CLEARY GOTTLIEB STEEN & HAMILTON LLP
`
`Case 1:21-cr-00067-DLC Document 47 Filed 11/29/21 Page 1 of 2
`Page 1 of 2
`Case 1:21-cr-00067-DLC Document 46 Filed 11/23/21
`STEVEN M.LOES
`BENET J, OHEILLY
`CRAIG EB. BROOD
`ADAME, FLEISHER
`HIGOLAS GRABAR
`SEAN A. O'HEAL
`DAVID E. BRODSKY
`GLENNP, MOGRORY
`RICHARD J. COOPER
`MATTHEW P, SALERND:
`MICHAEL J. ALBANO
`JEFFREY 5, LEWIS.
`PAUL J. SHIM
`VICTOR |. HOU
`STEVEN L. WILHER
`ROGER A, COOPER
`ANDRES DE LA CRUZ
`AMY R. SHAPIRO
`DAVID C. LOPEZ
`JENNIFER KENNEDY PARK
`MICHAEL A. GERSTEHZANG
`ELIZABETH LENAS
`LUKE A. BAREFOOT
`LEV L. BASSIM
`JORGE, JUANTORENA
`JONATHAN S, HOLOGDHER
`MICHAEL D. WE/NAERGER
`DANIEL ILAH
`MEYER HK. FEQIDA
`GAVID LEINWANO
`DIAHA L. WOLLMAH
`AORIATC R, EFIPSIS
`JEFFREY A. ROSENTHAL
`ELIZABETH VICENS
`MICHAEL &, DAYAH
`ADAM J. BRENHERAH
`ARID. MAGKINHOW
`CARMINE D. BDCCUZZI, JA.
`JAMES E. LANGSTON
`JEFFAEY D. KARBF
`KIMBERLY GROWN BLACKLOW
`JARED GERBER
`COLIN D. LLOYD
`AOQGERT J. RAYMOHD
`COREY HS. GOODMAN
`FRANCISCO L_ CESTERO
`FRANCESCA L. OOELL
`RISHE ZUTSHI
`WILLIAM L. MCRAE
`JANEVAHLARE
`DAVID H. HERRINGTON
`JASON FACTOR
`JOON H. KIM
`KIMBERLY R. SPOERRI
`AAROHJ. METERS
`MARGARET5. PEPOHIS
`DANIEL &. REYNOLDS
`LISA M. SCHWEITZER
`AUDRY X. CASUSOL
`JUAN G. GIRALDEZ
`ABEHA A. MAINOG
`DUANE HOLAUGHLIN
`HREOH S, PEACE
`HUGH C. CONROY, JA
`CHANTAL &. KORDULA
`JOSEPH LAHZKRON
`
`One Liberty Plaza
`New York, NY 10006-14706
`T: +4 212 225 2000
`F; +1 212 2253999
`
`clearygoittlieb.com
`
`WASHINGTON,D.C, : PARIS + BRUSSELS - LONDON « MOSCOW
`FRANKFURT +» COLOGNE - ROME + MILAN « HONG KONG
`BEVJING » BUENOS AIRES + SAO PAULO » ABUDHABI - SEQUL
`
`MAURIGE R. GINDH
`KATHERINE R. REAVES
`RAHUL MUKHI
`ELANA 5. BRONSON
`MANUEL SILVA
`KYLE A. HARAIS
`LINA BETSMAH
`AROHW MM. ZUCKERMAN
`KENHETH 5. ALAZEJEWSEI
`MARY E. HCDOGRALD
`F. JAMAL FULTOH
`RESIDENT PARTHEAS:
`SANDRA KM. ROCKS
`JUDITH KASSEL
`PENELGPE L. CHRISFOPHOROU
`BOAZ 5. MORAG
`MARY E. ALCOCH
`HEIDE H. ILGENFRITZ
`ANDREW WEAVER
`HELEMA K. GRAMHIS:
`JGHH¥. HARRISOR
`NEIL 8. MARKEL
`LAURA SAGARELLA
`JONATHAN DAW. GIFFORD
`SUSANMA E. PARKER
`DAVID WS, YUEN
`RESIGENT COUNSEL
`LOLYSE M. PARENT
`OF COUNSEL
`
`
`
`D; +£ 212-225-2950
`jkim@cgsh.com
`
`BY ECF
`
`The Honorable Denise L. Cote
`United States District Judge
`Southern District of New York
`500 Pearl Street, Courtroom 18B
`New York, NY 10007
`
`November 23, 2021
`
`Re: United States v. Daniel B. Kamensky, 21-cr-67 (DLC)
`
`Dear Judge Cote:
`
`Werepresent Daniel B. Kamensky, the defendant, in the above-captioned case. Pursuant
`to the sentence the Court imposed on May 7, 2021 of six months’ incarceration, followed by six
`months’ supervised released with a condition of home detention, Mr. Kamenskyis set to
`commencehis term of six months’ supervised release on December 16, 2021. In connection
`with the supervised release, we write to request the Court’s approval: (1) for the Probation
`Department to use smart phone location monitoring technology as the means of monitoring Mr.
`Kamensky’s home detention under supervised release; and (2) for Mr. Kamenskyto be permitted
`to visit his ailing father in Florida from December 20 to 26, 2021, during which time he will be
`under monitored home detention at his father’s residence.
`
`First, we understand from the Probation Departmentthat one of the available methods of
`monitoring home detention under supervised release includes location monitoring through a
`smart phone, as opposed to an electronic bracelet. The Probation Department seeks to employ
`this method of monitoring for Mr. Kamensky’s supervised release. Because the Judgment does
`not reflect any specific mannerin which home detention would be monitored, in order to use the
`this location monitoring option, the Probation Department has asked that we obtain the Court’s
`approval for the Probation Department to monitor home detention under the following terms:
`
`The defendantshall be monitored by location monitoring for a period of
`six months, using specific technology to be determined by the Probation
`
`Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP or an affiliated entity has an office in each ofthecities listed above.
`
`

`

`Case 1:21-cr-00067-DLC Document 47 Filed 11/29/21 Page 2 of 2
`Case 1:21-cr-00067-DLC Document 46 Filed 11/23/21 Page 2 of 2
`
`The Honorable Denise L. Cote
`p. 2
`
`Department. The defendantis restricted to his residenceat all times,
`except for employment; education; religious services; medical, substance
`abuse, or mental health treatment; attorney visits; court appearances;
`court-ordered obligations; or other activities as preapproved by the
`supervising Probation Officer. The defendant shall abide byall
`technology requirements and shall payail or part of the costs of
`participation in the location monitoring program, as directed by the Court
`and supervising Probation Officer.
`
`Second, as the Court may recall from the sentencing submissions, Mr. Kamensky’s
`elderly father is ill and resides in Florida. We respectfully request that Mr. Kamensky be
`permitted to visit his father from December 20 to 26, 2021, during which time he will comply
`with the same conditions of home detention at his father’s residence, including through use of the
`same location monitoring technology.
`
`The Probation Departmentjoins in the request that the terms of home detention include
`smatt phone location monitoring technology and does not object to the requested visit to Mr.
`Kamensky’s father. The Government does not object to the requests.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ Joon H. Kim
`
`Joon H. Kim
`
`ce:
`
`Probation Officer Javier Enciso (by email)
`AUSA Richard Cooper (by email)
`AUSA Daniel Tracer (by email)
`
`branted”
`
`fone Che
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.