Case 1:19-cr-00870-JMF Document 18 Filed 04/17/20 Page 1 of 2
`
`ROTHMAN, SCHNEIDER, SOLOWAY & STERN, LLP
`Attorneys at Law
`100 Lafayette Street, Suite 501
`New York, NY 10013
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Franklin A. Rothman
`Jeremy Schneider
`Robert A. Soloway
`David Stern
`
`Rachel Perillo
`
`
`Tel: (212) 571-5500
`Fax: (212) 571-5500
`
`
`
`April 14, 2020
`
`
`
`
`Re: United States v. Mustapha Raji
`
`19 Cr. 870 (JMF)
`
`
`
`
`
`By ECF
`Hon. Jesse M. Furman
`United States District Judge
`Southern District of New York
`40 Foley Square
`New York, New York 10007
`
`
`
`
`Dear Judge Furman:
`
`I am the attorney for Mustapha Raji, the defendant in the above referenced matter. Due
`
`to certain limitations posed by the present COVID-19 pandemic, and the ongoing discovery
`production in this case, I write with the consent of the attorney for the government, Dina
`McCleod, respectfully seeking an extension of the current motion deadlines and an adjournment
`of the status conference that is presently scheduled for May 11, 2020.
`
`The discovery that has already been produced in this case is massive, and I have not yet
`
`had sufficient time to review it in light of the present circumstances. The government has also
`informed me that it will be producing two additional phone extractions. Additionally, the
`defendant has neither reviewed nor received the discovery already produced. As the Court is
`aware, legal visiting at the Metropolitan Correctional Center, where Mr. Raji is in custody, is
`currently suspended. Some of the discovery materials are subject to a protective order and
`cannot be viewed outside the presence of counsel. Accordingly, additional time is needed to
`review the discovery and to ensure that Mr. Raji has reviewed it as well.
`
`
`
`The Court has set the following motion schedule: Motions due by May 8, 2020,
`Oppositions due by May 22, 2020, and Replies due by May 29, 2020. Because additional time is
`needed to review discovery and determine whether the defendant will be making motions, I
`respectfully request an extension of the Court’s deadlines to the following proposed dates:
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cr-00870-JMF Document 18 Filed 04/17/20 Page 2 of 2
`
`Hon. Jesse M. Furman
`April 14, 2020
`Page Two
`
`Motions Due: June 26, 2020
`Oppositions Due: July 10, 2020
`Replies Due: July 17, 2020
`
`Additionally, for the same reasons discussed above, I respectfully request an adjournment
`of the May 11th status conference and propose an adjournment date of June 20, 2020. The
`defendant consents to the exclusion of speedy trial time.
`
`If the Court has any questions regarding this application please contact my office.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/
`
`Jeremy Schneider
`
`cc:
`
`Dina McCleod (by ECF)
`Assistant United States Attorney
`
`Application GRANTED. The schedule suggested by the parties is hereby ADOPTED.
`The pretrial conference is ADJOURNED to June 29, 2020, at 3:30 p.m. Time is
`excluded in the interests of justice to allow the defendant and counsel adequate time to
`review the voluminous discovery and prepare pretrial motions. The Clerk of Court is
`directed to terminate ECF No. 17. SO ORDERED.
`
`April 17, 2020
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.