throbber
Case 1:20-cv-00769-JGK-SDA Document 178 Filed 01/20/23 Page 1 of 11
`Case 1:20-cv-00769-JGK-SDA Document i177 Filed 01/20/23 Pade 1 of 7
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
`
`Case No. 20-cv-769-IGK-SDA
`
`[PROPOSED] DEFAULT JUDGMENT
`AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION
`
`CENGAGE LEARNING,INC., BEDFORD,
`FREEMAN & WORTH PUBLISHING GROUP,
`LLC d/b/a MACMILLAN LEARNING,
`ELSEVIER INC., MCGRAW HILL LLC, and
`PEARSON EDUCATION,INC.,
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`Vv.
`
`TRUNG KIEN NGUYEN, DUY ANH NGUYEN,
`DUONG THI BAY, XUAN CHINH NGUYEN,
`TUAN ANH NGUYEN, VINH NGOC NGUYEN,
`LE TRANG, VAN QUYNH PHAM,THI LIEN
`PHUONG NGUYEN, VAN TUAN DANG, HIEN
`VO VAN, QUANG NGUYEN,JESSICA
`GOLDBERG, MAXIM GUBCEAC, TRACEY
`LUM, RODNEY MOUZONE, ZAINEE JALLAL,
`LUU VAN DOAN, BUI HAI LINH, MOHD
`HANIFF HASLAM, RAFAN WASEEF, SAMEER
`YAMAN, STEFAN DEMETER, SHAHBAZ
`HAIDER, ERIKA DEMETEROVA, ROSTISLAV
`ZHURAVSKIY, SUSAN RAGON, WALESKA
`CAMACHO, ANJUM AKHTER, HASEEB
`ANJUM, MUHD IZHAN KHAIRUL, VU XUAN
`TRUONG, BINH NGUYEN, ANTHONY
`TORRESMICHAEL MCEVILLEY, CORNELL
`KILLEBREW, MOHD ALI KAMIL, ADAM
`HAROLD, ABDUL RAHIM MOHSIN, REFAT
`HAMOUDA, MOHAMED SABEK, DO THANH
`DUY, CRIS AUSTIN, and WASRI WAMIN,
`
`Case 1:20-cv-00769-JGK-SDA Document 178 Filed 01/20/23 Page 1 of 11
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`JOHN G. KOELTL,District Judge:
`
`Plaintiffs Cengage Learning,
`
`Inc., Elsevier
`
`Inc., McGraw Hill LLC, and Pearson
`
`Education, Inc. (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) initiated this action on January 29, 2020 against Doe
`
`Defendants. Compl., ECF No. 1. At the same time that they filed the Complaint, Plaintiffs filed
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`GeeL20-CV-O07ESIGKSDA Document17? Filed 013013 PageZc7~
`
`an ex parte application for a Temporary Restraining Order, expedited discovery, Order to Show
`
`Cause why a Preliminary Injunction should not issue, and alternate service by email, which the
`
`Court granted on January 29, 2020. Ex Parte Order, ECF No. ll. Plaintiffs served the Doe
`
`Defendants by email with the Ex Parte Order,
`
`their moving papers,
`
`the Complaint, and the
`
`Summons. See Decl. of Service, ECF No. 9. After a show cause hearing, at which Defendants
`
`did not appear, the Court issued a Preliminary Injunction against the Doe Defendants on February
`
`24, 2020. Prelim. Inj., ECF No. 14. On March 19, 2020, upon Plaintiffs’ motion, the Court issued
`
`an Amended Preliminary Injunction. Am. Prelim. Inj., ECF No. 25. After conducting expedited
`
`discovery, Plaintiffs filed the Amended Complaint on July 1, 2020, naming Defendant Michael
`
`McEvilley, amongst others, (“Defendant”or “McEvilley”) on July 1, 2020. ECF No. 36. Plaintiffs
`
`served the Amended Complaint and Summons on Defendant on August 31, 2020. ECF No. 100.
`
`Defendant did notfile Answers or otherwise respond to the Complaintor the Amended Complaint.
`
`OnPlaintiffs’ supporting papers, on August 20, 2021, the Clerk of the Court entered a Certificate
`
`of Default against Defendant McEvilley. ECF No, 146.
`
`On August 31, 2021, Plaintiffs submitted an Order to Show Cause and memorandum in
`
`support of their request to enter a default judgment and permanent injunction against Defendant
`
`Case 1:20-cv-00769-JGK-SDA Document 178 Filed 01/20/23 Page 2 of 11
`
`pursuant to, inter alia, Rules 55(b) and 65(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. ECF Nos.
`
`148-153.
`
`On October11, 2022, the Court issued an Order determining that Plaintiffs are entitled to
`
`a default judgment and referred the case to Magistrate Judge Aaron to conduct an inquest. ECF
`
`No. 165.
`
`On November2, 2022, Plaintiffs filed their Proposed Findings of Fact, Memorandum of
`
`Law, and Declaration in support of the inquest. ECF Nos, 169-171.
`
`

