`
`ROTHMAN, SCHNEIDER, SOLOWAY & STERN, LLP
`Attorneys at Law
`100 Lafayette Street, Suite 501
`New York, NY 10013
`
`Franklin A. Rothman
`Jeremy Schneider
`Robert A. Soloway
`David Stern
`
`Rachel Perillo
`
`Via ECF
`Hon. Jesse M. Furman
`United States District Judge
`Southern District of New York
`40 Foley Square
`New York, New York 10007
`
`Tel: (212) 571-5500
`Fax: (212) 571-5500
`
`July 27, 2020
`
`Application GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is
`directed to terminate Doc. #36. SO ORDERED.
`
`Re: United States v. Mustapha Raji
`19 Cr. 870 (JMF)
`
`
`
`
`
`July 27, 2020
`
`Dear Judge Furman:
`
`I am the attorney for Mustapha Raji, the defendant in the above-referenced matter. On
`May 27, 2020, the Court granted Mr. Raji’s bail application and ordered that he be released
`pursuant to a $100,000 personal recognizance bond co-signed by three “financially responsible
`persons” and secured by $10,000 in collateral. Mr. Raji remains in custody.
`
`At this time, the parties have reached an agreement, and the government, by AUSA Eun
`Young Choi, consents to Mr. Raji’s release on bond co-signed by two financially responsible
`persons and one person for moral suasion purposes. The government has interviewed and
`approved all three individuals – Sergena St. Fort and Cheri Backman, who will be co-signing as
`financially responsible persons, and Patrick Wisner, who will be co-signing for moral suasion.
`
`Accordingly, it is respectfully requested that the Court modify its May 27, 2020 Bail
`Order to allow the bond to be co-signed by two financially responsible persons and one
`individual for moral suasion.
`
`If the Court has any questions regarding this matter, please contact my office. I thank
`your Honor for your time and attention to this matter.
`
`cc:
`
`AUSA Eun Young Choi (By ECF)
`AUSA Dina McCleod (By ECF)
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`/s/
`Jeremy Schneider
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
