`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
`----------------------------- - ------------x
`UNITED ST A TES OF AMERICA,
`
`-against-
`
`Sl 21-cr-0729 (LAK)
`
`TATIANA DANIEL,
`
`Defendant.
`------------------------------------------x
`
`MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
`
`LEWIS A. KAPLAN, District Judge.
`
`The defendant pled guilty to a series of outrageous frauds that took advantage of the
`COVID-19 pandemic for her own benefit. She was sentenced on April 29, 2024 in principal part
`to a term of imprisonment of 33 months. The Court granted her request for voluntary surrender to
`the Bureau of Prisons ("BOP") on the date and by the time designated by it, which was not to be
`earlier than June 6, 2024, and continued her on bail pending her surrender.
`
`Shortly thereafter, the defendant, through counsel, requested a 30-day extension of
`the self-surrender date, ostensibly to permit her to earn or otherwise procure additional funds to add
`to her BOP commissary account for use after she entered BOP custody. The Court agreed to a July
`8 date.
`
`The defendant, acting prose though she is represented by counsel, now says that she
`"require[ s] a further extension of her self-surrender date by another sixty ( 60) days." The ostensible
`reason is that the BOP has designated FCI Waseca, Minnesota, as the place for the service of her
`sentence., that Waseca is a long way from New York City, and that the defendant, her ailing mother
`and others in the family would be forced to make a long and costly trip in order to surrender there.
`Defendant hopes in the extended period to persuade the BOP to redesignate her to an institution
`closer to New York.
`
`This Court granted defendant's request to be permitted to surrender voluntarily at the
`institution designated by the BOP - rather than ordering her remand to the custody of the US
`Marshal immediately upon imposition of sentence -- for her convenience. And surely the long and
`costly trip for defendant, not to mention her mother and other family members who are not required
`to accompany defendant when she surrenders, may be avoided quite simply. Among other options,
`defendant and the family members simply could say their goodbyes in a more convenient and less
`costly location.
`
`
`
`Case 1:21-cr-00729-LAK Document 135 Filed 06/17/24 Page 2 of 2
`
`2
`
`The request for a 60-day extension is denied. The prior order directing surrender at
`the institution designated by the BOP for the service of defendant's sentence is vacated. Defendant
`is directed to surrender to the US Marshal for this district on the fourth floor of the courthouse at 500
`Pearl Street, New York, NY on July 8, 2024 before 2 p.m. This will relieve defendant herself of the
`cost of the trip to Waseca, Minnesota, as she would be transported at government expense. It would
`permit her family to accompany her to the place of surrender right here in New York City and spare
`them the cost and inconvenience of a trip to Minnesota.
`
`Nothing herein should be construed as indicating a negative view by the Court with
`respect to defendant's attempt to have the BOP redesignate her to a facility closer to New York. The
`Court would have no objection to such action.
`
`SO ORDERED.
`
`Dated:
`
`June 17, 2024
`
`

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ ChargeStill Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site