`USDC SDNY
`DOCUMENT
`ELECTRONICALLY FILED
`DOC #: _________________
`DATE FILED: 8/17/2024
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
`------------------------------------------------------------- X
`
`
`:
`UNITED STATES,
`:
`
`:
`:
`:
`:
`:
`:
`:
`:
`:
`
`:
`
`------------------------------------------------------------- X
`
`
`
`-v-
`
`
`
`ALVIN EUSEBIO, ALEXANDER
`FRANCISCO, et al.
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1:22-cr-522-GHW
`
`ORDER
`
`
`
`
`GREGORY H. WOODS, United States District Judge:
`
`
`
`In its May 24, 2024 order scheduling the trial in this matter, the Court established a date for
`
`any hearing with respect to any defense motions necessitating a hearing. Dkt. No. 346. That date is
`
`September 6, 2024 at 1:00 p.m. The Court has reviewed the parties’ submissions in connection with
`
`Defendant Alvin Eusebio’s motion to suppress evidence, Dkt. No. 387, and has determined that an
`
`evidentiary hearing with respect to that motion is necessary. The Court has also reviewed the
`
`parties’ submissions in connection with Defendant Alexander Francisco’s motion to suppress
`
`evidence, Dkt. No. 392, and does not anticipate that an evidentiary hearing with respect to that
`
`motion will be necessary.1 However, the Court may provide the parties the opportunity for oral
`
`argument with respect to that motion.
`
`
`
`Accordingly, the Court requests that counsel for the United States and counsel for Mr.
`
`Eusebio meet and confer regarding the anticipated duration of an evidentiary hearing with respect to
`
`Mr. Eusebio’s motion. The Court requests that those parties submit a joint letter to the Court with
`
`
`1 The Court notes that Defendant Francisco has not filed a timely reply to the Government’s opposition brief. The
`Court has not extended the deadline for that submission, has not received a request to extend that deadline, and
`therefore considers the motion to be fully submitted.
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cr-00522-GHW Document 434 Filed 08/19/24 Page 2 of 2
`
`the estimated duration of the hearing to the Court no later than August 21, 2024. The letter should
`
`also propose a schedule for submission of any appropriate documentary materials to the Court and
`
`each of the parties in advance of the hearing.
`
`In the event that the evidentiary hearing is anticipated to last more than three and a half
`
`hours, the Court expects to reschedule it to begin earlier during the day on September 9, 2024, or to
`
`reschedule it for another date. The Court will establish a modified schedule for the hearing with
`
`respect to Mr. Eusebio’s motion after it receives that letter. The Court may also establish an
`
`alternative date for the parties to appear for oral argument with respect to Mr. Francisco’s motion.
`
`SO ORDERED.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: August 17, 2024
`New York, New York
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`______________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
` __________________________________
`GREGOGOGOGOGOGOGOGOGOGOGOGOGOG RYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYRYR HHHH. WOODS
`
`GREGORY H. WOODS
`
`United States District Judge
`United States District Judge
`
`
`
`2
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
