484 B1
`3/2003 Wheeler et al.
`6,586.410 B1
`7/2003 Wheeler et al.
`6,638,529 B2 10/2003 Schwartz et al.
`(Continued)
`
`(65)
`
`Prior Publication Data
`
`FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`US 2014/OO65228A1
`
`Mar. 6, 2014
`
`CA
`CA
`
`4f1999
`2309.727 A1
`2271582 A1 11, 1999
`(Continued)
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`Arpicco, S. et al., “Preparation and Characterization of Novel
`Cationic Lipids Developed for Gene Transfection.” Proceed. Int’l
`Symp. Control. Rel. Bioact. Mater. (Controlled Release Society,
`Inc.), 1999, vol. 26, pp. 759-760.
`Arpicco, S. et al., “Synthesis, characterization and transfection activ
`ity of new Saturated and unsaturated cationic lipids.” IL Farmaco,
`(51) Int. Cl.
`2004, vol. 59, pp. 869-878.
`C7H 2L/04
`(2006.01)
`Ballas, N., et al., "Liposomes bearing a quaternary ammonium deter
`(52) U.S. Cl.
`gent as an efficient vehicle for functional transfer of TMV-RNA into
`USPC ......................................................... sagas plan
`toplasts." Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1988, vol. 939,
`(58) Field of Classification Search
`Erin, M.. “Step Taken Toward Improved Vectors for Gene Trans
`USPC ......................................................... 536/24.5
`fer.” Science, 1994, vol. 266, p. 1326.
`See application file for complete search history.
`Bass, “The Short Answer,” Nature, 2001, 411: 428-9.
`
`Related U.S. Application Data
`(63) Continuation of application No. 13/253,917, filed on
`Oct. 5, 2011, now Pat. No. 8,492,359, which is a
`continuation of application No. 12/424,367, filed on
`Apr. 15, 2009, now Pat. No. 8,058,069.
`Provisional application No. 61/045.228, filed on Apr.
`15, 2008.
`
`(60)
`
`(56)
`
`References Cited
`
`(Continued)
`
`Case 1:22-cv-02229-MKV Document 42-4 Filed 09/06/22 Page 2 of 75
`
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`4,394,448 A
`T. 1983 Szoka, Jr. et al.
`4,438,052 A
`3, 1984 Weder et al.
`4,515,736 A
`5, 1985 Deamer
`4,598,051 A
`7, 1986 Papahadjopoulos et al.
`4,897,355 A
`1/1990 Eppstein et al.
`5,013,556 A
`5, 1991 Woodle et al.
`5,171,678 A 12/1992 Behr et al.
`5,208,036 A
`5/1993 Eppstein et al.
`5,225,212 A
`7, 1993 Martin et al.
`5,264,618 A 1 1/1993 Felgner et al.
`5,283,185 A
`2/1994 Epand et al.
`5,320,906 A
`6/1994 Eley et al.
`5,334,761 A
`8/1994 Gebeyehu et al.
`5,545,412 A
`8/1996 Eppstein et al.
`5,578.475 A 11/1996 Jessee et al.
`5,627,159 A
`5, 1997 Shih et al.
`5,641,662 A
`6, 1997 Debs et al.
`
`5,279,833 A
`
`1/1994 Rose
`
`Primary Examiner — Brian Whiteman
`(74) Attorney, Agent, or Firm — Kilpatrick Townsend &
`Stockton LLP
`
`ABSTRACT
`(57)
`The present invention provides novel, stable lipid particles
`comprising one or more active agents or therapeutic agents,
`methods of making the lipid particles, and methods of deliv
`ering and/or administering the lipid particles. More particu
`larly, the present invention provides stable nucleic acid-lipid
`particles (SNALP) comprising a nucleic acid (such as one or
`more interfering RNA), methods of making the SNALP, and
`methods of delivering and/or administering the SNALP.
`
`-
`
`-
`
`-
`
`-
`
`-
`
`23 Claims, 24 Drawing Sheets
`
`
`
`US 8,822,668 B2
`Page 2
`
`(56)
`
`References Cited
`
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`WO
`WO
`WO
`WO
`WO
`WO
`WO
`WO
`WO
`WO
`WO
`WO
`WO
`WO
`WO
`WO
`WO
`WO
`WO
`WO
`WO
`WO
`WO
`WO
`WO
`WO
`WO
`
`96.40964 A2 12, 1996
`96.41873 A1 12, 1996
`98.51285 A2 11/1998
`OO?O3683 A2
`1, 2000
`00.15820 A1
`3f2000
`OO62813 A2 10, 2000
`01.053.74 A1
`1/2001
`O1/O5873 A1
`1/2001
`01.93836
`12/2001
`02A34236 A2
`5, 2002
`02/087541 A1
`11, 2002
`O3,O97805 A2 11/2003
`2004/065546 A2
`8, 2004
`2004/110499 A1 12/2004
`2005/007 196 A2
`1/2005
`2005/026372 A1
`3/2005
`2005/035764 A1
`4/2005
`2005/120152 A2 12/2005
`2006/002538 A1
`1/2006
`2006/053430 A1
`5.2006
`2007/056861 A1
`5/2007
`2009/086558 A1
`T 2009
`2009/11 1658 A2
`9, 2009
`2010/042877 A1
`4, 2010
`2010/048.228 A2
`4, 2010
`2010/088537 A2
`8, 2010
`2010, 105209 A1
`9, 2010
`
`1 1/2003 Eiblet al.
`6,649,780 B1
`6,671,393 B2 12/2003 Hays et al.
`6,696,424 B1
`2/2004 Wheeler
`6,815,432 B2 11/2004 Wheeler et al.
`6,858,224 B2
`2/2005 Wheeler et al.
`7,166,745 B1
`1/2007 Chu et al.
`7,422,902 B1
`9/2008 Wheeler et al.
`7,479,573 B2
`1/2009 Chu et al.
`7,601,872 B2 10/2009 Chu et al.
`7,687,070 B2
`3/2010 Gebeyehu et al.
`7,745,651 B2
`6/2010 Heyes et al.
`7,799,565 B2 * 9/2010 MacLachlan et al. ........ 435/458
`7,803.397 B2
`9/2010 Heyes et al.
`7,807,815 B2 * 10/2010 MacLachlan et al. ....... 536/24.5
`7,838,658 B2 * 1 1/2010 MacLachlan et al. ....... 536/24.5
`7,901,708 B2
`3/2011 MacLachlan et al.
`7,915,450 B2
`3/2011 Chu et al.
`7,982,027 B2 * 7/2011 MacLachlan et al. ....... 536/24.5
`8,058,068 B2 11/2011 Hawley-Nelson et al.
`8,058,069 B2 * 1 1/2011 Yaworski et al. ............. 435/458
`8, 101,741 B2 *
`1/2012 MacLachlan et al.
`536/24.5
`8, 158,827 B2
`4/2012 Chu et al.
`8,188,263 B2 * 5/2012 MacLachlan et al. ....... 536,245
`8.227.443 B2 * 7/2012 MacLachlan et al.
`... 514,44 A
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`8,236,943 B2 * 8/2012 Lee et al. ..................... 536, 24.5
`Beale, G. et al., “Gene Silencing Nucleic Acids Designed by Scan
`8,283,333 B2 * 10/2012 Yaworski et al. ........... 514,44 A
`ning Arrays: Anti-EGFR Activity of siRNA, Ribozyme and DNA
`8,455,455 B1* 6/2013 Robbins et al. ...
`... 514,44 A
`8.492.359 B2 * 7/2013 Yaworski et al. ........... 514/44 A Enzymes Targeting a Single Hybridization-accessible Region using
`8,513.403 B2 * 8/2013 MacLachlan et al. ....... 536/24.5
`the Same Delivery System.” Journal of Drug Targeting, 2003, vol. 11,
`8,569.256 B2 * 10/2013 Heyes et al. .......
`*
`No. 7, pp. 449-456.
`s
`8,598,333 B2 * 12/2013 MacLachlan et al. ....... 536,245
`& 8
`2001/0048940 Al 12/2001 Tousignant et al.
`Behr, J.-P. “Synthetic Gene-Transfer Vectors.” Acc. Chem. Res.,
`2003/0069173 Al
`4/2003 Hawley-Nelson et al.
`1993, vol. 26, pp. 274–278.
`2003/OO72794 A1
`4/2003 Boulikas
`Brigham, K. et al., “Rapid Communication: In vivo Transfection of
`2003/OO77829 A1
`4/2003 MacLachlan
`Murine Lungs with a Functioning Prokaryotic Gene Using a Lipo
`2003.0143732 A1
`7/2003 Fosnaugh et al.
`some Vehicle.” The American Journal of the Medical Sciences, vol.
`2004, OO63654 A1
`4, 2004 Davis et al.
`298, No. 4, pp. 278-281, 1989.
`2004/O142892 A1
`7/2004 Finn et al.
`Brummelkamp et al., “A System for Stable Expression of Short
`2004/0253723 A1 12/2004 Tachaset al.
`Interfering RNAs in Mammalian Cells.” Science, 2002. V. 296. pp.
`2004/0259247 A1 12, 2004 TuSchlet al.
`550-553.
`2005, OO64595 A1
`3/2005 MacLachlan et al.
`Cevic, G., “How Membrane Chain-Melting Phase-Transition Tem
`2005, 0118253 A1
`6/2005 MacLachlan et al.
`perature is Affected by the Lipid Chain Asymmetry and Degree of
`38.66 A. 13. SE al
`Unsaturation: An Effective Chain-Length Model.” Biochemistry,
`2006/0147514 A1
`7/2006 Gebeyehu et al.
`{R vol. 30, pp. 71867193.
`s
`2006/02284.06 A1 10, 2006 Chiou et al.
`Onnet al 'Recent advances in liposomal drug-delivery systems,
`2007/0042031 A1
`2/2007 MacLachlan etal
`Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 1995, vol. 6, pp. 698-708.
`2007/0202598 A1
`8, 2007 Chu et all
`Cortesi, R. et al., “Effect ofcationic liposome composition on invitro
`2007/0202600 A1
`8, 2007 Chu et al.
`cytotoxicity and protective effect on carried DNA.” International
`2009.0143583 A1
`6, 2009 Chu et al.
`Journal of Pharmaceutics, 1996, vol. 139, pp. 69-78.
`2009, 0291131 A1 11/2009 MacLachlan et al.
`Crystal, R. “Transfer of Genes to Humans: Early Lessons and
`2010. O159593 A1
`6, 2010 Chu et al.
`Obstacles to Success.” Science, 1995, vol. 270, pp. 404-410.
`2012/0136073 A1
`5/2012 Yang et al.
`Culver K. “The First Human Gene Therapy Experiment.” Gene
`2012fO238747 A1
`9, 2012 Chu et al.
`Therapy: A Handbook for Physicians, 1994, pp. 33-40.
`Duzgunes, N., “Membrane Fusion.” Subcellular Biochemistry, 1985,
`vol. 11, pp. 195-286.
`Dwarki, V.J., et al., “Cationic Liposome-Mediated RNA Transfec
`tion.” Methods in Enzymology, 1993, vol. 217, pp. 644-654.
`Elbashir et al., “Duplexes of 21-nucleotide RNAs mediate RNA
`interference in cultured mammalian cells.” Nature, May 2001, pp.
`494-498, vol. 411.
`Enoch, H. et al., “Formation and properties of 1000-A-diameter,
`single-bilayer phospholipid vesicles.” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,
`1979, vol. 76, No. 1, pp. 145-149.
`Felgner, J. et al., “Cationic Lipid-Mediated Transfection in Mamma
`lian Cells: Lipofection.” J. Tiss. Cult. Meth., 1993, vol. 15, pp.
`63-68.
`Felgner, J., et al., “Enhanced Gene Delivery and Mechanism Studies
`with a Novel Series of Cationic Lipid Formulations.” The Journal of
`Biological Chemistry, 1994, vol. 269, No. 4, pp. 2550-2561.
`Felgner, P. et al., “Lipofection: A highly efficient, lipid-mediated
`DNA-transfection procedure.” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1987, vol.
`84, pp. 7413-7417.
`
`FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS
`2330741 A1 11, 1999
`23970 16 A1
`T 2001
`2513623
`8, 2004
`O3-126211
`5, 1991
`05-202085
`8, 1993
`06-080560
`3, 1994
`91 (16024 A1 10, 1991
`93,05162 A1
`3, 1993
`2 : A. $32,
`2: A. 32
`95,02698 A1
`1, 1995
`95, 18863 A1
`7, 1995
`95.35301 A1 12/1995
`96,02655 A1
`2, 1996
`96,10390 A1
`4f1996
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-02229-MKV Document 42-4 Filed 09/06/22 Page 3 of 75
`
`CA
`CA
`CA
`JP
`JP
`JP
`WO
`WO
`W
`W.
`WO
`WO
`WO
`WO
`WO
`
`
`
`US 8,822,668 B2
`Page 3
`
`(56)
`
`References Cited
`
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`
`Felgner, P.L. et al., “Cationic Liposome Mediated Transfection.”
`Proc. West. Pharmacol. Soc., 1989, vol. 32, pp. 115-121.
`Gao, X. et al., “A Novel Cationic Liposome Reagent for Efficient
`Transfection of Mammalian Cells.” Biochem. Biophys.Res. Comm.
`1991, vol. 179, No. 1, pp. 280-285.
`Gershon, H. et al., “Mode of Formation and Structural Feature of
`DNA-Cationic Liposome Complexes Used for Transfection.” Bio
`chemistry, 1993, vol. 32, pp. 7143-7151.
`Global Newswire, retrieved from http://globalnewswire.com on Feb.
`27, 2013, Tekmira Sues Alnylam Pharmaceuticals for repeated mis
`use of tradesecrets and confidential information, Mar. 16, 2011, pp.
`1-3.
`Guy-Caffey, J. et al., “Novel Polyaminolipids Enhance the Cellular
`Uptake of Oligonucleotides.” The Journal of Biological Chemistry,
`1995, vol. 270, No. 52, pp. 31391-31396.
`Hawley-Nelson, Petal., "Lipofect AmineTM Reagent: A New, Higher
`Efficiency Polycationic Liposome Transfection Reagent.” Focus,
`1993, vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 73-80.
`Heyes et al., “Cationic lipid saturation influences intracellular deliv
`ery of encapsulated nucleic acids.” Journal of Controlled Release,
`2005, vol. 107, pp. 276-287.
`Heyes et al., “Synthesis of novel cationic lipids: effect of structural
`modification on the efficiency of genetransfer.” J.Med. Chem., 2002,
`vol. 45, pp. 99-114.
`Hyde, S. et al., "Correction of the ion transport defect in cystic
`fibrosis transgenic mice by genetherapy.” Nature, 1993, vol. 362, pp.
`250-255.
`Jiang, L. et al., "Comparison of protein precipitation methods for
`sample preparation prior to proteomic analysis,” Journal of Chroma
`tography A. 2004, vol. 1023, pp. 317-320.
`JP06080560—English abstract from CAplus 2 pages, 1994.
`Juliano, R. et al., “The Effect of Particle Size and Charge on the
`Clearance Rates of Liposomes and Liposome Encapsulated Drugs.”
`Biochem. Biophys.Res. Commun., 1975, vol. 63, No.3, pp. 651-658.
`Keough, K., “Influence of chain unsaturation and chain position on
`thermotropism and intermolecular interactions in membranes.”
`Biochem. Soc. Transactions, 1990, vol. 18, No. 5, pp. 835-837.
`Krichevsky, A. et al., “RNAi functions in cultured mammalian neu
`rons.” PNAS, 99(18): 11926-29, 2002.
`Lawrence et al., “The formation, characterization and stability of
`non-ionic surfactant vesicles.” S.T.P. Pharma Sciences, 1996, vol. 6,
`No. 1, pp. 49-60.
`Lawrence et al., “Synthesis and aggregation properties of dialkyl
`polyoxyethylene glycerol ethers.” Chemistry and Physics of Lipids,
`1996, 82(2):89-100.
`Legendre, J.-Y. et al., “Delivery of Plasmid DNA into Mammalian
`Cell Lines Using pH-Sensitive Liposomes: Comparison with
`Cationic Liposomes.” Pharm. Res., 1992, vol. 9, No. 10, pp. 1235
`1242.
`Leventis, R. et al., “Interactions of mammalian cells with lipid dis
`persions containing novel metabolizable cationic amphiphiles.”
`Biochem. Biophys. Acta, 1990, vol. 1023, pp. 124-132.
`Liu et al., “Cationic Liposome-mediated Intravenous Gene Deliv
`ery”. J. Biol. Chem., 1995, V. 270, pp. 24864-24870.
`
`Case 1:22-cv-02229-MKV Document 42-4 Filed 09/06/22 Page 4 of 75
`
`Marshall, E., “Gene Therapy's Growing Pains.” Science, 1995, vol.
`269, pp. 1050-1055.
`Murahashi et al., “Synthesis and evaluation of neoglycolipid for
`liposome modification.” Biol. Pharm. Bull., 1997, 2006):704-707.
`Orkin, S. et al., NIH Report, Report and Recommendations of the
`Panel to Assess the NIH Investment in Research on Gene Therapy,
`1995, pp. 1-41.
`Parret al., Factors influencing the retention and chemical stability of
`poly(ethylene glycol)-lipid conjugates incorporated into large
`unilamellar vesicles, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 1994, 1195:21
`30.
`Paul, C. et al., “Effective expression of Small interfering RNA in
`human cells.” Nature Biotech., 2002, vol. 20, pp. 505-508.
`Puyal, C. et al., “A new cationic liposome encapsulating genetic
`material: A potential delivery system for polynucleotides.” Eur, J.
`Biochem., 1995, vol. 228, pp. 697-703.
`Sawada et al., “Microemulsions in Supercritical CO utilizing the
`polyethyleneglycol dialkylglycerol and their use for the solubiliza
`tion of hydrophiles.” Dyes and Pigments, 2005, pp. 64-74, vol. 65.
`Shin et al. "Acid-triggered release via dePEGylation of DOPE
`liposomes containing acid-labile vinyl ether PEG-lipids,” Journal of
`Controlled Release, 2003, vol. 91, pp. 187-200.
`Song et al., “Characterization of the inhibitory effect of PEG-lipid
`conjugates on the intracellular delivery of plasmid and antisense
`DNA mediated by cationic lipid liposomes.” Biochimica et
`Biophysica Acta, 2002, 1558:1-13.
`Sorensen et al., “Gene Silencing by Systemic Delivery of Synthetic
`siRNAs in Adult Mice”. J. Biol. Chem., 2003, V. 327, pp. 761-766.
`Spagnou, S. et al., “Lipidic Carriers of siRNA: Differences in the
`Formulation, Cellular Uptake, and Delivery with Plasmid DNA.”
`Biochemistry, 2004, vol.43, pp. 13348-13356.
`Stamatatos, L. et al., “Interactions of Cationic Lipid Vesicles with
`Negatively Charged Phospholipid Vesicles and Biological Mem
`branes.” Biochemistry, 1988, vol. 27, pp. 3917-3925.
`Szoka, F. et al., “Comparative Properties and Methods of Preparation
`of Lipid Vesicles (Liposomes).” Ann. Rev. Biophys. Bioeng. 1980,
`vol. 9, pp. 467-508.
`Szoka, F. et al., “Procedure for preparation of liposomes with large
`internal aqueous space and high capture by reverse-phase evapora
`tion.” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1978, vol. 75, No. 9, pp. 4194
`4.198.
`Templeton, “Cationic Liposome-mediated Gene Delivery In vivo”.
`Bioscience Reports, 2002, vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 283-295.
`VanDerWoude, I. et al., “Parameters influencing the introduction of
`plasmid DNA into cells by the use of synthetic amphiphiles as a
`carrier system.” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 1995, vol. 1240, pp.
`34-40.
`Wheeler et al., "Stabilized Plasmid-lipid Particles: Constructions and
`Characterization.” Gene Therapy, V. 6, pp. 271-281, 1999.
`Wilson, R. et al., “Counterion-Induced Condensation of
`Deoxyribonucleic Acid, A Light-Scattering Study.” Biochemistry,
`1979, vol. 18, No. 11, pp. 2192-2196.
`Woodle, M.C. et al., “Versatility in lipid compositions showing pro
`longed circulation with sterically stabilized liposomes. Biochimica
`et Biophysica Acta, 1992, vol. 1105, pp. 193-200.
`Zhu, N. et al., “Systemic Gene Expression. After Intravenous DNA
`Delivery into Adult Mice.” Science, 1993, vol. 261, pp. 209-211.
