`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
`UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
`
`
`
`-against-
`
`NYSHIEM SPENCER, et al.,
`
` Defendants.
`
`ANALISA TORRES, District Judge:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`USDC SDNY
`DOCUMENT
`
`ELECTRONICALLY FILED
`DOC #: _________________
`
`DATE FILED: __6/5/2020_
`
`
`20 Cr. 78 (AT)
`
`
`
`ORDER
`
`SO ORDERED.
`
`Dated: June 5, 2020
`
`New York, New York
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`In light of the multi-party nature of this case, and the logistical challenges posed by
`COVID-19, it is hereby ORDERED that:
`
`1. By June 15, 2020, each attorney shall deliver a hard drive to the Government. By
`June 29, 2020, the Government shall screen discovery materials for privilege, load
`non-privileged materials to hard drives provided by defense counsel, and deliver a
`loaded hard drive to (1) each detained Defendant, and (2) counsel for each Defendant
`out on bail.
`
`2. By July 17, 2020, the Coordinating Discovery Attorney (“CDA”) shall provide a
`report to the Court concerning the status of discovery.
`
`
`3. The Government and each defense attorney shall individually discuss those portions
`of discovery which the Government has identified as of particular relevance to that
`Defendant.
`
`4. The next status conference in this case shall start at 2:00 p.m. on August 4, 2020.
`Defendants shall appear in groups of three at a time to be assigned by the Court. By
`July 24, 2020, the parties shall indicate whether they consent to conducting the
`proceeding telephonically, and whether Defendants wish to appear telephonically or
`waive appearance altogether.
`
`
`5. It is further ORDERED that the time until August 4, 2020 is prospectively excluded
`under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7), because the ends of justice
`served by excluding such time outweigh the interests of the public and Defendants in
`a speedy trial in that this will allow time for the Government to provide discovery on
`hard drives to each Defendant and for Defendants to review such discovery.
`
`
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
