`Case 1:20-cv-00769-JGK-SDA Document i177 Filed 01/20/23 Pade 1 of 7
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
`
`Case No. 20-cv-769-IGK-SDA
`
`[PROPOSED] DEFAULT JUDGMENT
`AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION
`
`CENGAGE LEARNING,INC., BEDFORD,
`FREEMAN & WORTH PUBLISHING GROUP,
`LLC d/b/a MACMILLAN LEARNING,
`ELSEVIER INC., MCGRAW HILL LLC, and
`PEARSON EDUCATION,INC.,
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`Vv.
`
`TRUNG KIEN NGUYEN, DUY ANH NGUYEN,
`DUONG THI BAY, XUAN CHINH NGUYEN,
`TUAN ANH NGUYEN, VINH NGOC NGUYEN,
`LE TRANG, VAN QUYNH PHAM,THI LIEN
`PHUONG NGUYEN, VAN TUAN DANG, HIEN
`VO VAN, QUANG NGUYEN,JESSICA
`GOLDBERG, MAXIM GUBCEAC, TRACEY
`LUM, RODNEY MOUZONE, ZAINEE JALLAL,
`LUU VAN DOAN, BUI HAI LINH, MOHD
`HANIFF HASLAM, RAFAN WASEEF, SAMEER
`YAMAN, STEFAN DEMETER, SHAHBAZ
`HAIDER, ERIKA DEMETEROVA, ROSTISLAV
`ZHURAVSKIY, SUSAN RAGON, WALESKA
`CAMACHO, ANJUM AKHTER, HASEEB
`ANJUM, MUHD IZHAN KHAIRUL, VU XUAN
`TRUONG, BINH NGUYEN, ANTHONY
`TORRESMICHAEL MCEVILLEY, CORNELL
`KILLEBREW, MOHD ALI KAMIL, ADAM
`HAROLD, ABDUL RAHIM MOHSIN, REFAT
`HAMOUDA, MOHAMED SABEK, DO THANH
`DUY, CRIS AUSTIN, and WASRI WAMIN,
`
`Case 1:20-cv-00769-JGK-SDA Document 178 Filed 01/20/23 Page 1 of 11
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`JOHN G. KOELTL,District Judge:
`
`Plaintiffs Cengage Learning,
`
`Inc., Elsevier
`
`Inc., McGraw Hill LLC, and Pearson
`
`Education, Inc. (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) initiated this action on January 29, 2020 against Doe
`
`Defendants. Compl., ECF No. 1. At the same time that they filed the Complaint, Plaintiffs filed
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`GeeL20-CV-O07ESIGKSDA Document17? Filed 013013 PageZc7~
`
`an ex parte application for a Temporary Restraining Order, expedited discovery, Order to Show
`
`Cause why a Preliminary Injunction should not issue, and alternate service by email, which the
`
`Court granted on January 29, 2020. Ex Parte Order, ECF No. ll. Plaintiffs served the Doe
`
`Defendants by email with the Ex Parte Order,
`
`their moving papers,
`
`the Complaint, and the
`
`Summons. See Decl. of Service, ECF No. 9. After a show cause hearing, at which Defendants
`
`did not appear, the Court issued a Preliminary Injunction against the Doe Defendants on February
`
`24, 2020. Prelim. Inj., ECF No. 14. On March 19, 2020, upon Plaintiffs’ motion, the Court issued
`
`an Amended Preliminary Injunction. Am. Prelim. Inj., ECF No. 25. After conducting expedited
`
`discovery, Plaintiffs filed the Amended Complaint on July 1, 2020, naming Defendant Michael
`
`McEvilley, amongst others, (“Defendant”or “McEvilley”) on July 1, 2020. ECF No. 36. Plaintiffs
`
`served the Amended Complaint and Summons on Defendant on August 31, 2020. ECF No. 100.
`
`Defendant did notfile Answers or otherwise respond to the Complaintor the Amended Complaint.
`
`OnPlaintiffs’ supporting papers, on August 20, 2021, the Clerk of the Court entered a Certificate
`
`of Default against Defendant McEvilley. ECF No, 146.
`
`On August 31, 2021, Plaintiffs submitted an Order to Show Cause and memorandum in
`
`support of their request to enter a default judgment and permanent injunction against Defendant
`
`Case 1:20-cv-00769-JGK-SDA Document 178 Filed 01/20/23 Page 2 of 11
`
`pursuant to, inter alia, Rules 55(b) and 65(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. ECF Nos.
`
`148-153.
`
`On October11, 2022, the Court issued an Order determining that Plaintiffs are entitled to
`
`a default judgment and referred the case to Magistrate Judge Aaron to conduct an inquest. ECF
`
`No. 165.
`
`On November2, 2022, Plaintiffs filed their Proposed Findings of Fact, Memorandum of
`
`Law, and Declaration in support of the inquest. ECF Nos, 169-171.
`
`
`
`SEs6L2OVOOTOITOK SOA Document177 Pied O1/2023 page3a7
`
`On November21, 2022, Magistrate Judge Aaron issued his Report & Recommendation
`
`(“Report & Recommendation), recommending that Plaintiffs be awarded $1,500,000 in statutory
`
`damages; a permanentinjunction be entered in Plaintiffs’ favor; a post-judgment asset restraint be
`
`imposed; the automatic stay of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 62(a) be dissolved to allow for
`
`immediate enforcement of the judgment; and the judgmentprovide forthe transfer of Defendant’s
`
`frozen assets to Plaintiffs. ECF No. 174.
`
`On January 11, 2023, the Court issued an Order indicating that it was adopting the Report
`
`& Recommendation. ECF No. 176.
`
`NOW, THEREFORE, having adopted the Report & Recommendation and reviewed the
`
`entire record herein, the Court HEREBY FINDS that:
`
`A.
`
`Plaintiffs are higher education publishers. Plaintiffs’ publications include physical
`
`and digital textbooks that are widely available in the United States to consumers and sold through
`
`direct sales channels and legitimate distributors and stores, including through onlinesales.
`
`B.
`
`Defendant intentionally reproduces and distributes for sale electronic, infringing
`
`copies of Plaintiffs’ copyrighted textbooks. Defendant does so through websites he owns and/or
`
`operates. Defendant’s websites namedin the original Complaint and additional websites identified
`
`Case 1:20-cv-00769-JGK-SDA Document 178 Filed 01/20/23 Page 3 of 11
`
`by Plaintiffs through third-party discovery in this action are listed as “Infringing Sites - Original
`
`Complaint” and “Infringing Sites - Associated Sites,” respectively, on Appendix A hereto
`
`(collectively, “Infringing Sites”).
`
`Cc.
`
`Defendant has been properly servedin this action with the Complaint, the Amended
`
`Complaint, and the Summonses;
`
`
`
`EseLIEVOOTEOIGKSDA Document177 Filed OL083 Page4ct'7
`
`D.
`
`Because Defendanthas notfiled an Answer, otherwise responded to the Complaint
`
`or the Amended Complaint, or otherwise appearedin this action, the Clerk of Court entered default
`
`against Defendant on August 20, 2021;
`
`E.
`
`Plaintiffs own the copyrights or exclusively control all rights, title, and interest in
`
`their respective works described on Exhibit C to the Amended Complaint(the “Authentic Works”),
`
`which is appended hereto as Appendix B;
`
`FE,
`
`Defendanthas willfully infringed Plaintiffs’ copyrights in the Authentic Works in
`
`connection with Defendant’s reproduction and distribution of unauthorized copies of Plaintiffs’
`
`textbooks, and Defendant,
`
`therefore,
`
`is liable for willful copyright
`
`infringement under the
`
`Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. §§ 101, ef seq.;
`
`G.
`
`Defendant’s willful infringement of Plaintiffs’ copyrights in the Authentic Works
`
`has caused Plaintiffs irreparable harm;
`
`H.
`
`As a result of Defendant’s unlawful conduct, Plaintiffs are entitled to the entry of a
`
`final judgment and permanent injunction against Defendant.
`
`Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, m
`
`accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d), Defendant, his officers, agents, servants,
`
`Case 1:20-cv-00769-JGK-SDA Document 178 Filed 01/20/23 Page 4 of 11
`
`employees, and attorneys, andall those in active concert or participation with him, are permanently
`
`enjoined and restrained from directly or indirectly infringing the copyrights owned or exclusively
`
`controlled by any of the Plaintiffs (or any parent, subsidiary, or affiliate of a Plaintiff), whether
`
`now in existence orlater created.
