Case 1:14-cv-02758-PAC Document 104-2 Filed 12/16/16 Page 1 of 7
`Case 1:14-cv—02758—PAC Document 104-2 Filed 12/16/16 Page 1 of 7
`
`EXHIBIT 1
`
`EXHIBIT 1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:14-cv—02758—PAC Document 104-2 Filed 12/16/16 Page 1 of 7
`
`EXHIBIT 1
`
`EXHIBIT 1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:14-cv-02758-PAC Document 104-2 Filed 12/16/16 Page 2 of 7
`
`Steve Maddox
`Saturday, November 26, 2016 4:55 PM
`Carr, Kathleen
`Lit-Team; Conlin, David; Venezia, Susan
`Re: Kowa Company, Ltd., et al. v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals, LLC,
`
`From:
`Sent:
`To:
`Cc:
`Subject:
`
`Kathleen,
`
`We have not heard from you regarding stipulation.
`At this point, Amneal would like to proceed with the promised deposition.
`It will not exceed one hour.
`Please advice as to time and place you are offering Dr. Kaduk.
`
`Steve Maddox
`
`From: Carr, Kathleen <KBCarr@mintz.com>
`Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2016 8:49 AM
`To: Steve Maddox
`Cc: Lit‐Team; Conlin, David; Venezia, Susan
`Subject: Re: Kowa Company, Ltd., et al. v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals, LLC,
`
`Steve,
`
`No, tomorrow does not work for Dr. Kaduk.
`
`We also continue to believe that the deposition will not be necessary. In the unlikely event that it becomes so, we will work with
`you to arrange a mutually convenient time that works for Dr. Kaduk,
`
`Kathleen
`
`Kathleen B. Carr | Member
`Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
`One Financial Center | Boston, MA 02111
`Direct: +1.617.348.1857<tel:+1.617.348.1857> | Fax: +1.617.542.2241<tel:+1.617.542.2241>
`E‐mail: KBCarr@mintz.com<mailto:KBCarr@mintz.com>
`Web: www.mintz.com<http://www.mintz.com>
`
`On Nov 10, 2016, at 7:33 AM, "Steve Maddox" <smaddox@meiplaw.com<mailto:smaddox@meiplaw.com>> wrote:
`
`Kathleen
`
`I do not think I have heard back on this. I assume the hour slot will be tomorrow. What time?
`
`1
`
`
`
`Case 1:14-cv-02758-PAC Document 104-2 Filed 12/16/16 Page 3 of 7
`
`Steve
`
`Sent from my iPhone
`
`Begin forwarded message:
`
`From: Steve Maddox <smaddox@meiplaw.com<mailto:smaddox@meiplaw.com>>
`Date: November 9, 2016 at 3:58:29 PM EST
`To: "Carr, Kathleen" <KBCarr@mintz.com<mailto:KBCarr@mintz.com>>
`Cc: Jennifer Scarpati <jscarpati@buddlarner.com<mailto:jscarpati@buddlarner.com>>, "Conlin, David"
`<DGConlin@mintz.com<mailto:DGConlin@mintz.com>>, Lit‐Team <lit‐team@meiplaw.com<mailto:lit‐team@meiplaw.com>>
`Subject: RE: Kowa Company, Ltd., et al. v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals, LLC,
`
`Kathleen,
`
`It looks like the stipulation will not get done, if at all, before the close of Kaduk depositions.
`So, Amneal would like 1 hour at the end of the currently schedule ones.
`Please let me know what time and which day.
`
`Thanks,
`
`
`
`‐‐‐‐‐Original Message‐‐‐‐‐
`From: Carr, Kathleen [mailto:KBCarr@mintz.com]
`Sent: Monday, November 07, 2016 4:06 PM
`To: Steve Maddox <smaddox@meiplaw.com<mailto:smaddox@meiplaw.com>>
`Cc: Jennifer Scarpati <jscarpati@buddlarner.com<mailto:jscarpati@buddlarner.com>>; Conlin, David
`<DGConlin@mintz.com<mailto:DGConlin@mintz.com>>; Lit‐Team <lit‐team@meiplaw.com<mailto:lit‐team@meiplaw.com>>
`Subject: Re: Kowa Company, Ltd., et al. v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals, LLC,
`
`Steve,
`
`Sounds good.
`
`Kathleen
`
`
`
`
`
`Kathleen B. Carr | Member
`Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
`One Financial Center | Boston, MA 02111
`Direct: +1.617.348.1857<tel:+1.617.348.1857> | Fax: +1.617.542.2241<tel:+1.617.542.2241>
`E‐mail: KBCarr@mintz.com<mailto:KBCarr@mintz.com><mailto:KBCarr@mintz.com>
`Web: www.mintz.com<http://www.mintz.com><http://www.mintz.com>
`
`On Nov 7, 2016, at 2:31 PM, "Steve Maddox"
`<smaddox@meiplaw.com<mailto:smaddox@meiplaw.com><mailto:smaddox@meiplaw.com>> wrote:
`
`Kathleen
`
`Let's just continue the Amneal deposition of kaduk until after all the others have done theirs. On off chance we can't get stip done
`by then, I will have few questions. But I agree that I expect it to go away.
`
`Steve
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case 1:14-cv-02758-PAC Document 104-2 Filed 12/16/16 Page 4 of 7
`
`Sent from my iPhone
`
`On Nov 7, 2016, at 2:02 PM, Carr, Kathleen <KBCarr@mintz.com<mailto:KBCarr@mintz.com><mailto:KBCarr@mintz.com>> wrote:
`
`Steve,
`
`A Word version is attached.
`
`We cannot execute the stipulation today as our clients are in Japan.
`
`It seems that there is no point in having an Amneal deposition of Dr. Kaduk on infringement when Amneal is not disputing
`infringement.
`
`As the deposition is unnecessary and would be a waste of both parties' time and expense, it seems that it should just be cancelled,
`don't you think?
`
`Kathleen
`
`From: Steve Maddox [mailto:smaddox@meiplaw.com]
`Sent: Monday, November 07, 2016 11:51 AM
`To: Carr, Kathleen
`Cc: Jennifer Scarpati; Conlin, David; Lit‐Team
`Subject: RE: Kowa Company, Ltd., et al. v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals, LLC,
`
`Kathleen,
`
`We will recommend that revised version you sent for our client to authorize execution.
`You of course may pass along to your client.
`Could you send Word version?
`
`Also, if we get the stipulation executed today, Amneal will not be deposing Dr. Kaduk tomorrow.
`
`Steve
`
`From: Carr, Kathleen [mailto:KBCarr@mintz.com]
`Sent: Monday, November 07, 2016 11:29 AM
`To: Steve Maddox <smaddox@meiplaw.com<mailto:smaddox@meiplaw.com><mailto:smaddox@meiplaw.com>>
`Cc: Jennifer Scarpati <jscarpati@buddlarner.com<mailto:jscarpati@buddlarner.com><mailto:jscarpati@buddlarner.com>>; Conlin,
`David <DGConlin@mintz.com<mailto:DGConlin@mintz.com><mailto:DGConlin@mintz.com>>; Lit‐Team <lit‐
`team@meiplaw.com<mailto:lit‐team@meiplaw.com><mailto:lit‐team@meiplaw.com>>
`Subject: RE: Kowa Company, Ltd., et al. v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals, LLC,
`
`Steve,
`
`We are following up with regard to our email below.
`
`Could you provide confirmation as to whether Amneal does not plan to attend Dr. Kaduk’s deposition tomorrow? As a courtesy to
`Dr. Kaduk (and us), it would be helpful to have that confirmation as soon as possible.
`
`Also, in reviewing your revisions to the stipulation, we have a couple of revisions to go with your revisions. Let us know if they look
`ok. Please also let us know if we may pass the draft along to our clients.
`
`Thanks,
`
`Kathleen
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case 1:14-cv-02758-PAC Document 104-2 Filed 12/16/16 Page 5 of 7
`
`
`From: Carr, Kathleen
`Sent: Sunday, November 06, 2016 10:02 PM
`To: Steve Maddox
`Cc: Jennifer Scarpati; Conlin, David; Lit‐Team
`Subject: Re: Kowa Company, Ltd., et al. v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals, LLC,
`
`Steve,
`
`Thanks for the response.
`
`We assume we can send this draft to our clients for approval ‐‐ could you confirm?
`
`With regard to Dr. Kaduk's depositions next week, yes, those are only directed to infringement ‐‐ they are individual defendant
`depositions on infringement issues related to the particular defendant.
`
`Dr. Kaduk did provide a rebuttal report related to validity (dated 7/14<x‐apple‐data‐detectors://0>) ‐‐ which Amneal had
`received. The deposition of Dr. Kaduk on Oct. 28th was on background in the morning and validity in the afternoon.
`
`Kathleen
`
`Kathleen B. Carr | Member
`Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
`One Financial Center | Boston, MA 02111
`Direct: +1.617.348.1857<tel:+1.617.348.1857> | Fax: +1.617.542.2241<tel:+1.617.542.2241>
`E‐mail: KBCarr@mintz.com<mailto:KBCarr@mintz.com><mailto:KBCarr@mintz.com>
`Web: www.mintz.com<http://www.mintz.com><http://www.mintz.com>
`
`
`
`
`
`On Nov 6, 2016, at 11:29 AM, "Steve Maddox"
`<smaddox@meiplaw.com<mailto:smaddox@meiplaw.com><mailto:smaddox@meiplaw.com>> wrote:
`Kathleen,
`
`Here is a slightly revised version of the stipulation you proposed.
`If it is ok with you, I will get final approval from Amneal to execute.
`Regarding Kaduk deposition, please let me know if plaintiffs intend to seek to introduce testimony from Kaduk solely directed to
`infringement – i.e., not directed to validity?
`
`
`
`Steve Maddox
`
`From: Carr, Kathleen [mailto:KBCarr@mintz.com]
`Sent: Saturday, November 05, 2016 10:46 AM
`To: 'Jennifer Scarpati' <jscarpati@buddlarner.com<mailto:jscarpati@buddlarner.com><mailto:jscarpati@buddlarner.com>>
`Cc: Conlin, David <DGConlin@mintz.com<mailto:DGConlin@mintz.com><mailto:DGConlin@mintz.com>>; Steve Maddox
`<smaddox@meiplaw.com<mailto:smaddox@meiplaw.com><mailto:smaddox@meiplaw.com>>
`Subject: RE: Kowa Company, Ltd., et al. v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals, LLC,
`
`Jen and Steve,
`
`May we hear back from you on this?
`
`As indicated below, it seems to make sense to get this resolved before the Kaduk infringement deposition.
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`Case 1:14-cv-02758-PAC Document 104-2 Filed 12/16/16 Page 6 of 7
`
`Thanks,
`
`Kathleen
`
`
`
`From: Jennifer Scarpati [mailto:jscarpati@buddlarner.com]
`Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2016 9:35 AM
`To: Carr, Kathleen
`Cc: Conlin, David; Steve Maddox
`Subject: Re: Kowa Company, Ltd., et al. v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals, LLC,
`
`Adding Steve Maddox to this chain.
`
`Jen
`
`On Nov 2, 2016, at 9:24 AM, Carr, Kathleen <KBCarr@mintz.com<mailto:KBCarr@mintz.com><mailto:KBCarr@mintz.com>> wrote:
`Jen,
`
`May we hear back from you on this?
`
`Thanks,
`
`Kathleen
`
`From: Carr, Kathleen
`Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 5:50 PM
`To: 'Jennifer Scarpati'
`Cc: Conlin, David
`Subject: RE: Kowa Company, Ltd., et al. v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals, LLC,
`
`Jen,
`
`We are following up with regard to the draft stipulation ‐ ‐ does it look ok? It seems that it would make sense to get this resolved
`before the Byrn and Kaduk infringement depositions.
`
`Let us know what you think or if you wish to discuss.
`
`Thanks,
`
`Kathleen
`
`
`
`, a draft
`
`From: Carr, Kathleen
`Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2016 2:28 PM
`To: 'Jennifer Scarpati'
`Cc: Conlin, David
`Subject: Kowa Company, Ltd., et al. v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals, LLC,
`
`Hi Jen.
`
`Further to our discussions about a stipulation relating to infringement with regard to
`stipulation is attached. See what you think, and let us know if you have any revisions or would like to discuss.
`
`
`
`
`
`Kathleen
`
`Kathleen Carr | Member
`
`5
`
`
`
`Case 1:14-cv-02758-PAC Document 104-2 Filed 12/16/16 Page 7 of 7
`
`Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
`One Financial Center | Boston, MA 02111
`Direct: +1.617.348.1857<tel:+1.617.348.1857> | Fax: +1.617.542.2241<tel:+1.617.542.2241>
`E‐mail: KBCarr@mintz.com<mailto:KBCarr@mintz.com><mailto:KBCarr@mintz.com>
`Web: www.mintz.com<http://www.mintz.com><http://www.mintz.com>
`[https://www.mintz.com/owa/mintz_logo.png]
`
`________________________________
`
`
`
`
`
`STATEMENT OF CONFIDENTIALITY:
`The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the
`addressee(s) and may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, or the person responsible
`for delivering the e‐mail to the intended recipient, be advised you have received this message in error and that any use,
`dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying is strictly prohibited. Please notify Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo
`immediately at either (617) 542‐6000 or at
`DirectorofIT@Mintz.com<mailto:DirectorofIT@Mintz.com><mailto:DirectorofIT@Mintz.com>, and destroy all copies of this message
`and any attachments. You will be reimbursed for reasonable costs incurred in notifying us.
`
`______________________________________________________________________
`This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
`For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
`______________________________________________________________________
`
`________________________________
`
`THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS EMAIL COMMUNICATION IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL USE
`OF THE DESIGNATED RECIPIENT NAMED ABOVE. This message may be an Attorney‐Client communication, and as such is privileged
`and confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this
`communication in error, and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of the message is strictly prohibited. If you have
`received this transmission in error, please destroy this transmission and notify us immediately by telephone and/or reply email.
`
`______________________________________________________________________
`This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
`For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
`______________________________________________________________________
`<Pitavastatin Revised Stipulation.docx>
`<61662647_1.docx>
`
`6
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