`* cited by examiner
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent
`
`
`
`US 8,822,668 B2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-02229-MKV Document 42-4 Filed 09/06/22 Page 5 of 75
`
`(Seo peee Jun
`
`) AqeA
`
`
`
`US 8,822,668 B2
`
`U.S. Patent
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-02229-MKV Document 42-4 Filed 09/06/22 Page 6 of 75
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Sep. 2, 2014
`
`Sheet 3 of 24
`
`US 8,822,668 B2
`
`Activity of SNALP Upon intravenous Administration in Mice
`group meani. SD (n=4)
`
`2. 5
`
`2. O -
`
`O. 5 -
`
`O. O
`?
`?o
`Ko
`Q S NY N.
`Go A Q
`N.
`N.
`e &
`sesssssssssssss
`S.
`S.
`S.
`S S S S S
`S.
`S.
`S.
`S.
`
`x
`SR
`
`Case 1:22-cv-02229-MKV Document 42-4 Filed 09/06/22 Page 7 of 75
`
`FIG 2
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Sep. 2, 2014
`
`Sheet 4 of 24
`
`US 8,822,668 B2
`
`3.0
`
`2. 5
`
`2. O
`
`
`
`O. 5
`
`O. O
`
`-47% WS PBS Control
`
`-77% WS PBS COntrol
`
`PBS
`
`2:30 SNALP 5x1 mg/kg 1:57 SNALP 5x0.1 mg/kg
`
`Case 1:22-cv-02229-MKV Document 42-4 Filed 09/06/22 Page 8 of 75
`
`FIG. 3
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Sep. 2, 2014
`
`Sheet 5 of 24
`
`US 8,822,668 B2
`
`Activity of SNALP Upon intravenous Administration in Mice
`group meant SD (n=4)
`
`2.0
`
`11 O5
`
`O 5
`
`O.O PBS Group 2 Group 3 Group 4 Group 5 Group 6 Group 7 Group 8
`
`Case 1:22-cv-02229-MKV Document 42-4 Filed 09/06/22 Page 9 of 75
`
`FIG. 4
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Sep. 2, 2014
`
`Sheet 6 of 24
`
`US 8,822,668 B2
`
`Activity of SNALP Upon intravenous Administration in Mice
`group mean it SD (n=4)
`
`2. O
`
`1 5 r
`
`1 O
`
`O 5
`
`O.O lili
`
`NS NN N- N5 Nx No
`1 Q to
`co
`e & cS
`cS S s cS s
`CS
`oS s
`oSsssssssss
`CS CS CS
`GS GS GS CS c. GS GS GS GS
`CS
`
`Case 1:22-cv-02229-MKV Document 42-4 Filed 09/06/22 Page 10 of 75
`
`FIG. 5
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Sep. 2, 2014
`
`Sheet 7 of 24
`
`US 8,822,668 B2
`
`Tolerability of IV 1:57 SNALP in Female BALB?c Mice, in
`168
`
`Alanine Aminotransferase
`Aspartate Aminotransferase
`Sorbital Dehydrogenase
`ALT levels indicate hepatocyte damage
`Incr'd SDH,
`96
`
`4, SD error
`
`81
`
``N
`
`?
`
`Tolerability of IV 1:57 SNALP in Female BALB/C Mice,
`SD error
`4
`n
`Alanine Aminotransferase
`2
`ASpartate Aminotransferase
`Sorbital Dehydrogenase
`3
`is considered clinically
`-fold increase ("3xULN"
`)
`2
`significant
`
`Case 1:22-cv-02229-MKV Document 42-4 Filed 09/06/22 Page 11 of 75
`
`
`
`ear PBS
`
`yringe Citrate
`
`79
`
`123
`9 mg/kg
`
`Lipid dose
`siRNA dose
`
`F.G. 6B
`
`)[XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX:S . EGOE!!!!!!!!!!!!!
`
`KXXXXXXXXXXXIEG
`Œ(
`
`SSSSSSSSSSS i CN (/)
`
`?&&&&&&&&&T? go
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Sep. 2, 2014
`
`Sheet 8 of 24
`
`US 8,822,668 B2
`
`S. 20, SNALP Activity From Different Manufacturing Processes
`FIG. 7A is -
`IV, 48 h, ApoB-10048 U2/2 G1/2 (Dow),
`<C
`female BALB/C mice, n=4, SD error
`Z 1.5
`?
`8
`5 1.0.
`CC
`(D
`
`0.5
`
`Ol
`CC
`as 0.0
`2
`
`M
`1
`1:57
`1:57
`1:57
`PBS 1:57
`Syringe Gear Syringe Gear
`0.05mg 0.05mg 0.1mg/ 0.1mg/
`/kg
`/kg
`kg
`kg
`
`O6 SNALP Re-Formulation - Activity Assessment in BALB/C Mice
`48 h time point, n=4, SD error bars
`
`FIG. 7B a
`S 0.5
`ch
`8 0.4
`sC.
`0.3
`& 02
`n
`$ 0.1
`c
`(2 -0.1
`
`Syringe Gear Syringe Gear
`Press Pump Press Pump
`0.05 mg/kg
`0.1 mg/kg
`
`FIG. 7C
`
`Case 1:22-cv-02229-MKV Document 42-4 Filed 09/06/22 Page 12 of 75
`
`
`
`Efficacy of SNALP. Formulations
`3. Fresh Terminal Plasma, nP4 female Balb/c mice, SD Error Bars
`Q
`70
`O)
`S
`6O.
