`
`THE LAW FIRM OF
`
`CÉSAR DE CASTRO, P.C.
`
`ATTORNEY AT LAW
`
`The District
`111 Fulton Street - 602
`New York, New York 10038
`631.460.3951 Office
`646.285.2077 Mobile
`646.839.2682 Facsimile
`cdecastro@cdecastrolaw.com
`cdecastrolaw.com
`
`February 24, 2023
`
`Via ECF
`
`The Honorable Gregory H. Woods
`United States District Judge
`United States Courthouse
`Southern District of New York
`500 Pearl St.
`New York, New York 10007
`
`2/27/2023
`
`Re: United States v. Christopher Santos, 22 Cr. 522 (GHW)
`
`Dear Judge Woods,
`
`We write to request, with the consent of the government and Pretrial Services, that Mr. Santos’s
`bail conditions be modified to permit Mr. Santos to visit his mother on a schedule set by Pretrial
`Services. This will be crucial for Mr. Santos to be eligible to receive the kidney transplant that
`he desperately needs.
`
`Mr. Santos currently does not have proper functioning kidneys and is awaiting a transplant. As a
`result, he is treated three times a week with dialysis. After attending his dialysis appointments,
`Mr. Santos is left physically drained and unable to cook for himself. The location of his dialysis
`treatments is close to his mother’s residence. Prior to his arrest, following his dialysis treatment,
`he would visit his mother who would cook for him at her house. He would eat and rest and
`return to his home somewhat rested and nourished. With his current restrictions, Mr. Santos is
`unable to visit his mother after his dialysis. He returns home after dialysis extremely fatigued
`and eats whatever is available, usually fast food, which is far from ideal nourishment following
`kidney dialysis.
`
`As noted above, Mr. Santos is currently on a kidney transplant waiting list. To be eligible for a
`donor kidney, a candidate must be healthy enough to receive the kidney. Since his arrest and
`home confinement, Mr. Santos’ health has deteriorated, which is putting his candidacy for
`transplant in jeopardy.
`
`Finally, as Mr. Santos was placed on home confinement before any of his co-defendants were
`indicted, his conditions of pretrial release do not preclude him from having contacts with any co-
`
`USDC SDNY
`DOCUMENT
`ELECTRONICALLY FILED
`DOC #:
`
`
`
`DATE FILED:
`
`
`
`MEMORANDUM ENDORSED
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cr-00522-GHW Document 110 Filed 02/27/23 Page 2 of 2
`
`defendants. The government requests and the defense consents to a modification that includes
`this condition.
`
`Accordingly, we respectfully request that the court modify Mr. Santos’s conditions of release to
`permit him to see his mother after his dialysis treatments on a schedule predetermined by Pretrial
`Services.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/
`
`César de Castro
`
` cc: All Parties (via ECF)
`
`Application granted. The conditions of Mr. Santos’ pretrial release are modified as follows: Mr. Santos may visit his
`mother following his dialysis treatments on a schedule to be determined by Pretrial Services. In addition, the
`defendant may not have contact with any of his co-defendants. The remaining conditions of Mr. Santos’ pretrial
`release remain in full force and effect.
`
`The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the gavel pending at Dkt. No. 108
`
`SO ORDERED.
`
`Dated: February 27, 2023
`New York, New York
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`_____________________________________
` GREGORY H. WOODS
` United States District Judge
`
`
`
`

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ ChargeStill Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site