`Case 1:14-cv-02758-PAC Document 32 Filed 10/11/14 Page 1 of 3
`
`EXHIBIT A
`
`EXHIBIT A
`
`
`
`Case 1:14-cv-02758-PAC Document 32 Filed 10/11/14 Page 2 of 3
`Case L:l-2 cv 00024 DLC Document 85 Filed 03/25ll-3 Page 1- of 2
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRTCT COURT
`SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
`
`TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY I,TD
`eL al, ,
`Pl-aintif f s,
`
`MYLAN, fNC, , et aI
`
`Defendants.
`
`X
`
`X
`
`1,2 Civ. 24 (DLC)
`
`ORDER
`
`ri\ll{]Ài
`
`sf as/ ß
`
`DENISE COTE, DistricL 'Judge:
`On March 22, 2oI3, the defendanLs Mylan Inc. and Mylan
`Pharmaceuticals Inc. ( "MyLan" ) submitted a LeLter regarding t'he
`sequence of experL reports wi th respecL to any secondary
`In Lhe
`consideration of non-obviousness ( "March 22 feLter" ) .
`March 22 letter, Mylan indicates that, depending on the
`fulfil-fment of their discovery obligations, Mylan
`plaintiffs,
`may seek Lo serve a rebuLtal report in accordance with Federal-
`Rul-es of Civil Procedure 26(a) (2) (D) (il) and 26(e). The
`obJ-igation to supplement pur:suant to RuIe 26(e) applies to
`The requirements of Rul-e
`"incompJ-ete or i-ncorrect" dj-sclosures.
`It is
`a courL order.
`26 (a) (2) (D) (f i) apply in the absence of
`
`hereby
`ORDERED that the defendants must serve their compleLe
`serve a supplemental
`expert report on May 24. They may not,
`
`
`
`Case 1:14-cv-02758-PAC Document 32 Filed 10/11/14 Page 3 of 3
`Case I:I2 cv 00024 DLC Document 85 Filed 03/2511-3 Page 2 ol2
`
`report followíng receipt of the ,June 21 rebutLal reporL without
`Ieave of the Court.
`
`SO ORDERED:
`New York, New York
`March 25, 201-3
`
`Dated
`
`rs
`Unit.ed St tes District 'Judge
`
`COTE
`
`D
`
`z
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