`
`Without limiting the foregoing, IT IS FURTHER ORDEREDthat, in accordance with
`
`Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d), Defendant, his officers, agents, servants, employees, and
`
`attorneys, and all those in active concert orparticipation with him, are permanently enjoined and
`
`
`
`CASEToy0NGIGECRBa AgsumentLs Filed Qr/seis3 Bg9ee git
`
`restrained from engaging in any of the followingacts:
`
`Directly or indirectly infringing any copyrighted workthat is owned orexclusively
`controlled by any of the Plaintiffs (“Plaintiffs’ Textbooks”), i.e., any copyrighted
`work published under any of the imprints identified on AppendixChereto;
`
`1)
`
`2)
`
`3)
`
`4)
`
`transmitting,
`reproducing, manufacturing, downloading, uploading,
`Copying,
`distributing, selling, offering to sell, advertising, marketing, promoting, or
`otherwise exploiting any of Plaintiffs’ Textbooks without Plaintiffs’ express
`written authorization;
`
`Enabling,facilitating, permitting, assisting, soliciting, encouraging, or inducing the
`copying, reproduction, manufacture, download, upload, transmission, distribution,
`sale, offering forsale, advertisement, marketing, promotion, or other exploitation
`of any of Plaintiffs’ Textbooks without Plaintiffs’ express written authorization;
`and
`
`Using, hosting, operating, maintaining, creating, or registering any computer
`server, website, domain name, domain name server, cloud storage, e-commerce
`platform, online advertising service, social media platform, or payment processing
`service to enable, facilitate, permit, assist, solicit, encourage, or induce the
`infringement of Plaintiffs’ Textbooks, as set forth in subparagraphs(1) through (3)
`above.
`
`IT IS FURTHER ORDEREDthat, pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 504(c), Plaintiffs’ request for
`
`statutory damages under the Copyright Act is granted, and Plaintiffs are awarded statutory
`
`damages of $1,500,000 against Defendant for his willful infringement of ten of Plaintiffs’
`
`Authentic Works.
`
`Case 1:20-cv-00769-JGK-SDA Document 178 Filed 01/20/23 Page 5 of 11
`
`IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
`
`69(a) and N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 5222(b), Defendant, his officers, agents, servants, employees, and
`
`attorneys, and all those in active concert or participation with him, and any financialinstitutions,
`
`i.c., banks, payment processing companies, savings and loan associations, credit card companies,
`
`credit card processing agencies, merchant acquiring banks, or other companics or agencies that
`
`engage in the processing ortransfer of money and/orotherassets (“Financial Institutions”), who
`
`receive actual notice ofthis Order, must immediately cease transferring, withdrawing, or otherwise
`
`
`
`SSs8L:20-ov-00760TGKSDA Document177 Filed 0130/23 pageedt7
`
`disposing of any moneyorotherassets in accounts holding or receiving moncy or other assets of
`
`Defendant’s, or in which Defendant has an interest (with “Defendant” for purposes of this
`
`provision meaning those personsdescribed by the names,aliases, and/or email addresses identified
`
`on Appendix A), including but notlimited to those accounts specified on Appendix D hereto
`
`(“Defendant’s Accounts”), or allowing such money orotherassets in Defendant’s Accounts to be
`
`transferred, withdrawn, or otherwise disposedof, until such time as the judgmentset forth herein
`
`is satisfied,
`
`IT 18 FURTHER ORDEREDthat the stay to enforce a judgment imposed by Rule 62(a)
`
`of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is hereby dissolved and Plaintiffs may immediately enforce
`
`the judgmentset forth herein.
`
`IT IS FURTHER ORDEREDthat in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 64,
`
`N.Y. C.P.LR. § 5225, and this Court’s inherent equitable powers to issue remedies ancillary to its
`
`authority to provide final relief, Financial Institutions holding currently restrained assets in
`
`Defendant’s Accounts shall release such assets to Plaintiffs in partial satisfaction of the damages
`
`award set forth herein within ten (10) business days following actual notice ofthis Order.
`
`IT IS FURTHER ORDEREDthat Defendantshall deliver to Plaintiffs for destruction all
`
`Case 1:20-cv-00769-JGK-SDA Document 178 Filed 01/20/23 Page 6 of 11
`
`electronic copies of Plaintiffs’ Textbooks, or derivative works thereof, that Defendant has in his
`
`possession, custody, or control, and all devices by means of which such copies have been created,
`
`pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 303.
`
`IT IS FURTHER ORDEREDthat the Clerk of Court is hereby directed to release the
`
`$10,000 cash bond, posted in accordance with the Ex Parte Order, to Plaintiffs by sendingit to
`
`their attorneys of record, Oppenheim + Zebrak, LLP,at 4530 Wisconsin Avenue, NW,5th Floor,
`
`Washington, DC 20016.
`
`
`
`eeTOECOMERISD, WGHMENAT Fled SHBOR? Rage
`
`IT IS FURTHER ORDEREDthat this Court shall retain jurisdiction over the parties and
`
`the subject matter of this litigation for the purpose of interpretation and enforcement of this
`
`Permanent Injunction.
`
`FINAL JUDGMENTis hereby entered in favor of Plaintiffs against Defendant Michael
`
`McEvilley in the total amount of $1,500,000, as described above, plus post-judgment interest
`
`calculated at the rate set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1961.
`
`oo;“y
`
` Itis SO ORDEREDthis 2Uday of
`-%,Vo fey,
`eeOficle
`
`HON. JOHN G. KOELTL
`United States District Judge
`
`Case 1:20-cv-00769-JGK-SDA Document 178 Filed 01/20/23 Page 7 of 11
`
`
`
`C
`
`1:20-cv-00769-
`
`Case 1:20cv00J6OIGK-SDA Document171 Pied01/203 ‘Page * 8 1°
`
`-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`finfo.uberbooks@gmaileom|
`Jinfowuberbooks@gmaileom
`[kiwibookelub21@emailcom
`[kiwibookolu621@gmailcom|
`fiavishsupplyxo@gmaikeom|
`fmohammadahlan87@outlook.com|
`[mohammadahlan87@outlookcom|
`[myfavoritethingsO2@gmailcom|
`[myfavoritethingsO2@pmailcom|
`Pp
`Po
`Po
`Pp
`po
`oT
`shop.bestbook@gmail.com
`shop.besthookz@pmailcomET
`[smartedu.contact@gmaileom|
`smarteducontact@gmailcom|
`[surelyskateco@gmailcom|
`
`DEFAULT JUDGMENT APPENDIX A
`Cengage Learning, Ine., et al. v. Trung Kien Nguyen, et al, Civil Action No. 20-cv-769-JGR
`
`
` ‘ngingSites-Original.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`InfringingSites= 02"
`
`|inn
`
`
`o
`mall Addresses
`:
`5
`Defendant'sAliases
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`“Associated Sites
`-
`
`“Complaint
`:
`
`
`
`
`besthookz.myshopify.com**
`Adam Haris Hamzah
`ahmadanwaribinzakaria@outlook.my
`ebookspot.shap
`:
`ify.
`b
`=
`Ahmad Amwari Zakaria
`ooksddays.myshopify.com
`ridaycollection.myskopify.com
`—_|azmeerkh@gmail.com
`a-shopp.myshopify.com
`
`iwibookclub.myshopify.com _[booksdkimi@gmail.com—_[pdfxpress.com
`
`[AnwarBusiness __—_—_[payversitystore,myshopify.com _[ebaokspo2019@gmaiteom|
`[Biizzardbooks ______|smart-edu-store.myshopify.com
`[Raycollection.contact@@gmail.com[|
`ooks4Kimi
`studentnclass.myshopify.com
`help.pdfxpress@gmail.com
`i
`ibrahimroslanG | @gmail.com
`Danial Hungry
`Icmxmedia@gmail.com Po
`=
`infokoalaprint@gnuail.com PT
`info. payversilystore@gmail.comYTrtrt—SY
`
`|=
`
`=B
`
`Po
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-00769-JGK-SDA Document 178 Filed 01/20/23 Page 8 of 11
`
`
`
`Case1.20cv0076eeSBA Bocument178. FiledOMeMes Rage 9 ot 1
`
`DEFAULT JUDGMENT APPENDIX 8B
`Cengage Learning, Inc., et al. v. Trung Kien Nguyen, et al, Civil Action No. 20-cv-769-JGK
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`TX0007165716
`TX0008733303
`TX0008778862
`TX0007929583
`
`McGraw Hill|Taxation of Individuals, 8th TX0008738099
`Pearson
`Campbell Biology, I 1th
`TX0608472354
`
`
`Pharmacology for Nurses A Pathophysiologic Approach, Sth
`|TX0008241655
`
`REGISTRATION NUMBER
`TX000876463 |
`TX0008390253
`TX0008702724
`
`TXG0088 16586nn
`
`SS TYTLE Choo
`Oo
`A Guide to Crisis Intervention, 6th
`Essentials of Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences, 8th
`Foundations of Marketing, 8th
`rinciples of Microeconomics, 3th
`harmacology and the Nursing Process, 8th
`|Diugs, Society, and Human Behavior, 17th
`|Marketing, 7th
`
`
`
`
`McGraw Hill
`McGraw Hill
`
`
`
`P P
`
`Case 1:20-cv-00769-JGK-SDA Document 178 Filed 01/20/23 Page 9 of 11
`
`
`
`CV
`Vv-007
`Case 1:20-
`Case
`0-c
`1:2
`
`cv-00baaShEh Realient 159.3hSYUfhG3s Fagsap Htt
`
`
`
`DEFAULT JUDGMENT APPENDIX C
`Cengage Learning, Inc., et al. vy. Trung Kien Nguyen, et al, Civil Action No, 20-cv-769-JGK
`
`‘Cengage Learning 2 Macmillan Learning
`Brooks Cole
`Bedford, Freeman & Worth High School
`Cengage
`Publishers
`Cengage Learning
`Bedford/St. Martin’s
`Course Technology
`BFW
`Delmar
`BFW High Scheol Publishers
`Gale
`Freeman
`Heinle
`Macmillan Learning
`Milady
`W.H. Freeman & Company
`National Geographic Learning
`Worth
`South-Western Educational Publishing
`Worth Publishers
`
`Wadsworth _
`
`Elsevier.
`Syke
`Academic Cell
`Medicine Publishing
`Academic Press
`Morgan Kaufmann Publishers
`Amirsys
`Mosby
`Butterworth Heinemann
`Newnes
`Digital Press
`North Holland
`Elsevier
`Saunders
`Gulf Professional Publishing
`Urban & Fischer
`Hanley & Belfus
`William Andrew
`Knovel
`Woodhead Publishing
`
`Made2SimpleBoos
`=
`-McGraw Hill :
`BEE Pearson
`
`irwin
`Addison Wesley
`Lange
`Adobe Press
`McGraw-Hill
`Allyn & Bacon
`McGraw-Hill Education
`Benjamin Cummings
`McGraw-Hill Higher Education
`Brady
`Case 1:20-cv-00769-JGK-SDA Document 178 Filed 01/20/23 Page 10 of 11
`Cisco Press
`McGraw-Hill Professional
`Financial Times Press/FT Press
`McGraw-Hill Ryerson
`McGraw-Hill/Appleton & Lange
`IBM Press
`McGraw-Hill/Contemporary
`Longman
`McGraw-Hill/Dushkin
`New Riders Press
`McGraw-Hill/lrwin
`Peachpit Press
`McGraw Hill
`Pearson
`NTC/Contemporary
`Pearson Education
`Osborne
`Que Publishing
`Sams Publishing
`Schaum’s
`
`
`
`aseOOoTe Bocument 155USAUa. aggatt
`
`DEFAULT JUDGMENT APPENDIX D
`Cengage Learning, Inc., et al. v. Trung Kien Nguyen, et al, Civil Action No. 20-cv-769-JGK
`
`“Financial Institution’ =)Account Number >
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BankofAmericaiPITT3SSS
`
`
`
`BankofAmeria(S18
`PayPal«BRAS
`
`
`Papas
`eo|oy]ro
`PayPalTI
`
`PayPalse
`
`
`PayPalS—~«iPBN
`Oo}
`
`rg
`
`fa]Ma]
`
`*AKAB
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-00769-JGK-SDA Document 178 Filed 01/20/23 Page 11 of 11
`
`
`
`