`S
`50
`92
`8
`40 -
`9
`30
`O
`st
`20
`o
`1 O
`cus
`O
`S
`f
`c
`?h
`
`Press Pump Press Pump
`0.05 mg/kg
`0.1 mg/kg
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Sep. 2, 2014
`
`Sheet 9 of 24
`
`US 8,822,668 B2
`
`Tolerability of 157 SNALP IV in BALB/c Mice, n=4 (Grp 1-3 n=3), SD error
`
`
`
`6%
`
`4%
`
`2%
`
`-6%
`
`9:1
`6:1
`6:1
`6:1
`6:1
`9:1
`9mg/ 11 mg 11 mg 13.9/1591.9/19
`
`Case 1:22-cv-02229-MKV Document 42-4 Filed 09/06/22 Page 13 of 75
`
`FIG. 8
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent
`
`US 8,822,668 B2
`
`CO ÈN
`
`+
`
`CN
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-02229-MKV Document 42-4 Filed 09/06/22 Page 14 of 75
`
`%
`
`7 (7
`
`)
`
`FIG. 9
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Sep. 2, 2014
`
`Sheet 11 of 24
`
`US 8,822,668 B2
`
`Tolerability of IV 1:57 Gear PBS In-Line SNALP in Female BALB/c
`Mice, n=4, SD error
`
`9
`
`Z2:: % W: :
`W.
`% :: % 2.
`5
`% % 2 2
`
`688
`3.
`
`s
`
`3
`
`:X
`:X 2::::x:
`:: 2. :::
`3.
`9:1
`6:1
`6:1
`9:1
`6:1
`6:1
`9:1
`SNALP SNALP SNALP SNALP SNALP SNALP SNALP
`9mg/ 11 mg/ 11 mg/ 13mg/ 15mg/ 17mg/ 11 mg/kg
`kg
`kg
`kg
`kg
`kg
`kg
`48h
`
`Alanine Aminotransferase
`Aspartate Aminotransferase
`83 Sorbital Dehydrogenase
`Samples taken at 24 h time point except
`for last grp (48 h).
`
`1200
`
`1,000
`
`800
`
`s
`
`6OO
`
`400
`
`200
`
`
`
`
`
`PBS
`
`Case 1:22-cv-02229-MKV Document 42-4 Filed 09/06/22 Page 15 of 75
`
`FIG. 10A
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Sep. 2, 2014
`
`Sheet 12 of 24
`
`US 8,822,668 B2
`
`ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ77 ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ44
`KXXX
`ZZZZZZZZ
`::
`ZZYZZYZZZZZZ
`SxYxxxS
`ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
`XXXXX
`277277-222
`XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
`EZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
`XXXXXXXX
`s
`ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
`SXXX
`...E.
`777.2777ZZZZZ
`XXXXXXXXXXX
`ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
`XX
`
`
`
`XXXXX EA
`: 7272.27727
`SXX
`
`XXX
`Yaaaa.
`X
`:::::
`22222
`XXY
`:::::
`222222
`X
`.
`
`Z :
`
`2
`xx
`
`Case 1:22-cv-02229-MKV Document 42-4 Filed 09/06/22 Page 16 of 75
`
`g
`
`S.
`
`O
`cyd
`
`O
`CN
`
`O
`v
`
`|euON Olu Jeddn plo--X
`
`S s
`i s
`
`s
`
`i 8
`
`S f
`
`CN
`
`6
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Sep. 2, 2014
`
`Sheet 13 of 24
`
`US 8,822,668 B2
`
`FIG. 1 1A
`157 Gear PBS In-Line SNALP Activity From Different input Lipid: Drug Ratios
`IV, 48 h, ApoB-10048 U2/2 G1/2 (Dow), female BALB/c mice, n=4, SD error
`
`3.0
`
`2. 5
`
`2. O
`
`1 5
`
`1.O
`
`O. 5
`
`FIG 11B
`
`0.40
`
`O.35
`
`0.30
`
`0.25
`
`0.20
`
`0.15
`
`2-tailed T-test: p=0.078
`
`SNALP Re-Formulation - Activity Assessment in BALB/C Mice
`DOWApoB lead siRNA, 48 h time point, n=4, SD error bars
`LLO =9%
`
`-53%
`eXcluded
`h)
`
`Case 1:22-cv-02229-MKV Document 42-4 Filed 09/06/22 Page 17 of 75
`
`O. 10
`
`0.05
`
`O.OO
`
`
`
`Y77
`
`:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
`
`:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
`
`:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
`
`:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
`
`kg
`Kg
`mg/kg
`1:57 SNALP (10:1)
`
`0.1 mg/l 0.2 mg/l 0.4 mg/
`kg
`kg
`kg
`mg/kg
`New 1:57 SNALP (7:1)
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Sep. 2, 2014
`
`Sheet 14 of 24
`
`CO LO <r çO ÇON -
`Q C C co o co C
`
`Case 1:22-cv-02229-MKV Document 42-4 Filed 09/06/22 Page 18 of 75
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Sep. 2, 2014
`
`Sheet 15 of 24
`
`US 8,822,668 B2
`
`O
`120%
`
`11.5%
`5. 1 10%
`
`10.5%
`
`100%
`
`95%
`
`90%
`8
`
`-0- LUC -A-PLK1424
`
`12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 44 48 52 56 60
`Study Day
`
`Case 1:22-cv-02229-MKV Document 42-4 Filed 09/06/22 Page 19 of 75
`
`FIG. 13
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Sep. 2, 2014
`
`Sheet 16 of 24
`
`US 8,822,668 B2
`
`- A - Control SNAP -C)- Active SNALP
`
`100%
`
`80%
`
`60%
`
`40%
`
`20%
`
`O%
`15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90
`Days after seeding
`
`Case 1:22-cv-02229-MKV Document 42-4 Filed 09/06/22 Page 20 of 75
`
`FIG. 14
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Sep. 2, 2014
`
`Sheet 17 of 24
`
`US 8,822,668 B2
`
`
`
`PBS
`
`Luc
`
`PLK1424
`
`Case 1:22-cv-02229-MKV Document 42-4 Filed 09/06/22 Page 21 of 75
`
`FIG. 15
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Sep. 2, 2014
`
`Sheet 18 of 24
`
`US 8,822,668 B2
`
`
`
`-- PLK1424.5'RACE
`product
`476bp
`
`Case 1:22-cv-02229-MKV Document 42-4 Filed 09/06/22 Page 22 of 75
`
`FIG 16
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Sep. 2, 2014
`
`Sheet 19 of 24
`
`US 8,822,668 B2
`
`x200 mag
`
`x400 mag
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-02229-MKV Document 42-4 Filed 09/06/22 Page 23 of 75
`
`x400 mag
`
`FIG. 17
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Sep. 2, 2014
`
`Sheet 20 of 24
`
`US 8,822,668 B2
`
`
`
`6x2mg/kg Mean tumor volume
`
`-- PLK-DMA
`-A-PLK-DSA
`
`8
`
`1 O
`
`12
`
`14
`
`16
`Days
`
`18
`
`20
`
`22
`
`24
`
`Case 1:22-cv-02229-MKV Document 42-4 Filed 09/06/22 Page 24 of 75
`
`FIG. 18
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Sep. 2, 2014
`
`Sheet 21 of 24
`
`US 8,822,668 B2
`
`PLK mRNA silencing in scid/beige mice treated with 2mg/kg 1:57 SNALP against
`subcutaneous Hep3B tumors
`
`100%
`
`
`
`0.70
`0.60
`
`0.50
`
`0.40
`
`SwS
`s
`-
`
`x
`
`-52%
`
`&Q
`S
`
`Case 1:22-cv-02229-MKV Document 42-4 Filed 09/06/22 Page 25 of 75
`
`FIG. 19
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Sep. 2, 2014
`
`Sheet 22 of 24
`
`US 8,822,668 B2
`
`6x2mg/kg Mean tumor volume
`
`Crossover dosing of Luc
`cDMA group with 6 x 2
`mg/kg PLK cDSA SNALP
`
`-0- LuC-DMA
`-H PLK-DMA
`- A - PLK-OSA
`
`Initial 6 x 2 mg/kg
`SNALP
`
`2200
`
`2000
`1800
`1600
`E
`1400
`O
`> 5 1200
`E
`1000
`8OO
`
`600
`
`400
`
`2OO
`
`8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50
`Days
`
`
`
`--
`
`Case 1:22-cv-02229-MKV Document 42-4 Filed 09/06/22 Page 26 of 75
`
`FIG. 20
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Sep. 2, 2014
`
`Sheet 23 of 24
`
`US 8,822,668 B2
`
`Mean hPLK (1:4): hCGAPDH (1:40) minus "background"
`
`120
`
`
`
`1.OO
`
`0.80
`
`0.60
`
`0.40
`
`0.20
`
`O.OO
`
`24h LUC 1:57 24h PLK 1.57 24h PK 1:57 96h PLK 1:57 96h PLK 1.57
`CDMA
`CDMA
`CDSA
`CDMA
`CDSA
`
`Case 1:22-cv-02229-MKV Document 42-4 Filed 09/06/22 Page 27 of 75
`
`FIG 21
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Sep. 2, 2014
`
`Sheet 24 of 24
`
`US 8,822,668 B2
`
`
`
`-- 1:57 PEG-CDSA SNALP
`
`-A - 1:57 PEG-CDMA SNALP
`
`Case 1:22-cv-02229-MKV Document 42-4 Filed 09/06/22 Page 28 of 75
`
`FIG. 22
`
`
`
`US 8,822,668 B2
`
`1.
`LPID FORMULATIONS FOR NUCLECACD
`DELIVERY
`
`CROSS-REFERENCES TO RELATED
`APPLICATIONS
`
`The present application is a continuation of U.S. applica
`tion Ser. No. 13/253,917, filed Oct. 5, 2011, now U.S. Pat. No.
`8.492.359, which application is a continuation of 12/424,367
`filed Apr. 15, 2009, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,058,069, which
`application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application
`No. 61/045.228, filed Apr. 15, 2008, the disclosures of which
`are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety for all
`purposes.
`
`STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY
`SPONSORED RESEARCH ORDEVELOPMENT
`
`Not applicable.
`
`NAMES OF PARTIES TO AJOINT RESEARCH
`AGREEMENT
`
`Not applicable.
`
`REFERENCE TO A “SEQUENCE LISTING. A
`TABLE, ORACOMPUTER PROGRAM LISTING
`APPENDIX SUBMITTED AS ANASCII TEXT
`FILE
`
`10
`
`15
`
`25
`
`30
`
`The Sequence Listing written in file-77-3.TXT, created on
`Aug. 22, 2013, 8,192 bytes, machine format IBM-PC, MS
`Windows operating system, is hereby incorporated by refer
`ence in its entirety for all purposes.
`
`35
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`
`RNA interference (RNAi) is an evolutionarily conserved
`process in which recognition of double-stranded RNA
`(dsRNA) ultimately leads to posttranscriptional Suppression
`40
`of gene expression. This Suppression is mediated by short
`dsRNA, also called small interfering RNA (siRNA), which
`induces specific degradation of mRNA through complemen
`tary base pairing. In several model systems, this natural
`response has been developed into a powerful tool for the
`investigation of gene function (see, e.g., Elbashiret al., Genes
`Dev., 15:188-200 (2001); Hammond et al., Nat. Rev. Genet.,
`2:110-119 (2001)). More recently, it was discovered that
`introducing synthetic 21-nucleotide dsRNA duplexes into
`mammalian cells could efficiently silence gene expression.
`Although the precise mechanism is still unclear, RNAi
`provides a potential new approach to downregulate or silence
`the transcription and translation of a gene of interest. For
`example, it is desirable to modulate (e.g., reduce) the expres
`sion of certain genes for the treatment of neoplastic disorders
`Such as cancer. It is also desirable to silence the expression of
`genes associated with liver diseases and disorders such as
`hepatitis. It is further desirable to reduce the expression of
`certain genes for the treatment of atherosclerosis and its
`manifestations, e.g., hypercholesterolemia, myocardial inf
`arction, and thrombosis.
`A safe and effective nucleic acid delivery system is
`required for RNAi to be therapeutically useful. Viral vectors
`are relatively efficient gene delivery systems, but suffer from
`a variety of limitations, such as the potential for reversion to
`the wild-type as well as immune response concerns. As a
`result, nonviral gene delivery systems are receiving increas
`
`2
`ing attention (Worgall et al., Human Gene Therapy, 8:37
`(1997); Peeters et al., Human Gene Therapy, 7:1693 (1996):
`Yei et al., Gene Therapy, 1:192 (1994); Hope et al., Molecular
`Membrane Biology, 15:1 (1998)). Furthermore, viral systems
`are rapidly cleared from the circulation, limiting transfection
`to “first-pass' organs Such as the lungs, liver, and spleen. In
`addition, these systems induce immune responses that com
`promise delivery with Subsequent injections.
`Plasmid DNA-cationic liposome complexes are currently
`the most commonly employed nonviral gene delivery
`vehicles (Felgner, Scientific American, 276:102 (1997);
`Chonn et al., Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 6:698
`(1995)). For instance, cationic liposome complexes made of
`an amphipathic compound, a neutral lipid, and a detergent for
`transfecting insect cells are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,458,
`382. Cationic liposome complexes are also disclosed in U.S.
`Patent. Publication No. 20030073640.
`Cationic liposome complexes are large, poorly defined
`systems that are not Suited for systemic applications and can
`elicit considerable toxic side effects (Harrison et al., Biotech
`niques, 19:816 (1995); Lietal. The Gene, 4:891 (1997); Tam
`etal, Gene Ther, 7:1867 (2000)). As large, positively charged
`aggregates, lipoplexes are rapidly cleared when administered
`in vivo, with highest expression levels observed in first-pass
`organs, particularly the lungs (Huang et al., Nature Biotech
`nology, 15:620 (1997); Templeton et al., Nature Biotechnol
`ogy, 15:647 (1997); Hofland et al., Pharmaceutical Research,
`14:742 (1997)).
`Other liposomal delivery systems include, for example, the
`use of reverse micelles, anionic liposomes, and polymer lipo
`somes. Reverse micelles are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,429,
`200. Anionic liposomes are disclosed in U.S. Patent Publica
`tion No. 20030026831. Polymer liposomes that incorporate
`dextrinor glycerol-phosphocholine polymers are disclosed in
`U.S.
`Patent
`Publication
`Nos. 20020081736 and
`20030082103, respectively.
`A gene delivery system containing an encapsulated nucleic
`acid for systemic delivery should be small (i.e., less than
`about 100 nm diameter) and should remain intact in the cir
`culation for an extended period of time in order to achieve
`delivery to affected tissues. This requires a highly stable,
`serum-resistant nucleic acid-containing particle that does not
`interact with cells and other components of the vascular com
`partment. The particle should also readily interact with target
`cells at a disease site in order to facilitate intracellular delivery
`of a desired nucleic acid.
`Recent work has shown that nucleic acids can be encapsu
`lated in small (e.g., about 70 nm diameter) “stabilized plas
`mid-lipid particles' (SPLP) that consist of a single plasmid
`encapsulated within a bilayer lipid vesicle (Wheeler et al.,
`Gene Therapy, 6:271 (1999)). These SPLPs typically contain
`the “fusogenic' lipid dioleoylphosphatidylethanolamine
`(DOPE), low levels of cationic lipid, and are stabilized in
`aqueous media by the presence of a poly(ethylene glycol)
`(PEG) coating. SPLPs have systemic application as they
`exhibit extended circulation lifetimes following intravenous
`(i.v.) injection, accumulate preferentially at distal tumor sites
`due to the enhanced vascular permeability in Such regions,
`and can mediate transgene expressio