`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
`
`UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
`
`-against-
`
`NATHANIEL COLES,
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`PAUL G. GARDEPHE,U.S.D.J.:
`
`ORDER
`
`19 Cr. 789 (PGG)
`
`On February 7, 2023, the Governmentfiled a motion for compassionate release as
`
`to Defendant Nathaniel Coles pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)@). (Mot. (Dkt. No. 937))
`
`For the reasonsstated below, the motion will be granted.
`
`BACKGROUND
`
`I.
`
`CHARGES, PLEA, AND SENTENCE
`
`On November6, 2019, Coles was charged with conspiracy to violate the Travel
`
`Actin violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 371 and 1952; wrongful disclosure of individually identifiable
`
`healthcare information in violation of 42 U.S.C. §§ 1320d-6(a)(1)-3, (b)(3) and 18 U.S.C. § 2;
`
`and payments of bribes and gratuities to an agent of a federally funded organizationin violation
`
`of 18 U.S.C. §§ 666(a)(2) and 2. The Governmentalleged that Coles committed these offenses
`
`in connection with his participation in a bribery and kickback scheme involving a ring of
`
`conspirators who procured information regarding motor vehicle accident victims and then
`
`steered those victims to corrupt medical clinics and law firms in exchange for kickbacks.
`
`(Indictment (Dkt. No. 1))
`
`Coles “was a manageror supervisorof [this] criminal activity.” (Dec. 9, 2021
`
`Sent. Tr. (Dkt. No. 661) at 22) He “wasactive in the schemefor approximately 11 years and
`
`Case 1:19-cr-00789-PGG Document 938 Filed 02/09/23 Page 1 of 8
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:19-cr-00789-PGG Document 938 Filed 02/09/23 Page 2 of 8
`
`wasoneofits principal beneficiaries. He recruited and then paid monthly bribes of thousands of
`
`dollars to corrupt hospital employees who provided him with the names and contact information
`
`of hundreds of motor vehicle accident victims each month.” (Id.) After receiving this
`
`information, “Coles then arranged for Codefendant Anthony Rose and other coconspirators to
`
`contact the victim and steer them to certain medical clinics and law firms who would pay
`
`kickbacks of $1,500 or $2,000 per referral to Coles.” (Id.) Coles also received payments from
`
`several of the medical clinics to which he referred car crash victims. “Over the years, Mr. Coles
`
`realized millions from his illegal schemes.” (Id. at 22-23)
`
`On June 28, 2021, Coles pleaded guilty to conspiracy to violate the Travel Act.
`
`(June 28, 2021 Tr. (Dkt. No. 620))
`
`At the December 9, 2021 sentencing, this Court noted that while Coles — then 68
`
`— suffered from diabetes, he was otherwise in good health. (Dec. 9, 2021 Tr. (Dkt. No. 661) at
`
`24; see also PSR (Dkt. No. 520) 4 145 (“[Coles] otherwise reported to be in overall good
`
`physical health and has never been hospitalized.”)) This Court went on to sentence Coles to five
`
`years’ imprisonment andthree years’ supervised release. (Dec. 9, 2021 Tr. (Dkt. No. 661) at 25)
`
`Coles was ordered to surrender to Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”) custody on
`
`February 9, 2022. (Jan. 7, 2022 Order (Dkt. No. 677)) He has thus served approximately one
`
`year ofhis five-year sentence.
`
`II.
`
`MOTION FOR COMPASSIONATE RELEASE
`
`In a February 7, 2023 motion, the Government asks this Court to grant Coles
`
`compassionate release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)q). (Mot. (Dkt. No. 937)) The
`
`Government explainsthat “[o]n January 9, 2023, the BOP contacted [the Government] to request
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:19-cr-00789-PGG Document 938 Filed 02/09/23 Page 2 of 8
`
`
`
`Case 1:19-cr-00789-PGG Document 938 Filed 02/09/23 Page 3 of 8
`
`consideration for a reduction of sentence to time served for Nathaniel Coles, based on his
`
`terminal medical condition”:
`
`BOPreports that Coles’ health significantly deteriorated over the past few
`months. Coles, who will turn 70 next week, was sent to the hospital on November
`9, 2022, due to complaints of shortness of breath, cough, andbilateral leg
`swelling. He has remained hospitalized since that time. Coles wasinitially noted
`to be in acute renal failure with indications of congestive heart failure. Coles was
`then diagnosed with Amyloid Cardiomyopathy, and began chemotherapy on
`December 20, 2022. On December 31, 2022, Coles went into cardiac arrest and
`recovered after six minutes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. He was also
`intubated, but was able to be extubated on January 1, 2023. Coles recently
`underwent a procedure on January 18, 2023, for placement of an automatic
`implantable cardioverter defibrillator. BOP further reported to [the Government]
`that according to treatment providers, Coles’ prognosis is extremely poor, with a
`life expectancy offive to six months and a 100 percent mortality rate within one
`year. Because he is considered terminally ill with a poor prognosis,a life
`expectancy of less than 18 months, and an end-of-life trajectory, BOP has
`determined that Coles meets BOP’s medical criteria for consideration for a
`reduction in sentence. BOP Director Colette Peters has approved this requestfor
`a reduction in sentence to time served, as has [the Government]. If Coles is
`released, he plansto live with his daughter, Latisha Coles, at her home in Charlotte,
`North Carolina, where he expects to receive end-of-life care. This release plan has
`been approved by the United States Probation Office for the Western District of
`North Carolina.
`
`(Id. at 2-3 (formatting altered))
`
`The Government contendsthat “Coles’ terminal medical condition constitutes
`
`[an] ‘extraordinary and compelling reason[]’ warranting the requested reduction in sentence [to
`
`time served].” The Governmentfurther contends that, after Coles’ release from prison, “he
`
`should begin immediately serving the three-year term of supervised release previously imposed
`
`by the Court.” (Id. at 3)
`
`Case 1:19-cr-00789-PGG Document 938 Filed 02/09/23 Page 3 of 8
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:19-cr-00789-PGG Document 938 Filed 02/09/23 Page 4of 8
`
`I.
`
`LEGAL STANDARD
`
`DISCUSSION
`
`The compassionate release statute — 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A) — provides that a
`
`court may
`
`upon motion ofthe Director of the Bureau of Prisons, or upon motion of the
`defendant .. . reduce the term of imprisonment (and may impose a term of
`probation or supervised release with or without conditions that does not exceed
`the unserved portion ofthe original term of imprisonment), after considering the
`factors set forth in section 3553(a) to the extent that they are applicable,if it finds
`that ... extraordinary and compelling reasons warrant such a reduction... .
`
`18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A).
`
`Il.
`
`ANALYSIS
`
`A.
`
`“Extraordinary and Compelling Reasons”
`
`Congress tasked the Sentencing Commission with providing guidance to courts
`
`regarding the application of the compassionate release statute. See 28 U.S.C. § 994(t) (“The
`
`Commission, in promulgating general policy statements regarding the sentencing modification
`
`provisionsin section 3582(c)(1)(A)oftitle 18, shall describe what should be considered
`
`extraordinary and compelling reasons for sentence reduction, including thecriteria to be applied
`
`anda list of specific examples.”); see also United States v. Ebbers, 432 F. Supp. 3d 421, 427
`
`(S.D.N.Y. 2020). The Commission’s policy statement and commentary concerning §
`
`3582(c)(1)(A) are found in U.S. Sentencing Guideline § 1B1.13, which states that a court may
`
`reduce a sentencefor “[e]xtraordinary and compelling reasons,” including where the defendantis
`
`
`“suffering from a terminalillness (i.e., a serious and advanced illness with an end oflife
`
`trajectory),” such as “metastatic solid-tumor cancer, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), end-
`
`stage organ disease, and advanced dementia.” U.S.S.G. § 1B1.13(1)(A) & cmt. n.1(A)Q@).
`
`Case 1:19-cr-00789-PGG Document 938 Filed 02/09/23 Page 4 of 8
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:19-cr-00789-PGG Document 938 Filed 02/09/23 Page 5of8
`
`The Governmentarguesthat Coles’ diagnosis of amyloid cardiomyopathy
`
`constitutes an “‘extraordinary and compelling reason’ warranting the requested reduction in
`
`sentence.” (Mot. (Dkt. No. 937) at 3 (quotation marks for emphasis in original))
`
`Amyloid cardiomyopathyis a “rare cardiac condition characterized by deposits of
`
`amyloid protein in the heart muscle, causing the heart to stiffen and thereby limiting its ability to
`
`pumpblood to the body.
`
`[Amyloid cardiomyopathy] patients experience a progressive decline in
`
`function, beginning with fatigue and shortness of breath and ending with potential heart failure,
`
`inability to perform even the mostbasic daily activities, and eventually death. Without
`
`treatment, patients have a median life expectancy of two to three-and-a-half years after
`
`diagnosis. An estimated 100,000 to 150,000 Americans, most of whom are elderly, suffer from
`
`the condition.” Pfizer, Inc v. United States Dep’t of Health & Hum.Servs., 42 F.4th 67, 70 (2d
`
`Cir. 2022) (quotations omitted).
`
`Here, the Governmentrepresents that Coles’ prognosisis “extremely poor, with a
`
`life expectancy offive to six months, and a 100 percent mortality rate within one year.” (Mot.
`
`(Dkt. No. 937) at 2). As noted above, Coles is now 70 years old. He has been hospitalized for
`
`the past three months. He has suffered cardiac arrest, and six minutes of CPR were required to
`
`resuscitate him. An automatic defibrillator has been implanted in his heart. Coles’ heart
`
`condition is regarded as terminal. (Id.)
`
`This Court concludes that Coles’ amyloid cardiomyopathy condition constitutes
`
`an “extraordinary and compelling reason[]” for purposes of the compassionate release statute.
`
`See United States v. Kelley, 464 F. Supp. 3d 1134, 1135, 1137 (N.D. Cal. 2020) (finding
`
`extraordinary and compelling reasons where defendant suffered from terminal prostate cancer
`
`with two-year life expectancy); United States v. Winckler, Criminal Action No. 13-318, 2020
`
`Case 1:19-cr-00789-PGG Document 938 Filed 02/09/23 Page 5 of 8
`
`
`
`:
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:19-cr-00789-PGG Document 938 Filed 02/09/23 Page 6 of 8
`
`WL 1666652, at *2 (W.D. Pa. Apr. 3, 2020) (finding extraordinary and compelling
`
`circumstances where defendant was diagnosed with “stage-four metastatic thyroid cancer” and
`
`had life expectancy of less than twelve months); United States v. Wong Chi Fai, 93-CR-1340
`
`(RID), 2019 WL 3428504, at *1, *3 (E.D.N.Y. July 30, 2019)(finding extraordinary and
`
`compelling circumstances where defendant suffered from “metastatic papillary thyroid cancer”
`
`with twelve-month life expectancy).
`
`B.
`
`Section 3553(a) Factors
`
`Asto the Section 3553(a) factors, Coles’ offense is serious. He was a manager
`
`and supervisor of a massive, multi-year-long scheme to commit bribery and unlawfully obtain
`
`information about motor vehicle accident victims from hospitals and law enforcement. He
`
`personally profited from this schemeto the tune of millions of dollars.
`
`As to Coles’ personal history and characteristics, he had a stable upbringing. (See
`
`PSR (Dkt. No. 520) € 130) He has been married four times and has four children.
`
`(Id. {{{ 131-
`
`32, 136) He has a GED andanassociate’s degree and worked as a computer technician for many
`
`years before becoming a medical clinic manager, including at one ofthe medicalclinics involved
`
`in the charged scheme.
`
`(Id. {J 165-69). He has a history of drug abuse.
`
`(Id.
`
`149-55) Before
`
`his instant conviction, he had a 1969 conviction for petit larceny, a 1977 conviction for
`
`attempted criminal possession of a controlled substance, and a 1977 federal conviction for bank
`
`robbery in the Eastern District of New York, for which he received a sentence of four years’
`
`imprisonment.
`
`(Id. § 113-18)
`
`
`
`This Court finds, however, that given Coles’ terminalillness, his short life
`
`expectancy, and the conditions of his supervised release, his release does not pose a dangerto the
`
`community. See United States v. Perez Alvarado, Case Nos. 16-cr-00940-BAS,16-cr-02770-
`
`Case 1:19-cr-00789-PGG Document 938 Filed 02/09/23 Page 6 of 8
`
`
`
`Case 1:19-cr-00789-PGG Document 938 Filed 02/09/23 Page 7 of 8
`
`BAS, 17-cr-07017-BAS, 2020 WL 5203386,at *2-3 (S.D. Cal. Sept. 1, 2020) (granting
`
`compassionate release where defendant was diagnosed with stage four colon cancer, which was
`
`“likely to be a terminal diagnosis,” and which maderecidivism “unlikely”) (quotation omitted);
`
`Winckler, 2020 WL 1666652, at *2-3 (finding that defendant’s “age, cancer diagnosis and
`
`deteriorating physical condition makeit unlikely that Defendant will reoffend” where defendant
`
`was 59 years old, had stage four thyroid cancer, and hadalife expectancy of less than a year).
`
`Finally, Coles has served a yearin prison. Given his terminal diagnosis and
`
`deteriorating medical condition, further imprisonment is not necessary to serve the goals of
`
`deterrence and promoting respect for the law. See United States v. Karr, No. 6:17-CR-25-REW,
`
`2020 WL 774363, at *5—6 (E.D. Ky. Feb. 18, 2020) (granting compassionate release where
`
`defendant had served two years of 108-month sentence, was diagnosed with stage four lung
`
`cancer, and had a life expectancy of less than twelve months; finding that there is “no material
`
`risk of future criminality in a reduction based on a post-crime, terminal diagnosis”).
`
`Finally, Coles’ offense — conspiracy to violate the Travel Act — did not involve
`
`violence or a risk of violence.
`
`The Court concludesthat Coles’ amyloid cardiomyopathy and short life
`
`expectancy constitute “extraordinary and compelling reasons” that warrant his release, and that
`
`these circumstancesare not outweighed by the Section 3553(a) factors.
`
`CONCLUSION
`
`The Government’s motion for Defendant Coles’ compassionate release (Dkt. No.
`
`937) is granted, and heis ordered released pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). The terms
`
`and conditions of Coles’ supervised release set forth in the December 14, 2021 Judgment (Dkt.
`
`
`
`No. 637) are re-imposed, with the following amendment:
`
`Case 1:19-cr-00789-PGG Document 938 Filed 02/09/23 Page 7 of 8
`
`
`
`Case 1:19-cr-00789-PGG Document 938 Filed 02/09/23 Page 8 of 8
`
`The standard condition of supervised release that requires employment (Dkt. No. 637
`at 4, clause 7) is suspended.
`
`Dated: New York, New York
`February 9, 2023
`
`SO ORDERED.
`
`4
`DO
`
`PaulG.Gardephe
`~
`United States District Judge
`
`Case 1:19-cr-00789-PGG Document 938 Filed 02/09/23 Page 8 of 8
`
`
`
`
`
`

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ ChargeStill Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site