throbber
Case 1:14-cv-02758-PAC Document 163 Filed 02/24/17 Page 1 of 120
`H1UsKOW1
`
`1653
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
`------------------------------x
`
`KOWA PHARMACEUTICALS AMERICA, INC., et al.,
`
`
`
`
`
` Plaintiffs,
`
`14 Civ. 2758 (PAC)
`14 Civ. 5575 (PAC)
`14 Civ. 7934 (PAC)
`15 Civ. 3935 (PAC)
`
`
`
` v.
`
`
`AMNEAL PHARMAEUTICALS, LLC, et al.,
`
`
`
` Defendants.
`
`------------------------------x
` New York, N.Y.
` January 30, 2017
` 9:30 a.m.
`
`Before:
`
`
`HON. PAUL A. CROTTY,
`
`
`
` District Judge
`
`
`APPEARANCES
`
`
`MINTZ LEVIN COHN FERRIS GLOVSKY & POPEO, P.C.
` Attorneys for Plaintiffs Kowa and Nissan
`BY: KATHLEEN B. CARR
` DAVID G. CONLIN
` JENNIFER L. DEREKA
` PETER J. CUOMO
`
`MADDOX EDWARDS, PLLC
` Attorneys for Defendant Amneal
`BY: STEVEN A. MADDOX
` JEREMY J. EDWARDS
`
`FLEMMING ZULACK WILLIAMSON ZAUDERER, LLP
` Attorneys for Defendant Sawai
`BY: CRAIG S. KESCH
` -and-
`SUGHRUE MION, PLLC
` Attorneys for Defendant Sawai
`BY: MICHAEL DZWONCZKY AZY S. KOKABI
`
`
` SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
` (212) 805-0300
`
` 1
`
` 2
`
` 3
`
` 4
`
` 5
`
` 6
`
` 7
`
` 8
`
` 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-02758-PAC Document 163 Filed 02/24/17 Page 2 of 120
`H1UsKOW1
`
`1654
`
`APPEARANCES
`(Continued)
`
`
`KELLEY DRYE & WARREN, LLP
` Attorneys for Defendant Lupin
`BY: DOUGLASS C. HOCHSTETLER
` CONSTANTINE KOUTSOUBAS
`
`ALSO PRESENT:
`
`ANDY CEPREGI, technician
`GEOFF ROBERTS, technician
`BRIAN SPARKS, technician
`
`
`
` SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
` (212) 805-0300
`
` 1
`
` 2
`
` 3
`
` 4
`
` 5
`
` 6
`
` 7
`
` 8
`
` 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`

`

` 1
`
` 2
`
` 3
`
` 4
`
` 5
`
` 6
`
` 7
`
` 8
`
` 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Case 1:14-cv-02758-PAC Document 163 Filed 02/24/17 Page 3 of 120
`H1UsKOW1
`
`1655
`
`(Trial resumed; in open court)
`
`THE COURT: Good morning. Dr. Byrn is going to
`
`testify, is that right?
`
`MR. CONLIN: Yes, your Honor.
`
`THE COURT: With regard to Mr. Maddox's letter of
`
`January 26, the response of January 29; the letters of
`
`January 28 and the response of January 29 dealing with PTX 735,
`
`14B, and 74, the objection is sustained.
`
`Call Dr. Byrn.
`
`MR. MADDOX: Your Honor, just a quick question with
`
`respect to demonstratives for Dr. Byrn.
`
`We have objected to several because they contain --
`
`you talked about those exhibits.
`
`THE COURT: When we get to them, we will take them.
`
`MR. MADDOX: Thank you.
`
`THE COURT: Come on up, Dr. Byrn.
`
`Dr. Byrn, you have been in the courtroom throughout
`
`the proceeding, haven't you?
`
`THE WITNESS: Yes.
`
`THE COURT: Let me remind you, you're still under
`
`oath. We are not going to swear you again.
`
`THE WITNESS: OK.
`
` STEPHEN R. BYRN, resumed.
`
`THE COURT: Mr. Bauer.
`
`MR. BAUER: Good morning, your Honor.
`
` SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
` (212) 805-0300
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-02758-PAC Document 163 Filed 02/24/17 Page 4 of 120
`H1UsKOW1 Byrn - direct
`
`1656
`
` 1
`
` 2
`
` 3
`
` 4
`
` 5
`
` 6
`
` 7
`
` 8
`
` 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`DIRECT EXAMINATION
`
`BY MR. BAUER:
`
`Q. Good morning, Dr. Byrn.
`
`A. Good morning.
`
`MR. BAUER: Your Honor, we previously heard from
`
`Dr. Byrn in terms of his qualifications. I would like, with
`
`the court's permission, to just read in Mr. Byrn's
`
`qualifications as an expert to see if there is any objection.
`
`THE COURT: Mr. Maddox, do you have any objection?
`
`He's already been qualified as an expert. He's filed
`
`expert reports.
`
`He's an expert, isn't he?
`
`MR. MADDOX: Absolutely.
`
`THE COURT: He is qualified as an excerpt. Prior
`
`qualification is good enough for this particular episode as
`
`well.
`
`MR. BAUER: He's an expert in solid state chemistry,
`
`drug formulation, and manufacture of composition of
`
`pharmaceutical drug products.
`
`THE COURT: OK.
`
`BY MR. BAUER:
`
`Q. Dr. Byrn, you have been here for the past two weeks and you
`
`have listened to all the testimony and seen the exhibits in the
`
`case?
`
`A. Yes.
`
` SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
` (212) 805-0300
`
`

`

` 1
`
` 2
`
` 3
`
` 4
`
` 5
`
` 6
`
` 7
`
` 8
`
` 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Case 1:14-cv-02758-PAC Document 163 Filed 02/24/17 Page 5 of 120
`H1UsKOW1 Byrn - direct
`
`1657
`
`Q. And have you rendered an opinion in this case concerning
`
`the validity of the '993 claims?
`
`A. Yes.
`
`Q. Based on evidence that you've seen in this case and the
`
`testimony that you've heard, has anything changed your opinion?
`
`A. No. I still believe that the '993 patent is valid.
`
`Q. For the court, could you please summarize the bases for the
`
`reasons that you believe that the claims of the '993 patent are
`
`valid?
`
`A. Yes. I've got --
`
`Q. And could you go to slide two, please.
`
`A. So, first, form A, claims 1 and 22 to 25, are
`
`non-anticipated. That's still my opinion, and this is because
`
`there's insufficient information in the EP '406 and example
`
`three, and I'll describe that.
`
`And second, that a person of skill could get -- and
`
`this is a key element -- could get different polymorphic forms
`
`of pitavastatin calcium following example three of the '406.
`
`That means that example three doesn't necessarily inevitably
`
`produce form A.
`
`Q. And with respect to obviousness, Dr. Byrn?
`
`A. And then for obviousness, form A of claims 1 and 22 to 25
`
`are not obvious.
`
`In my opinion, the defendants' position is based on
`
`hindsight and that polymorphs are not at all predictable. And
`
` SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
` (212) 805-0300
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-02758-PAC Document 163 Filed 02/24/17 Page 6 of 120
`H1UsKOW1 Byrn - direct
`
`1658
`
` 1
`
` 2
`
` 3
`
` 4
`
` 5
`
` 6
`
` 7
`
` 8
`
` 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`a POSA would not have been able to predict whether a specific
`
`polymorph will be produced, much less that it will be form A.
`
`And also, a person of skill would have understood that
`
`a polymorph screen is anything but routine and could involve
`
`thousands of experiments.
`
`Finally, performing such a comprehensive screen
`
`wouldn't have provided a person of skill with a reasonable
`
`expectation of success that a specific polymorph would have
`
`been produced, much less it would have been form A.
`
`Q. Now, if we can go to slide three.
`
`Turning to the '993 patent, what is the general
`
`subject matter of the '993 patent, Dr. Byrn?
`
`A. The '993 patent addresses the preparation of forms A, B, C,
`
`D, E, F, and the amorphous form of pitavastatin calcium. And
`
`form A, this general description gives a general framework for
`
`making form A. It says form A can generally be prepared from
`
`pitavastatin sodium upon reaction with calcium chloride in an
`
`aqueous reaction medium.
`
`And then it also says there's an alternative that
`
`form A can also be prepared using the lactone and calcium
`
`hydroxide.
`
`Q. Is this passage here sufficient to always get form A?
`
`A. No. That's what I'll be testifying about. But this is not
`
`enough information to necessarily and inevitably make form A.
`
`Q. Now, would you characterize this as just a general
`
` SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
` (212) 805-0300
`
`

`

` 1
`
` 2
`
` 3
`
` 4
`
` 5
`
` 6
`
` 7
`
` 8
`
` 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Case 1:14-cv-02758-PAC Document 163 Filed 02/24/17 Page 7 of 120
`H1UsKOW1 Byrn - direct
`
`1659
`
`framework?
`
`A. That's right. It's a general overall procedure to make
`
`form A.
`
`Q. And in this patent, is there a more specific procedure that
`
`teaches a POSA how to obtain form A?
`
`Could we go to the next slide, please.
`
`A. Yes. This is example one. This would give a recipe to a
`
`person of skill, a way to make form A, and it's specific. It
`
`gives you enough information to make form A.
`
`And it starts with a compound using the chemical
`
`compound 4.15 grams, the chemical compound, and it's actually
`
`what's called a tert-butyl ester, which is a different
`
`derivative from some of the others we will see, but a specific
`
`derivative.
`
`And then it says it was suspended in a solvent. It is
`
`called a mixture of methyl tert-butyl and methanol, and then
`
`you add to that solution an aqueous solution of sodium
`
`hydroxide, and then it makes a yellow color, yellow solution,
`
`which is stirred for a given time.
`
`And then you cool -- I'm about in the middle now --
`
`you cool the mixture to room temperature and add 50 mls of
`
`water and stir, and then you do a separation. There is some
`
`organic solvents, so the water and the organic solvents
`
`separate a little bit like vinegar and oil. So they separate
`
`and you carry out that separation. It says the aqueous phase
`
` SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
` (212) 805-0300
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-02758-PAC Document 163 Filed 02/24/17 Page 8 of 120
`H1UsKOW1 Byrn - direct
`
`1660
`
` 1
`
` 2
`
` 3
`
` 4
`
` 5
`
` 6
`
` 7
`
` 8
`
` 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`was separated.
`
`And then to this solution you add the calcium
`
`chloride, and you stir the suspension for 16 hours. And then
`
`you filter the suspension, and then here is the drying, which
`
`is key. You dry at 40 degrees C and 50 millibar, which is a
`
`given pressure, for 16 hours, and then it tells you you get
`
`form A and it is characterized by the X-ray pattern.
`
`Then also, it says there is further characterization
`
`by some other analytical methods, thermogravimetry, FT-IR, and
`
`then it tells you that the water content is 10 percent. And it
`
`tells you the differential scanning calorimetry, which is a
`
`measurement, another analytical measurement, showing a melting
`
`point of 95. So this is a specific procedure that a person of
`
`skill could follow.
`
`Q. For the record, this is PTX 143 as the '993 patent, and
`
`this is based on Bates number 844714. It is column eight,
`
`line 28 through 53.
`
`Thank you, Dr. Byrn.
`
`And if we could go to the next slide, which is still
`
`in the '993 patent, PTX 143 at Bates number 844711.
`
`What is shown on this slide, Dr. Byrn?
`
`A. This shows -- and it is in column one of the patent -- and
`
`it shows that the patent disclosed that the prior art made
`
`crystalline pitavastatin calcium. It says there is a synthetic
`
`procedure for the preparation of pitavastatin calcium, that
`
` SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
` (212) 805-0300
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-02758-PAC Document 163 Filed 02/24/17 Page 9 of 120
`H1UsKOW1 Byrn - direct
`
`1661
`
` 1
`
` 2
`
` 3
`
` 4
`
` 5
`
` 6
`
` 7
`
` 8
`
` 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`means the synthesis of the solvent, and it says that it is a
`
`white crystalline material what a melting point 190 to 192.
`
`Q. And in terms of the disclosure, where is this information
`
`found, the front or the back of the patent?
`
`A. Yes. So it is in column one, right at the bottom. You can
`
`see that on the left side of the slide. So it is right up
`
`front for the reader.
`
`Q. Now, turning to the next slide, slide six.
`
`MR. BAUER: For the record, your Honor, this
`
`reference, this citation to this is in the slide DTX 1359, but
`
`the binders are using PTX 1337. It is the same file history,
`
`and having what was originally produced to us, 1359, is missing
`
`some pages, so we submitted PTX 1337. But the Bates numbers
`
`that we are relying on and the documents that we are relying on
`
`in this exhibit are the exact same.
`
`MR. MADDOX: Your Honor, there appears to have been
`
`some sort of error in the copying and so forth. We are going
`
`to work that out and get it properly submitted.
`
`We have been told that the testimony won't involve any
`
`of the pages that they believe are missing, so we should just
`
`go ahead just for now, and we will sort it out.
`
`THE COURT: Thank you, Mr. Maddox.
`
`Mr. Bauer, go ahead.
`
`MR. BAUER: Thank you.
`
`BY MR. BAUER:
`
` SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
` (212) 805-0300
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-02758-PAC Document 163 Filed 02/24/17 Page 10 of 120
`H1UsKOW1 Byrn - direct
`
`1662
`
` 1
`
` 2
`
` 3
`
` 4
`
` 5
`
` 6
`
` 7
`
` 8
`
` 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Q. So on Bates number Mylan (Pitav) 014575, what is shown,
`
`Dr. Byrn?
`
`A. This is shown in the prosecution history that the
`
`applicants disclose a third-party observation from December
`
`2006, and it is on a letterhead by Wachtershauser & Hartz,
`
`December 14, 2006.
`
`Q. If we can go to the next slide, which refers to Bates
`
`numbers 14586 and 14583.
`
`What does this slide show, Dr. Byrn?
`
`A. So this also shows -- this is from the prosecution history,
`
`and it shows, if you look down the middle, it says: Sir,
`
`attached heretofore filing are the following papers. It says,
`
`Information disclosure statement third-party observation. So
`
`that's being submitted to the patent office. And then the
`
`patent office replied with a receipt date of 23rd of June,
`
`2008.
`
`Q. So, Dr. Byrn, does it appear that the date this December
`
`2006 third-party observation was submitted was June 23, 2008?
`
`A. That's what it looks like. It's the receipt date at the
`
`patent office.
`
`Q. OK. If we go to the next slide, which is from PTX 172,
`
`Bates numbers 1335157 and 1335159, what is this showing,
`
`Dr. Byrn?
`
`A. This is showing that the examiner acknowledged the
`
`third-party -- the receipt of the third-party observation.
`
` SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
` (212) 805-0300
`
`

`

` 1
`
` 2
`
` 3
`
` 4
`
` 5
`
` 6
`
` 7
`
` 8
`
` 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Case 1:14-cv-02758-PAC Document 163 Filed 02/24/17 Page 11 of 120
`H1UsKOW1 Byrn - direct
`
`1663
`
`There is a call-out that says AAN, and then it gives the name
`
`of the third-party submission. And then at the bottom of that
`
`page, it's signed and dated by the examiner.
`
`Q. That means the examiner saw this document and considered
`
`it?
`
`A. That's correct.
`
`Q. If we go to the next slide, which is also from the file
`
`history of PTX 172, and the document on the left-hand side has
`
`Bates numbers 1335158.
`
`What does this document show, Dr. Byrn?
`
`A. It shows the applicant informed the U.S. Patent Office that
`
`Hartz & Wachterhauser, who filed the December 3, 2006
`
`third-party observation, were representing the patent owner
`
`Nissan.
`
`Q. And that document on the right is an excerpt bearing Bates
`
`numbers 1334204.
`
`Is this a communication to the patent office
`
`indicating that the Wachterhauser law firm that previously
`
`submitted the December 2006 observation is now representing the
`
`patent owner?
`
`A. Yes. It says, now acting as representative of the new
`
`proprietor, Nissan Chemical Industries.
`
`Q. And this document was submitted to the United States Patent
`
`Office?
`
`A. That's my understanding.
`
` SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
` (212) 805-0300
`
`

`

` 1
`
` 2
`
` 3
`
` 4
`
` 5
`
` 6
`
` 7
`
` 8
`
` 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Case 1:14-cv-02758-PAC Document 163 Filed 02/24/17 Page 12 of 120
`H1UsKOW1 Byrn - direct
`
`1664
`
`Q. And is what is shown on the left-hand side of the document
`
`under AAA?
`
`A. That's right. That's my understanding.
`
`Q. If we now can turn to the next slide, which is EP '406
`
`patent, which is DTX 0034, it is also tab four in the binders.
`
`We have heard a lot about this patent, Dr. Byrn. What
`
`does it describe?
`
`A. So this patent describes a very general synthesis of
`
`pitavastatin calcium. And I've got a slide on the next page.
`
`Q. And if we go back, just spend a little more time on the.
`
`'406.
`
`What, if any, solid form is described in EP '406?
`
`A. The only solid form that's described are white crystals
`
`with a melting point of 190 to 192.
`
`Q. Does the '406 patent provide any diffractograms?
`
`A. No.
`
`Q. Does the '406 patent provide any peak lists?
`
`A. No.
`
`Q. You mentioned the white crystals of example three, is that
`
`correct?
`
`A. Yes.
`
`Q. And you said that was the only solid form described in
`
`EP '406?
`
`A. That's right.
`
`Q. So let's take a look at EP '406, example three, which is on
`
` SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
` (212) 805-0300
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-02758-PAC Document 163 Filed 02/24/17 Page 13 of 120
`H1UsKOW1 Byrn - direct
`
`1665
`
` 1
`
` 2
`
` 3
`
` 4
`
` 5
`
` 6
`
` 7
`
` 8
`
` 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`slide 11, tab four, at Mylan 01494.
`
`Could you walk us through what that example describes?
`
`A. Sure. So it starts with 12 grams, and then there is a long
`
`chemical name, which is the name of pitavastatin. And then it
`
`says, D(+) phenylethylamine salt compound, and it has some
`
`symbols, including a minus and a plus. That is the cryo salt,
`
`mix salt of the phenylethylamine compound. It tells you that
`
`was obtained from example one of that patent.
`
`Then they added to that -- that is a different
`
`starting material from example one in the '993 patent. And
`
`then they added to that sodium hydroxide aqueous solution and
`
`water and stirred. It doesn't say yellow solution or anything,
`
`they just stirred. And then they added aqueous calcium
`
`chloride to that, and it says was dropwise added. Then they
`
`say it was stirred overnight, no temperature, and then the
`
`white precipitate was collected by filtration. And this is
`
`where -- and it gives nine grams of white crystals. So very
`
`abbreviated example.
`
`Q. Is the methodology of the melting point described in this
`
`example?
`
`A. No. There is no direction to a person of skill how to
`
`measure that melting point.
`
`Q. Are the stirring conditions provided?
`
`A. No. There is no stirring conditions, no temperature.
`
`Q. Are the drying conditions provided?
`
` SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
` (212) 805-0300
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-02758-PAC Document 163 Filed 02/24/17 Page 14 of 120
`H1UsKOW1 Byrn - direct
`
`1666
`
` 1
`
` 2
`
` 3
`
` 4
`
` 5
`
` 6
`
` 7
`
` 8
`
` 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`A. No. There's no dry -- unlike example one, there is no
`
`drying whatsoever provided.
`
`Q. And if we could turn to slide 12.
`
`Is your testimony consistent with that of Dr. Roberts
`
`and Dr. Sessler?
`
`A. Yes. So on this slide, I summarize what Dr. Roberts and
`
`Dr. Sessler testified, and I'll cover that some more in the
`
`future. But they agree that no stirring temperature, no
`
`stirring speed, and no stirring time was provided, in that it
`
`was overnight, but it was vague as to what the length of time
`
`was. And then they also testified that there was no drying
`
`time, temperature, and pressure. And in the drying of a
`
`compound like this, time, temperature and pressure are critical
`
`to understand those.
`
`Q. In terms of drying time, does EP '406 describe whether or
`
`not the pitavastatin calcium obtained in example three is a
`
`high dried?
`
`A. No, it didn't. And the drying time is critical as to
`
`whether a hydrate is produced or not.
`
`Q. Does the EP '406 disclosure anywhere in that disclosure
`
`describe the pitavastatin calcium as a hydrate?
`
`A. No. And we also know that there are many hydrates. There
`
`are several hydrates in which pitavastatin calcium can exist,
`
`and it doesn't provide any information on those.
`
`Q. But none of those different hydrates were known prior to
`
` SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
` (212) 805-0300
`
`

`

` 1
`
` 2
`
` 3
`
` 4
`
` 5
`
` 6
`
` 7
`
` 8
`
` 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Case 1:14-cv-02758-PAC Document 163 Filed 02/24/17 Page 15 of 120
`H1UsKOW1 Byrn - direct
`
`1667
`
`the filing date of the '993 patent, isn't that correct?
`
`A. That is correct. We only know that now from the '993
`
`patent.
`
`Q. So if we go to the next slide, still further talking about
`
`example three of EP '406, what is this slide saying, Dr. Byrn?
`
`A. This slide outlines the details of the various drying
`
`conditions and shows what I was talking about, that the example
`
`three allows a broad range of drying conditions.
`
`So on the temperature side, example three allows air
`
`drying and ambient temperature, moderate temperature drying are
`
`putting it in an oven at higher temperature, and then on the
`
`pressure side, you could have no vacuum, aspirator vacuum,
`
`which is sort of an intermediate, known to a person of skill
`
`known to be intermediate, or you could put it in a vacuum pump
`
`and do very low vacuum. And the time is variable, and that is
`
`a critical aspect. So how long you do it is crystal.
`
`Q. And this lack of drying condition information, what,
`
`if any, effect can it have on the water content of the
`
`pitavastatin calcium sample obtained by example three?
`
`A. Well, it can change the water content over a broad range.
`
`Q. And if we could go to slide 14, please.
`
`Were you in court when Dr. Roberts testified about the
`
`broad range of water content of 3 to 15 percent by following
`
`example three?
`
`A. Yes.
`
` SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
` (212) 805-0300
`
`

`

` 1
`
` 2
`
` 3
`
` 4
`
` 5
`
` 6
`
` 7
`
` 8
`
` 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Case 1:14-cv-02758-PAC Document 163 Filed 02/24/17 Page 16 of 120
`H1UsKOW1 Byrn - direct
`
`1668
`
`Q. Do you agree with that testimony?
`
`A. I do. I agree that the pitavastatin calcium product from
`
`'406 can have a water content ranging from 3 to 15 percent.
`
`Q. Could it be more than that, than 3 to 15?
`
`A. I wouldn't think it would be more than that based on the
`
`conditions provided, based on the indications provided.
`
`Q. And if we go to slide 16.
`
`What is this showing, Dr. Byrn?
`
`A. This shows an experiment where changing water content
`
`results in different polymorphic forms.
`
`Q. If we go to the next slide. If we go to just number one --
`
`and this is from PTX 172, Bates numbers 1334985 through
`
`1334995, and box number one appears at 1334985.
`
`What does this describe, Dr. Byrn?
`
`A. Well, box number one just describes it. It says patent
`
`2006-501997.
`
`Q. OK.
`
`A. And then it says, experimental report and it is dated
`
`December 10, 2012.
`
`Q. And if we could pull up from PTX 172, page 922, and zoom in
`
`on that table.
`
`What does this table show, Dr. Byrn?
`
`A. So this shows the result of this experiment, and what it
`
`shows -- and it is also stated in words on the slide -- it
`
`shows that if you have low humidity at 49 percent, you observe
`
` SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
` (212) 805-0300
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-02758-PAC Document 163 Filed 02/24/17 Page 17 of 120
`H1UsKOW1 Byrn - direct
`
`1669
`
` 1
`
` 2
`
` 3
`
` 4
`
` 5
`
` 6
`
` 7
`
` 8
`
` 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`crystal form A. So at the top it says under low humidity and
`
`it says observe crystal form A. If you go under high humidity,
`
`at least 50 percent, it shows that you have crystal form E.
`
`So this is showing that depending on what humidity you
`
`have, you have either pitavastatin calcium crystal form A or
`
`pitavastatin crystal form E, and this correlates with the
`
`drying conditions I was outlying. So if you dry such that you
`
`create low humidity, you end up with form A. If you dry such
`
`that you create high humidity, you end up with form E.
`
`So this shows unequivocally, if you follow '406, since
`
`it has no drying conditions, you can get either form A or E.
`
`Q. So this table which is shown at 1334986, in fact, shows
`
`that at low humidity, isn't it true there is a lower water
`
`content in the pitavastatin crystal at lower humidity?
`
`A. That's correct. You're drying at lower humidity, you're
`
`drying under conditions where you have lower humidity, and you
`
`get lower water content.
`
`Q. So when you're looking at this table, the low humidity, the
`
`water content is lower for crystal form A than the pitavastatin
`
`is under high humidity, which has a higher water content and
`
`transforms to form E.
`
`A. Correct. And it is saying, actually, that, at most,
`
`49 percent. So the low humidity is up to 49 percent and the
`
`high humidity is 50 percent and above.
`
`Q. And the humidity level changes the water content level in
`
` SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
` (212) 805-0300
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-02758-PAC Document 163 Filed 02/24/17 Page 18 of 120
`H1UsKOW1 Byrn - direct
`
`1670
`
` 1
`
` 2
`
` 3
`
` 4
`
` 5
`
` 6
`
` 7
`
` 8
`
` 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`the sample, right?
`
`A. Correct. And the slide states pita reversibly transforms
`
`between the crystal form A and the crystal form E by the
`
`influence of relative humidity. That is in the report that is
`
`the conclusion of the report.
`
`Q. Is that another way of saying that a pitavastatin calcium,
`
`having a lower water content, is form A and having a higher
`
`water content transforms to form E?
`
`A. That's correct. That is known to a person of skill in the
`
`art, and I have seen other information that shows that also.
`
`Q. If you go back to -- you see the header of the slide, it
`
`says changing water content results in different polymorphic
`
`forms.
`
`How does this test show that?
`
`A. So it shows that depending on how you dry or how you follow
`
`example three, you would end up with either different water
`
`content and that would produce different forms. So it would
`
`show, like I was saying in the introduction, that a person of
`
`skill can obtain different polymorphic forms of pitavastatin
`
`calcium by following example three.
`
`Q. Can we turn to slide No. 18, which pertains to DTX 034,
`
`which is the '406 patent, and DTX 056, which is Nissan's
`
`third-party 2006 experiment. The DTX 056 is found at tab six
`
`and DTX 0034 is found at tab four.
`
`What is this slide showing, Dr. Byrn?
`
` SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
` (212) 805-0300
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-02758-PAC Document 163 Filed 02/24/17 Page 19 of 120
`H1UsKOW1 Byrn - direct
`
`1671
`
` 1
`
` 2
`
` 3
`
` 4
`
` 5
`
` 6
`
` 7
`
` 8
`
` 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`A. This shows the differences between the EP '406 example
`
`three, what's in EP '406, and the actual 2006 experiment that
`
`we've been discussing.
`
`Q. And who carried out this 2006 experiment, Dr. Byrn?
`
`A. This was carried out by Nissan.
`
`Q. And how does the experiment carried out by Nissan differ
`
`from example three of EP '406?
`
`A. So I highlighted the differences. The first is that it
`
`says that the reaction mixture was dissolved overnight at
`
`15 degrees centigrade, so it gave a temperature there. And
`
`then the second difference is, it says it was washed with
`
`water, 50 milliliters. And then the third difference, it says
`
`that the crystals were dried under reduced pressure for
`
`50 minutes and 40 degrees to obtain the target -- and then it
`
`gives the chemical name -- 4.18 grams, 92 percent yield,
`
`moisture content, 10.5 percent. And that is within the ranges
`
`that we have been discussing.
`
`Q. Is 50 degrees centigrade room temperature?
`
`A. No. As we discussed, it is 59 degrees Fahrenheit.
`
`Q. And the step of washing water with 50 milliliters, is that
`
`described in example three of EP '406?
`
`A. No.
`
`Q. And these drying conditions mainly in the 2006 experiment,
`
`is any of that information provided in example three of
`
`EP '406?
`
` SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
` (212) 805-0300
`
`

`

` 1
`
` 2
`
` 3
`
` 4
`
` 5
`
` 6
`
` 7
`
` 8
`
` 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Case 1:14-cv-02758-PAC Document 163 Filed 02/24/17 Page 20 of 120
`H1UsKOW1 Byrn - direct
`
`1672
`
`A. No. In fact, EP '406 doesn't even use the word dry.
`
`Q. So this is what one skilled in the art could possibly fill
`
`in and try this combination of drying conditions?
`
`A. Well, it is one of a large number or many possible drying
`
`conditions they could fill in, a person of skill could fill in.
`
`Q. Can this filling in of other conditions result in a drying
`
`content of range of 3 to 15 percent?
`
`A. Correct, and that range could result in different solid
`
`forms either E or A. So you could get different forms from
`
`'406.
`
`Q. So if we go to the next slide, is this a summary, Dr. Byrn,
`
`of EP '406?
`
`A. Yes.
`
`Q. And basically, what does it say?
`
`A. So the method that you obtain the material in '406, we're
`
`just told filtration. And then like I've been saying, there is
`
`no drying conditions disclosed. And then the description of
`
`what was obtained is just a white crystalline precipitate.
`
`Q. And how does that compare, if we turn to slide 20, with
`
`Nissan's 2006 experiment?
`
`A. So then a more detailed experiment, Nissan explained, do
`
`filtration and then a water wash, and then drying for
`
`50 minutes at 40 degrees C under reduced pressure. So details
`
`there. And then getting form A, crystalline -- the material
`
`that was obtained was form A.
`
` SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
` (212) 805-0300
`
`

`

` 1
`
` 2
`
` 3
`
` 4
`
` 5
`
` 6
`
` 7
`
` 8
`
` 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Case 1:14-cv-02758-PAC Document 163 Filed 02/24/17 Page 21 of 120
`H1UsKOW1 Byrn - direct
`
`1673
`
`Q. I would like to move now to another patent. Let's go to
`
`slide number 25, which references a Mylan application. This is
`
`PTX 0849. This is found at tab number nine.
`
`A. OK. I've got tab nine.
`
`Q. And what does this slide say, Dr. Byrn?
`
`A. So this is a Mylan application for a novel form of
`
`pitavastatin calcium, and it is filed by the Mylan research
`
`group in Hyderabad, India.
`
`Q. If we can go to the next slide, slide number 26. We are
`
`still at PTX 849. Now we are going to page two of that or page
`
`three.
`
`What do we see in terms of the background of the
`
`invention?
`
`A. So on page two --
`
`Q. Page three, Dr. Byrn.
`
`A. Pardon?
`
`Q. Page three of the application.
`
`A. OK. On page three is a description of the -- it says,
`
`U.S. 20090172008 -- sorry -- U.S. 2009-0182008, discloses
`
`crystalline forms A, B, C, D, E, and F, and the amorphous form.
`
`So this is post '993 patent.
`
`Q. And what is the 2009-0182008 application?
`
`Can we go to the next slide, please.
`
`What is this demonstrative showing, Dr. Byrn?
`
`A. It shows that that reference to U.S. 2009-0182008
`
` SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
` (212) 805-0300
`
`

`

` 1
`
` 2
`
` 3
`
` 4
`
` 5
`
` 6
`
` 7
`
` 8
`
` 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Case 1:14-cv-02758-PAC Document 163 Filed 02/24/17 Page 22 of 120
`H1UsKOW1 Byrn - direct
`
`1674
`
`corresponds to the '993 patent, so they are referencing back to
`
`the '993 patent. And this slide shows the various correlations
`
`of the various numbers to reach that conclusion. This
`
`slide 27.
`
`Q. If we now go to PTX 849, page 28 of that document.
`
`Is this the example from the Mylan application,
`
`Dr. Byrn?
`
`A. Correct. This is from page six now of the Mylan
`
`application.
`
`Q. And could you explain to the court what this example shows?
`
`A. Sure. So this -- now this, in that previous slide, this
`
`was called a novel crystalline form because it's different from
`
`A, B, C, D, E, and F. So Mylan is calling this a novel form.
`
`And the procedure that they used is quite similar to
`
`the '406 procedure. And they start with
`
`alpha-methylbenzylamine. And in organic chemistry, we name
`
`compounds sometimes differently, so alpha-methylbenzylamine
`
`here is alpha-methylbenzylamine in the '406.
`
`Q. So the alpha-methylbenzylamine salt in this Mylan
`
`application is the same starting material as the
`
`phenylethylamine salt in EP '406, example three?
`
`A. That's correct.
`
`Q. OK.
`
`A. And then we use 15 grams. '406 uses 12 grams, which is a
`
`very similar procedure. And then we add sodium hydroxide, just
`
` SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
` (212) 805-0300
`
`

`

` 1
`
` 2
`
` 3
`
` 4
`
` 5
`
` 6
`
` 7
`
` 8
`
` 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Case 1:14-cv-02758-PAC Document 163 Filed 02/24/17 Page 23 of 120
`H1UsKOW1 Byrn - direct
`
`1675
`
`as is done in the '406. And stirred, again, just as it is done
`
`in the '406. And then to that solution, calcium chloride was
`
`added, and the mixture again was stirred, filtered and washed
`
`with water. And then the obtained compound was dried below
`
`50 to give pitavastatin calcium form P, as in Paul. So not A
`
`or E, not any of the forms in the '993, but a brand new form.
`
`Q

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket