throbber
Case 1:14-cv-02396-PGG-SN Document 287-4 Filed 11/01/22 Page 1 of 4
`Case 1:14-cv-02396-PGG-SN Document 287-4 Filed 11/01/22 Page 1 of 4
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT C
`EXHIBIT C
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-02396-PGG-SN Document 287-4 Filed 11/01/22 Page 2 of 4

`

`
`
`

`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
`SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 


`

`
`Plaintiff, 
`
`NETWORK‐1 TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 



`vs. 

`GOOGLE LLC AND YOUTUBE, LLC, 


`
`Defendants. 
`








`

`

`
`Case No. 1:14‐CV‐02396‐PGG‐SN 
`Case No. 1:14‐CV‐09558‐PGG‐SN 




`




`Expert Rebuttal Report of Dr. Gregory K. Leonard 
`

`


`



`

`

`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-02396-PGG-SN Document 287-4 Filed 11/01/22 Page 3 of 4
`


`
`
`negotiation, and it is not possible to reliably adjust to account for dissimilarities, then the 
`license should not be used as a comparable. 
`
`a. License Agreement Between 
`
` and Mirror Worlds 
`
`100. A potentially comparable license is the agreement between 
` and Mirror 
`Worlds.  The agreement grants 
` a license under the “Mirror Worlds Patents,”205 which is 
`defined as all patents and patent applications in all jurisdictions worldwide that are assigned to 
`or owned by Mirror Worlds and Network‐1.206  The agreement covers 39 issued U.S. patents 
`and 15 U.S. applications.  The Patents‐in‐Suit represent three of the patents in the licensed 
`portfolio.207  The agreement went into effect on July 8, 2016, and will remain effective 
`

`

`
`.208  
`
` agreed to a 
`
` for this license.209  
`
`101. This agreement shows that Network‐1 was willing to license the Patents‐in‐Suit 
`to a technology company that has a track record for developing new software (including 
`internet) products and powerful platform economies of scope, and could have reasonably 
`expected 
` to put the licensed Patents‐in‐Suit into use by developing their own type of 
`content identification system.   
`
`102.
`’s resources and expanding product offerings are frequently directed 
`toward audio and visual media products.  For example, 
` provided “

`” a system of matching a user’s local music collection with the versions of songs that 
` stored on its cloud.210  In 2018, 
` acquired 
`, an app that allows users to 
`
`                                                       
`205   “Settlement and License Agreement,” Agreement between 
`Mirror Worlds Agreement”), § 1.2 (NETWORK1_014113). 
` Mirror Worlds Agreement, § 1.2. 
`206  
` Mirror Worlds Agreement, Exhibit B‐1 and B‐2. 
`207  
` Mirror Worlds Agreement, § 5.1. 
`208  
` Mirror Worlds Agreement, § 3.1. 
`209  
`210   “Subscribe to 
`,” 
`, https://support
`
`
`
`50 
`
` and Mirror Worlds, July 8, 2016, (“
`

`
`.  
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-02396-PGG-SN Document 287-4 Filed 11/01/22 Page 4 of 4
`


`
`
`System outside of the U.S., Google could have accelerated efforts to switch over to the Siberia 
`system. 
`






`Gregory K. Leonard 
`
`   
`
`Dated:  February 14, 2020 
`
`
`
`94 
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket