`
`January 24, 2024
`
`1/26/2024
`
`Via ECF
`Hon. Gregory H. Woods
`United States District Court Judge
`Daniel Patrick Moynihan Courthouse
`500 Pearl Street
`New York, NY 10007
`
`Re: United States v. Enmanuel Liriano 22 Cr. 522 (GHW)
`
`Dear Judge Woods:
`
`John Diaz, Esq. and I represent Mr. Liriano in the above mentioned matter. I write to
`respectfully request a modification to Mr. Liriano’s bail conditions.
`
`Mr. Liriano and his girlfriend are expecting their first child anytime within the next
`couple of weeks. Their child is scheduled to be delivered at New York Presbyterian Hospital
`located on three blocks covering 165th to 168th and Broadway in Manhattan. A condition of Mr.
`Liriano's bail directs him to avoid travel within a five block radius of 174th and 175th Street in
`Manhattan. However, the quickest route to the Hospital from their home in New Jersey is to
`travel over the George Washington bridge directly to the hospital. In doing so, Mr. Liriano may
`inadvertently have to travel through the five block radius precluded in his bail conditions.
`
`Mr. Liriano respectfully requests a bail modification that will allow him to travel through
`the precluded five block radius to transport his girlfriend to New York Presbyterian for the birth
`of their child.
`
`The government and Mr. Liriano’s Pretrial Officer have no objections to the request.
`
`Application granted. If it is necessary for the defendant to
`travel through the precluded zone to bring his partner to the
`hospital for the birth of his child, he may do so for that
`limited purpose on that single occasion. The Clerk of Court
`is directed to terminate the motion pending at Dkt. No. 277.
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`
`___________________
`Cory Garcia, Esq.
`
`SO ORDERED.
`
`Dated: January 26, 2024
`New York, New York
`
`MEMORANDUM ENDORSED
`
`USDC SDNY
`DOCUMENT
`ELECTRONICALLY FILED
`DOC #:
`
`
`
`DATE FILED:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`_____________________________________
` GREGORY H. WOODS
` United States District Judge
`
`
`
`

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ ChargeStill Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site