throbber
Case 1:22-cv-01860-KPF Document 36 Filed 04/20/22 Page 1 of 3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`VIA ELECTRONIC FILING
`
`The Honorable Katherine Polk Failla
`United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
`Thurgood Marshall Courthouse
`40 Foley Square, Room 618
`New York, NY 10007
`
`Re: Dinosaur Financial Investment Group LLC et al. v. CUSIP Global Services, et
`al., Case No. 22 Civ 1860-KPF
`
`
`Dear Judge Failla:
`
`Plaintiffs Dinosaur Financial Group LLC and Swiss Life Investment Management
`Holding AG request a pre-motion conference on their motion for partial summary
`judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(a) and this Court’s Individual
`Rule of Practice in Civil Cases 4(a). Plaintiffs seek a declaration as a matter of law
`that the nine-digit numbers that are CUSIP identifiers are not copyrightable and
`American Bankers Association (“ABA”) copyright # TX 6-146-660 grants no copyright
`in CUSIP identifiers themselves. The motion is not on consent of all parties.
`
`The questions presented on the proposed motion are dispositive of the liability issues
`in this case. Without the protection of a copyright, Defendants have no lawful means
`to stop financial institutions from using CUSIP identifiers. If Defendants cannot
`lawfully preclude a financial institution from using CUSIP identifiers, they cannot
`require financial institutions to enter a license and pay a fee to use the CUSIP
`identifiers. To the extent that they have entered into agreements with such
`requirements, they have violated the antitrust laws by restraining trade in the use
`of CUSIP identifiers.
`
`
`The undisputed facts material to the motion are: 1) the ABA’s copyright; 2) the
`structure
`of
`the
`nine-digit
`numbers
`that
`are CUSIP
`identifiers
`(https://www.cusip.com/identifiers.html#/CUSIP); and 3) the use of a CUSIP
`identifier for financial instruments by financial institutions in the normal course of
`their businesses (id.). The ABA’s copyright sets forth a claim in a “compilation of
`database material,” which consists of “up to 60 different data elements relating to
`over 26 million financial instruments” (https://www.cusip.com/index.html). A single
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-01860-KPF Document 36 Filed 04/20/22 Page 2 of 3
`
`
`
`one of those sixty data elements is the CUSIP identifier at issue in this litigation (id.).
`All CUSIP identifiers in existence today have been generated by a system of 50-year-
`old rules requiring the first six numbers to identify the unique name of the issuer,
`the next two numbers to identify the type of instrument (equity or debt), and the last
`number to represent a mathematical formula checking the accuracy of the previous
`eight characters.
`
`The law is as clear as the facts. The certificate claims a copyright in a compilation of
`data. Section 101 of the Copyright Act (Title 17 of the United States Code) defines a
`“compilation” as “a work formed by the collection and assembling of preexisting
`materials or of data that are selected, coordinated, or arranged in such a way that
`the resulting work as a whole constitutes an original work of authorship.” (Emphasis
`added.) Section 103 of that Act expressly states that a copyright in a compilation
`“extends only to the material contributed by the author of such work, as distinguished
`from the preexisting material employed in the work, and does not imply any exclusive
`right in the preexisting material.” As the Supreme Court ruled in Feist Publications,
`Inc. v. Rural Tel. Serv. Co., 499 U.S. 340 (1991):
`
` A
`
` factual compilation is eligible for copyright if it features an original
`selection or arrangement of facts, but the copyright is limited to the
`particular selection or arrangement. In no event may copyright extend
`to the facts themselves.
`
`
`Id. at 350-51.
`
`Thus, the copyright claimed via certificate # TX 6-146-660 protects only the
`compilation as a whole, in no way extending to the individual data items (the CUSIP
`identifiers) in the compilation.
`
`Moreover, there is nothing original or creative in the CUSIP identifiers that would
`justify copyright protection. In a case markedly similar to this one, Justice Alito—
`then a judge on the Third Circuit Court of Appeals—held in an 11-2 en banc decision
`that numbers generated by a numbering system that required a rigid, unchanging
`structure were not original or creative and were therefore not copyrightable. See
`Southco, Inc. v. Kanebridge Corp., 390 F.3d 276 (3d Cir. 2004) (en banc).
`
`The same is true here. The CUSIP identifiers are generated using a convention
`established more than 50 years ago that strictly determines the format of the CUSIP
`identifier and each character within it. The CUSIP identifiers are not copyrightable
`and have not been copyrighted.
`
`Finally, the Copyright Office would not have issued the registration to the ABA had
`it claimed that the CUSIP identifiers standing alone are subject to copyright
`protection. This is because the Copyright Office procedures provide that “individual
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-01860-KPF Document 36 Filed 04/20/22 Page 3 of 3
`
`
`
`numbers, letters, sounds, and short phrases consisting of such elements are not
`copyrightable, because they do not contain sufficient creative authorship.”
`Compendium of the U.S. Copyright Office Practices, Ch. 300 at 29 (1/28/2021 3d ed.).
`
`Accordingly, the court should schedule a pre-motion conference to permit Plaintiffs
`to proceed with their motion for partial summary judgment.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`Leiv Blad
`Jeffrey Blumenfeld
`COMPETITION LAW PARTNERS PLLC
`1101 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
`Washington, DC 20004
`Telephone: (202) 742-4300
`
`Robert N. Kaplan
`Gregory K. Arenson
`KAPLAN FOX & KILSHEIMER LLP
`850 Third Ave.
`New York, NY 10022
`Telephone: (212) 687-1980
`
`David Nimmer
`Joseph Mantegani
`IRELL & MANELLA LLP
`1800 Avenue of the Stars
`Suite 900
`Los Angeles, CA 90067
`Telephone: (310) 277-1010
`
`cc: Eric J. Stock, Gibson Dunn
`
`David Kiernan, Jones Day
`
`Seth Greenstein, Constantine Cannon
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket