Case 1:22-cr-00522-GHW Document 16 Filed 12/22/22 Page 1 of 1
`
`THE LAW FIRM OF
`
`CÉSAR DE CASTRO, P.C.
`
`ATTORNEY AT LAW
`
`MEMORANDUM ENDORSED
`
`December 21, 2022
`
`Via ECF
`
`The Honorable Gregory H. Woods
`United States District Judge
`United States Courthouse
`Southern District of New York
`500 Pearl St.
`New York, New York 10007
`
`The District
`111 Fulton Street - 602
`New York, New York 10038
`631.460.3951 Office
`646.285.2077 Mobile
`646.839.2682 Facsimile
`cdecastro@cdecastrolaw.com
`cdecastrolaw.com
`
`USDC SDNY
`DOCUMENT
`ELECTRONICALLY FILED
`DOC #:
`
`
`
`12/22/2022
`
`DATE FILED:
`
`
`Re: United States v. Christopher Santos, 22 Cr. 522 (GHW)
`
`Dear Judge Woods,
`
`We write, with the consent of the government and Pretrial Services, to request a modification of
`Mr. Santos’s bail conditions to include a curfew rather than home detention, and permit him to
`obtain employment. Currently, the conditions of Mr. Santos’s release only allow him to leave
`his home for dialysis, other medical appointments, and to meet with counsel. Mr. Santos would
`like to use his time on Pretrial Supervision productively and seek and obtain employment. As
`noted above, both the government and Pretrial Services consent to this request with the caveat
`that Mr. Santos not obtain overnight employment.
`
`Accordingly, we respectfully request that the court modify Mr. Santos’s conditions of release to
`permit him to seek and obtain employment and that his home confinement be replaced with a
`curfew (the hours decided at the discretion of Pretrial Services).
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/
`
`César de Castro
`
`Application denied. This application provides insufficient justification
`for the proposed modification of the conditions of Mr. Santos's pretrial release.
`The application appears not to describe accurately the conditions of Mr. Santos's
`pretrial release. Counsel states that "the conditions of Mr. Santos's release only
`allow him to leave his home for dialysis, other medical appointments, and to
`meet with counsel." This representation to the Court seems to be inconsistent
`with the release conditions described in Dkt. No. 4 at ECF page 5.
`The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion pending at Dkt. No. 15.
`cc: All Parties (via ECF)
`SO ORDERED.
`Dated: December 22, 2022
`New York, New York
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.