`

`SEs6L2OVOOTOITOK SOA Document177 Pied O1/2023 page3a7
`
`On November21, 2022, Magistrate Judge Aaron issued his Report & Recommendation
`
`(“Report & Recommendation), recommending that Plaintiffs be awarded $1,500,000 in statutory
`
`damages; a permanentinjunction be entered in Plaintiffs’ favor; a post-judgment asset restraint be
`
`imposed; the automatic stay of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 62(a) be dissolved to allow for
`
`immediate enforcement of the judgment; and the judgmentprovide forthe transfer of Defendant’s
`
`frozen assets to Plaintiffs. ECF No. 174.
`
`On January 11, 2023, the Court issued an Order indicating that it was adopting the Report
`
`& Recommendation. ECF No. 176.
`
`NOW, THEREFORE, having adopted the Report & Recommendation and reviewed the
`
`entire record herein, the Court HEREBY FINDS that:
`
`A.
`
`Plaintiffs are higher education publishers. Plaintiffs’ publications include physical
`
`and digital textbooks that are widely available in the United States to consumers and sold through
`
`direct sales channels and legitimate distributors and stores, including through onlinesales.
`
`B.
`
`Defendant intentionally reproduces and distributes for sale electronic, infringing
`
`copies of Plaintiffs’ copyrighted textbooks. Defendant does so through websites he owns and/or
`
`operates. Defendant’s websites namedin the original Complaint and additional websites identified
`
`Case 1:20-cv-00769-JGK-SDA Document 178 Filed 01/20/23 Page 3 of 11
`
`by Plaintiffs through third-party discovery in this action are listed as “Infringing Sites - Original
`
`Complaint” and “Infringing Sites - Associated Sites,” respectively, on Appendix A hereto
`
`(collectively, “Infringing Sites”).
`
`Cc.
`
`Defendant has been properly servedin this action with the Complaint, the Amended
`
`Complaint, and the Summonses;
`
`

`

`EseLIEVOOTEOIGKSDA Document177 Filed OL083 Page4ct'7
`
`D.
`
`Because Defendanthas notfiled an Answer, otherwise responded to the Complaint
`
`or the Amended Complaint, or otherwise appearedin this action, the Clerk of Court entered default
`
`against Defendant on August 20, 2021;
`
`E.
`
`Plaintiffs own the copyrights or exclusively control all rights, title, and interest in
`
`their respective works described on Exhibit C to the Amended Complaint(the “Authentic Works”),
`
`which is appended hereto as Appendix B;
`
`FE,
`
`Defendanthas willfully infringed Plaintiffs’ copyrights in the Authentic Works in
`
`connection with Defendant’s reproduction and distribution of unauthorized copies of Plaintiffs’
`
`textbooks, and Defendant,
`
`therefore,
`
`is liable for willful copyright
`
`infringement under the
`
`Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. §§ 101, ef seq.;
`
`G.
`
`Defendant’s willful infringement of Plaintiffs’ copyrights in the Authentic Works
`
`has caused Plaintiffs irreparable harm;
`
`H.
`
`As a result of Defendant’s unlawful conduct, Plaintiffs are entitled to the entry of a
`
`final judgment and permanent injunction against Defendant.
`
`Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, m
`
`accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d), Defendant, his officers, agents, servants,
`
`Case 1:20-cv-00769-JGK-SDA Document 178 Filed 01/20/23 Page 4 of 11
`
`employees, and attorneys, andall those in active concert or participation with him, are permanently
`
`enjoined and restrained from directly or indirectly infringing the copyrights owned or exclusively
`
`controlled by any of the Plaintiffs (or any parent, subsidiary, or affiliate of a Plaintiff), whether
`
`now in existence orlater created.
`
`Without limiting the foregoing, IT IS FURTHER ORDEREDthat, in accordance with
`
`Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d), Defendant, his officers, agents, servants, employees, and
`
`attorneys, and all those in active concert orparticipation with him, are permanently enjoined and
`
`

`

`CASEToy0NGIGECRBa AgsumentLs Filed Qr/seis3 Bg9ee git
`
`restrained from engaging in any of the followingacts:
`
`Directly or indirectly infringing any copyrighted workthat is owned orexclusively
`controlled by any of the Plaintiffs (“Plaintiffs’ Textbooks”), i.e., any copyrighted
`work published under any of the imprints identified on AppendixChereto;
`
`1)
`
`2)
`
`3)
`
`4)
`
`transmitting,
`reproducing, manufacturing, downloading, uploading,
`Copying,
`distributing, selling, offering to sell, advertising, marketing, promoting, or
`otherwise exploiting any of Plaintiffs’ Textbooks without Plaintiffs’ express
`written authorization;
`
`Enabling,facilitating, permitting, assisting, soliciting, encouraging, or inducing the
`copying, reproduction, manufacture, download, upload, transmission, distribution,
`sale, offering forsale, advertisement, marketing, promotion, or other exploitation
`of any of Plaintiffs’ Textbooks without Plaintiffs’ express written authorization;
`and
`
`Using, hosting, operating, maintaining, creating, or registering any computer
`server, website, domain name, domain name server, cloud storage, e-commerce
`platform, online advertising service, social media platform, or payment processing
`service to enable, facilitate, permit, assist, solicit, encourage, or induce the
`infringement of Plaintiffs’ Textbooks, as set forth in subparagraphs(1) through (3)
`above.
`
`IT IS FURTHER ORDEREDthat, pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 504(c), Plaintiffs’ request for
`
`statutory damages under the Copyright Act is granted, and Plaintiffs are awarded statutory
`
`damages of $1,500,000 against Defendant for his willful infringement of ten of Plaintiffs’
`
`Authentic Works.
`
`Case 1:20-cv-00769-JGK-SDA Document 178 Filed 01/20/23 Page 5 of 11
`
`IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
`
`69(a) and N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 5222(b), Defendant, his officers, agents, servants, employees, and
`
`attorneys, and all those in active concert or participation with him, and any financialinstitutions,
`
`i.c., banks, payment processing companies, savings and loan associations, credit card companies,
`
`credit card processing agencies, merchant acquiring banks, or other companics or agencies that
`
`engage in the processing ortransfer of money and/orotherassets (“Financial Institutions”), who
`
`receive actual notice ofthis Order, must immediately cease transferring, withdrawing, or otherwise
`
`

`

`SSs8L:20-ov-00760TGKSDA Document177 Filed 0130/23 pageedt7
`
`disposing of any moneyorotherassets in accounts holding or receiving moncy or other assets of
`
`Defendant’s, or in which Defendant has an interest (with “Defendant” for purposes of this
`
`provision meaning those personsdescribed by the names,aliases, and/or email addresses identified
`
`on Appendix A), including but notlimited to those accounts specified on Appendix D hereto
`
`(“Defendant’s Accounts”), or allowing such money orotherassets in Defendant’s Accounts to be
`
`transferred, withdrawn, or otherwise disposedof, until such time as the judgmentset forth herein
`
`is satisfied,
`
`IT 18 FURTHER ORDEREDthat the stay to enforce a judgment imposed by Rule 62(a)
`
`of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is hereby dissolved and Plaintiffs may immediately enforce
`
`the judgmentset forth herein.
`
`IT IS FURTHER ORDEREDthat in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 64,
`
`N.Y. C.P.LR. § 5225, and this Court’s inherent equitable powers to issue remedies ancillary to its
`
`authority to provide final relief, Financial Institutions holding currently restrained assets in
`
`Defendant’s Accounts shall release such assets to Plaintiffs in partial satisfaction of the damages
`
`award set forth herein within ten (10) business days following actual notice ofthis Order.
`
`IT IS FURTHER ORDEREDthat Defendantshall deliver to Plaintiffs for destruction all
`
`Case 1:20-cv-00769-JGK-SDA Document 178 Filed 01/20/23 Page 6 of 11
`
`electronic copies of Plaintiffs’ Textbooks, or derivative works thereof, that Defendant has in his
`
`possession, custody, or control, and all devices by means of which such copies have been created,
`
`pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 303.
`
`IT IS FURTHER ORDEREDthat the Clerk of Court is hereby directed to release the
`
`$10,000 cash bond, posted in accordance with the Ex Parte Order, to Plaintiffs by sendingit to
`
`their attorneys of record, Oppenheim + Zebrak, LLP,at 4530 Wisconsin Avenue, NW,5th Floor,
`
`Washington, DC 20016.
`
`

`

`eeTOECOMERISD, WGHMENAT Fled SHBOR? Rage
`
`IT IS FURTHER ORDEREDthat this Court shall retain jurisdiction over the parties and
`
`the subject matter of this litigation for the purpose of interpretation and enforcement of this
`
`Permanent Injunction.
`
`FINAL JUDGMENTis hereby entered in favor of Plaintiffs against Defendant Michael
`
`McEvilley in the total amount of $1,500,000, as described above, plus post-judgment interest
`
`calculated at the rate set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1961.
`
`oo;“y
`
` Itis SO ORDEREDthis 2Uday of
`-%,Vo fey,
`eeOficle
`
`HON. JOHN G. KOELTL
`United States District Judge
`
`Case 1:20-cv-00769-JGK-SDA Document 178 Filed 01/20/23 Page 7 of 11
`
`

`

`C
`
`1:20-cv-00769-
`
`Case 1:20cv00J6OIGK-SDA Document171 Pied01/203 ‘Page * 8 1°
`
`-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`finfo.uberbooks@gmaileom|
`Jinfowuberbooks@gmaileom
`[kiwibookelub21@emailcom
`[kiwibookolu621@gmailcom|
`fiavishsupplyxo@gmaikeom|
`fmohammadahlan87@outlook.com|
`[mohammadahlan87@outlookcom|
`[myfavoritethingsO2@gmailcom|
`[myfavoritethingsO2@pmailcom|
`Pp
`Po
`Po
`Pp
`po
`oT
`shop.bestbook@gmail.com
`shop.besthookz@pmailcomET
`[smartedu.contact@gmaileom|
`smarteducontact@gmailcom|
`[surelyskateco@gmailcom|
`
`DEFAULT JUDGMENT APPENDIX A
`Cengage Learning, Ine., et al. v. Trung Kien Nguyen, et al, Civil Action No. 20-cv-769-JGR
`
`
` ‘ngingSites-Original.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`InfringingSites= 02"
`
`|inn
`
`
`o
`mall Addresses
`:
`5
`Defendant'sAliases
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`“Associated Sites
`-
`
`“Complaint
`:
`
`
`
`
`besthookz.myshopify.com**
`Adam Haris Hamzah
`ahmadanwaribinzakaria@outlook.my
`ebookspot.shap
`:
`ify.
`b
`=
`Ahmad Amwari Zakaria
`ooksddays.myshopify.com
`ridaycollection.myskopify.com
`—_|azmeerkh@gmail.com
`a-shopp.myshopify.com
`
`iwibookclub.myshopify.com _[booksdkimi@gmail.com—_[pdfxpress.com
`
`[AnwarBusiness __—_—_[payversitystore,myshopify.com _[ebaokspo2019@gmaiteom|
`[Biizzardbooks ______|smart-edu-store.myshopify.com
`[Raycollection.contact@@gmail.com[|
`ooks4Kimi
`studentnclass.myshopify.com
`help.pdfxpress@gmail.com
`i
`ibrahimroslanG | @gmail.com
`Danial Hungry
`Icmxmedia@gmail.com Po
`=
`infokoalaprint@gnuail.com PT
`info. payversilystore@gmail.comYTrtrt—SY
`
`|=
`
`=B
`
`Po
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-00769-JGK-SDA Document 178 Filed 01/20/23 Page 8 of 11
`
`

`

`Case1.20cv0076eeSBA Bocument178. FiledOMeMes Rage 9 ot 1
`
`DEFAULT JUDGMENT APPENDIX 8B
`Cengage Learning, Inc., et al. v. Trung Kien Nguyen, et al, Civil Action No. 20-cv-769-JGK
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`TX0007165716
`TX0008733303
`TX0008778862
`TX0007929583
`
`McGraw Hill|Taxation of Individuals, 8th TX0008738099
`Pearson
`Campbell Biology, I 1th
`TX0608472354
`
`
`Pharmacology for Nurses A Pathophysiologic Approach, Sth
`|TX0008241655
`
`REGISTRATION NUMBER
`TX000876463 |
`TX0008390253
`TX0008702724
`
`TXG0088 16586nn
`
`SS TYTLE Choo
`Oo
`A Guide to Crisis Intervention, 6th
`Essentials of Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences, 8th
`Foundations of Marketing, 8th
`rinciples of Microeconomics, 3th
`harmacology and the Nursing Process, 8th
`|Diugs, Society, and Human Behavior, 17th
`|Marketing, 7th
`
`
`
`
`McGraw Hill
`McGraw Hill
`
`
`
`P P
`
`Case 1:20-cv-00769-JGK-SDA Document 178 Filed 01/20/23 Page 9 of 11
`
`

`

`CV
`Vv-007
`Case 1:20-
`Case
`0-c
`1:2
`
`cv-00baaShEh Realient 159.3hSYUfhG3s Fagsap Htt
`
`
`
`DEFAULT JUDGMENT APPENDIX C
`Cengage Learning, Inc., et al. vy. Trung Kien Nguyen, et al, Civil Action No, 20-cv-769-JGK
`
`‘Cengage Learning 2 Macmillan Learning
`Brooks Cole
`Bedford, Freeman & Worth High School
`Cengage
`Publishers
`Cengage Learning
`Bedford/St. Martin’s
`Course Technology
`BFW
`Delmar
`BFW High Scheol Publishers
`Gale
`Freeman
`Heinle
`Macmillan Learning
`Milady
`W.H. Freeman & Company
`National Geographic Learning
`Worth
`South-Western Educational Publishing
`Worth Publishers
`
`Wadsworth _
`
`Elsevier.
`Syke
`Academic Cell
`Medicine Publishing
`Academic Press
`Morgan Kaufmann Publishers
`Amirsys
`Mosby
`Butterworth Heinemann
`Newnes
`Digital Press
`North Holland
`Elsevier
`Saunders
`Gulf Professional Publishing
`Urban & Fischer
`Hanley & Belfus
`William Andrew
`Knovel
`Woodhead Publishing
`
`Made2SimpleBoos
`=
`-McGraw Hill :
`BEE Pearson
`
`irwin
`Addison Wesley
`Lange
`Adobe Press
`McGraw-Hill
`Allyn & Bacon
`McGraw-Hill Education
`Benjamin Cummings
`McGraw-Hill Higher Education
`Brady
`Case 1:20-cv-00769-JGK-SDA Document 178 Filed 01/20/23 Page 10 of 11
`Cisco Press
`McGraw-Hill Professional
`Financial Times Press/FT Press
`McGraw-Hill Ryerson
`McGraw-Hill/Appleton & Lange
`IBM Press
`McGraw-Hill/Contemporary
`Longman
`McGraw-Hill/Dushkin
`New Riders Press
`McGraw-Hill/lrwin
`Peachpit Press
`McGraw Hill
`Pearson
`NTC/Contemporary
`Pearson Education
`Osborne
`Que Publishing
`Sams Publishing
`Schaum’s
`
`

`

`aseOOoTe Bocument 155USAUa. aggatt
`
`DEFAULT JUDGMENT APPENDIX D
`Cengage Learning, Inc., et al. v. Trung Kien Nguyen, et al, Civil Action No. 20-cv-769-JGK
`
`“Financial Institution’ =)Account Number >
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BankofAmericaiPITT3SSS
`
`
`
`BankofAmeria(S18
`PayPal«BRAS
`
`
`Papas
`eo|oy]ro
`PayPalTI
`
`PayPalse
`
`
`PayPalS—~«iPBN
`Oo}
`
`rg
`
`fa]Ma]
`
`*AKAB
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-00769-JGK-SDA Document 178 Filed 01/20/23 Page 11 of 11
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket