`Case 1:18-cr-00905-LTS Document 156 Filed 10/09/20 Page 1 of 1Case 1:18-cr-00905-LTS Document 157 Filed 10/19/20 Page 1 of 1
`U.S. Department of Justice
`
`[Type text]
`
`United States Attorney
`Southern District of New York
`
`The Silvio J. Mollo Building
`One Saint Andrew’s Plaza
`New York, New York 10007
`
`October 9, 2020
`
`MEMO ENDORSED
`
`The Honorable Laura Taylor Swain
`United States District Judge
`United States Courthouse
`500 Pearl Street, Chambers 1640
`New York, NY 10007
`
`Re: United States v. Xiao Yu Wang, et al., 18 Cr. 905 (LTS)
`
`Dear Judge Swain:
`
`The Government writes to respectfully request an adjournment of the next status
`
`conference in the above-captioned case, currently scheduled for October 22, 2020, for
`approximately 30 days. The parties are continuing to discuss potential pretrial resolutions, a
`process that has been made more difficult by the COVID-19 pandemic, which has negatively
`impacted the parties’ ability to move the case forward. The Government consulted with defense
`counsel for each defendant, who consent to the adjournment.
`
`Accordingly, the Government respectfully requests that time be excluded under the Speedy
`Trial Act between October 22, 2020 through the next scheduled conference, because the “ends of
`justice served by the granting of such continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the
`defendant in a speedy trial.” 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A). The Government consulted with defense
`counsel for each defendant, who do not object to the exclusion of time.
`
`The conference is adjourned to
`November 16, 2020, at 12:00 p.m.
`noon. The time period from today
`through November 16, 2020, is
`excluded from speedy trial
`computations for the reasons stated
`above. DE #s 155 and 156
`resolved.
`SO ORDERED.
`10/9/2020
`/s/ Laura Taylor Swain, USDJ
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`AUDREY STRAUSS
`Acting United States Attorney
`
`by: _/s/Elizabeth A. Espinosa _____
`Elizabeth A. Espinosa
`Assistant United States Attorney
`(212) 637-2216
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
